I think a wizard can be a princess sometimes.. I mean a tower is a tower
NASA
will byers stan first human second
occasionally subtle
taylor price
almost home
YOU ARE THE REASON
cherry valley forever

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
Sade Olutola
ojovivo

PR's Tumblrdome
Xuebing Du

roma★

oozey mess
No title available

Discoholic 🪩
Keni

if i look back, i am lost

Love Begins
Show & Tell
seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye

seen from Tunisia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Switzerland

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Vietnam
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia
seen from South Korea

seen from South Korea
seen from Malaysia
@oc-thats-why
I think a wizard can be a princess sometimes.. I mean a tower is a tower
the most fucked up thing ever is being obsessed w ur own oc. why do i have to make content of them why cant they just magically appear on my screen for me to reblog 200 times. fucked up and also evil
Jordan Jinx: Guitarist/singer, age 30
Olive Dagger: Manager, age 28
Amira Dean: Singer, age 25
Dottie Dixon “DD”: songwriter/drummer, age 23
Phoenix “Nonix” Falls: guitarist, age 24
Misty David: manager/mom, age 34
Antonio “Tony” Acosta: filmmaker/director, age 29
Benny Barrow: guitarist/singer, age 32
Harley David: manager/mom, age 35
Annie Collins: songwriter/singer, age 27
https://flow.page/fynnsocs
A place to see all my ocs Pinterest boards
You’ve heard of “Fake Dating.” Now get ready for
Fake Family
1. “This guy is being a creep and won’t leave me alone. Will you pretend to be my overprotective older brother for five minutes?”
2. “The nurse said only family was allowed back here, so I told her we were siblings. Just go along with it.”
3. “That person asked if I was your S/O. I’m sick of people not believing when I say we’re friends, so I said we were siblings.”
4. “I’m your bodyguard, but the event you’re going to does not allow bodyguards, so I’m now your sibling.”
5. “I was on a date, and the person made me uncomfortable, so I told them my parent was a cop. Only problem: My parents are dead, and you’re the only cop I know. Help?”
6. “We have a very elaborate story of how we’re related that we tell everyone when they meet us. No one has any idea that it isn’t true.”
7. “I told someone we were siblings, but we look nothing alike, so you said I was adopted. Now they want to have dinner with my family… Are your parents good at lying?”
8. “We always joke that we’re siblings, but someone didn’t realize we were joking, so now we’re seeing how far we can carry this out.”
9. “Our organization is extremely covert, but your friends have caught me at your place a few times picking you up. I just found out that you’ve been telling them I’m your hysterical aunt who calls you every time she has a new heartbreak. Really? You couldn’t come up with a less embarrassing cover?”
10. “Look, I love you, too, but if you keep telling people you’re my grandchild, I’m going to scream. I’m not that old, you know?”
Hey people with OCs reblog this so I can find more peoples’ OCs to love and cherish unconditionally
instead of infodumping about my oc i'm just going to post text post memes about her with no context
when u create too many ocs and dont have the time to develop them all equally and ur brain just wants u to focus on one or two at a time but u keep making more and more and u feel like ur abandoning the ones u havent done anything with for a while
•they're girlfriends •
aww nasa has a page for space technology terms you can use in science fiction
nerds
gender neutral masterpost
what is gender neutrality?
names and titles
specific and neutral pronouns
how to write with neutral terms
more neutral writing
use this instead of that
how to use common neutral pronouns
relationship terms
Okay, this is in incredibly petty nitpick, but: if you’re writing a fantasy setting with same-sex marriage, a same-sex noble or royal couple typically would not have titles of the same rank - e.g., a prince and a prince, or two queens.
It depends on which system of ranking you use, of course (there are several), but in most systems there’s actually a rule covering this scenario: in the event that a consort’s courtesy title being of the same rank as their spouse’s would potentially create confusion over who holds the title by right and who by courtesy, the consort instead receives the next-highest title on the ladder.
So the husband of a prince would be a duke; the wife of a queen, a princess; and so forth.
(You actually see this rule in practice in the United Kingdom, albeit not in the context of a same-sex marriage; the Queen’s husband is styled a prince because if he were a king, folks might get confused about which of them was the reigning monarch.)
The only common situation where you’d expect to see, for example, two queens in the same marriage is if the reigning monarchs of two different realms married each other - and even then, you’d more likely end up with a complicated arrangement where each party is technically a princess of the other’s realm in addition to being queen of her own.
You’ve gotta keep it nice and unambiguous who’s actually in charge!
Okay, I’ve received a whole lot of asks about this post, so I’m going to cover all of the responses in one go:
1. The system described above is, admittedly, merely one of the most common. Other historically popular alternatives include:
The consort’s courtesy title is of the same rank as their spouse’s, with “-consort” appended to it: prince and prince-consort, queen and queen-consort, etc. This is how, e.g., present-day Monaco does it.
The consort is simply styled Lord or Lady So-and-so, and receives no specific title. I can’t think of any country that still does it this way, off the top of my head, but historically it was a thing.
(Naturally, your setting needn’t adhere to any of these, but it would be highly irregular for it to lack some mechanism for clarifying the chain of command.)
2. The reason why the consort of a prince is historically a princess even though those titles are the same rank is basically sexism. This can go a couple of ways:
In many realms, there was no such thing as being a princess by right; the daughter of a monarch would be styled Lady So-and-so and receive no specific title, so the only way to be a princess was to marry a prince.
In realms where women could hold titles by right, typically a masculine title was informally presumed to outrank its feminine counterpart. So, e.g., kings outrank queens, princes outrank princesses, etc.
In either case, no ambiguity exists.
(Interestingly, this suggests that in a more egalitarian setting where masculine titles are not presumed to outrank their feminine counterparts, or vice versa, you’d need to explicitly disambiguate rankings even outside the context of same-sex marriages. Food for thought!)
3. It would also be possible to have two kings or two queens in the same marriage without multiple realms being involved in the case of a true co-monarchy. However, true co-monarchies are highly irregular and, from a political standpoint, immensely complicated affairs. If you’re planning on writing one of those, be prepared to do your research!
4. The next rank down from “countess” is either “viscountess” or “baroness”, depending on which peerage system you’re using.
(Yes, that last one actually came up multiple times. Apparently there are a lot of stories about gay countesses out there!)
I’d like to argue with this, but I can’t.