Work in progress, depicting the infamous dragons of Dinas Emrys. I feel this has potential to become something quite special, a tapestry, an embossed and foiled note book? What do you think?
sheepfilms
đȘŒ

if i look back, i am lost
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
hello vonnie
No title available
Not today Justin
KIROKAZE

izzy's playlists!
Cosmic Funnies
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Three Goblin Art

tannertan36
I'd rather be in outer space đž
tumblr dot com

titsay
Game of Thrones Daily
RMH
occasionally subtle

seen from Chile
seen from Netherlands
seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from United States

seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Arab Emirates

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Netherlands

seen from France
@otherworldlyshade
Work in progress, depicting the infamous dragons of Dinas Emrys. I feel this has potential to become something quite special, a tapestry, an embossed and foiled note book? What do you think?
December! The Mari Lwyd is coming!
31 Days of Hellenic Polytheism
Anyone can participate regardless of how long youâve been a Hellenic polytheist! My hope is to use these questions to reflect on the year, and repeat next year to see what has changed, and hopefully to continue doing that every year!
Answer in as much or as little detail as you see fit. You are allowed to skip any questions that you are uncomfortable answering. These questions can also apply to heroes, not just deities. You can pick specific deities to answer each one, or answer the questions with all the deities you worship. This might apply to other Pantheons and Iâm happy for it to be used as such. Feel free to tweak some of the questions to fit those pantheons if youâd like!
Please link this list on your posts with your answers so that it is easy for others to find if they want to participate too after seeing your answers.
THIS IS TO BE DONE DURING DECEMBER, IâM JUST POSTING THE LIST NOW SO PEOPLE CAN FIND IT!
Have fun!
Iâm going to use this differently than the way it was intended, as I think it can make for a good introduction to a new blog. Iâm just going to answer each of the questions, prefacing this by saying that I have studied Mediterranean religions and philosophies in antiquity in an academic context for ten years before beginning to practice polytheism almost six years ago. Given that, how I relate to polytheist religiosity looks different than most contemporary polytheists.
1) Kybele, and yes. I have come to understand her to be my Leader God, as the ancient philosophers put it.
2) Isis, and Iâm afraid that my answers to subsequent questions might make me appear more mystical than I actually am. She appeared to me in a dream. And while I never presume to know the intentions of the Gods, I would imagine it would have something to do with how her providence penetrates our material existence and unites souls by way of their reversion on their cause. Along with how my soul tends towards the Vivific Gods. Who can really say?
3) As I said in my initial introduction, about six years ago.
4) Oh, Iâm always wanting to learn about other Gods. Iâm not sure if I could single out one more than any other.
5) Iâm not sure what this question means, to be perfectly honest. I know that in the theurgic literature, there are highly specific terms which discuss our relationship to the Gods. The closest of these terms to a bond would be that of henosis, or union with a God, which tends to be overblown and sensationalized by modern commentators. But if we take the Platonists at their word, anytime one approaches a God sincerely, whether in prayer or contemplation, one inevitably unites with them. Itâs not a question of how one unites to their God or if one can be united with their God, but more so a question of how one remains united. And according to the ancients, the mysteries, whether we are speaking of the mystery cults or philosophy, teach us how to remain in union with our God. So how often have I united with a God? As often as I can. And how have I sought to remain united with them? By continuing to strive to live a good life.
6) As much as I might wish to say that I give offerings every morning and evening as Hesiod encourages, I donât. But I remain in near perpetual contemplation of the Gods and the world. Which, again, is probably making me sound more mystical than I actually am. I donât think that this is particularly uncommon among religious souls.
7) Yes. Iâm not sure that, âbeing out,â really affects my worship in anyway.
8) I donât have altars. I donât want altars, as I am not a priest with a temple. I do have two shrines, as my statues cannot all fit in one place.
9) Not so much a specific practice that I am skeptical of, but a specific mode of relating to the Gods. I often come across polytheists spouting off endless, scrupulous lists of, âDo this,â âDonât do this,â and, âOnly do this if,â etc. and how this produces an anxious mode of worship in many people. The ancients called this superstition and believed that it hindered, not helped, in oneâs relationship with the Gods and the world, c.f. Theophrastusâ âThe Superstitious Man.â Seeing the subjectivity that this produces in individuals, I tend to agree with the ancients on this.
10) That you donât need to engage in anachronisms of reconstructionist, revivalist, eclecticism, hard polytheism, soft polytheism, etc. in order to relate to the contemporary community. You can just relate to the community through your worship of the Gods and your engagement with the various polytheist traditions of antiquity.
11) Well, I suppose that the clearest signs that we receive from the Gods are oracles. And in practicing theurgy, I have experienced trance possession and given oracular messages to groups. So I suppose those would constitute my clearest signs. Again, making me sound more mystical than I actually am.
12) Yes. I pour out the libations and eat the food, as the consuming of the food constitutes an important form of divination.
13) Yes. I write my own prayers and hymns, but will also use prayers and hymns from antiquity.
14) The notion that Gods have domains is a relic of the Medieval Christian commentary on our myths. The ancients understood the Gods to have timai, meaning honors. The timai concern who traditionally honored a God, along with how, when and where they traditionally honored a God. So timai concern how we relate to the Gods. The Gods are not limited by their timai, but concern themselves with all things in accordance with their unique prerogatives. So no, because Gods do not have domains.
15) I wouldnât know where to begin to answer how my worship of the Gods has changed me. I suppose I could say that my contemplation of the metaphysics of polytheism has made my politics deeply anarchist, proceeding from Damasciusâ metaphysical insight that the polytheist cosmos is, âanarkhos,â leaderless or without first principle. It has also lead my thinking to become deeply existential and highly contextualist.
16) Ignore the noise, simply offer sincere worship to the Gods.
17) Iâm very new to Tumblr, and am still finding blogs. Sorry. đŹ
18) Yeah, Iâm not really sure what this question means either. I suppose I do somethings that look like ancient magic, however I donât really have intentions of bringing about changes in the world, but use these methods to draw closer to the Gods, as the theurgists did. Iâm also a capable technical diviner, and use divination both within ritual contexts and to aid others. I also engage in fairly standard modes of prayer and offerings. And I engage in philosophical contemplation.
19) I worship far too many Gods to do this succinctly. I will say that Hymns of Poseidon by Maple & Rye very surprisingly dips into the ancient theology of Poseidonâs providence being expressed in the world as kinesis. And itâs a really good song.
20) My favorite aspect of Hellenic Polytheism is its rich mythological tradition, which most traditional religions do not and did not have.
21) Iâm assuming that this question concerns contemporary retellings or adaptations of Greek mythology, as this is what the ancient mythological tradition is, in essence. To that, I have to say no. Thatâs not because I have an issue with this, but because I havenât actually read or watched any.
22) I would want to participate in a civic festival, as I know that Labrys has revived some of them in Greece.
23) I donât really use terms like UPG or VPG. I donât find them to be all that helpful in theological reflection, as they center the academic gaze and the academic study of history and not the Gods.
24) I donât really think of offerings as something to be proud of or not to be proud of. I donât really see them as concerning me.
25) I donât think I will ever stop being surprised by how intellectually rich Hellenic mythology is.
26) When I am in the habit of making daily offerings, I will engage in the monthly festivals of the Attic calendar.
27) I think that what we would now call the transness of Kybeleâs mythology and cult is not only severely underrated, it is deeply misunderstood by the predominantly cis scholars who study this today and the intellectuals who commented on it in antiquity.
28) Itâs not so much a myth but a collection of myths, but my answer to this would be the Odyssey. I personally find it to be the most theologically rich text that we have from antiquity.
29) Iâm not really sure what this question means. But I guess to try to answer this question, most of the Gods that I regularly worship are Vivific Gods. Which would suggest that I highly value life and its mysteries.
30) So again, this will make me sound very mystical, but I occasionally with have dream theophanies of Gods which are Americanized. For example, Kybele has often appeared to me as an old woman in a prairie dress, sitting in a rocking chair, holding a frame drum, wearing a crown made of rawhide, and flanked by two mountain lions.
31) This is not intended to be a cop out answer, but I see all experiences of the Gods to be good. Whether that takes the form of insight in contemplation, seeing them in the phenomenological impressions of the sensible world, approaching them with offerings, witnessing them in dreams or becoming possessed by them in trance. And because of this, I find it impossible to single one out over any other.
I was rereading Divine Iamblichusâ De Mysteriis for a completely unrelated reason, when I paid closer attention to two questions asked by Porphyry than I had in previous readings. Quoting the first paragraph of Book IX:
âI consider you, therefore, as asking, for it is your inquiry, âWhy, since the Gods dwell in the heavens alone, there are invocations by theurgists of terrestrial and subterranean Gods?â For what you assert in the beginning is not true, that the Gods circumvolve in the heavens alone: since all things are full of them. You also inquire, âHow some of the Gods are said to be aerial, and different Gods are allotted different places, and circumscribed portions of bodies, though they possess infinite, impartible, and incomprehensible power? And how, likewise, there will be a union of them with each other, as they are separated by divisible circumscriptions of parts, and by difference of places and subject bodies?â Of all these, therefore, and an infinite number of other similar questions, one and the best solution will be obtained by surveying the mode of divine allotment.â
Intriguingly, instead of launching into a discussion of ÏÎčÎŒÎ±ÎŻ, Iamblichus begins to give account for an astrological theory, that he then uses as an analogy for his short discussion of honors.
(Petrus Apianus, Cosmographia Petri Apiani, Per Gemmam Frisivm apud Louanienses Medicum & Mathematicu[m] insignem, iam demum ab omnibus vindicata mendis, ac nonnullis quoque locis aucta. Additis eiusdem argumenti libellis ipsius GemmĂŠ Frisij, 'Aegidius Coppenius Diesth', 'Reiner Gemma Frisitus', 'Birckmannica Officina', 3r, Latin, 1564, Jagiellonian Library, BJ Cam. L. V. 26, Antwerpia)
As an aside, and at the risk of sounding mystical, these questions stood out to me as I have recently had a dream in which Gods appeared in different portions of my body and the varying landscape around me morphed into images of the Gods. And upon awaking, the dream felt significant to me, though it was not entirely clear why.
I was aware of traditional associations between the Gods and certain animals, plants, stones, herbs and geographical features. I knew that these traditions were significant to the formation of rituals and served as ritual components. And I was also aware of the complex theological imagery of nektar-ikhor found in the writings of the inspired poets, which provided some measure of unity to the dynamic systems of correspondences at play in Greek religious life.
(The Death of Talos, 425-400 BCE, Attic Red-Figured Volute Krater, ΀erracotta, Height: 75 cm, Archaeological Museum Jatta, Ruvo di Puglia, Italy)
(âThe Punishment of Prometheusâ, Salvator Rosa, Oil on canvas, 344 x 212 cm, 1648-1650, Galeria Nazionale d ÌArte Antica Palazzo Corsini)
However the logic of these correspondences in Late Antique religiosity, particularly in the case of Theurgic Platonism, was lost to me, until I read Book IX more closely.
If one was to take Divine Iamblichusâ initial responses to Porphyry at face value, then one might be tempted to conclude that the Theurgic Platonists hold to a strict and ultimately incoherent division of the Gods into the categories of ouranic, khthonic and katakhthonic. However, such a reading would immediately come into conflict with Divine Iamblichusâ immediate turn to celestial light.
It would seem that when Divine Iamblichus says, âthat the Gods [do not] circumvolve in the heavens alone,â that, âalone,â is doing a lot of work in that statement. As we see elsewhere in De Mysteriis (despite Iamblichusâ critiques of astrology), the heavens remain a primary site for divine revelation. Even as Iamblichus says, in his paraphrase of Thales, that the Gods permeate all thingsâa logical consequence of their hypostatic relationship to Being.
In other words, if the Gods permeate all things, then their revelation is not limited to the heavens alone. This is true even if the Gods are revealed more perfectly (within the Late Antique understanding shared by Divine Iamblichus and Porphyry) through the intelligible and mathematical movements and arrangements of the heavenly bodies.
Going beyond this and given the point that the Divine Iamblichus was trying to make concerning ÏÎčÎŒÎ±ÎŻ, in many ways astrology would seem to make for the most obvious analogy available to the philosopher, as astrologyâno matter its theoretical explanationâis an art of sympathies, i.e. an art that demonstrates the interpenetrating and interrelating nature of all things.
However, it becomes apparent as the book begins to draw to a close that Divine Iamblichusâ reference to astrology is not merely an analogy. On the contrary, Iamblichus argues that the heavens should be understood as a mean term in the unfolding of the cosmos by way of divine providence. To provide an extended quote:
âAfter the same manner, therefore, the whole world being partible, is divided about the one and impartible light of the Gods. But this light is every where one and the same whole, and is impartibly present with all things that are able to participate of it; through an all perfect power fills all things, and by a certain causal comprehension, incloses and terminates the whole of things in itself, and is every where united to itself, and conjoins ends to beginnings. This too, all heaven and the earth imitating, revolve with a circular motion, are united to themselves, and lead the elements which are carried round in a circle. Hence the cosmos causes all things to be in each other, and to tend to each other, makes the end of one thing to coalesce with the beginning of another, as, for instance, earth with heaven, and produces one connexion and concord of wholes with wholes.â
With this in mind, one can now begin to read Book IX against the grain and begin to discern various potential logics at play in determining correspondences for ritual. Given theurgyâs privileging of the ancient and the traditional, we must first assume that traditional offerings and correspondences which we can find in myth and the historical and archeological records would be favored. However, with the growth in cities and colonies, in the number of cults (not all having myths to draw on), and in the spread of cults across varying ecological and geological regions in the Hellenistic and Late Antique eras, prohibitions of ignorance of the land and the availability and cost of items likely created problems for civic and household worship, much as they do for polytheists today. And this is likely where oracular and technical divination would play a major role.
It was in the Hellenistic era that astrologers began to write about the planetary natures of a wide variety of plants, stones and geological features found throughout the Roman Empire, building upon older regional sources. And while one might think that this could only lead to the cultic expansion of the traditional seven Gods ruling the visible planets (i.e., Selene, Hermes, Aphrodite, Helios, Ares, Zeus, and Kronos), for the ancient mind, so inundated with a Stoic logic of cosmic sympathy, this could not be further from the case. As Sallustius says in On the Gods and the Cosmos when relating the Olympians to the Ptolemaic cosmos:
âWhile these Gods possess the cosmos in a primary way, the other Gods must be supposed to be contained in them, as for instance Dionysos in Zeus, Asklepios in Apollo, and the Kharites in Aphrodite. Further, we can see their spheres, earth as Hestiaâs, water as Poseidonâs, air as Heraâs, fire as that of Hephaistos, and six spheres, those higher, belonging to the Gods to whom they are usually assigned; for we must regard Apollo and Artemis as Sun and Moon. We must give the sphere of Kronos to Demeter, the ether again to Athena, while the firmament is common to them all.â
(Giulio Romano, Ceiling of the Room of the Giants, c. 1532-1534, fresco, Palazzo del Te, Mantua, Italy)
In this intersection of Sallustiusâ theology and astrology, the differences between the two discourses are mediated by the Platonic grounding of sympathy in the Gods, by way of their hypercosmic banquet. As Sallustius says, âthe other Gods must be supposed to be contained in [the Olympians],â or as Proclus would later express it, âall the Gods are in each of the Gods.â To apply this to the discussion at hand, the supplicant must understand the nature of each planet in order to discern the providences at play in each in that moment. From there, stones, plants and animal-shaped cakes or animal images can be incorporated into rituals in accordance with their planetary natures and rituals and temples could also be placed in appropriate geographical locals.
Such an approach could even be further refined by more modern systems of planetary correspondences for plants in creating contemporary theurgic rituals, where each of a plantâs parts are provided with planetary correspondences, such that a traditionally Jovian plant could have Venusian flowers and Saturnian roots. Something which can figure into the timing and nature of its use.
As for parts of the body, Hellenistic astrology spoke of this as well. However, not through planetary correspondences but through zodiacal and decanic correspondences. Having grown up in a family of farmers and ranchers, this method of zodiacal correspondences is a practice that I am very familiar with, as many farms and ranches still use these correspondences, today, in order to time certain aspects of animal husbandry.
As the decans and their relationship to parts of the body and their rulership by the Hellenic Gods would require its own essay, I will stick to the zodiacal correspondences. The discussion of the Homo Signorum, or Zodiacal Man, has its first dated appearance in Maniliusâ Astronomica in c. 30-40 CE. In the Astronomica, Manilius relates the head to Aries, the neck to Taurus, the shoulders to Gemini, the chest to Cancer, the sides to Leo, the belly to Virgo, the butt to Libra, the genitals to Scorpio, the thighs to Sagittarius, the knees to Capricorn, the lower leg to Aquarius, and the feet to Pisces.
Zodiacal signs, too, would have traditional rulerships by Gods. In this same text, Manilius also provides us with these rulershipsâAthena rules Aries, Aphrodite rules Taurus, Apollo rules Gemini, Hermes rules Cancer, Zeus and Kybele rule Leo, Demeter rules Virgo, Hephaistos rules Libra, Ares rules Scorpio, Artemis rules Sagittarius, Hestia rules Capricorn, Hera rules Aquarius, Poseidon rules Pisces.
There are conceivably two uses of this zodiacal system in theurgy, given the usage of this system in medicine and animal husbandry. On the one hand, it provides another God to pray to on behalf of a sick or ailing individual beyond yours or their leader God and the patrons of healing and medicine, whether local or Panhellenic. On the other, it can provide greater specificity in the parts of animals to depict in cakes and votive offerings. Though there are perhaps other possibilities that I have not considered.
(Limbourgh Brothers, Anatomical Man from Les TrÚs Riches Heures du Duc de Berry, c. 1411-1416, tempura on vellum, Condé Museum, Ms.65, f.14v)
However, there are other potential means presented by the Divine Iamblichus which could be explored by the contemporary theurgist. To quote Iamblichus:
âWill not, therefore, he who surveys this conspicuous statue of the Gods, thus united to itself, be ashamed to have a different opinion of the Gods, who are the causes of it, so as to introduce among them sections, and separations, and corporeal-formed circumscriptions? I, indeed, should think, that every one would be thus disposed. [âŠ] I think, therefore, that the several participants of the divinities are of such a nature, that some partake of them etherially, others aerially, and others aquatically; which also, the art of divine works perceiving, employs adaptations and invocations, conformable to such a division. And thus much concerning the distribution of the more excellent genera into the world.â
To the Divine Iamblichusâ point, the celestial system is not the only natural system with a mathematical and intelligible structure. There are many natural divisions of nature, such as the aerial and aquatic, mentioned by Iamblichus, but also those elucidated by contemporary sciences such as niches, biomes, among others. The role that each element plays reflects a certain nature which is, of course, indicative of divine providence, and through the understanding of these interrelations we have the potential to discover an even greater number of ways to relate to the Gods and render ourselves intelligible to them through our rituals.
In a certain sense, this post might be redundant. After all, most theurgists already use tables of correspondences or divination to form rituals. However, I have yet to see these tendencies fully grounded in tradition or logic, and this post is a first small step in that direction.
âBeloved Pan, and all other Gods that dwell in this place, grant that I may become beautiful within, and that such outward things as I have may not war against the spirit within me. May I count him rich who is wise, and as for gold, may I possess so much of it as a temperate man might bear and carry with him.â
âSocrates, Phaedrus 279b8-c3
Pan, 2nd Century CE copy of Greek original, Rome, Italy
âHail, O Mother of the Gods, many-named, blessed with beautiful offspring. Hail, O Hekate Prothypaie, Megasthenes.
âBut also he: Hail, O Janus Propator, Zeus Aphthite. Hail, O Zeus Ypate.
âMake radiant the course of my life, and make it laden with good things. Drive away evil afflictions from my limbs and my soul, furiously raging around the earth. Draw my soul to you, after it has been purified by consciousness-stirring rites. Truly, I beg, give a hand. And with your winds bring me, exhausted, to the harbor of piety.
âHail, O Mother of the Gods, many-named, blessed with beautiful offspring. Hail, O Hekate Prothypaie, Megasthenes.
âBut also he: Hail, O Janus Propator, Zeus Aphthite. Hail, O Zeus Ypate.â
âProclus, Hymn 6
Unknown Sculptor, Two-Faced Janus, Italy, late 18th C, Marble, The Winter Palace