discourse kin ✨ @passive-aggressive-fandom - Tumblr Blog

hey yall im gonna,,, leave this blog adios my friends

saintphilomena-deactivated20171

look folks

it literally takes 30 seconds to go to fucking http://report.cybertip.org/submit and report ANY AND ALL child p*rnogr/aphy that you see online and you don’t have to drag anyone else into it.

you don’t have to expose anyone else to child pornography, you don’t have to signal boost offending urls to report-a-predator and lapis-hates-pedos, you don’t have to link people to blogs and websites containing the offending and illicit material, or whatever the hell it is you’re doing. it’s legal, it’s taken seriously, and they don’t fuck around with reports.

i hate that side of tumblr that sits there and exposes minors to predators under the guise of ‘taking them down and being safe’ as if they can’t get fucking hurt in the process.

saintphilomena-deactivated20171

if i’m not making myself clear enough and you still want to seem cool for your half-assed vigilantism by making a tumblr warning post as opposed to reporting it to the fucking FBI:

you can get in TONS of trouble for spreading it around. yes, you are fucking spreading it around if you sit there and give out the url to it.

if you have a blog that’s about discourse or whatever and you fucking link that stuff, you are giving predators easy one-click access to it, spreading images of children having their lives ruined and exposing minors to that. it does not matter if you are a minor yourself or what your intentions are.

fangedfiend-deactivated20200430

And unfortunately this only applies to imagery of real people. The law doesn’t cover things like illustrations (you’ll just have to murder the OP for that)

saintphilomena-deactivated20171

incorrect. 18 U.S. Code § 2256 which is the law covering the regulations of child pornography explicitly covers ‘[…] any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct […]’

the law does in fact, cover things like illustrations. there have been court cases on it.

shotacon/lolicon cp art may not be a priority but it will be addressed and investigated, but real government agencies will spend more time cracking down on images of literal human children being abused.

it would behoove you to not spread unsourced misinformation regarding the literal legal code of child pornographic content on my post– i know what i’m talking about.

#reblog #mod hurdy #mod luhloyd