I don’t think you’ve understood a single word I’ve said, and frankly, it’s like talking to a brick wall that takes your words and spits them back in a random order.
You are clearly an Amity Stan. I don’t have a problem with Amity as a character, but I hate just about any type of character stans to begin with, because— as demonstrated here— they are generally incapable of letting their faves have flaws.
Maybe one day you will recognize it is good for characters to have flaws, because without flaws, there is nothing to grow from.
It’s fine to headcanon Boscha posted and captioned those pictures on Amity’s scroll, but from a literary standpoint you have to understand there’s a rule in writing. Two, actually, that I think could apply: Show, don’t tell and Chekhov’s Gun.
If Boscha had really been the one to post or caption those pictures, there would have to be a verbal or visible nod to this for it to be considered canon.
They would have to show it. An example would be, having Boscha ask if she can caption another photo for Amity.
Amity’s distant behaviour isn’t a sign she didn’t write the posts, it’s just a sign she is generally unhappy.
Additionally— the photos are used to motivate Willow to act recklessly because Amity used to be her friend. The significance of the photos in the first place is the rift between Willow and Amity. Willow doesn’t mention Boscha at all. It’d essentially be retconning it by having it be Boscha who wrote the posts all along.
As for the “humans can bite it” comment— Boscha literally wasn’t present for that. That scene happens after they’ve animated the house and Luz is expressing hesitance in showing off to Amity.
And it happens directly after we see Boscha on her way to Amity’s house. (They prank Boscha with the house and Boscha screams and runs off terrified.)
Boscha couldn’t have had anything to do with that. She couldn’t have posted on Amity’s penstagram, and she just got threatened by what she thinks is a talking, walking house that could crush her— bullying Luz is low on her priority list.
Also, don’t write threateningly-worded messages, especially if they’re in response to something you don’t understand.
Essentially: Hunter and Amity are character parallels. The show drew that parallel for a reason. Amity was able to see herself in Hunter’s struggles. That’s why she extends sympathy in the first place.
But Hunter saw an opportunity to go home, and his illusions weren’t shattered enough for him to accept her lifeline. That’s fine.
It took Amity more than once to accept Luz’s lifeline. If she didn’t at least try to give Hunter a second chance after he rejected her first lifeline, she would be hypocritical by definition.
The show didn’t do that, thankfully, because they didn’t want to make Amity a hypocrite— nor did they have the time for that drama.
also, just a p.s: TVTropes classifies Amity squashing King’s cupcake as Evil is Petty, in which “taking candy from a baby” falls under. In which a character who is a antagonist, minor or major, does some things solely for the sake of being a dick. That was absolutely Amity lashing out, and since King did nothing to deserve it, it was bullying.
You seem like someone who would argue with calling Amity an antagonist, so here’s the definition: “The principal character in opposition to the protagonist or hero of a narrative or drama”
Amity 100% starts out opposing Luz & Co, much like Lilith, and therefore is an antagonist. Though she later joins the main cast and gets redeemed.
theartofmadeline
annaxmalina
titsay
jacobvanloon
dededos
tangentwithtanner
janainaart
