flight 1412 to qing jing peak

LB | It/any | French Header by Orioto

[pikmininaplane]

on all levels except physical I am yellow pikmin in a plane dot png

[pikmininaplane]

literally me

[alzalupa]

[gracekraft]

It takes two to tangle~

Recently played the @truthscrapper demo and now I'm even more excited to find out just what the heck is wrong with these two and Sosotte in the final game <33

[frodo-of-the-nine-fingers]

immortality as theft (you have to steal life from something else) immortality as parasitism (there is something else inside You that is keeping you alive and you become less of yourself more and more the longer it stays in you) immortality as violence (everything is trying to kill you because everything is supposed to die and the universe will always try to find a way to right the wrong that is You) you understand

[reinapepiada]

shipping a consensual, safe & sane pairing all the while i'm shaking my head in disapproval so the audience knows i still love wildly toxic abusive fictional dynamics

[hiimrock1]

Thunderstorm seasons

[insecuregodcomplex]

[ilynpilled]

We Might Have To Get A Little Less Fandom-y

Mo Drammeh There is something really wrong with the way we talk about books on the Internet. When I have a discussion with my real life frie

There is something really wrong with the way we talk about books on the Internet. When I have a discussion with my real life friends — which I do have! — about literature, I notice the lack of desperation in the air which seems to pervade online literary discourse. When we read fiction, we seem to have a very bad habit of projecting our neuroses onto it. The expectations placed upon the novel (both as a medium and in the sense of individual novels) these days are increasingly bewildering. In an earlier article, I articulated my opposition to the idea that the novel and the act of reading itself would save us from fascism, but this is only one of many burdens people have placed on the novel. People will put out deeply, uh, motivated interpretations of novels. People treat characters like they’re real people and real people like they’re characters. Pages and pages of arguments between two people who equally do not understand the themes of the book or show they’re talking about. Much discussion about books seems to have very little to do with the content of the books themselves and very much to do with the people having those discussions. In this article, I want to get to the bottom of why, and I believe the only way to find that ‘why’ is by interrogating the idea of fandom, and its relationship to consumerism.

Genre Antagonist (@AuthorialGail) on X

A writer。 Teaching, too. They/she, trans, Black.

[vacationtown]

The price of love is inevitably pain

[marsvs-thesun]

Belette my beloved i dont even regret spending 3 hours this morning painstakingly pausing and screenshooting, now can you please stand still in view of the camera in neutral lighting for 2 minutes so i can figure out wtf youre wearing <3

[bardically-uninspired]

waiting for the other shoe to drop

[tyo1999]

I was about to say that I'm not always awful to my blorbos but Cone's bleeding here so maybe I am

[somie]

[asepriterico]

[basingstokemercury]

"character deserved better" (but they were never going to get it that's the stuff great tragedies are made of) vs "character deserved better" (but the writers really blew it)

[valtsv]

reading bad media takes online will never compare to the exquisite torture that is trying to have a conversation about basic literary analysis with your own family members

[valtsv]

discussing media with people online: can you please put down the greek mythology for a second and actually read the text in front of you

discussing media with your parents:

[rockstarcotta]