first-hand accounts of US drone attacks from civilian victims ..
we're not kids anymore.

No title available
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
taylor price
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Today's Document
i don't do bad sauce passes
d e v o n
Cosmic Funnies
$LAYYYTER

★
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

Love Begins
One Nice Bug Per Day

No title available
AnasAbdin

shark vs the universe

Product Placement
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Claire Keane
seen from T1

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Spain

seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
seen from Cambodia

seen from United States
seen from South Korea
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
@polisli
first-hand accounts of US drone attacks from civilian victims ..
The Huffington Post | By Luke Johnson Posted: 07/26/2013 12:58 pm EDT | Updated: 07/26/2013 4:51 pm EDT
Amid the Obama administration’s crackdown against whistleblowers, Change.gov, the 2008 website of the Obama transition team laying out the candidate’s promises, has disappeared from the internet.
The Sunlight Foundation notes that it last could be viewed on June 8, which was two days after the first revelations from Edward Snowden (who had then not yet revealed himself) about the NSA’s phone surveillance program. One of the promises Obama made on the website was on “whistleblower protections:"
Often the best source of information about waste, fraud, and abuse in government is an existing government employee committed to public integrity and willing to speak out. Such acts of courage and patriotism, which can sometimes save lives and often save taxpayer dollars, should be encouraged rather than stifled. We need to empower federal employees as watchdogs of wrongdoing and partners in performance. Barack Obama will strengthen whistleblower laws to protect federal workers who expose waste, fraud, and abuse of authority in government. Obama will ensure that federal agencies expedite the process for reviewing whistleblower claims and whistleblowers have full access to courts and due process.
The White House did not respond to multiple requests for comment on why the page was deleted. The site had offered a way to compare Obama’s promises and administration actions and still can be viewed on the Wayback archive.
The page has long had a link to whitehouse.gov along with a note saying that “the transition has ended and the new administration has begun;" however, the website’s pages have recently become inaccessible from the site.
Prior to the Snowden leaks but after Pfc. Bradley Manning gave classified information to WikiLeaks, the Obama administration launched the Insider Threat program to combat leaks, in part by asking coworkers to keep a close eye on their fellow employees. The program also ordered more protections for those who use proper channels, but four national security whistleblowers have said that they became targets of Justice Department investigations after bringing concerns to the Department of Defense Inspector General.
Really, Mr. President, our memories are not as weak as you and your administration seem to think they are. This is a clumsy and embarrassing attempt to rewrite history. But we will not forget. Nor will history. History will judge you no matter how much you attempt to deform or delete from it. The truth will always live on somewhere and reappear when most needed by the society.
[On Tuesday July 30] Bradley Manning, a whistleblower, was convicted by a military court at Fort Meade of 19 offences for supplying the press with information, including five counts of ‘espionage’. He now faces a maximum sentence of 136 years.
The ‘aiding the enemy’ charge has fallen away. It was only included, it seems, to make calling journalism ‘espionage’ seem reasonable. It is not.
Bradley Manning’s alleged disclosures have exposed war crimes, sparked revolutions, and induced democratic reform. He is the quintessential whistleblower.
This is the first ever espionage conviction against a whistleblower. It is a dangerous precedent and an example of national security extremism. It is a short sighted judgment that can not be tolerated and must be reversed. It can never be that conveying true information to the public is ‘espionage’.
President Obama has initiated more espionage proceedings against whistleblowers and publishers than all previous presidents combined.
In 2008 presidential candidate Barack Obama ran on a platform that praised whistleblowing as an act of courage and patriotism. That platform has been comprehensively betrayed. His campaign document described whistleblowers as watchdogs when government abuses its authority. It was removed from the internet last week.
Throughout the proceedings there has been a conspicuous absence: the absence of any victim. The prosecution did not present evidence that – or even claim that – a single person came to harm as a result of Bradley Manning’s disclosures. The government never claimed Mr. Manning was working for a foreign power.
The only ‘victim’ was the US government’s wounded pride, but the abuse of this fine young man was never the way to restore it. Rather, the abuse of Bradley Manning has left the world with a sense of disgust at how low the Obama administration has fallen. It is not a sign of strength, but of weakness.
The judge has allowed the prosecution to substantially alter the charges after both the defense and the prosecution had rested their cases, permitted the prosecution 141 witnesses and extensive secret testimony. The government kept Bradley Manning in a cage, stripped him naked and isolated him in order to crack him, an act formally condemned by the United Nations Special Rapporteur for torture. This was never a fair trial.
The Obama administration has been chipping away democratic freedoms in the United States. With today’s verdict, Obama has hacked off much more. The administration is intent on deterring and silencing whistleblowers, intent on weakening freedom of the press.
WASHINGTON (AP) — The 162,000 jobs the economy added in July were a disappointment. The quality of the jobs was even worse.
A disproportionate number of the added jobs were part-time or low-paying — or both.
Bureau of Lies and Scams: Unemployment at 7.4 Percent
From the report:
Total nonfarm payroll employment increased by 162,000 in July, and the unemployment rate edged down to 7.4 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Employment rose in retail trade, food services and drinking places, financial activities, and wholesale trade.
Karl Denninger of Market ticker has this analysis:
Annualized, and population-corrected, we’re still in the hole… that figure is now -415,000 jobs annualized adjusted for population changes. So no, we’re not “growing" employment — we’re stagnant.
Part-time for economic reasons workers (those who want full-time jobs but can’t find them) was flat annualized and up only slightly compared to last month. Non-economic part-timers (by choice) was up 84,000 on the month and also up annualized.
Discouraged workers were up about 135,000 annualized.
Weekly hours were down a tenth and hourly earnings were off 2 cents. If you look at the average weekly earnings loss ($3.09) and multiply it by the total employed (145,113,000) then divide by the average weekly earnings the imputed job loss due to hourly earnings and hour declines is 543,573, massively dwarfing the so-called “gains."
This is a crap report no matter the spin put on it.
The NSA program Xkeyscore essentially makes available everything you’ve ever done on the Web — browsing history, searches, emails — at the tap of a keyboard.
Maybe what we all need is a good slap in the face.
Momentous change almost always begins with the courage of people taking back their own lives against the odds.
New Statesman - John Pilger - July 25th
I have known my postman for more than 20 years. Conscientious and goodhumoured, he is the embodiment of public service at its best. The other day, I asked him, “Why are you standing in front of each door like a soldier on parade?”
“New system,” he replied. “I am no longer required simply to post the letters through the door. I have to approach every door in a certain way and put the letters through in a certain way.”
“Why?”
“Ask him.”
Across the street was a solemn young man, clipboard in hand, whose job was to stalk postmen and see they abided by the new rules, no doubt in preparation for privatisation. I told the stalker my postman was admirable. His face remained flat, except for a momentary flicker of confusion.
In Brave New World Revisited, Aldous Huxley describes a new class conditioned to a normality that is not normal “because they are so well adjusted to our mode of existence, because their human voice has been silenced so early in their lives, that they do not even struggle or suffer or develop symptoms as the neurotic does”.
Surveillance is normal in the Age of Regression – as Edward Snowden revealed. Ubiquitous cameras are normal. Subverted freedoms are normal. Effective public dissent is now controlled by the police, whose intimidation is normal.
The traducing of noble terms such as “democracy”, “reform”, “welfare” and “public service” is normal. Prime ministers lying openly about lobbyists and war aims is normal. The export of £4bn worth of British arms, including crowd control ammunition, to the medieval state of Saudi Arabia, where apostasy is a capital crime, is normal.
The wilful destruction of efficient, popular public institutions such as the Royal Mail is normal. A postman is no longer a postman, going about his decent work; he is an automaton to be watched, a box to be ticked. Aldous Huxley described this regression as insane and our “perfect adjustment to that abnormal society” a sign of the madness.
Are we “perfectly adjusted” to all of this? No, not yet.
Read more
Manning faces up to 136 years in prison . . .
The former intelligence analyst was convicted of 20 of 22 charges for sending hundreds of thousands of government and diplomatic secrets to WikiLeaks, but he was found not guilty of aiding the enemy, which alone could have meant life in prison without parole.
It was President Obama himself who infamously said, “If you see something, say something." It seems Manning neglected to read the fine print. Now the whistleblower who called attention to U.S. war crimes faces life in prison while the perpetrators of those crimes go scot-free. Sort of makes a total mockery of the Nuremberg trials and our government’s participation in that landmark event.
Russia has stabbed us in the back, and each day that Mr. Snowden is allowed to roam free is another twist of the knife.
Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. calling on President Obama to recommend moving the G-20 summit of world leaders in St. Petersburg on Sept. 5-6.
I disagree vehemently with Schumer's remark here. You can draw your own conclusion.
ANDREW TAYLOR | August 1, 2013 AP
WASHINGTON — Leaving piles of unfinished business for the fall, Congress began exiting Washington Thursday for a five-week vacation with its accomplishments few, its efforts at budgeting in tatters and its collective nerves frayed by months of feuding.
Army private faces sentence of life in military custody with no chance of parole if convicted on 'aiding the enemy' charge.
An eyewitness to the crash says that Hasting’s body was not burnt below the shoulders, which raises even more question as to why the body was cremated. Something of the same sort of cremation occurred in a mysterious shoot down of a helicopter in Afghanistan that resulted in the deaths of 30 Americans, including Seal Team 6 members that took part in the raid on Osama Bin Laden’s residence. Infowars reports:
The Pentagon told the families that all the bodies were cremated due to the fact that they were badly burned in the crash. However, pictures have emerged that show some deceased SEALs without bad burns. “The body I saw didn’t need to be cremated,” said Rep. Chaffetz, [who is investigating the shoot down in his role as chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform subcommittee on National Security].
The Pentagon also claims that, despite recovering all the bodies of those killed, the helicopter’s black box was washed away in a flash flood. According to Infowars, Chaffetz, said that the DoD’s explanation regarding the helicopter’s black box is “awfully odd."
This is important because the body was cremated without the permission of the family. There is a long (though not very respectable) history of this sort of journalistic invention. Remember the Roswell "weather balloons"? The government is so very expert at fabricating tales for the innocents of America.
My understanding is that espionage means giving secret or classified information to the enemy. Since Snowden shared information with the American people, his indictment for espionage could reveal (or confirm) that the US Government views you and me as the enemy.
Ron Paul (Source)
"The question is not ‘do you have something to hide?’ The question is whether we control government or the government controls us."
Oliver Stone for ACLU
Tell Congress To Act Now To End The Surveillance State
Following the revelations of the NSA scandal, Oliver Stone has made a great short video about ”the government’s gigantic surveillance machine that is eating our freedom."
In the video Stone explains why the NSA program matters for every American, and asks whether this means we control our government or they control us.
Watch it now.
(via genqueue)
Key points from Edward Snowden’s statement to human rights groups at Sheremetyevo airport
Here are the key points from Edward Snowden’s statement to human rights groups at Sheremetyevo airport, as published by WikiLeaks.
• He said that his revelations of his professional “capability without any warrant to search for, seize, and read your communications, anyone’s communications, at any time” had drawn attention to “a serious violations of the law”, under the US constitution and the universal declaration of human rights. He hit back at US claims that secret court rulings legalised such surveillance, saying: “These rulings simply corrupt the most basic notion of justice – that it must be seen to be done.”
• He invoked the second world war and the crimes of the Nazis by claiming he was acting according to principles set down at the Nuremburg trials, namely that individuals have a duty to humanity over and above their duty to their country. “individual citizens have the duty to violate domestic laws to prevent crimes against peace and humanity from occurring,” he said.
• Snowden said that he had not aimed to enrich himself by passing on his secrets, and nor had he “partnered” with any foreign government to guarantee his safety.
• He said the US had violated international laws in putting pressure on other countries not to take him in, something he said represented a threat to “the basic rights shared by every person, every nation, to live free from persecution, and to seek and enjoy asylum”.
• He said nations including Russia, Venezuela, Bolivia, Nicaragua, and Ecuador had offered him asylum and said he accepted all of the offers and any others he may be given in the future. Referring specifically to Venezuela, he said his “asylee status” was now formal and said no country had a right to limit his right to take up that offer. But because of the “unlawful threat” of the US and European countries it was currently “impossible” for him to travel to Latin America to take up such an offer.
• He asked Human Rights Watch and Amnesty to assist him in securing guarantees of safe passage to Latin America, and to help him with his asylum request to Moscow.
Countries around the world are collecting genetic material from millions of citizens in the name of fighting crime and terrorism – and, according to critics, heading into uncharted ethical terrain.