Works by Yuri Hill
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

No title available
YOU ARE THE REASON
AnasAbdin
Peter Solarz

Product Placement
trying on a metaphor
Show & Tell
hello vonnie

★

if i look back, i am lost

JBB: An Artblog!
Misplaced Lens Cap
Sade Olutola
art blog(derogatory)

#extradirty

shark vs the universe
One Nice Bug Per Day
tumblr dot com
Cosimo Galluzzi
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from Germany

seen from Türkiye
seen from Morocco
seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Australia

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
@postpunkpixie
Works by Yuri Hill
Losers Didn’t Actually Read Frankenstein, Write an Article About It Anyway, More at 11
Siouxsie Sioux by Steve Severin taken on September 20, 1976; the day of the 100 Club Punk Festival
Plate № 2 from Bill Sienkiewicz’s Vampyres series (1985).
I love Bill Sienkiewicz so muchhhhhh
“Golly jeepers
Where’d you get those weepers?
Peepshow, creepshow
Where did you get those eyes?
L.A. goth boy Leo at Helter Skelter, L.A., 1992. From the late ‘80s to early ‘90s the club was at several different locations, and always boasted the biggest and best clientele of goths, rivet heads and dark wavers. It was run by Michael Stewart and Bruce Perdew, the latter of whom created the magnificent skeletal and cadaver artwork for the club’s fliers, advertisements and murals. This photo was published in an article about Helter Skelter in Propaganda Magazine Issue No. 19/Fall 1992. Photo by Fred H. Berger, 1992. (Posted June 20 ’18)
#propaganda magazine #gothic #goth #helter skelter #androgyny #vampire #skull #fred h. berger #photography
Siouxsie Sioux, 1980s.
in the late 1790s it was in style to wear earrings depicting the execution of louis xvi.
Siouxie Sioux in Ghent, Belgium. 1982.
Bauhaus playing with Nico, 1981
PSA to all bats: Stay hydrated and keep away from the giant flaming orb in the sky.
possibly controversial opinion: i think “natural” makeup is, over time, more damaging than bold, obvious makeup
I don’t think that’s controversial at all.
@qualr sure I’ll explain :-)
Mainly because makeup itself, the generic concept, is an integral part of human identity. People have always done it (even Neanderthals used makeup) and we’re always going to keep doing it. The concept of decorating our faces/bodies with colored pigments is practically hardwired and on a deep level just plain FUN (look at how much kids love to get their faces painted at fairs and carnivals and so on). The concept is also totally gender neutral. In some societies, men traditionally do it more than women, for example. Using your own body as a canvas for art taps into a mystical, childlike sense of wonder. First you look one way, then… another! Like magic.
But mainstream commercial makeup culture as it exists today is incredibly exploitative, misogynist, colonialist, colorist, and hurts women, especially poorer women and women who don’t fit the racial ideal as expressed by the mainstream corporate beauty industry. And a big part of that is pushing “natural” looks. All women are supposed to look “naturally” poreless, for example (which isn’t realistic or healthy) and are punished socially and often financially if we aren’t. Another example: contouring is supposed to accentuate the “natural” lines of your face but for me and a lot of other Asian women with moonfaces, it’s the furthest thing from natural! The further you are from the rich thin young lightskinned bigeyed straightsmallnosed highcheekboned look, the more weirdly artificial the word “natural” becomes. We’re supposed to sink all this time and money and resources into achieving this bullshit “natural” look until it all feels a bit like Sisyphus rolling the stone up the hill.
Putting a bright blue streak on your eyelids and walking out the door might take five seconds and probably makes you feel expressive and happy and good about yourself, even if it seems “tacky” through the lens of mainstream makeup culture. But taking an hour and trying soooo hard, using all the latest expensive products to make it seem like you’re not really trying at all, makes a lot of women feel worse about themselves, not better. In fact it leads to a lot of women feeling insecure about their real face and their real skin. There are many ways to look garish, but only ONE way to look “natural”. Instead of turning your own face into a canvas where you’re the creative artist, you’re following a ruthless set of instructions and doing a sort of strict paint-by-numbers that you’re never going to do right anyway. So it represents giving up more power over your own face/body than you’re actually getting back. Subjugation to the social norm, not creativity.
How to spot a dragon using an illusion spell
credit
shes just a dense, thick bitch
Have a good day at work little buddy
EVERYONE LOOK AT THIS IMMEDIATELY.
His name is Black and was adopted by the workers of a construction site in Antofagasta, Chile. He was found by some workers near the area, when he was just a kitten, and they decided to take care care of him. The workers loved him and one of the cleaning ladies of the site designed some mini reflective jackets- and other outfits- for him. He was officialy named foreman and had its own access credential to the construction site. I belive the constrution work finished on 2017 and he was adopted by one of the employees.
Look at him!
He is such a good site foreman!
He’s working so hard and doing such a good job! <3
I looked up ‘CATPATAZ DE INGRESO’ (on the cat’s ID card) and Google Translate corrected my spelling.
‘Capataz’ = ‘foreman’.
‘Catpataz’ = a terrible, terrible pun.
Thank y’all for bearing with the political topics being so prevalent on the blog recently. Here is a heartwarming story and a horrible pun.
Natacha, 1990