Behold my Domain

It's not very impressive, I admit, but it's mine.

[albertothechihuahua]

this is the money dog, repost in the next 24 hours and money will come your way!!

[jaxblade]

ehh what the hell

[jaxblade]

OH MY GOD SO NO FUCKIN BULLSHIT I SWEAR To GOD. I reblogged this an hour ago and IM NOT Lying My Tax Refund which I did in late march popped into my Bank Account, and it was a Decent sized amount……

WHAT THE FUCK Is THIS MAGIC!??!?!?! Im trying this again IM NOT BSing hahahaha thats actually pretty cool xD

[jaxblade]

yooooo

yoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

FUCKIN YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

no BULLSHIT I KID YOU NOT! Look what I found while walking Home…..

OH MY GOD

OH MY F*CKIN GOD

THIS POST FUCKIN WORKS?!?!?! THIS IS PAST A COINCIDENCE NO WAY!??! NO FRIGGIN WAY!!! 

Im Going to reblog this every day to test this, its MAGIC ITS FRIGGIN MAGIC 

[que-pasadena]

I need to believe in the heart of the post…

[perlexnoire-deactivated20150716]

Oh? Well… *reblag*

[zer0will2live]

i reblogged this and now my uncle is giving me 250 to dye my hair nani the fucko

[qslay]

I have nothing to lose

[stoicdaydreamer]

my palm was itchin today not riskin it

[saint-vore]

call me australian but i just think that everyone should be required to vote and every municipality should have the obligation to make it as easy for everyone to vote as possible

[presiding-over-nothing]

What should the government be allowed to do to me if I dint cast a ballot?

[unknought]

Higgledy piggledy, turning and turning as gyres are widening, centers unheld,

things fall apart and there’s anarchy everywhere; falcons fly freely and can’t be compelled.

Dimming the tide there is blood in the water and everywhere customs of innocence drowned.

Held by the worst is a fervent intensity; lacking conviction the best run aground.

Surely there must be some kind of apocalypse; surely epiphany must be at hand!

Visions unbidden from Spiritus Mundi of something awakening out on the sand:

Head of a man with a leonine frame and a pitiless gaze that’s as blank as the sun;

sleep became nightmare by passage of centuries long before eons of slumber were done.

Higgledy piggledy, beast of antiquity, imminent, just as the prophecies warn,

shambling slowly but revelatorily, slouching towards Bethlehem, there to be born.

[zannolin]

national treasure movies + text posts (part 10)

[adzolotl]

‘Twas brillig, and the slithy toves A stately pleasure-dome decreed. And what rough beast, its hour come round at last, Could frame thy fearful symmetry?

[patienz]

they fuck you up your mum and dad two vast and trunkless legs of stone i do not like it, sam i am as small as a world and as large as alone

[playwrongs]

God moves in a mysterious way:

He gives his harness bells a shake.

What will survive of him is love

If he should die before he wake.

[inthefallofasparrow]

I had a dream, which was not all a dream. See in her cell sad Eloisa spread, Look’d up in perfect silence at the stars. I shut my eyes and all the world drops dead.

A sudden blow: the great wings beating still Rage, rage against the dying of the light. Pack up the moon and dismantle the sun, I work all day, and get half-drunk at night.

If I should die, think only this of me, Between what I see and what I say, In this short Life that only lasts an hour Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day?

[monsterpotion]

#i get knocked down but i get up again #o‚ what a rogue and peasant slave am i! #didnt make sense not to live for fun #do you love the color of the sky? #everybody wants to rule the world #everybody walk the dinosaur #and if i could‚ i’d make a deal with god: #to keep it real i fuck him on the floor

tags by @arcnoise

[monamoni]

A remarkable fever of Mobula rays migrating off the coast of Baja California.

[onenicebugperday]

Chilean plasterer bee, Caupolicana fulvicollis, Colletidae

Photos 1-2 by pedrova, 3 by enriquezrenteria, 4-5 by cesar_picar, and 6 by edonoso

[deadgenerations]

in australia it is a universal pharmacist policy that plan b will not be sold to men under any circumstances and to also obfuscate this policy - it is not widely known and they often do not tell men this is why they won't sell it to them. if you ask them about it they will always give different reasons for why because truthfully there isnt actually any reason for it. its just the policy. they often claim that its about giving women the correct information about how to take it and side effects, but if you have ever bought plan b yourself at an aussie chemist you know that they don't actually do that, they at most just read the label to you.

[phaeton-flier]

Trying to figure out a good reason for this and failing — maybe they're afraid of men who secretly take off the condom and then slip the pill into their girlfriend's food the next day? Or men lying about wanting kids but secretly dosing said wives? I honestly can't think of a solution that doesn't run through "you're a dirty sinner for wanting this"

[isaacsapphire]

The obvious explanation is to prevent men from causing an unwanted (by the mother) miscarriage, which may be a crime.

[thathopeyetlives]

People slipping their lover / wife / family member abortifacients without their knowledge or consent definitely does seem to be a Problem That Exists. Also maybe forced prostitution.

As far as I can tell, the basic issue is that if the woman gets pregnant unexpected to the man, then she will either expect the man to step up, or will leave him if he doesn't.

(and forced / pressured abortion as a way to enable and smooth over sexual exploitation of women is something often talked about in pro-life circles)

[deadgenerations]

hey can you launder your catholic propaganda elsewhere or just kill yourself you evil little shit? dont you have pedophilia to pretend doesnt happen?

[presiding-over-nothing]

Can't you just block the guy if you hate him that much?

[deadgenerations]

in australia it is a universal pharmacist policy that plan b will not be sold to men under any circumstances and to also obfuscate this policy - it is not widely known and they often do not tell men this is why they won't sell it to them. if you ask them about it they will always give different reasons for why because truthfully there isnt actually any reason for it. its just the policy. they often claim that its about giving women the correct information about how to take it and side effects, but if you have ever bought plan b yourself at an aussie chemist you know that they don't actually do that, they at most just read the label to you.

[phaeton-flier]

Trying to figure out a good reason for this and failing — maybe they're afraid of men who secretly take off the condom and then slip the pill into their girlfriend's food the next day? Or men lying about wanting kids but secretly dosing said wives? I honestly can't think of a solution that doesn't run through "you're a dirty sinner for wanting this"

[isaacsapphire]

The obvious explanation is to prevent men from causing an unwanted (by the mother) miscarriage, which may be a crime.

[thathopeyetlives]

People slipping their lover / wife / family member abortifacients without their knowledge or consent definitely does seem to be a Problem That Exists. Also maybe forced prostitution.

As far as I can tell, the basic issue is that if the woman gets pregnant unexpected to the man, then she will either expect the man to step up, or will leave him if he doesn't.

(and forced / pressured abortion as a way to enable and smooth over sexual exploitation of women is something often talked about in pro-life circles)

[deadgenerations]

hey can you launder your catholic propaganda elsewhere or just kill yourself you evil little shit? dont you have pedophilia to pretend doesnt happen?

[generallemarc]

Marvel is using AI art-the bottom left hand has an extra finger

This is a billion-dollar company. I get that the asterisk next to the name implies this isn't final, but this company is owned by Disney-at no point in the development process should ai "work" be acceptable. Literally the only time ai-assisted anything isn't lazy and scummy is if you're two dudes trying to animate a project way bigger than you could manage on your own in your spare time(and you don't 'train' it on other peoples' art), like that one animated short that made Mother's Basement flip his lid because he either didn't bother checking to see if it was made by a big studio or not or he just didn't care. This is not that. This literally could not get further from that.

[acanieve]

i get where you’re coming from but where’s the extra finger?

[generallemarc]

It's cut off by the edge, but you can see it at the base of the hand. There are only five finger-bases, but that's because the index and ring finger are emerging from the same base like they're messengers of the Greater Will. Or maybe the ring finger is just emerging from the ether, idk. Either way, the hands don't lie.

[presiding-over-nothing]

I think you're pretty badly off-base, unfortunately. I roughly sketched out how I think the fingers actually line up with the bases; they're just bent enough at the right angle, and part of it is cut off, so it's hard to actually tell how they're arranged, but it definitely doesn't look artificially generated. After all, every other hand in the pic looks perfectly fine at a glance.

[pragnificent]

This is Money Snake. She only appears every 312 years. 

If you reblog her picture within the next twenty-five seconds you will have good luck and fortune for the rest of your life. 

[thingsamylikes]

I reblogged her late last year and my 2024 has been very satisfying work-wise and (secure enough to not stress out) money-wise so far. Money Snake is wise and good.

[carpecake]

Not worth taking the risk

[aurae-rori]

snek please bless me

[isaacsapphire]

Haven’t seen a Tumblr good luck post in a long time, and I especially loved the money snake back when. Snek plz.

[pragnificent]

This is Money Snake. She only appears every 312 years. 

If you reblog her picture within the next twenty-five seconds you will have good luck and fortune for the rest of your life. 

[thingsamylikes]

I reblogged her late last year and my 2024 has been very satisfying work-wise and (secure enough to not stress out) money-wise so far. Money Snake is wise and good.

[salmonella-destroyer-of-worlds]

[frances-kafka]

The Worst People You Have Never Met, or, What I Learned During A Four Year Academic Study of Online Harassment In The Dungeons & Dragons Community

Dr Clio Belle Weisman

From the article: Having just escaped the world of incel culture I was not much interested in the kind of people that write shitty messages on Twitter because a new Star Wars character is black. At first glance that kind of harasser seemed both relatively well-understood by my field and boring. I was more interested in those who, at least on paper, were like the people around me every day and who were what the industry claimed to want to be — creative artists, writers, progressives, feminists, LGBTQ+ folk. I know why right-wingers want to hurt diverse groups of creative people, I do not have a handle on why diverse groups of creative people hurt each other. And I desperately wanted to. This article really needs to get more traction than it is.

[abilitiesconsideredunnatural]

Oh I wondered if you'd heard about the gaming clusterfuck! Note to my followers: Don't be put off by the opinions in this paragraph -- the article gets into the nitty-gritty of other people being horrible, and in one major harasser's case it shows the author switching from Believing The Woman to siding with the accused because of this case's mountain of evidence. It's like the reverse of those people who have all the right opinions on paper then are total scumbags on the personal level -- the performative male feminist etc.

[isaacsapphire]

I hadn't heard about this particular cluster (fuck, of people, B) previously, yet the frame is so familiar as to be almost dull: person with clout and a little integrity others wish to unthrone, cluster B ex, and at last there is a casus belli

[philippesaner]

Like I said elsewhere in the chain...I am familiar with this particular cluster, and this article is absolutely not to be trusted.

[presiding-over-nothing]

Why not, specifically?

[philippesaner]

I'll quote my other reblog:

It says “he has never lost a case”, but take a look at this verdict from a defamation case he “won”. The court evaluated eight fairly horrible accusations of abuse against him, and found that six were true. One of the other two was a subjective opinion. But the remaining accusation was unfair to him, so they awarded damages of…one dollar. In addition, the court found that he lied about a lot. He escaped punishment for that because it’s not actually illegal to lie, and his lies were found to be non-defamatory. Someone writing in good faith would, I think, see fit to mention this. That being said, there is a strong bias against Zak because of his incredibly toxic personality. People often believe false claims against him simply because they’ve interacted with him. Which isn’t very fair.

I've never been entirely sure how much to believe against Zak. His long history of sock-puppeting, brigade-calling, and forum-thread-ruining is not controversial, I've seen him do that stuff with my own two eyes. And so have thousands of others.

But the more serious accusations often boiled down to he-said-she-said. And since he's such an asshole, plenty of people had motive to lie about him. So when people said (for example) that they got harassing emails on accounts that they only ever used to email Mike Mearls about Zak being a terrible human being, I wasn't completely sure I could believe it.

If you have your own doubts about this or that allegation, fair enough. Just know that you can't trust this article.

Also, ask yourself how much time and mental energy you want to spend untangling the Zak Lore. His general toxicity is completely uncontroversial and much of the really bad stuff has been found true in court. Given that, is it really worth the effort required to figure out which of the middleweight accusations was fair?

[presiding-over-nothing]

To be very honest, now I'm a lot more suspicious of your motivations than the article's, since that entire last paragraph is you trying to manipulate me into giving up on figuring out what is true or not because you personally think Zak Smith is a big internet meanie.

Considering all relevant interview clips are archived here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GJAJNbF2Tg&list=PPSV

It's hard for me to "not trust" things that people involved in the situation said about the situation, with their own mouths and words, even if the presentation of one court case (out of evidently 3 total he's won so far and another that's been appealed back and forth) was dubious.

[philippesaner]

Given that he abused his girlfriend, how much time do you want to dedicate to figuring out which online insults were sent by his sockpuppets and which were "naturally occurring"?

Seriously, how much?

Five hours? Twenty? Two hundred?

I've wasted significantly too much time on this drama. I'm trying to warn you against my mistakes.

[presiding-over-nothing]

The only thing that matters to me is the truth. If, as is quite apparent from the article, multiple people have admitted to lying about him and making accusations without any real evidence, then there is clearly a big problem here. If I'm going to dislike Zak it's going to be for reasons that are true and not reasons that are false. He certainly doesn't sound like a winner, but I'm not going to let you tell me to just take everything said about him at face value just because.

[philippesaner]

So, how many hours?

If you want the truth, you can spend as much time as you want on this or any other topic. But how much of your life are you willing to spend?

This isn't a rhetorical question.

[presiding-over-nothing]

Why are you trying so hard to maneuver me into not looking into this at all? That's not a rhetorical question either.

[frances-kafka]

The Worst People You Have Never Met, or, What I Learned During A Four Year Academic Study of Online Harassment In The Dungeons & Dragons Community

Dr Clio Belle Weisman

From the article: Having just escaped the world of incel culture I was not much interested in the kind of people that write shitty messages on Twitter because a new Star Wars character is black. At first glance that kind of harasser seemed both relatively well-understood by my field and boring. I was more interested in those who, at least on paper, were like the people around me every day and who were what the industry claimed to want to be — creative artists, writers, progressives, feminists, LGBTQ+ folk. I know why right-wingers want to hurt diverse groups of creative people, I do not have a handle on why diverse groups of creative people hurt each other. And I desperately wanted to. This article really needs to get more traction than it is.

[abilitiesconsideredunnatural]

Oh I wondered if you'd heard about the gaming clusterfuck! Note to my followers: Don't be put off by the opinions in this paragraph -- the article gets into the nitty-gritty of other people being horrible, and in one major harasser's case it shows the author switching from Believing The Woman to siding with the accused because of this case's mountain of evidence. It's like the reverse of those people who have all the right opinions on paper then are total scumbags on the personal level -- the performative male feminist etc.

[isaacsapphire]

I hadn't heard about this particular cluster (fuck, of people, B) previously, yet the frame is so familiar as to be almost dull: person with clout and a little integrity others wish to unthrone, cluster B ex, and at last there is a casus belli

[philippesaner]

Like I said elsewhere in the chain...I am familiar with this particular cluster, and this article is absolutely not to be trusted.

[presiding-over-nothing]

Why not, specifically?

[philippesaner]

I'll quote my other reblog:

It says “he has never lost a case”, but take a look at this verdict from a defamation case he “won”. The court evaluated eight fairly horrible accusations of abuse against him, and found that six were true. One of the other two was a subjective opinion. But the remaining accusation was unfair to him, so they awarded damages of…one dollar. In addition, the court found that he lied about a lot. He escaped punishment for that because it’s not actually illegal to lie, and his lies were found to be non-defamatory. Someone writing in good faith would, I think, see fit to mention this. That being said, there is a strong bias against Zak because of his incredibly toxic personality. People often believe false claims against him simply because they’ve interacted with him. Which isn’t very fair.

I've never been entirely sure how much to believe against Zak. His long history of sock-puppeting, brigade-calling, and forum-thread-ruining is not controversial, I've seen him do that stuff with my own two eyes. And so have thousands of others.

But the more serious accusations often boiled down to he-said-she-said. And since he's such an asshole, plenty of people had motive to lie about him. So when people said (for example) that they got harassing emails on accounts that they only ever used to email Mike Mearls about Zak being a terrible human being, I wasn't completely sure I could believe it.

If you have your own doubts about this or that allegation, fair enough. Just know that you can't trust this article.

Also, ask yourself how much time and mental energy you want to spend untangling the Zak Lore. His general toxicity is completely uncontroversial and much of the really bad stuff has been found true in court. Given that, is it really worth the effort required to figure out which of the middleweight accusations was fair?

[presiding-over-nothing]

To be very honest, now I'm a lot more suspicious of your motivations than the article's, since that entire last paragraph is you trying to manipulate me into giving up on figuring out what is true or not because you personally think Zak Smith is a big internet meanie.

Considering all relevant interview clips are archived here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GJAJNbF2Tg&list=PPSV

It's hard for me to "not trust" things that people involved in the situation said about the situation, with their own mouths and words, even if the presentation of one court case (out of evidently 3 total he's won so far and another that's been appealed back and forth) was dubious.

[philippesaner]

Given that he abused his girlfriend, how much time do you want to dedicate to figuring out which online insults were sent by his sockpuppets and which were "naturally occurring"?

Seriously, how much?

Five hours? Twenty? Two hundred?

I've wasted significantly too much time on this drama. I'm trying to warn you against my mistakes.

[presiding-over-nothing]

The only thing that matters to me is the truth. If, as is quite apparent from the article, multiple people have admitted to lying about him and making accusations without any real evidence, then there is clearly a big problem here. If I'm going to dislike Zak it's going to be for reasons that are true and not reasons that are false. He certainly doesn't sound like a winner, but I'm not going to let you tell me to just take everything said about him at face value just because.

[frances-kafka]

The Worst People You Have Never Met, or, What I Learned During A Four Year Academic Study of Online Harassment In The Dungeons & Dragons Community

Dr Clio Belle Weisman

From the article: Having just escaped the world of incel culture I was not much interested in the kind of people that write shitty messages on Twitter because a new Star Wars character is black. At first glance that kind of harasser seemed both relatively well-understood by my field and boring. I was more interested in those who, at least on paper, were like the people around me every day and who were what the industry claimed to want to be — creative artists, writers, progressives, feminists, LGBTQ+ folk. I know why right-wingers want to hurt diverse groups of creative people, I do not have a handle on why diverse groups of creative people hurt each other. And I desperately wanted to. This article really needs to get more traction than it is.

[abilitiesconsideredunnatural]

Oh I wondered if you'd heard about the gaming clusterfuck! Note to my followers: Don't be put off by the opinions in this paragraph -- the article gets into the nitty-gritty of other people being horrible, and in one major harasser's case it shows the author switching from Believing The Woman to siding with the accused because of this case's mountain of evidence. It's like the reverse of those people who have all the right opinions on paper then are total scumbags on the personal level -- the performative male feminist etc.

[isaacsapphire]

I hadn't heard about this particular cluster (fuck, of people, B) previously, yet the frame is so familiar as to be almost dull: person with clout and a little integrity others wish to unthrone, cluster B ex, and at last there is a casus belli

[philippesaner]

Like I said elsewhere in the chain...I am familiar with this particular cluster, and this article is absolutely not to be trusted.

[presiding-over-nothing]

Why not, specifically?

[philippesaner]

I'll quote my other reblog:

It says “he has never lost a case”, but take a look at this verdict from a defamation case he “won”. The court evaluated eight fairly horrible accusations of abuse against him, and found that six were true. One of the other two was a subjective opinion. But the remaining accusation was unfair to him, so they awarded damages of…one dollar. In addition, the court found that he lied about a lot. He escaped punishment for that because it’s not actually illegal to lie, and his lies were found to be non-defamatory. Someone writing in good faith would, I think, see fit to mention this. That being said, there is a strong bias against Zak because of his incredibly toxic personality. People often believe false claims against him simply because they’ve interacted with him. Which isn’t very fair.

I've never been entirely sure how much to believe against Zak. His long history of sock-puppeting, brigade-calling, and forum-thread-ruining is not controversial, I've seen him do that stuff with my own two eyes. And so have thousands of others.

But the more serious accusations often boiled down to he-said-she-said. And since he's such an asshole, plenty of people had motive to lie about him. So when people said (for example) that they got harassing emails on accounts that they only ever used to email Mike Mearls about Zak being a terrible human being, I wasn't completely sure I could believe it.

If you have your own doubts about this or that allegation, fair enough. Just know that you can't trust this article.

Also, ask yourself how much time and mental energy you want to spend untangling the Zak Lore. His general toxicity is completely uncontroversial and much of the really bad stuff has been found true in court. Given that, is it really worth the effort required to figure out which of the middleweight accusations was fair?

[presiding-over-nothing]

To be very honest, now I'm a lot more suspicious of your motivations than the article's, since that entire last paragraph is you trying to manipulate me into giving up on figuring out what is true or not because you personally think Zak Smith is a big internet meanie.

Considering all relevant interview clips are archived here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GJAJNbF2Tg&list=PPSV

It's hard for me to "not trust" things that people involved in the situation said about the situation, with their own mouths and words, even if the presentation of one court case (out of evidently 3 total he's won so far and another that's been appealed back and forth) was dubious.

[frances-kafka]

The Worst People You Have Never Met, or, What I Learned During A Four Year Academic Study of Online Harassment In The Dungeons & Dragons Community

Dr Clio Belle Weisman

From the article: Having just escaped the world of incel culture I was not much interested in the kind of people that write shitty messages on Twitter because a new Star Wars character is black. At first glance that kind of harasser seemed both relatively well-understood by my field and boring. I was more interested in those who, at least on paper, were like the people around me every day and who were what the industry claimed to want to be — creative artists, writers, progressives, feminists, LGBTQ+ folk. I know why right-wingers want to hurt diverse groups of creative people, I do not have a handle on why diverse groups of creative people hurt each other. And I desperately wanted to. This article really needs to get more traction than it is.

[abilitiesconsideredunnatural]

Oh I wondered if you'd heard about the gaming clusterfuck! Note to my followers: Don't be put off by the opinions in this paragraph -- the article gets into the nitty-gritty of other people being horrible, and in one major harasser's case it shows the author switching from Believing The Woman to siding with the accused because of this case's mountain of evidence. It's like the reverse of those people who have all the right opinions on paper then are total scumbags on the personal level -- the performative male feminist etc.

[isaacsapphire]

I hadn't heard about this particular cluster (fuck, of people, B) previously, yet the frame is so familiar as to be almost dull: person with clout and a little integrity others wish to unthrone, cluster B ex, and at last there is a casus belli

[philippesaner]

Like I said elsewhere in the chain...I am familiar with this particular cluster, and this article is absolutely not to be trusted.

[presiding-over-nothing]

Why not, specifically?