Dear Sir,
> > Yang: Corruption in economics happens every where outside the
> theories and concepts itself but corruption in Fengshui happens within
> the theories and concepts itself, not for the same reasons!
You said:That's not true. Also in economics you have different "schools" which
disagree about theory and concepts, and who consider the other schools
as false or corrupted thinking. You can check out the "Austrian school" and "Keynesian economics" for
examples.
You are certainly right there! Maybe we have cutural difference to understand each other, what I mis-understood your meaning of "Corruption", it is not disagreement of any theory and concepts of Fengshui, but rather corrupted fengshui will bring dissasters!
> >Yang: my previous statement says that Yang Gong fengshui is not a
> topic on universities and fengshui is a science are two different
> issues, they do not add up while they do not contradict to each other!
> Maybe you don't know YGFS, that is why!
>
You said: If feng shui (or some schools of it) is a science, then why is it not a
topic on universities?
That are not two different issues, they are directly connected because
universities are there to study all the sciences.
We don't need to know YGFS to understand that.
Fengshui can never be, or I should say not within my times to see, any universities there to teach fengshui as a formal and proper subject, because of simply 3 reasons, and could be more:-
1. To approve Fengshui as a subject which brings endorsement in the field of fengshui in the University requires a atleast an University Deaprtment Head to approve Fengshui as a Subject for its endorsement of qualification, if not for the National Level, who must need to have a good fengshui knowledge to be appointed as the Department Head of Fengshui?
Maybe I can be one of them in YGFS to be appointed but again the next problem arises, no body is qualified enough to assess my skills and knowledge in YGFS.
2. Teaching in the University requires Proper formal Qualifications besides fengshui skills and knowledge, if there is no body in this World to prove my YGFS is wrong, can I regard myself as the Leader of YGFS to teach YGFS in the University since I have proper
formal education and good YGFS's skills and knowledge besides from a Famous Univesity in China? I doubt it very much!
3. is to borrow your words: It is important to understand that being a topic of a course in university is not an endorsement for the validity of the Fengshui. Studying certain fengshui as a seminars in the University like many times I was invited to teach and give seminars, in Fengshui is not an endorsement for the given Fengshui Topics, just like studying prostitution in sociology is not an
endorsement for prostitution.
They are many other reasons that fengshui can not be in the University as a proper and formal education! Basing on the
3 simple reasons, there is no way, Fengshui can be taught as a Subject which bring endorsement for the field of fengshui
in the University which requires examination to be held to qualify the University's fengshui student!
> >>If the fengshui claims can be easily proven by clear mechanism, then
> why isn't it being done?
> >YGFS's claims can be easily proven by its own mechanism, maybe you don't know!
>
> >>And then why isn't fengshui at all the universities
> already?Something doesn't add up here.
> >YGFS is not in the University because the rulers in the governement do not want them to be, they rely on YGFS to gain powers in the Government in order to secure their positions!
>
> It happened in Yuan, Ming and Qing Dynasty back many hundreds years, it is still is today!
You said: The Chinese government has nothing to say over Western universities. If
fengshui can be shown to be a science, then Western universities will accept it. So this is a very poor argument you bring here.
Western Universities worse still. As I see the fengshui standards in the West, there are alot more to learn from Chinese Speaking Countries! Besides, the above-mentioned reasons£º-
1. To approve Fengshui as a subject in the University requires .....
2. Teaching in the University requires Proper formal .........
3. is to borrow your words: It is important to£¬understand .........
The right time has not come yet for any Chinese University to teach Fengshui as a Formal and Proper Education£¬let alone the Western Universities. If Universities were to teach YGFS as a formal and proper education, I will be the 1st one there to challange them just to find out the truth of YGFS there, because wrong endorsement of fengshui in the Universities, will be dissteress to the field of fengshui£¡
Where are the easy proofs that YGFS has produced?
There are many easy proofs that YGFS has produced in my blogs:-
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/articlelist_1725325940_0_1.html
or http://groups.google.com/group/ganzhou-yu-che-tang-malaysia-yang-gong-fengshui/topics?start=
> >Yang: maybe you do not really know YGFS, in terms of sampling, no
> matter how many YGFS masters you engage to audit a fengshui site, they
> will give you the same answers. If this reason, I will not regard that
> as opinion or belief rather it is a fengshui result, YGFS Masters use
> the same YGFS mechanism to give the same result. Thus, it is not an
> opinion or a belief!
You told: As said, I never heard about Yang Kong.
But that doesn't matter.
It is not unusual for a method to always give the same result, no matter who is the master. That simply means it is a mechanical system with no room for different interpretations.
But everybody getting the same result doesn't mean the system also works in practice. They may all get the same irrelevant results.
If YGFS produces the same irrelevant results. It will not last until now from Yang Gong's time since Tang Dyanasty sometime back 1200 years!
You said: "But now something else is contradicting itself in your sayings.
You are telling us that no matter how many YGFS practitioners I engage,
they will always give the same result and there is no opinion or belief
coming in.
But in your other message you are talking about outdoing the other YGFS
masters in your group.
How can there be any "outdoing" if every master always gets the same
results in YGFS?
If all students in a class find that 2+3=5 , then nobody is outdoing
anybody, isn't it?
I ready answered your question in my previous posting!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TradFengShui/message/8025
> >>D: Maybe you don't know, but there are plenty of examples of cures and
> medicines that have been on the market but were later proven to be
> ineffective or even dangerous and have been taken off the market.
> Just google for "medicines taken off market" and you will find many
> interesting stories.
> Medicine is frequently over claimed.
> Here is a partial list:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_withdrawn_drugs
>
> >Yang: that does not change the fact that we survive because of
> Medicine, same thing applies to YGFS.
>
Yes, but that was not the point, right?
Just because some people have been helped by medicine does not imply
that (some) medicine is not overrated.
Just because some people claim to have results from feng shui, doesn't mean that we should not wonder whether feng shui is over claimed.
Yes, you are certainly right there, on the other hand, YGFS unless proven to be over-claimed, until it is so proven, how do you know YGFS has not been over-claimed since you have not up to such
level of understanding and practising YGFS!
Best wishes,
Prof. Dr. Yang
stormborns
areudirty
dailybridgerton
romaincrisis
yousharknotpass
pixelskylines