a href= http://www.balticmill.com target= _blank BALTIC Centre for Contemporary Art /a presents a site-specific collaborative commission by artist
tumblr dot com
ojovivo
art blog(derogatory)
almost home
taylor price
trying on a metaphor
One Nice Bug Per Day

Product Placement

No title available
No title available

Kiana Khansmith
Jules of Nature

â
Claire Keane
Cosimo Galluzzi

oozey mess

No title available

Kaledo Art
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸
Cosmic Funnies

seen from Malaysia

seen from Sweden
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Canada

seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Finland

seen from Ireland
seen from Netherlands

seen from China
seen from South Africa
seen from United Kingdom
seen from T1

seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany
@professionalpracticecharwal-blog
a href= http://www.balticmill.com target= _blank BALTIC Centre for Contemporary Art /a presents a site-specific collaborative commission by artist
Sara Barker and Ryder Architecture
The Subtle Knife 2013
 In these images, (as I was not allow to take photographs of my own) you can clearly see what I have been discussing in the previous post; the reflection of the structure in the glass within the piece, therefore creating and acknowledging a virtual space in which a new structure is contained within. This has been a great inspiration and turning point within my practice which has been hugely influenced by this architectural structure, as it allowed me to investigate other elements of virtual space.
Sara Barker and Ryder Architecture
A subtle Knife 2013
 This piece is a site specific installation/sculpture, created in response to the space of the Baltic gallery. This piece of work has been one of the greatest inspirational pieces of my artist practice so far this year. The sculpture truly represented the multi-faceted structure that exists within sculpture, which is an element in my practice that I have been focusing on recently. The huge inspiration in this piece was in fact the way the glass had been used alongside the more traditional elements in the piece such as the copper etc. The glass's reflection of the piece encouraged the illusion that the sculpture actually moved past the space of the glass and around to the other side, and this reflection created a whole new element to the structure. However as the viewer, when I moved around to the other side of the glass this part of the structure was no longer there.
I have taken this great element of surprise and illusional aspect and applied it to my own practice in the area of virtual space recognition. The sculpture and structures reflected in the glass do exist, however they exist within the virtual space of the glass itself therefore the appeared and illusion structure has no physicality to touch and interact with, only through the sight and the movement of the viewer.
I have therefore used this element and idea alongside the curation of the neon piece in my degree show. Through building a Perspex shelf specific to the size of my neon sculpture, is specific positions the viewer can see the reflection of the neon on the Perspex however the illusion is create that it exists, yet it only exists within the virtual space and it could also be argued that it could not exist without the presence of the viewer as their movement and physical interaction brings out this element of the sculpture.
Lorna Simpson
Baltic Exhibition
 The curation of the images through the exhibition were also interesting, particularly the bottom image. When viewing the photographs I was led to wonder what story they are trying to tell, and there was a great sense of personal memories embedded within the photographs. Looking at the overall curation of this set of photographs, I started to think of many alternative reasonings behind the presentation. The idea I feel which would be most likely (although I am still not sure) is that the presentation and the structure of the curation of the photographs is created through the representation of the sound waves from the film around the corner from the piece. Once again if this is true, this is only a very slight element to the exhibition and the majority of the viewers would not have noticed this aspect of the curation. I find work that is sneaky and doesn't not try to give everything away about a piece of work is very strong and interesting for the viewer as it provides the viewer with room to create their own personal understanding of the work, as I did when I moved around the exhibition. The display of images is something I have not thought about previously to the piece of work, however it is something I will now consider when planning for my degree show and the arrangement of the work I am showing.
Lorna Simpson, Cloud 2005
This piece was also exhibited in the exhibition and I liked the overall curation and the selection of works which were shown as there was a great variety and they worked well together. This piece in particular I felt I was very attracted to, as there is a great aura given out in the image and as I am currently working with sculptural elements in my artist practice, I began to relate the piece to aspects within space and negative space.
When viewing the image, I began to see the connection between both the cloud and the shadowing on the floor, and the space in between. However looking closer and thinking about the piece logically, naturally there would not be a beam of light casted down from a cloud, creating a 'light' shadow. It is this illusion which is quite interesting as it is discrete and unnoticeable, yet the viewer still feels drawn in my something... It is the element of wonder that I feel has a strong influence on the viewer when viewing artwork.
Lorna Simpson, Chess 2013
This piece was also utilising the medium of projection, however the projections were not shown in response to the position of the viewer for example, eye level. Instead they were projected onto the wall above the viewer so I was forced to look up to the piece. There was a system through which the projections took place and the actual films themselves were quite unusual.
When watching the piece, I began to realise that the films portrayed games of chess, in which the players were all the same person and one time. This drew me in and forced me to question how this was possible, and I began to think about the use of mirrors etc. in the piece to reflect the person in the films. However I was never truly sure of how the piece was made.
This was a very interest aspect to the piece, almost illusional, as I could not understand fully how the piece was constructed. There also is not a huge clue to the overall concept of the work, but I did feel that the work was once again intended to be seen by a viewer and it is this interaction between artwork and viewer which truly brought the work alive.
http://www.nowness.com/day/2011/5/15/1457
21 March 2014 - 22 June 2014
 Lorna Simpson
 This first European retrospective presents more than 30 years of Lorna Simpson's work across the mediums of photography, film, video, and drawing. Born in Brooklyn, New York, Simpson became well-known in the mid-1980s for her conceptually rigorous and language driven large-scale works combining photographs and text.Â
Although the texts add significance to the images, the connection between both is open and the narrative allusive and coded, rather than direct or documentary, her critical strategy nevertheless leaves room for the spectator's imagination. In these photographs, Simpson employs the figure of the African-American woman to challenge conventional views of gender, identity, culture, history, and memory, and examines the ways in which these shape interactions, relationships and experiences.Â
In the mid-1990s, she began creating large multi-panel photographs printed on felt, mostly accompanied by text panels indicating different locations and intimate encounters. In the last fifteen years, she has turned to film and video works in which individuals engage in enigmatic conversations that seem to address the mysteries of both identity and desire. The exhibition also gathers a large group of watercolors Simpson has created since 2005. In her most recent works she involves an archive of photographs from the 1950s, which she has been adding to by creating her own replicas of these images, posing herself to mimic the originals.
The film Momentum (see images above) is an unusual piece and the first response I felt I gave it as a viewer is looking at the way they are dressed and the matching golden costume. Due to the huge scale of the screens, the gold shines through the whole space, acting as a great positive light and it provided the space with a great sense of life. It did not feel like the traditional white cube gallery space.
After a while, I began to notice how the two screens were playing the same film however one side was a few seconds slower than the other. I felt as the viewer, I was unable to watch the actual film itself in full as I kept uncontrollably shifting my sight between the two films, watching each section repeat itself on the alternative screen.
One fascinating element to me was that due to the fact that the piece was a projection from behind the screen, when the viewers move past the back of the piece their viewer interrupts the flow from the projector therefore their shadow becomes part of the piece. As their shadow is imprinted onto the screen which is holding the projection, it could be argued that the screen itself is acting as the plinth in a traditional gallery space, and that the viewer has therefore become piece of the artwork themselves. I thoroughly enjoy artwork which incorporates the presence of the viewer as I do believe that this is the purpose of creating artwork. The overall exhibition, particularly this piece Momentum, has been a great inspiration to my artist practice, particularly in the aspect of thinking about allowing the viewer's presence to be acknowledged and also the use of projection in a space.
When I viewed this exhibition at Newcastle's AV Festival I felt it was extremely unique and an interesting experience for the viewer. As I was a viewer moving throughout the space of the gallery exhibition, it definitely seemed that the purpose of the work incorporated the viewing of the spectator as I could felt my presence within the space was intended. This is an element of the spectator's experience that can often be missing when viewing a sculptural piece that shows little interaction from the piece itself. The overall curation of this exhibition indeed incorporated the viewer and the work was told in a story-like structure, as each piece led onto the next.
This film is once again of the first attempt of the virtual sculpture however due to a technical glitch, the film did not render the expected image and the majority of the red exterior was lost from the film. However, I felt this incorporated the structural and geometric element to my practice as you can now see the internal structure and the mesh of lines and formations which have been built in order to create the piece. This once again signifies the importance of the structural build and the process of production, as this parts are no longer hidden.
This piece in particular inspired a print making work shop during which I produced many etchings and screen prints. The lines and formations within the piece inspired the structures I was working with throughout the workshops, therefore the pieces produced as the outcome could then be considered as reconstructions of the virtual sculpture.
Here is the first attempt of the virtual sculpture. Due to the virtual space of which it inhabits, the sculpture has the ability to move and present itself in alternative perceivable formations, rather then being held in one position. This system allows the sculpture's multi-faceted structure to be seen and recognised as every position is different, and there are multiple alternative perceptions the viewer may take away from the piece.
This piece of work truly explores the idea of a traditional expectation of sculpture, as the traditional sculpture would be presented to the viewer in a still formation and in one perminant position. The movement of the camera around the sculpture acts as the eye of the viewer, and it exploits the traditional element within the interaction between both viewer and artwork as the viewer is no longer required to move around the sculpture and interact with it, as the sculpture now interacts with the viewer.
There are many aspects that have also been taken away from the sculpture, ones of which it would have acquired had the sculpture been a traditiona solid piece placed on a plinth. The sculpture within the virtual space no longer has a solidity and a physical presence, and the viewer can no longer physical interact with the piece, for example, it can not be physically touched and manipulated by the viewer's engagement. This issue is currently and element within my practice which is being focused on, as I have began to reflect on this area through questioning my practice: how can the viewer engage with the virtual sculpture?
My answer, I have discovered, would be to project the virtual sculpture onto a physical sculpture that exists in the viewer's space. This would allow the physical sculpture to act as the plinth by holding the piece, and it would also provide the virtual with a solidity, one of which the viewer will be able to physically interact with. Through this system many more questionable theories have arisen such as what is the true role of the plinth in contemporary art? Can it be signified as a piece of artwork in it's own right?
The position I a currently in as an artist is that of a curator as I am now coming to the end of curating my space for the degree show. I have taken all of this into consideration when planning the presentation of the work in the space and I am particularly considering the role of the viewer in the space.
The viewer has always been a significant factor of my work, as I believe (alongside Duchamp, Mary Jane Jacob and many theorists) that art work is to be experienced and it is created and completed by the viewer. I wish for the viewer's presence to be a significant element in my work and I am currently planning the projection to cut through the viewer's path in order to enable them to physically alter the piece through their presence and their shadow.
Manfred Mohr Cubic Limit, 1973-74 digital transfer of 16mm film 4 minutes, silent edition of 6
During Manfred Mohrâs legendary 1971 exhibit at the Museum of Modern Art in Paris, he met the CEO of C.G.M (La Companie Generale de Micromatique), a data storage and preservation company, which specialized in microfilm. Mohr was invited to experiment on their brand new machine DATAGRAPHIX 4460 to make computer animations. He gladly accepted and during the next 4 years made several short computer films.
According to Mohr, âIt was a very painful experience since the process was very slow and the turnover dragged out over many months.â For the film, each frame was drawn in high resolution with a light beam directly from the computer onto 16mm film to create the animations.
Video:Â http://vimeopro.com/bitforms/mohr/video/67598990
These structures relate to the current stage of my artist practice, in which I explore the elements of virtual space. These geometric structure are interactive and move throughout the space, rather than a simple still drawing.
Exhibitions can try to replace 'presence' but at the same time they separate the spectators from life by offering organised knowledge in place of the totality of real experience.
Altshuler, B. (2009) âA Manual: [For the 21st Century Art Institution]â, Walther Konig, p.56
The purpose of exhibitions is to be experienced.
All exhibitions are temporary acts. An exhibition is a transient state of things brought together in the equally transient presence of spectator, rather than a permanent collection of artfully arranged objects.
Altshuler, B. (2009) âA Manual: [For the 21st Century Art Institution]â, Walther Konig, p.56
A neutral space everywhere pretending to be placeless.
Altshuler, B. (2009) âA Manual: [For the 21st Century Art Institution]â, Walther Konig, p.27
A very simple, yet thought provoking quote in relation to the space within a gallery.
Brushed off, pampered, re-painted, it resumes its blankness. Its still potent powers, like those of the blank canvas, should not be underestimated.
Altshuler, B. (2009) âA Manual: [For the 21st Century Art Institution]â, Walther Konig, p.27
The quote I feel truly represents the current stage of the degree show preparation, as I have now painted the whole of the space which will be holding my work and I have now cleaned and scrubbed the floor. Although this is not within a conventional gallery space, this act of reversing and taking the space back to a blank canvas is very familiar with the art world, as all traces and events which have taken place within this space is taken away and hidden. All elements of distraction and manipulation are destroyed.
Space is shapeless so we continually box it, delivering quotas of voids. Box is easier to understand than space, so we ask it questions we used to ask of space. [...] Every installation is engaged in reciprocal definition with its box, asking the (sometimes bewildered) question 'Where am I?', the answer being of course, you're boxed.
Altshuler, B. (2009) "A Manual: [For the 21st Century Art Institution]", Walther Konig, p.26
In relation to O'Doherty's White Cube theory, the theorist himself expresses the theory of the space within a gallery space and how as both artists and viewers, we approach and work with the embedded space. When in the space of a gallery, we can often feel cut off from the world and transported into a new enclosed space. There is great power within this space, and art exhibited within it either utilises and works with this power or attempts to reverse, manipulate and avoid the power it holds over artwork.