Should prosopagnosics be excluded from go-no-go studies that use facial expressions? Should they be excluded from IAT studies that use faces? Are our data valid? These are some thoughts.
Sometimes posts like these confuse me, but they get me researching. So, for the facial expressions one, I think no for congenital and yes for acquired (I hadn’t realized there was a difference with this part, but there really really is, which I guess is why I didn’t see why prosopagnosia should disqualify anyone from that).
For the second, I’ll admit I don’t know a lot about those studies, but it looks like someone did a study of 1 with acquired prosopagnosia, take the results for what you will, and certainly I’d want to see a bigger study and have it broken down to CP vs AP vs control
Sometimes I just worry that we have experimental measures that rely too heavily on facial processing, but we don’t take into account that 2.5% of the population is essentially face blind. I’ve wondered how we may see null results in some studies because of this, or some people may skew results into rejecting the null when there was an extraneous variable causing individual differences. But it’s something I’ve thought of more and more as I further learn about cognition research that is 100% facial processing and never has any type of pre-screening for prosopagnosia.













