No title available
No title available
taylor price
DEAR READER
tannertan36
Kiana Khansmith
dirt enthusiast
pixel skylines
NASA
PR's Tumblrdome
almost home
Keni
Aqua Utopia｜海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Origami Around
AnasAbdin
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
wallacepolsom
Janaina Medeiros
No title available
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Netherlands
seen from Japan
seen from Indonesia
seen from India
seen from India
seen from Türkiye
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Finland
seen from United States
@punctuationmarx
Tumblr being the "piss on the poor" reading comprehension site makes sense when you realize that 79% of adults in the US are functionally illiterate. Same goes for Twitter and TikTok.
that's a real high number, sport. where'd you get it?
hey anon
please tell me you didn't google "US literacy rates" and then make the funniest possible mistake one could make in that situation
New Talamasca update!
And for the agents
no longer praying on your downfall, i will be directly involved 😌 interview with the vampire tweet round up
46/xxx
Thinking about Lestat’s “of course. of course. of course!”
IWTV IS OFFICIALLY EMMY NOMINATED SHOW 🎉🎊
still need to find a way to make those acting category voters to watch IWTV though
i could not make this up
Jeanloup Sieff - Dress by Yves Saint Laurent Rive Gauche (Vogue Paris 1970)
okay so I finished Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl (1861) by Harriet Jacobs, and here are my takeaways, because it was AMAZING and I can't believe all US students aren't required to read it in school:
shows how slavery actually worked in nuanced ways i'd never thought much about
example: Jacobs's grandmother would work making goods like crackers and preserves after she was done with her work day (so imagine boiling jars at like 3 a.m.) so that she could sell them in the local market
through this her grandmother actually earned enough money, over many years, to buy herself and earn her freedom
BUT her "mistress" needed to borrow money from her. :)))) Yeah. Seriously. And never paid her back, and there was obviously no legal recourse for your "owner" stealing your life's savings, so all those years of laboring to buy her freedom were just ****ing wasted. like.
But also! Her grandmother met a lot of white women by selling them her homemade goods, and she cultivated so much good will in the community that she was able to essentially peer pressure the family that "owned" her into freeing her when she was elderly (because otherwise her so-called owners' white neighbors would have judged them for being total assholes, which they were)
She was free and lived in her own home, but she had to watch her children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren all continue to be enslaved. She tried to buy her family but their "owners" wouldn't allow it.
Enslaved people celebrated Christmas. they feasted, and men went around caroling as a way to ask white people in the community for money.
But Christmas made enslaved people incredibly anxious because New Years was a common time for them to be sold, so mothers giving their children homemade dolls on Christmas might, in just a few days' time, be separated from their children forever
over and over again, families were deliberately ripped apart in just the one community that Harriet Jacobs lived in. so many parents kept from their children. just insane to think of that happening everywhere across the slave states for almost 200 years
Harriet Jacobs was kept from marrying a free Black man she loved because her "owner" wouldn't let her
Jacobs also shows numerous ways slavery made white people powerless
for example: a white politician had some kind of relationship with her outside of marriage, obviously very questionably consensual (she didn't hate him but couldn't have safely said no), and she had 2 children by him--but he wasn't her "master," so her "master" was allowed to legally "own" his children, even though he was an influential and wealthy man and tried for years to buy his children's freedom
she also gives examples of white men raping Black women and, when the Black women gave birth to children who resembled their "masters," the wives of those "masters" would be devastated--like, their husbands were (from their POV) cheating on them, committing violent sexual acts in their own house, and the wives couldn't do anything about it (except take out their anger on the enslaved women who were already rape victims)
just to emphasize: rape was LEGALLY INCENTIVIZED BY US LAW LESS THAN 200 YEARS AGO. It was a legal decision that made children slaves like their mothers were, meaning that a slaveowner who was a serial rapist would "own" more "property" and be better off financially than a man who would not commit rape.
also so many examples of white people promising to free the enslaved but then dying too soon, or marrying a spouse who wouldn't allow it, or going bankrupt and deciding to sell the enslaved person as a last resort instead
A lot of white people who seemed to feel that they would make morally better decisions if not for the fact that they were suffering financially and needed the enslaved to give them some kind of net worth; reminds me of people who buy Shein and other slave-made products because they just "can"t" afford fairly traded stuff
but also there were white people who helped Harriet Jacobs, including a ship captain whose brother was a slavetrader, but he himself felt slavery was wrong, so he agreed to sail Harriet to a free state; later, her white employer did everything she could to help Harriet when Harriet was being hunted by her "owner"
^so clearly the excuse that "people were just racist back then" doesn't hold any water; there were plenty of folks who found it just as insane and wrongminded as we do now
Harriet Jacobs making it to the "free" north and being surprised that she wasn't legally entitled to sit first-class on the train. Again: segregation wasn't this natural thing that seemed normal to people in the 1800s. it was weird and fucked up and it felt weird and fucked up!
Also how valued literacy skills were for the enslaved! Just one example: Harriet Jacobs at one point needed to trick the "slaveowner" who was hunting her into thinking she was in New York, and she used an NYC newspaper to research the names of streets and avenues so that she could send him a letter from a fake New York address
I don't wanna give away the book, because even though it's an autobiography, it has a strangely thrilling plot. But these were some of the points that made a big impression on me.
Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl also inspired the first novel written by a Black American woman, Frances Harper, who penned Iola Leroy. And Iola Leroy, in turn, helped inspire books by writers like Nella Larsen and Zora Neale Hurston. Harriet Jacob is also credited in Colson Whitehead's acknowledgments page for informing the plot of The Underground Railroad. so this book is a pivotal work in the US literary canon and, again, it's weird that we don't all read it as a matter of course.
(also P.S. it's free on project gutenberg and i personally read it [also free] on the app Serial Reader)
update!!!!
So Harriet Jacobs's brother was named John Swanson Jacobs, and in her memoir she's like "btw my brother ran away too." But we don't learn a lot about him.
Well, guess what? John Swanson Jacobs wrote a memoir, too. And it was rediscovered. Recently. It was published in full for the first time since 1850 last year, in 2024.
Harriet and John Jacobs both ran away, but they lived very different lives. Harriet Jacobs took a more "typical" path for a Black abolitionist of her era: She asked a white abolitionist to take the credit for her book, since otherwise it wasn't going to get published/read (it was only proven in the 21st century that Harriet herself wrote it).
But John Swanson Jacobs?
He gave all of America the middle finger, became a sailor, traveled the world (the Caribbean, England, Russia, Ukraine, Thailand, India, all over), then ended up in Australia and got his memoir published in a newspaper in Sydney, where he didn't need white people's "permission" to publish it, didn't have to accept the indignity of having a white editor, and didn't need to pretend that he wasn't really the author of his own book.
He called it The United States Governed by Six Hundred Thousand Despots, referring to the 600,000 slaveowners living in the US.
Like, whoa.
The historian who discovered his memoir,,and wrote a biography on him, describes him as a man with "apocalyptic intelligence."
It is so cool that this book exists. And it kinda sucks because I just know if it'd come out in 2020 people would have been all over it, but I haven't seen it in any bookstores. I got my library to stock it; maybe you can request it at your library, too.
The new edition is annotated by Jonathan D. S. Schroeder, the historian who found Jacobs's memoir in an 1850 Australian newspaper. He recommends--and I do too--reading Harriet and John Swanson Jacobs's memoirs back-to-back, and the annotations in Six Hundred Thousand Despots highlight parts where the siblings' books corroborate or differ from each other's accounts, something I'm personally enjoying a lot.
Lost on the other side of the world since 1855, the story of John Swanson Jacobs finally returns to America. This comprehensive edition incl
So yeah. Our only extant fugitive slave narrative written by a world-traveling sailor who told all of America to fuck off and went to live his life. Very very cool book. 10/10 recommend.
Xユーザーの日々 (沖縄)さん：「ガザミ 那覇市鏡原 #crab」
What I would do to smoke a joint and draw at this table
It’s in Okinawa, for those looking to make a giant crab pilgrimage
people sometimes lament the “decline” of satire but in the 18th century people were just churning out reams of political cartoons featuring a tiny little man next to a giant brutish woman and the tiny man is saying Lady Mary O Do Not Crush Me To Death and the giant woman is saying I Am Going To My Women’s Group To Discuss Politicks. I Have Six Lovers And One Is A Papist.
and the caption is something like If The Poor Should Be Suffered To Vote.
From capitalstitchco on Threads
As a recently sober (just over a year) person, the most frequent response I get is immediate arguing and disrespect.
Statements like demanding to know what's in the cup I'm drinking, wanting to smell breath to be sure I'm not lieing, they couldn't live without alcohol, it IS their crutch and they don't care, I'm stupid for being sober, omg whyyyyyyyyyy, arguing with me to just drink "it's not that big a deal", constant offers to get me alcohol (not just a "taste"), eyerolling and huffiness, saying i only went sober in solidarity with my ex so it's not really being sober (instead of seeing it as we went sober*together*), bartenders extremely rude about me ordering a NA something or just fuckin soda. Telling me the goal should be having one drink a night instead of zero drinks. One person even told me "you shouldn't admit you've had problems like that, it makes you seem unstable."
The kindest responses: ONE bartender didn't charge me for a tiny cup of redbull and sprite and ONE coworker asked "really? You're not joking?" then "oh I never would have guessed, okay."
I bought myself a token thing bc I didn't do AA but liked the chip idea and even though it's on display in my apt I don't show it to anyone. If they ask I'll be honest, but at this point, I'm very quiet about my sobriety bc I don't want the grief.
The Outbursts Of Everett True (June26th1919)
Art by AD Condo
— Nizar Qabbani, ‘What Love Can Do’, from Arabian Love Poems: Full Arabic and English Texts (via lunamonchtuna)
Abandonware should be public domain
Yeah okay, I'll reblog that!
I didn't see if anyone here has talked about this point yet or not, but I just rewatched the season 3 teaser and something clicked in my head.
Daniel said to Lestat:
“Thanks for the ticketS last night, great show”.
So he had already attended his concert and was not alone. I understand that they made some changes, so Lestat and his band will give more than one concert before he gets abducted by Akasha, and Danny will probably attend more than one concert in the show, but anyway, it seems to me that during that interview Daniel and Armand had already made up and were at the concert together.
And that marker writing on the assistant's hand, or whoever it was,
“Armand told the truth”.
If Danny and Armand have made up, then most likely this writing is a provocation initiated by Armand himself. There is a possibility that he even wrote it himself, because the handwriting is very elegant and vintage, so to speak.
Idk but it actually sounds very logical...🤔
⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘
+ I rewatched it and omg how I love the always sassy Daniel! Like when Lestat's lawyer said they only had 45 minutes and he was like:
“Who the fuck are you?🙄💅🏻”
And how many times he used different derivatives of the word “fuck” in that short teaser.
And also, when he jokingly asked if they have insurance for homicide, you know baby, that’s ironic, because you should have had it yourself when you were human, with your lack of self-preservation instinct...🤣
