Game of Thrones Daily

roma★
Color Me Curious

ellievsbear
RMH

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
macklin celebrini has autism
ojovivo
The Stonewall Inn
NASA
One Nice Bug Per Day
Doug Jones

gracie abrams
YOU ARE THE REASON
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr
Today's Document
Misplaced Lens Cap
tumblr dot com
official daine visual archive

seen from Türkiye
seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from Guatemala
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Brazil
seen from Türkiye
seen from Mexico

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Chile
seen from Ukraine

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
@purpleradfeminista
I saw these social experiment videos where they took 10 little girls and 10 little boys and put them in separate houses for a week without adult supervision/rules.
The little girls painted, played dress up, cooked dinner and sat around the table together to eat. They made a cleaning list of who did what chores. They picked up after themselves when they made a mess. When one of them hurt another girls feelings they comforted her and had a conversation about it. They laughed, they baked cakes, they made a catwalk and fashion show. Some of the girls made a beauty salon. They choreographed dances and told scary stories. They formed bonds and showed their capacity for forgiveness and humanity.
The little boys immediately trashed the house. They drew on the walls with whatever they could find. They broke all the furniture and didn’t cook a single meal even though the kids were required to take a cooking course before the experiment. Instead they lived on dry cereal and soda. The boys eventually spit into two gangs, one was rowdier than the other. They teamed up against the “weaker weird” boy and made him feel unwanted. When they got bored they decided to quote “trash the rest of the place.” They acted like savages, cavemen. No social skills, no creativity, no empathy for one another. They didn’t have any activities that didn’t involve destruction, violence, or vandalism. They showed no humanity.
This frightened me. Is it learned behavior? Is it in males DNA? I don’t know. But it definitely confirmed my belief that schools should be separated by sex so that girls have the opportunity to flourish more. We are so much more creative, kind, and human.
The state of the house... a dump. Of course they tried to hurt animals too. Boys being Boys being Sociopaths.
I posted this a while ago:
The notes of this post quickly became filled by men harassing me saying I was an insane cunt and overreacting.
But I also got a lot of women sharing their experiences with boys, identical to mine. Obsession with destruction, inflicting pain, cruelty, animal abuse, violence, aggression and filth. Not to mention sadism, sexism and perversion.
Some people told me I was wrong to use the word "evil" about (male) kids. But look at the language people use in the comment section of the experiment:
Truth is, it's not "deviant" behaviour if it's the norm. In my personal and professional experience there is nothing unusual to see here. Boys commonly behave this way and are indeed encouraged by laughing parents who don't want their son to be a "sissy" who cares about stupid female things like respect, hygiene, solidarity, imagination, nurturing etc. Talk to parents, they'll complain a little bit, but most of them prefer having a violent and destructive son than an "effeminate" gentle and mindful one any day.
off 2 sleep
I found that Tampax tweet, it wasn't a stupid response to someone else, it was on its own, posted as (what someone thought was) a clever bit of marketing.
We should not put up with this shit.
brother: sometimes it seems like the end result of feminism will be that nobody (read: straight women) even fucks anymore. and that will be how we go extinct
dad: hahaha
men are so incapable of even imagining changing their own behavior that in the hypothetical scenario where all straight women decide to be celibate as a result of observing male’s terrible behavior, the blame is placed on feminism and not the male behavior that spawned the movement in the first place. men are very smart
personally I think that if one half of a species evolves to be so vicious and antisocial that the other half refuses to reproduce with them, it makes perfect sense for it to go extinct
today in famous male scientists that had their wives do half the work and receive none of the credit, french chemist, bacteriologist, and microbiologist louis pasteur, who invented the rabies and anthrax vaccine, pasteurisation, and other significant scientific achievements. his wife, marie pasteur was his 'assistant'. not only did she obviously do all the housework, raising their 5 kids, three of whom died before adulthood. but she was also an active participant in his experiments, wrote down everything he said and did, recorded his experimentd, and defacto created his publications, cared for his human test subjects (when it came to rabies, parents were basically throwing their bitten, not yet symptomatic, children at the couple to vaccinate), and helped collect and produce the resources needed for his experiments. she was an educated woman and chemist in her own right.
he said very little of her, certainly little praise, but louis pasteur's students and his colleagues all praised marie on her work and contributions with louis, and for so many traditionist men of science to informally credit marie in her efforts, she must have had a major impact on louis' endeavors. pierre curie is marie curie's collaborator, marie pasteur is louis' assistant and wife, as are so many other wives that contributed immensely to the research and work of their husbands. in fact, little can be found about marie pasteur, at least in english, beyond mention of the basic information above, from the biographical dictionary of women in science by marilyn ogilvie and joy harvey.
y’all are walking around with your pussy bald????
the hair that naturally grows from my crotch is not “nasty” or a “jungle.” it is natural and meant to be there. shaving or waxing is not cleaner—it will leave you prone to infections and skin issues because your pussy is not MEANT to be bare, it’s meant to be protected by hair.
Ok so Google says the purpose of pubic hair is to reduce friction during sex, that is the first thing that comes up, i didn’t look any further Into it, so as an ace cis female I keep my pussy bald bc it’s less itchy and, to me personally, nicer to look at/just nicer to have. I also prefer pussies to be bald when I watch porn, but again that’s just me. I will admit that a nicely trimmed bush is also v sexy
sex is not the only reason women should be protecting their pussy. it prevents the spread of bacteria and pathogens too, which is more important to me than anyone’s sexual or aesthetic pleasure.
secondly, porn is a disgusting industry that capitalized on rape, racism, and pedophilia. i’m not sure why as an ace person you’re watching pornography because it seems like it would go against the entire basis of ace—if it’s not about sexual desire, why are you watching sexual material that’s based almost entirely in the subjugation of women? porn is not where i would want to form informed taste and preferences considering its a festering wound of women’s pain and suffering, parades us around as inhuman dolls to shave and wax and tan and put under the knife and force into uncomfortable positions, shove things wherever they want to.
Watching porn will quickly have any straight woman IDing as “ace” because of course none of us want to be treated like that by men
Watching porn will also have women self-objectifying to the extent of policing the appearance of their own pussy when nobody fucking else ever even sees it 😭
it’s “just nicer” wow amazing coincidence how almost all women started finding it “just nicer” when porn became mainstream. Almost like porn makes us hate our bodies @hotdiggitydammit
CONFIRMED 🎉👩🏾⚖️
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson will become the 116th Associate Justice of the US Supreme Court and the FIRST Black woman to sit in the highest court.
image source
SewBeautifulx on Etsy
Today in Black Excellence: Maya Angelou—a literature titan whose 1969 memoir was the first nonfiction bestseller by an African American woman.
“There is no greater agony than bearing an untold story inside you.” —Maya Angelou, I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings.
What was the early life of Maya Angelou?
She became a celebrated writer and Black icon, but it came from a childhood of tragedy. Born on April 4, 1928, in St. Louis, Missouri, Angelou was quickly exposed to racism as a child. Her parents split when she was young, and while visiting her mother, aged eight, she was raped by her mother’s boyfriend: her uncles killed the boyfriend in revenge. These horrors left Angelou mute for five years, as she discussed in an interview with Oprah, a close friend. At age 16, she gave birth and was forced to work grueling jobs to support her son—including fry cook, sex worker, and nightclub performer.
She recounted her traumas to close friend James Baldwin—fellow writer and Black icon. He challenged Angelou to write about her experiences, and she published the wildly successful memoir I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings. It catapulted Angelou to international stardom and was nominated for a National Book Award in 1970. It remained on The New York Times’ paperback nonfiction bestseller list for two years—the longest record in history.
What made her such a Black icon?
Angelou was a close friend of Martin Luther King Jr., who was assassinated on her birthday in 1968. Angelou stopped celebrating her birthday for years afterward. In 1964, Angelou helped another activist friend Malcolm X in founding the Organization of Afro-American Unity.
Spanning over 50 years, she published seven autobiographies, three books of essays, books of poetry, and plays. Her 1971 poetry collection, Just Give Me a Cool Drink of Water ’Fore I Die, was nominated for the Pulitzer Prize. Because of her tireless work in literature and political activism, Angelou became widely respected as a spokesperson for the Black experience, particularly of women. You can even find her legacy in your pocket—she recently became the first black woman to appear on a US quarter.
Original portrait by Tumblr Creatr @inuqo
"I was filled with such deep gratitude while working on this illustration of Maya Angelou. Her talent, creativity, strength, power and resilience is inspiring to us all and I wanted to display how beautiful her Universe was. How important her words and life's journey was because it showed us that no matter how hard we fall, still we can rise".”
—@inuqo
I love this so much.
for women, strength is how much pain you can endure
for men, strength is how much pain you can inflict
Stop speaking for men, especially if you are not and have never been a man.
Men throughout history have worked exhausting hours and worked horribly dangerous jobs to provide for their families.
Men work so hard in pursuit to help their families that they often lose the chance to actually be there to watch their kids grow up and bond with their loved ones. So often that it has become a trope.
Men are the overwhelming majority of combat injury and death throughout history, protecting their land and loved ones from invaders.
Men are the overwhelming majority of first responders and law enforcement who put their lives on the line to protect people like you.
And enduring all of this for the sake of others is fully recognized as strength to all accept sexist radfems who want any excuse to spread hatred and generalizations about men. From sexist radfems who will do anything to make women as a group appear to be superior by default instead of equal, like they claim.
Claim #1: men work harder than women.
Status: FALSE
Men have worked, historically, a fraction of the time women work, with more recognition and more reward than women.
Prehistoric women had stronger arms than modern athletes (1).
“Throughout the Industrial Revolution, gender was a major influence on worker salary. Women tended to receive between one third to on half of a man’s average salary. As the manufacturing industries began to grow, they would take advantage of these low average salaries amongst women and children. The ability to employ these women and children for little pay proved to be very beneficiary to these companies. Many industries exploited these people’s need for money, as they would turn a major profit in exchange for very cheap labor. Tasks such as printing, spinning, and other duties commonly learned at home were easy jobs to learn and were some of the most profitable. (2)“
In the United States: The Equal Pay Act was an effort to correct a centuries-old problem of gender-based wage discrimination.Women made up a quarter of the American workforce by the early 20th century, but they were traditionally paid far less than men, even in cases where they performed the same job. In some states, female workers were also forced to contend with laws that restricted their working hours or prohibited them from working at night (3).
The Equal Pay Act did not pass until 1963 (4). The wage gap exists to this day, due in part to wage secrecy, differing job titles for men and women, and a consistent undervaluing of skills when presented with a resume with a female name on top compared to a male name (5).
To be fair the above study has been conducted in everything from teaching to business. Male names get better offers and more interviews. Female names and obviously nonwhite names get poorer offers and fewer interviews.
Claim #2: men don’t get to spend as much time on childcare because they work too hard
Status: FALSE
Fathers have more free time than mothers (6). There is still a gender gap in the amount of house work men do. Full time working mothers spend more time doing childcare work than stay at home fathers (7). There’s even a gender gap observed in young children; daughters do more chores for less pay than sons (8).
Claims #3 and #4: men are overwhelmingly injured and killed throughout history and this is women’s fault
Status: FALSE
Much of these stats were taken from my other post, which, curiously has not been rebutted in any meaningful way. If you’ve read that before feel free to skip this.
Men are overwhelmingly first responders because historically men have barred women from being considered for fields like active combat (below), firefighting (8), and the police force (9).
Secondly, war affects the lifespan of women more than men. Even putting aside that most people killed from wars were not considered active combat:
Effect of Armed Conflict on Life Expectancy - Plümper and Neumayer 2006 In this study, armed conflict was demonstrated to have a statistically significant and adverse effect on women as measured by the decline in the ratio of female to male life expectancy (Plümper and Neumayer 2006). Normally women live longer than men in almost all societies, so a decrease in the gender gap is interpreted as suggesting that the direct and indirect consequences of conflict combined either kill more women or that the killed women are younger on average than the men killed. The authors therefore concluded that wars negatively affected women more than men when taking into account the entire conflict cycle (10).
Women still make up the vast majority of trafficking victims (11), sweatshop workers (12) , and prostitutes (13) in the world. Are you now going to claim that a US soldier, whose risk of dying was approximately 0.33% in Afghanistan alone over the past 15 years, has an equal risk of death as any or all of these professions? Because you’d be wrong.
Total number of troops in Afghanistan from this source (13). Total number of Afghanistan US troop casualties here (14). Table 1 below.
Table 1: tally of US troops deployed to Afghanistan (13) and total US casualties (14) expressed as a percentage using the following formula: # deaths * 100 / Total # of troops deployed. Max is the maximum percentage of troop death to deployed, min is the minimum percentage, and ave is the average percentage. Please note that even the maximum percentage is half a percentage point.
The maximum percentage of troops who die is 0.496% or 310 deaths out of 67,000. Prostitutes, particularly trafficked women and children, on the other hand, have nearly an 8% chance of being murdered while actively in prostitution (15). Please note that the overall statistics given in the abstract look at the women over 32 years, and that many of those women were not actively prostitutes for that long, in part because of the declining income earnings for older prostitutes (16).
Claim #5 “And enduring all of this for the sake of others is fully recognized as strength to all accept[sic] sexist radfems who want any excuse to spread hatred and generalizations about men. From sexist radfems who will do anything to make women as a group appear to be superior by default instead of equal, like they claim.”
Status: FALSE
Putting aside that this person misspelled “except,” claimed that male supremacy is “Fully recognized as strength to all,” and that they called “radfems” sexist and hateful approximately four times in only 56 words, where is the evidence of “sexist radfem hatred”? Where are the radical feminists killing male infants because they were born male? I have statistics of men killing female infants shortly after their birth (17).
Where are the radical feminists raping and murdering men, insisting that men change their names after marriage, insisting that male bodies be legally regulated?
I have statistics on the other side, too: girls age 15-19 in the world will most likely die in childbirth than any other cause (18), half of all Americans believe a woman should be legally forced to take her husband’s last name (19), marital rape was legal until 1993 (20) and to this day women can be made to pay alimony to their abusive husbands who have attempted to murder them (21), and that marital rape is still “semi-legal” in eight US states (22).
The claims above can only be accepted as logical with the following unsaid assumptions: (1) women owe men gratitude for our existence (2) by living independently, women are stealing something from men that is owed to them and (3) the only true “equality” between the sexes involves a recognition that men are superior. Those assumptions are all FALSE.
The underlying claims are also false.
women perform 66% of the world’s work
produce 50% of the food
but earn 10% of the income
and own 1% percent of the property
women who work full time earn only 77% of what men make
13% of women over 75 are poor compared to 6% of men
women are 70% of the world’s poor
If men want to feel good about themselves, they need to stop basing it on “better-than” bullshit and start doing some goddamn self-examination.
Mr. Rogers is a great role model, start there.
So basically, to sum up, @cheshireinthemiddle it’s time for you to shut the fuck up. You’re a vile, pathetic, misogynistic, boldfaced liar. Your willful ignorance is disgusting and your desperate attempt to paint men as victims is straight up laughable. Your blatant hatred of women is not in any way new or original; you’re not enlightened beyond our comprehension, and you’re certainly not bestowing upon us mere lowly females some sort of superior knowledge previously unheard of. You’re doing nothing but making yourself look like a fucking dumbass when you waltz in to a conversation about female suffering and screech the same old tired cry of “wHat abOuT MeN?¡!” as though it’s revolutionary.
Lol normal feminist response, @taramaclaywasaterf. Calling people misogynistic for…defending against negative generalizations against men. How dare I, I guess. I’m in a hotel on my ohone right now, but even i can dispute these claims.
1. The fact is that men on average work longer hours. They work more overtime. They pursue higher paying careers. They pursue riskier careers that are high risk/high return. Men take fewer vacations, are less likely to quit a job for the same reasons, which means as those who stay with a company/business longer they are more likely to get a promotion. They are more likely to ask for/negotiate more money in an interview. When you actually compare salaries with these variables, the “wage gap” becomes almost non existent. Because it’s an earnings gap.
2. You both intentionally misinterpreted my comment about fathers who work. One of the issues with working mothers today is having trouble caring for their children and pursuing their career. This is made into a womens issue despite the fact that men have been dealing woth it for years to the point that it has become a trope. For couples with children, where one parent works and one parent stays home, men are still more likely to work compared to staying home. The parent who works is around considerably less than the one who has no paycheck, and thus they are in the child’s life less. This is considered a sacrifice when mothers do it. It is considered strength.
3. AGAIN, @greenwire puts words in my mouth to strawman the argument. I didnt say it was necessarily women’s fault that men die much much much more often than women.
Men are more likely to take dangerous jobs both from interest of men and a disproprtionate lack of interest from women (so there is more need for men to get these jobs). Men consistently make up 90%+ of workplace injury and death, not because of negligence from men compared to women, but because these very dangerous jobs are worked by men at such a comparative difference. There is also a disparity of activism for worker’s safety.
Women tend to go after safer jobs (for their education level) with low risks. This can often lead to lower paying jobs, which is considered a necessary trade off. Many men do this too.
Same with dangerous jobs, the military is also mostly men. It is a dangerous job where you apply to essentially be a pawn in war if the need should arrise. In almost every country with a draft, only men can be drafted. In fact in the US, it is the law that men apply for the selective service or face serious consequences including but not limited to a refusal of citizenship, refusal of government services, heavy fines, and jail time which is typically long enough to take your right to vote away.
. Women are part of society. Especially part of societies where they can vote and protest. So they have a hand in how we as a society treat people. They have a hand in how we as a society set expectations and gender roles for people. You cannot pretend like women are blameless in this. Women are people. And people contribute to these issues.
4. And again, @greenwire makes a strawman argument to fight against. I never said “male supremacy” should be supported. When women sacrifice themselves for children or their husbands, it is recognized as strength. We know that men do that as well. As shown above, men at least do so with their lives at higher numbers. So yes, sacrficing yourself is strength when men do it. Same for women. If you only see it as strength when women do it, you need to reevaluate your concept of equality.
5. @taramaclaywasaterf @greenwire you must both have some kind of filter up when you hear people defending men from generalizations and misandry. You change words around and assume that people recognizing the strength of men means they think less than women. You throw accusations of misogyny out without reflecting on your own misandry. You see asvocating for men as some type of attack. And that really says something about you.
You cant keep comparing women to men and claiming to be against sexism if you arent even willing to consider what men deal with. If your bias is so heavy that you cant even do that much, you better expect a lot more than just me to oppose you and your clear sexism.
I gave you 23 sources and you responded with “the fact is x is true” and then cited nothing? And you think this is a rebuttal?
Let’s just take the first paragraph:
The fact is that men on average work longer hours. They work more overtime. They pursue higher paying careers. They pursue riskier careers that are high risk/high return. Men take fewer vacations, are less likely to quit a job for the same reasons, which means as those who stay with a company/business longer they are more likely to get a promotion. They are more likely to ask for/negotiate more money in an interview. When you actually compare salaries with these variables, the “wage gap” becomes almost non existent. Because it’s an earnings gap.
1- Where are your sources for claiming that “men on average work longer hours”? I posted sources to the contrary - that there is no time in history when men have done the majority of the work. Where is your source to the contrary?
2- Every sentence in this paragraph is an assertion with evidence and no conclusion.
-“[Men] work more overtime.”
-“[Men] pursue higher paying careers.”
-”[Men] pursue riskier careers” (I suppose you missed how a majority of sweatshop workers, prostitutes, and human trafficking victims are women? It was cited.)
-”Men take fewer vacations and are less likely to quit a job”
All of these are listed as though they are facts with absolutely no resources to back them up.
The fact that you think you can Jedi mind trick me into accepting your assertions as facts when I took well over an hour to find sources from several countries, from the UN, from international agencies, from journal articles, from news reports on journal articles that exist behind a paywall is itself a representation of your bloated male ego at work.
It took you two weeks to write this, there are no sources, and there’s no conclusions other than the fact that you think my statement of facts backed up by primary and secondary sources is “mean” to you. If this were an academic paper, you would have failed.
Genuinely can’t stand the new favouritism towards video format. You want me to spend a whole two minutes listening to someone say out loud a paragraph I could read in 20 seconds?
(This is about tiktok. I hate tiktok.)
Tiktok was a mistake. Major downgrade from vine
this and I especially hate video recipes. Can you please just write it down and let me read it? Maybe a few pictures if it’s really necessary.
Biological females have the right to express themselves whatever they want.
Styles like flannel shirt and short hair are never exclusively "masculine" regarding gender expression.
As for lesbians, no one has the right to pressure us into what to identify as, not even ourselves.
(It's really back to that homophobia again...)
Very informative thread -source
Dr. Sarah Taber fucking SNAPPED
Today in Black Excellence: Shirley Chisholm, the first African American—and the first woman—to seek nomination for President.
“I want history to remember me... not as the first black woman to have made a bid for the presidency of The United States, but as a black woman who lived in the 20th century and who dared to be herself. I want to be remembered as a catalyst for change in America.”
—Shirley Chisholm
Chisholm wanted to be remembered as a “catalyst for change.” What did she do?
Shirley Anita Chisholm was a politician, educator, and writer. There would be no Barack Obama or Kamala Harris without her—she was a trailblazer in every sense of the word.
Citing her “double-handicap” of being a Black woman, Chisholm initially rejected a political career but became increasingly engaged in fighting racial and gender inequality. She eventually joined the Democratic Party in Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn, winning a seat in the United States Congress in 1968, and becoming the first Black woman to do so.
What did she achieve in politics?
With a seat at the table, “Fighting Shirley” introduced over 50 pieces of legislation on behalf of the poor, protesting racial and gender inequality. She became a fierce critic of the Vietnam War when opposition to the war was considered radical. Her outspoken assault on injustice earned her few friends in the white political establishment.
While campaigning for the 1972 primaries, Chisholm was allowed only one speech in televised debates and was otherwise blocked from participation. Despite this, students, women, and minorities proved loyal supporters: In 12 primaries, she garnered 152 (10%) of delegates’ votes, despite a poorly financed campaign and widespread political hostility.
The 1972 primaries also displayed her remarkable character, when she chose to visit racist and segregationist Governor George Wallace of Alabama in hospital after a failed assassination attempt.
After retiring from Congress in 1983, Chisholm taught at Mount Holyoke College and co-founded the National Political Congress of Black Women.
Original portrait by Tumblr Creatr @banana-peppers
“It was an honor to create a piece celebrating Shirley Chisholm. She was the first Black woman elected to Congress and to seek a major party nomination for presidency. Her trailblazing career is truly inspiring and I wanted to capture her power, her bravery and her magic. Her motto Unbought and Unbossed implores us to forge our own path no matter what obstacles try to stand in our way."
—@banana-peppers