Helloooo Fellow doctor who fans ! If you are rad-aligned, a woman AND into doctor who you should join our server :)
Check out the Radoctor Who community on Discord - hang out with 11 other members and enjoy free voice and text chat.
wallacepolsom

No title available

Discoholic šŖ©
I'd rather be in outer space šø
cherry valley forever
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Jules of Nature
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

oozey mess

⣠Chile in a Photography ā£
RMH

No title available

Kaledo Art
No title available
Peter Solarz
Claire Keane

@theartofmadeline
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
NASA

PR's Tumblrdome
seen from Germany
seen from Japan
seen from Nigeria

seen from Netherlands

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia

seen from United States
seen from Lithuania
seen from United States

seen from Spain

seen from United States
seen from Angola
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Hungary

seen from United States

seen from Lithuania

seen from Ecuador

seen from United States

seen from United States
@searchingforproofsthatimwrong
Helloooo Fellow doctor who fans ! If you are rad-aligned, a woman AND into doctor who you should join our server :)
Check out the Radoctor Who community on Discord - hang out with 11 other members and enjoy free voice and text chat.
not all trans women get bottom surgery or want it.
And what about it? Do you think the ones who do are transphobic ?
Arenāt you the ones who wanted their sex changed on all their documents? This is the result
This is a real issue that's affecting women in healthcare because transmascs are sold the idea that there's 0 downsides to changing sex marker on our files. This causes transmascs and detrans women to face sexual assault in medical settings, improper medical care, and even death. Why do you believe "you asked for it" is ok when women identify as trans?
Besides... Doctors not reading the files hurts and kills women who aren't transmasc too. This is not just a little "gotcha" moment. This is something that affects all women. A little solidarity between transmascs, detrans women, and women who were never trans would be a lot better than "this is what you wanted". No, what they wanted was a doctor who would read their damn file.
Iām not saying they deserve it, Iām saying trans ideology hurts the very women theyāre trying to help. Putting āmā on a female personās file is ofc gonna cause problems and misunderstandings
Ur googling skills are terrible.
There is a FOI (freedom of information, specifically this is the FOI 200615022 of July 2022) about exactly this question and the UK gov made this handy little spreadsheet :
Can you point exactly where you think the massive numbers of poor little transwomen wrongly incarcerated for prostitution are?
You can go see what the actual charges are (here : SourceĀ : GOV.UK https://share.google/6IHdDjgbYa67bGtQV )
and see that it's not "sex work" (which btw is not illegal in the UK, solliciting and advertising sex work is however but they do not usually lead to the offender ending up in prison).
The sexual crimes of those 60% transwomen are sexual assault and rape and possession of child pornography etc. They're not fucking victims.
Using statistics about rapists and claiming they're poor little victims of transphobia is what's disgusting. Stop fucking lying if you want to be taken seriously
If male/female socialization doesn't exist, you are arguing one of two things
Men and women don't behave in different ways (observably untrue, if this was the case sexism would not exist)
Men and women behave in different ways due to biology (age-old sexist talking point, doesn't explain how behavior is heavily impacted by time period and culture)
If all trans women are female socialized, I can't understand how this would be the case unless you believe in a special female soul that is so present in a person AMAB that it deflects any and all absorbing of lessons and treatment from being perceived as male by others for an entire childhood. (Even if the individual thought they were male their entire childhood, had no female friends, and displayed clearly male-patterned socialization their whole life until transition)
If trans women become female socialized as soon as they transition, this implies childhood is not a critical development period that sticks with you for your whole life, which is untrue. This also implies most trans women are perceived as women and live the same as cis women as soon as they transition which is untrue.
What did they do to be expelled from the friend group though I wanna hear what the friend group has to say
I think these tags are important.
When I was with transfeminist circles I saw these posts all the time and it was a super effective guilting tactic. I kept several MTFs in my mutual circles way too long after they started going on aggressive screeds against "TME"s (which I wasn't even against at the time due to said transfeminist conditioning), doing kink shit I'd normally block people over on-sight, and making comments like "I don't agree with ISFF but the construction of the pedophile is used to oppress us"... because I was afraid I'd look like a transmisogynist excising them from my social circles. So, with the other transbians on the site, they continued to get worse in ways none of my other mutuals did and my dash became insufferable lol.
I am reminded of the minority tolerance phenomenon. As a trend, people become less bigoted towards a minority group the more they interact with members of said group inter-personally. This isn't to say minorities will have no problems in non-minority friend groups, but that as a trend they become more liked the more familiar a majority gets to them, because it becomes clear they are just normal people with harmless differences like everyone else.
This makes this whole thing a real outlier. Trans women getting in social groups *while* already out as trans women (so there's no "coming out as gay and being kicked out of a friend group" bias happening), becoming friends with the people there, and then being expelled again and again, well... That's not really typical?
If the problem is "trans women are seen as gross and weird and everyone is always looking for a socially acceptable reason to call them gross and weird", why is this superficial barrier of "difference", being perceived as "gross and weird", not diminishing as the MTF befriends the circle, and prolonged interaction makes people see that he's actually pretty normal? That's generally how it is for gay people.
Yeah youāre absolutely right. When I was in high school I was a pure hearted baby feminist who just wanted to be open minded and accept everyone. I knew 2 ātrans girlsā during that time and I thought being an ally meant ignoring my own feelings of discomfort because they were āwrong.ā They both did things I wonāt get into here that scared me, made me uncomfortable, and pushed my boundaries. I ended up finding out one of them was a full on rapist and psychopath but thatās another story. What made me feel crazy was people in my friend group knew all along and still chose to defend him and hang out with him. Even after all that I wanted to believe I had just met a bad apple and trans women as a whole were wonderful people who wanted to be accepted just like me. It took a lot of exposure online to just how disgusting they could be to change my mind. I see a lot of teenage girls and young women bending over backwards to defend and include transwomen and hating on TERFs. It doesnāt make me angry. They remind me of me. I just hope that they are safe because it seems like young, passionate, empathetic women are taught to think of themselves last.
COCSA is so common I wish more parents would stop leaving siblings alone together, especially older boys with younger girls :[
Iām so glad the parent is not giving her son a free pass to sexually assault people due to being autistic. That was such a prevalent issue when I was still in grade school. Boys from special ed would harass and grope their female classmates without any consequences š«©
boys are fucking demons
Bet 20 bucks that those boys were exposed to porn.
Porn rotted them at a formative age, I don't know if they can be cured, but brothers raping their sisters didn't use to be this common.
i mean i dont doubt they watched porn because its basically ubiquitous among children these days. But also this has always been common. It is an epidemic in Amish communities where they don't have access to porn. women of our grandmothers and great grandmothers generations have spoken about these things in hushed tones. the biggest difference between then and now and the amish and the average joe family is that one had/has no access to the internet to share these stories, and one does. A lot of women cling to the belief that porn is what causes all this male violence, because it means they don't have to reckon with there being a deeper problem with males than just videos on the internet. The videos are a symptom, not the cause.
this is just child abuse.
Facts women NEED to know!!
I firmly believe one reason women are more prone to developing alzheimers is because women are so stressed. The vast majority of women are caretakers in some sense (This goes for women without a male partner and children too, many women take care of elderly family members) and that would put a lot of pressure on anyone.
my theory is TBIs as a result of domestic violence
https://www.wbur.org/onpoint/2022/11/18/rebroadcast-an-invisible-epidemic-survivors-of-domestic-violence-on-living-with-traumatic-brain-injury
like the crutch of most transmisogynistic movements is arguing that being born amab inherently makes u a predator and unsafe for āreal womenā why would u want to promote or agree with rhetoric that directly paints you as an untrustable villianā¦.the rhetoric itself is harmful u canāt separate the harm it does from ur feelings of āhating menā š like i hate men 2 but they r not designed to be evil they just benefit from upholding misogyny and that is a choice that misogynistic men makeā¦not some sleeper agent programmingā¦..
You don't need men's "evilness" to be inherent for radfem theory to make sens. Like I am sorry to say that "transwomen are men" doesn't mean "transwomen are men aka inherently evil" but does indeed mean "transwomen are men, they benefit from upholding misogyny and chose to do that at the same rate as any other men"
Like maybe you're straight up insane and think that "men aren't inherently evil" means that changing rooms, bathroom, rape crisis centers, prisons and sports shouldn't be segregated by sex. But if you're not you still need to do the work of telling us what exactly is the difference between transwomen and other men.
In my view it's rather the TRANS pov that argues that men are inherently evil, but that magically transwomen have the non-evil soul of a woman and therefore shouldn't be lumped in with them. Or, sometimes that the evilness is stored in the balls, the penis, the Testosterone or whatever else and therefore transwomen by transitioning manage to get rid of that evilness and shouldn't be lumped with other men. All of that is bullshit.
some of you are painfully unaware that part of the whole reason many kinksters are like "what happens in my or someone else's bedroom is no one else's business"
is because people have been arrested and put in fucking PRISON just for having gay sex in the privacy of their own homes. in the United States. this millennium.
if you think i'm joking, look up Lawrence v. Texas (2003). 14 out of the 50 US States STILL had laws on the books criminalizing sodomy--and yes, you could be imprisoned for multiple years and sometimes even life for repeat offenses.
in the years directly leading up to the landmark case, enforcement even in those 14 states varied, but it was absolutely weaponized against queer people, especially when stacked on top of other offenses to make up a longer sentence.
um so anyway, what happens between two or more consenting adults in the privacy of their own homes is none of my OR YOUR business, and i'm not fucking kidding!
how about heterosexuals stop comparing critique of bdsm to fucking homosexuality? being hay is not a kink. homophobic piece of shit. if you beat your partner "sexually" to the point they have bruises and someone calls the cops on you it's not because they "hate people having weird sex" it's because you beat your partner and call it kink because they didn't say no i guess. Christ
imagine if YOU did keep it to yourselves and didn't wear fetish gear in public and call everyone who says it's inappropriate especially in front of children that they're a reactionary puritanical fascist that need to keep their kids home? imagine if the most popular artists playing on radio didn't switch up to talking about sexy strangulation and sexy injuring your partner in 2020s? imagine if yall didn't spread false infographics about "safe strangulation" as if cutting off oxygen from brain isn't INHERENTLY DANGEROUS?? men have been having violent sex with women - both consensually and not - with women for thousands of years, don't you fucking dare compare yourself to gay people. the reason you have to use a whole different demographic to convince people of your point is because none of this shit applies to monogamous hets who were into "bdsm" (even if they didn't call it such) and you KNOW IT
i'm gay as Christmas morning. call me heterosexual again, i fucking dare you.
i am gay. i am not monogamous. i engage in bdsm. you've got a loooot of false equivalencies in that response, my friend, and i gotta say, it's not a great look when your main argument doesn't even apply to the person who wrote the post š¬
you're a straight girl lmaooo
ahhhh, yes, the common behaviors of a "straight girl" such as:
-being into women, men, non-binary people, and others who don't fit into those categories
-getting my breasts removed as an adult
-not knowing how to put on makeup besides for theatrical reasons
-dating and fucking gay men who are attracted to me because im a man
-being deeply uninterested in wearing dresses, skirts or anything from the "women's" side of the store
-taking T and having a voice deep enough that i can sing baritone
-actively enjoying curating my beard
-showing off my extremely hairy legs to anyone who will look at them
-being deeply uninterested in most female pop stars, especially Taylor Swift
š¤·āāļø but you're SOOOOO right, these are clearly all the hallmarks of a classically straight cisgender girl š¤Ŗ
so you're not gay you're a bisexual woman who takes testosterone to imitate the appearance of men and tries to prove her manhood by.... implying that make up and pop music are inherently female interests. that's totally not sexism
The real reason kinksters say "What happens in my bedroom is no one else business" is not because of gay people, with whom they have nothing in common, itās because that's the excuse of wife beaters everywhere.
Also that list is so fucking funny. "I got my breasts removed therefore I am a man" idk how to tell you this but men don't get their breasts removed. Also "I am a gay man!!! The proof is I hate female pop stars" lmao yeah gay men are very well known for not being into female pop stars??
Rape is a torture method that often targets women and for some reason many people don't view it as such. In many dictatorships (such as the brazilian one), female political prisoners or wives of male political prisoners were raped as "punishment" to the point they begged for another type of torture, but somehow rape isn't seen like the torture it is by the majority of people.
itās even worse when itās seen as a torture that some women deserved. i donāt care where a woman is on the political spectrum, far left or far right, if you can respect your males enemies by killing them with a shoot and you donāt see the utility in raping them, you CAN do the same with women, but you choose to not and you use their ideas as a way to justify your hatred for women.
Does anyone have the link to the study for this?
ive been meaning to check the sources on this post for awhile, so what better time than now. uncropped image below so you can see it kinda better-ish
reverse image searching the photo op provided brought me to a post on ifunny, dated to jan 29, 2023 [link], posted by antiusury. from what i can tell, this is the first time the image was used.
the first [link], archive.is/5biVF, leads to an offender management statistics quarterly: january to march 2021. the second link is to a gender identity census done in england and wales [link].
i dont think i need to say this "infographic" is complete shit, a cursory glance over at the words on the left shows how wildly uneven the sample sizes for this. 103 out of 30.4 mil for women, 11,660 out of 29.5 mil for men, and 92 out of 48 THOUSAND for tims. comparing boulders to rocks here, millions for thousands.
Are those "samples" when it's the entire population. There's "only" 48 thousand TIM in the whole of england and wales.
Honestly I do not see the problem, why would you need the sample sizes to be even? Do we need the trans population to be half the population to compare them to cis people ? Because then no stats about trans people will ever be receivable.
I do think the methodology is fucking stupid here, notably it doesn't account for age, I think TIMs are way more likely to be in the peak offending age than the general population (if nothing else, babies do not identify as trans and are also somewhat unlikely to be sex offenders). But correcting for this would still be comparing millions to thousands. It also fundamentally wouldn't change the point much, especially comparing for women, I do not need to look at the exact numbers to know that if there is 103 female offenders for 92 Trans identified males then the trans identified male offending rate is nowhere close to the general female population's.
Hi! Below is a post a friend of mine wrote, but was too afraid, understandably to post. I've offered to use my platform to share it.
Before I say anything, this post is for those of you who defend other trans women to your very last, women like kinky-robot-girl, Patricia Taxxon, isuggestforcefem, sailatina (sailor-crusader), all the ageplaying transfems on this site who get nuked multiple times a day, etc.. Despite all this support and rhetoric, which I love to see, I do not think many of you are really willing to fully acknowledge that thought-crimes are not real in the case of people attracted to children. For us all to be free, we can leave no one behind, and that includes pedophiles whether you like it or not. The word 'pedophile' does not imply action of any kind, it is merely a descriptor. People will say 'pedophile' and mean 'child abuser'. This is stupid and wrong, those terms are entirely separate. If you conflate those two terms to mean the same thing, you might as well say that 'trans woman' is synonymous with 'misogynystic rapist', which I don't think I have to explain to you the wrongness of.
I ought to make something clear, I am a trans woman, an ageplayer, a victim of *real* CSA, and I am attracted to adults. With this being told, I want it understood that I, happily, am friends with several pedophiles, and I know for certain they would never hurt an actual child. Now, sure, I imagine many of you would be willing to acknowledge such a thing in your own lives when pressed. However, just this acknowledgment is not the important part here. The important part is to not treat the pedophiles you love, and the pedophiles in this community, as disposable the moment they, or you, are accused of something heinous; be proud to be friends with a pedophile. Defend them. Be proud such a person trusts you with that knowledge. Something you need to be able to do is to say a sentence like "no one is free until we all are, and that includes people who are attracted to children" without immediately quantifying it with "and that does not condone fucking literal children" that second part should be understood implicitly. When a trans woman says she has a rape/noncon kink, do you think she actually wants to rape someone, or is inciting literal rape towards herself? No, I don't think you do. Why, then, do you not apply the same rational logic to pedophiles?
I am fully willing to say that I have age regressed and subsequently engaged in play with a pedophile whom I love. This does not make me a victim of any kind. It does not make her a predator of any kind. It makes us two consenting adults, engaging in activity we consented to of our own free will. I am close friends with a particular trans woman. I am close friends with a particular pedophile. These statements are entirely separate things. And don't make me fucking say that I know not all trans women are pedophiles. If that was a thought you had while reading this, fuck you. Anyways, one of those statements does not necessitate the other, even remotely. I know all too well that as trans women, speaking up on a subject such as this is an extremely hard thing to do. Harassment fucking sucks, believe me, I know. But I refuse to bend to it, as should you. I refuse to shrink in the face of those who would isolate and kill a friend of mine for the attraction she experiences. Such a type of attraction is just a thing that happens. Are we gonna cast out and isolate the trans women we claim to unwaveringly support for their intrusive thoughts? I would never and neither should you. The moment we let bigots, terfs, tMRAs, transandrobros, and any other anti-transfem hate group isolate one type of trans woman from the rest of our community, we have already lost. Be a safe person for ALL transfems.
if you wondered whatās going on in trans tumblr rn
waow this man with a little girl pfp just wanted to share this message from a totally real anonymous csa survivor friend about how important it is to protect pedophiles..... that is so nice
crazy work
just remembered this statue full of bees I saw a few years ago outside a junk shop