The Tatler, England, October 2, 1907

No title available
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
styofa doing anything

if i look back, i am lost
Sweet Seals For You, Always
DEAR READER
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Misplaced Lens Cap
RMH
YOU ARE THE REASON

blake kathryn

No title available
Xuebing Du

Discoholic 🪩

PR's Tumblrdome
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

JVL

Kaledo Art

roma★
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Russia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@radical-phoenix
The Tatler, England, October 2, 1907
So I haven't really been active in Tumblr for a long time. Looking through the notes on posts I see almost everybody's posting their comments in the tags?
Is it because Tumblr is banning radfems?
I'm still not over "the moral necessity of being sexist to JKR" or whatever the exact title was, like imagine the same performative liberal crowd was talking about "the moral necessity of being racist to Ben Carson" or "the moral necessity of being homophobic to Milo Yiannopoulos" or "the moral necessity of being antisemitic to Michael Cohen" hello how progressive can you pretend to be if you only oppose bigotry when it's directed at people who agree with you
oh, and meanwhile misgendering rapists is never ok. So a rapist doesn't deserve transphobia but a woman tweeting shit you don't like deserves sexism.
In a weird way it's entirely consistent with the rest of TRA ideology. TRAs have to deny sex-based oppression in order to support men claiming to be women and taking women's resources and positions in the first place. They don't consider sexism a legitimate form of bigotry because they can't while still advocating for TIMs. What's funny is that, based on the video's comments, even a bunch of this douchebag's fans think this is a "bad look" and equivalent to saying it's necessary to be racist to Candace Owens, but haven't figured out that thinking sexism is okay is the natural conclusion of trans ideology.
btw erlick is constantly getting influencer deals and brand placements on IG & every woman is welcome to join her voice to everyone who contacts brands and asks if they want a rapist representing them. the ads are regularly pulled. erlick had to move cities bc everyone knew. this can happen again, erlick can be driven farther from fresh hunting grounds, the more people that know the better
Terfs are a little silly goofy " having hairy legs is the radfem i like your shoelaces code " and then they call women of color men for having more body hair 😐
which part of "adult human female" are you having trouble with
“They call women of color men” no actually, that’s trans rights activists who insist on othering WOC by comparing them to males. “If black women count as women, why can’t trans women?” is a common (and very racist) sentiment expressed by TRAs.
Doctors Hate Her! Local woman is "just really mean to doctors", says one
Maybe, just maybe, no one truly buys into your sham identity, which is why they laugh when you propose that a heterosexual man can be a homosexual woman? Just a thought.
And maybe no one sees a problem with ~afab non-binary~ lesbians is because they’re biologically female so they can be lesbians
Could be the penis factor
Facts.
For context: This guy was the co-creator of Dogecoin.
ID: A twitter thread from Jackson Palmer
I am often asked if I will "return to cryptocurrency" or begin regularly sharing my thoughts on the topic again. My answer is a wholehearted "no", but to avoid repeating myself I figure it might be worthwhile briefly explaining why here...
After years of studying it, I believe that cryptocurrency is an inherently right-wing, hyper-capitalistic technology built primarily to amplify the wealth of its proponents through a combination of tax avoidance, diminished regulatory oversight and artificially enforced scarcity.
Despite claims of "decentralization", the cryptocurrency industry is controlled by a powerful cartel of wealthy figures who, with time, have evolved to incorporate many of the same institutions tied to the existing centralized financial system they supposedly set out to replace.
The cryptocurrency industry leverages a network of shady business connections, bought influencers and pay-for-play media outlets to perpetuate a cult-like "get rich quick" funnel designed to extract new money from the financially desperate and naive.
Financial exploitation undoubtedly existed before cryptocurrency, but cryptocurrency is almost purpose built to make the funnel of profiteering more efficient for those at the top and less safeguarded for the vulnerable.
Cryptocurrency is like taking the worst parts of today's capitalist system (eg. corruption, fraud, inequality) and using software to technically limit the use of interventions (eg. audits, regulation, taxation) which serve as protections or safety nets for the average person.
Lose your savings account password? Your fault. Fall victim to a scam? Your fault. Billionaires manipulating markets? They're geniuses.
This is the type of dangerous "free for all" capitalism cryptocurrency was unfortunately architected to facilitate since its inception.
But these days even the most modest critique of cryptocurrency will draw smears from the powerful figures in control of the industry and the ire of retail investors who they've sold the false promise of one day being a fellow billionaire. Good-faith debate is near impossible.
For these reasons, I simply no longer go out of my way to engage in public discussion regarding cryptocurrency. It doesn't align with my politics or belief system, and I don't have the energy to try and discuss that with those unwilling to engage in a grounded conversation.
I applaud those with the energy to continue asking the hard questions and applying the lens of rigorous skepticism all technology should be subject to. New technology can make the world a better place, but not when decoupled from its inherent politics or societal consequences.
End ID.
I used the same picrew all the genders seem to be using these days to make my own
His name is Tim. He likes to dress up as anime schoolgirls.
The First Kiss (of Adam and Eve) (1891) by Salvador Viniegra
I’ve just had to refresh my US Visa because I’ve been out of the US for so long. I wonder if people out there know how many vaccinations you need to be allowed to enter the US to live…
Next blood moon
So every 5th post is an ad and so far I've seen an ad with a video of a girl with half her ass out and an ad for concealed carry that stokes paranoia asking "Are you ready?"
The banning of #girl sends such a sick message. We are just pornographic material 24/7 for men huh? We don't have to even be doing something sexual, we are pornographic fodder simply because we exist? Did they forget girl means female child?
Girl is 'pornographic', woman is 'exclusionary', female is 'dehumanising' or otherwise 'a colonialist classification', why are losing the words needed to speak for ourselves?
The terms being banned fills me with rage. We are human first, before anything, we have been human form millions of years, and then what? A couple decades of pornography and now 'femaleness is pornography'? Everything associated with femaleness is pornography? For a long long time we didn't even have words to describe us as a class because we were only ever defined as 'wife' or 'daughter', now that we have words? They're pornographic? I'm going to scream!
“people with ovaries” but not “people with testicles” 🥴
🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪