Honey, an objective fact isn’t a “different opinion”. Stop trying to twist shit to put them in your narrative. Yes, you can’t think for yourself obviously, coming from how you can’t do research. Disagreeing with you isn’t misogyny hon.
Okay, so let’s move on to my regular, MRA humiliating session, i’m really bored of doing this everyday you know? Like, i’m starting to think since y'all repeat the same false shit over and over again, maybe y'all are bots? Seems reasonable enough. I may change my mind if y'all start to act like interactive human beings who can learn.
Court bias? I’m actually tired of you MRAs repeat the same lies.
According to DivorcePeers.com, the majority of child custody cases are not decided by the courts.
In 51 percent of custody cases, both parents agreed — on their own — that mom become the custodial parent.In 29 percent of custody cases, the decision was made without any third party involvement.In 11 percent of custody cases, the decision for mom to have custody was made during mediation.In 5 percent of custody cases, the issue was resolved after a custody evaluation.Only 4 percent of custody cases went to trial and of that 4 percent, only 1.5 percent completed custody litigation.
In other words, 91 percent of child custody after divorce is decided with no interference from the family court system. How can there be a bias toward mothers when fewer than 4 percent of custody decisions are made by the court honey? Or is it that majority of judges are also male, do they have a “misandry bias” against themselves too?
1. Fathers are less involved in their children’s care during the marriage.
2. Fathers are less involved in their children’s lives after divorce.
3. Mothers gain custody because the vast majority of fathers choose to give them custody.
4. There is no Family Court bias in favor of mothers because very few fathers seek custody during divorce.
So like, get your facts right next time. Just because there is a sheer number, doesn’t mean there isn’t a context beyond it. Men DON’T ASK FOR CUSTODY. Even if they do, they’re more likely to get it. They’re deadbeats, accept it.
how about the stats on absent fathers? or the amount of time fathers spend with children once the divorce is final. According to the above study, when fathers and children live separately, 22 percent of fathers see their children more than once a week. Twenty-nine percent of fathers see their children one to four times a month. The most disturbing fact though is that 27 percent of fathers have no contact with their children at all. Some fathers, those among the 27 percent who have no contact with their children post-divorce, may even argue that gender bias during divorce litigation is the reason they no longer engage in parenting or any form of relationship with their children.
See? Easy, MRAs have washed your brain and you didn’t even look for a counter-argument. This is what i meant by being incompetent. Don’t scream into an echo chamber.
Women get lesser sentences.
Again, you (as all mras) seem to forget that majority of judges are male. Considering, less than %20 of crimes are committed by women, AND the exceptions of context, and two different crime categories, this still isn’t women’s fault. Are you impying male judges have a self-hating misandry bias again?
http://law.jrank.org/pages/1250/Gender-Crime-Differences-between-male-female-offending-patterns.html
prostitution is one of the two crime categories where women get longer sentences than johns and pimps.
This is true in all countries for which data are available. It is true for all racial and ethnic groups, and for every historical period. In the United States, women constitute less than 20 percent of arrests for most crime categories.
Females have even lower representation than males do in serious crime categories. Since the 1960s in the United States, the extent of female arrests has generally been less than 15 percent for homicide and aggravated assault, and less than 10 percent for the serious property crimes of burglary and robbery.
Aside from prostitution, female representation has been greatest for minor property crimes such as larceny-theft, fraud, forgery, and embezzlement. Female arrests for these crime categories has been as high as 30 to 40 percent, especially since the mid-1970s. The thefts and frauds committed by women typically involve shoplifting (larceny-theft), “bad checks” (forgery or fraud), and welfare and credit fraud—all compatible with traditional female consumer/domestic roles.
Trends in female crime relative to male crime are more complex. Some writers claim that female crime has been increasing faster than male crime, as measured by the percentage of female arrests. This has clearly been true in the case of minor property crimes, where the percentage of female arrests had about doubled between 1960 and 1975 (from around 15 to 30 percent or more), with slight additional increases since then. Smaller but fairly consistent increases are also found for substance abuse categories, but they remain less than 20 percent for all categories. The same can be said of major property crimes (which remain less than 10 to 15%). However, the percentage of female arrests has declined for other categories like homicide and prostitution; and it has fluctuated for still other categories such as aggravated assault and druglaw violations (see Steffensmeier, 1993, for a review of trends and explanations).
Women commit crimes enormously less than men, and when they do get lighter sentences for the same crime, it isn’t her own doing.
Whether these patterns of more lenient sentencing for women reflect unwarranted disparities or legitimate sentencing considerations that happen to disproportionately benefit women has been the subject of lively debate. Analyses of data and case law have suggested that judges’ paternalistic attitudes toward women might hold women to be more vulnerable and sympathetic and less responsible than men (Nagel & Johnson, 1994; Segal, 2000; Schazenbach, 2004). Differences may arise from enduring attitudes that hold women more responsible for child care.
Part of the more lenient treatment may arise, however, from differences between the genders that are relevant to sentencing but not well captured by the available data. Several commentators have noted that women offenders are often among the least culpable members of criminal conspiracies, yet are subject to lengthy sentences due to the conduct of their accomplices, on whom they may be emotionally or financially dependent (Demleitner, 1995). Judges may seek to mitigate the effects of strict application of the guidelines rules based on female offenders sometimes being dominated by more culpable male accomplices. There is also reason for judges to believe that women are more instrumental in raising their children than their male counterparts (Wald, 1995; Raeder, 1993), and may suffer more from imprisonment than do men due to greater separation from their families caused by the relative scarcity of prisons for women (Seldin, 1995).
http://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/research-and-publications/research-projects-and-surveys/miscellaneous/15-year-study/chap4.pdf
Women are seen as weak, delicate accessories for men, hence why even the male judges don’t take them seriously. And the burden of fixing this is women’s problem if men are so annoyed by it? Why won’t they consider doing something then instead of screeching about feminism online? Oh wait, there HAS been feminist campaigns to bring this issue onto the light https://everydayfeminism.com/2015/04/prision-injustice-feminism/
Another exception in crime: Partner homicide.
http://m.digitaljournal.com/news/crime/sentences-are-lighter-for-men-who-murder-female-partners-study/article/450197
Women who kill or commit violence against male intimate partners usually receive longer sentences than men who kill or commit violence against female intimate partners, even in self-defense.
In general, men who abuse, beat or kill their wives or girlfriends tend to get very light sentences.
However, the same is not true for women. Women who assault or kill male partners tend to get extremely harsh sentences, even if they do so in self-defense.
According to US statistics compiled by the National Clearinghouse for the Defense of Battered Women:
The average prison sentence for men who kill their intimate partners is 2 to 6 years. Women who kill their partners are sentenced, on average, to 15 years. A pair of Maryland cases vividly illustrates this inequality in sentencing. In one case, a judge in Baltimore County, Maryland sentenced Kenneth Peacock to 18 months for killing his unfaithful wife. The very next day, another judge in the same county sentenced Patricia Ann Hawkins to three years in prison for killing her abusive husband. Significantly, the prosecutor in the Peacock case requested a sentence twice as long as the one imposed, while the prosecutor in the Hawkins case requested one-third of the sentence imposed.
So like, are you done? I’m bored of the mra victim complex, i’m gonna get a strawberry milkshake, take a chill pill girl.
annaxmalina
jbbartram-illu
theartofmadeline
turnnoffyourmind
kianamaiart
romaincrisis
origamiaround
