Rant blog

Just a rant blog - SHE/HER PROSHIPPERS DNI!

[rantblogblog]

IF YOU ARE A PROSHIPPER STAY AWAY FROM ME AND MY BLOG! WHY DID I GET A BUNCH OF BRAINWASHED CHILDREN AND PREDATORS ON HERE REBLOGGING MY SHIT!??

Do Not Interact if you are or support any of the following:

Proshippers/Darkshippers/Ex-antis/anti-antis

AI USERS/LOVERS!

Radqueers

Shotacons, lolicons

Groomers/Pedophiles

"Consensual abuse" believers

If you think incest and rape are kinks

TERFs

Fujoshis + fundanshis

Pro-ana/eating disorder glamorizing blogs

Anti-furries

Anti-therians

Anti-age regression + anti-pet regression

Anti-LGBTQ

Lolita romanticizers

ABDL/Age play/DDLG/etc.

Vore fetishists

Melanie Martinez stans + supporters

Dream stans + supporters

Swifties

Daddy's Little Toy/Tori Woods defenders

MAP/NOMAP apologists

People who make "problematic jokes" and hide behind "dark humor"

"Age is just a number" people

Users of AI-generated CSAM or "lolicon/shota because it's not real" excuses

Alt-right, incel, or manosphere adjacent ideologies

Zoophile apologists or "zoo-neutral"

"Fiction ≠ reality" extremists who use that as a shield for vile content

People who treat triggers and boundaries as jokes or "overreactions"

---------------

YUMESHIPPERS/SELF INSERT ARE OKAY, I AM ONE AND AS LONG AS YOU AINT A PROSHIT!

[kinzinthebinz]

Btw hating on gooseworx for being racist isn't transphobic. Her being trans doesnt erase the fact she made jokes and jabs towards minorities. Stop forgetting that.

[alnstcriticalluka]

“If you dislike Jax’s writing you’re transphobic” huh????

[ohmyang3l]

if goose was genuinely banned from tumblr for the staffs’s transphobia that’s absolutely disgusting. obviously. but PLEASE do not attack the crit community for it? critical communities have existed for years and goose is a grown ass woman ? stop acting like she’s some babey u need to protect.

[a-queer-man-of-a-few-words]

Goose with Jax is basically every internalized misogynistic female fan with their Tumblr Sexymen.

“He’s a piece of shit, but I love him. And because I love him, I will downplay all of his wrongdoings. He’s too precious to face any consequences.”

[domain-of-revelation]

If you feel personally attacked because people don’t like your “thing,” you have an issue. And it’s your issue to deal with. Yours. You are equating your self worth with the things you enjoy, and you’re taking it personally when people rightfully call out pertinent issues that need attention brought to them. Telling people to stop criticizing what you enjoy is going to do the opposite, and then you’re going to be more upset. Crusading against critics is pointless. Perhaps seeking the answer as to why you take criticism over an animated show so seriously would help you as an individual.

— Edit: if you think this is about you. Yes, yes it is.

[baydoors9000]

We're doing everythinggggggggg BUT putting things in the show, omggggggg "They've been talking for hours 😍" ABOUT WHAT???

[pomnitonic]

"women suck. they can only redeem themselves if they get beaten up by men" jesus fucking christ

[charoitenigma]

no white baby, calling criticism from Black people against your comfort show transphobic doesn’t make you look any less racist for supporting the show and it’s awful creator and voice actors.

[vvvirgil]

that isn't QUITE why we were mad

[pussymuncher7]

Guys does being trans and depressed give you an excuse to drive your extremely supportive friends, who do literally nothing in the narrative expect support you, to suicide. Along with violently hurting the other ones to the point where one is scared to disobey you and thinks you’re going to violently hurt her just for having boundaries and saying “no”

[carto0ncritter]

"You're not supposed to feel bad for Jax, her backstory is just an explanation for her behavior, not an excuse!"

Meanwhile the framing in the show:

Aww, look at her! Isn't she an adorable girl? Get out of here

Feel sympathy for Jax even though she hurt the person who's hugging her right now (who, mind you, almost died in Jax's arms). Don't have Pomni call Jax out on her bullshit and hug her instead while they both cry. Will Jax show genuine remorse for the things she's done? No. Will Jax get consequences for her actions (death isn't one)? No. Will Jax get a redemption arc? No. Is Jax a well written cautionary tale? No because her story isn't framed as one despite the intent. Will Jax mention any of her victims? Say how much she wishes she had made different choices? Apologize for anything? No, no and no!

Amanda's comment doesn't help either

No wonder people associate Jax with just her transness, draw her like this girly girl and forget the other characters (Jax's victims)

[rantblogblog]

Proshits can't stay out of anti tags.

[rantblogblog]

They're so sensitive and mad about this, LMAO

[recovery-within-the-iris]

Since I'm getting hate, I'll say my other peace about Jax. I think it's why Jax in particular irritates me so much

Jax is the epitome of roleplaying with the worst person alive. They're the oc who has to constantly be upset and in need of support but never accepts it and only uses it to hurt others, everyone has to forgive them immediately when they hurt others, everyone has to be attracted to them, everyone else's problems get solved immediately while theirs drags on and on, they constantly need to be walked back off the cliff and yet, still in the end, they make their oc have a big dramatic suicide scene and everyone else has to give them a big elaborate funeral and the person they kept targeting isn't allowed to be sad anymore. Literally the " well I guess everyone would be happier if I just DIED!" and everyone around them is so fucking tired of this bullshit they just say yes. Then the group chat rp partners all leave and make their characters have happy, fun and spicy adventures without the fucking angsty energy vampire in the corner.

This goes doubly for if you have a player like that at your DND table.

[missongbird]

Gooseworx taking a black man's song and having a pedophile who is friends with shadman sing it is just....wow. I never wont be baffled by it

[litwicking-it]

has anyone talked about the amazing digital queerbait yet?

goose wrote a show queerbaiting us with a trans character who isnt allowed to be trans or go by she/her outside of twitter and is constantly marketed with the maid dress that makes her uncomfortable and dysphoric. and people are defending this rep with their lives

writing ragatha with "lesbian intent" (this comes from a tumblr post which iykyk so bear with me) ? when does she get to be lesbian in the show, when is that shown or even implied?

zooble being said to use any pronouns while only being addressed by they/them same with she/they ribbit only being she/her

zooble and jax are BOTH walking stereotypes!!

i dont want my trans/queer rep to be half baked like this im sorry man

[rantblogblog]

The Hypocrisy of "Don't Like, Don't Read" When They Won't Let You Scroll in Peace

PROSHITS DNI!

There is a specific kind of irony that only exists in online fandom, and it's embodied by the proshipper who preaches "don't like, don't read" while making it functionally impossible to avoid their content. For a community that claims to value freedom above all else, they sure do spend a lot of energy forcing their work into spaces explicitly marked as off-limits.

Let's talk about tagging, or rather, the deliberate refusal to do it properly. Fandom runs on tagging. It's the basic courtesy that allows a 14-year-old looking for fluffy fanart to avoid stumbling onto explicit adult content. It's the entire reason the "don't like, don't read" philosophy can even function. But too many proshippers treat tagging like a suggestion rather than a boundary-respecting necessity. They'll use vague tags. They'll hide problematic content under cutesy euphemisms. They'll create entirely new tags specifically to evade the block functions that antis and minors use to protect themselves. This isn't creative freedom. This is actively sabotaging the tools people use to consent to what they see.

And when they get blocked? When an anti curates their own space and excludes them? The response is often block evasion. New blogs. New accounts. A relentless determination to force their way back into a space that explicitly rejected them. This isn't engagement. This is harassment with extra steps.

Then there's the invasion of anti spaces. Proshippers will wander into tags like "anti proship" or "antis dni" and act shocked—shocked—that the people there don't want to see proship content. They'll reblog anti posts to mock them. They'll flood the tags with their own content specifically to trigger the people filtering those tags. They deliberately cross the line and then cry censorship when they're met with resistance.

And here's the killer: these are the same people who plaster "DNI IF YOU'RE AN ANTI" all over their own blogs. They demand that antis respect their boundaries. They demand that antis stay out of their spaces. They insist that consent matters. But the moment the roles are reversed? Suddenly boundaries are "censorship." Suddenly curated spaces are "echo chambers." Suddenly the rules only apply when they're the ones being protected.

You cannot claim to care about consent and then deliberately circumvent every tool designed to secure it. You cannot preach "your kink is not my kink and that's okay" while shoving your kink down the throats of people who have explicitly said it's not okay. The refusal to tag properly, the block evasion, the tag invasion—these aren't acts of creative defiance. They are acts of targeted harassment dressed up in the language of freedom.

If you truly believe in "don't like, don't read," then you have to accept that "don't read" means allowing people the space to not read. You have to tag honestly. You have to accept blocks. You have to stay out of tags that aren't for you. Otherwise, you're not a defender of free expression. You're just a hypocrite who can't stand that someone, somewhere, doesn't want to see what you're making.

[rantblogblog]

Motherfuckers are proving me right!