Well.. Well.. Well This guy, Deion has been pretty spot on with his card readings. 😏
Divinitydiondivinetarotread (YouTube)
@stephanie13diann
Nailed it and fish wasn’t in the ending either
Color Me Curious

oozey mess

@theartofmadeline
No title available
RMH
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
ojovivo

Product Placement
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

if i look back, i am lost
untitled
Fai_Ryy
occasionally subtle
Claire Keane
No title available
EXPECTATIONS
d e v o n
Monterey Bay Aquarium
The Stonewall Inn
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
seen from France

seen from Türkiye
seen from Kenya
seen from Austria

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Italy

seen from Belarus

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Bolivia
seen from Morocco
seen from Austria
seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia
seen from Austria

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
@rebelbossheart
Well.. Well.. Well This guy, Deion has been pretty spot on with his card readings. 😏
Divinitydiondivinetarotread (YouTube)
@stephanie13diann
Nailed it and fish wasn’t in the ending either
If a real child had been publicly introduced in October and the couple were simply having marital problems afterward, you would normally expect the child narrative to become more concrete over time, not less. Or just go silent completely while they worked on their own family.
You’d get gradual parenting language, “adjusting to life with a baby,” comments about routines, work-life balance, maybe generic “they’re loving parenthood” pieces. Even if the marriage were shaky, the child itself would usually become more firmly established as a separate biographical fact.
Instead, the child gets loudly inserted, then never really develops. The coverage keeps looping back to the same wedding/baby/Oscars timeline, while the relationship gets more separation-coded and the child remains oddly static.
The sheer number of relationship timelines makes the ambiguity stranger. Years of heavy relationship pushes followed by more retrospective pushing this year, while actual current couple/family substance gets thinner, feels less like an organic family story and more like narrative maintenance.
Family narratives normally accumulate lived detail over time. This one keeps accumulating recaps. That is an important difference here.
If there were a real shared child and the marriage was merely under strain, the first priority would normally be to contain the instability, not let it become a parallel public storyline. You’d expect the team to steer everything toward something bland and protective: “they’re focused on their family,” “they’re adjusting to parenthood,” “they’re keeping things private.” Even if there were cheating rumors in low-tier tabloids or blinds, you would usually try to starve them of oxygen rather than allow them to keep stacking while the child narrative was fresh.
The marriage instability was allowed to remain visible for months, then actually accumulate. The Oscars gave the couple a controlled public appearance, but instead of using that moment to reset the story, the post-Oscars period added more scrutiny, more timelines, more negative relationship framing, and then the old other-woman lane came back and was answered. If the goal were “protect the shaky family,” that is terrible containment.
If old material was being used to create the impression of current couple activity, that doesn’t reduce attention. It encourages people to investigate provenance, timelines, geography, and whether the couple is actually together. That is the opposite of making a private family boring.
So the function begins to look less like “hide the problems” and more like let the public slowly absorb that there are problems.
If the relationship was already over in substance — whether genuinely or contractually — then you don’t necessarily need to protect the marriage image anymore. You may actually want the public to notice that something is wrong so that the eventual ending feels unsurprising.
The Oscars then becomes easier to understand too. If they still had an appearance obligation or needed one last public couple moment, they could fulfill that without verbally recommitting to the relationship. Afterward, instead of stabilizing the family, they let the erosion continue.
That isn’t a happy family narrative, it’s a set up for ending.
Megan, please step the fuck down in public relations on all your clients. Because:
I am laughing so hard!! I see someone wrote a message online how the baby was adopted by Alba and not Chris. Funny as f@ck now team real are saying, no the baby was adopted by Chris and not alba. BUT.. but.. buuut.. I thought they were a loving happy couple and through all that love making that team real pretends they have they made a beautiful child. So now there was no baby making… WHAT?! 🤣 I see they changed their story to be whatever they see on the Internet that best suits them. 😂// wait so not legally married? commitment, and only he adopted a kid now? so its not them being pregnant at all? You know I think i can get behind this one.
i have no idea what is going on.
Can you just imagine when the fake kid goes to school. And the teacher say what does your mom and dad do for a living?
And a kid goes my mom‘s a porn actress, and my dad hangs out with other people who he kisses on the neck
What happened to that “leaked info” that team real got saying Chris was with the fake wife yesterday doing stuff only for him to show up in California no where near her. Hmm, and who was watching that fake baby I wonder?! 😂
They can’t even get their fanfic stories straight
🤣🤣🤣
Casper the friendly ghost was watching the fake kid
If a real PR crisis team had to manage Chris Evans’ failed PR marriage stunt, they wouldn’t be “strategizing” or “rebuilding the narrative.” No. They’d be dragging his PR team by their lanyards into a conference room and asking who exactly thought this stunt was going to survive contact with reality.
A proper crisis team would take one look at the mess, the contradictions, the limp rollout, the timeline that collapses under basic daylight, and say:
“This isn’t a storyline. This is a crime scene.”
They’d treat the whole marriage stunt like a contaminated file, gloves on, tongs out, holding it at arm’s length like it smells. Because it does smell. It reeks of desperation, poor planning, and someone in the office thinking “maybe no one will notice” like the public is blind and bored.
A real crisis team would immediately:
kill the stunt
bury the stunt
salt the earth where the stunt once stood
No soft fade out. No gentle distancing. Just a swift, merciless execution.
Then they’d turn to him with the kind of tone reserved for celebrities who make their jobs harder and say:
“You’re done. No more hints. No more accidental confirmations. No more chaotic reveals. You sit still while we clean up the wreckage.”
And behind closed doors? Oh, the roast would be biblical.
They’d be pacing the room like:
“You launched a marriage stunt with no timeline integrity, no exit plan, no narrative cohesion, and no contingency? Are you TRYING to tank your own brand?”
They’d flip through the press coverage like they’re reviewing evidence in a fraud trial:
“Why does every article contradict the last one? Why does the messaging look like it was written by five interns who don’t speak to each other? Why does this rollout feel like a dare?”
A real crisis team wouldn’t just fix the stunt, they’d erase it from the timeline like a corrupted save file. They’d rebuild his image from scratch, brick by brick, while his current PR team sits in the corner sweating and wondering how they still have jobs.
Because the truth is simple: A competent crisis team would’ve cleaned this disaster in one afternoon. His team let it rot in public.
Chris goo’s over and neck kissing every other brunette but wifey
Chris and fake pornstar wifey just needs to end this shit already. Because all the signs is definitely not looking good for him and she’s dragging it. Apparently, she likes being used.
But wifey is a porn star so she gets used all the time apparently
Loving the smart anons coming in as so proud of you all ❤️
Apparently, they can't say a thing because of...
Privacy ~~~ 🤣🤣🤣 Yes, that sh#ts fake!!
If a real PR crisis team had to manage Chris Evans’ failed PR marriage stunt, they wouldn’t be “strategizing” or “rebuilding the narrative.” No. They’d be dragging his PR team by their lanyards into a conference room and asking who exactly thought this stunt was going to survive contact with reality.
A proper crisis team would take one look at the mess, the contradictions, the limp rollout, the timeline that collapses under basic daylight, and say:
“This isn’t a storyline. This is a crime scene.”
They’d treat the whole marriage stunt like a contaminated file, gloves on, tongs out, holding it at arm’s length like it smells. Because it does smell. It reeks of desperation, poor planning, and someone in the office thinking “maybe no one will notice” like the public is blind and bored.
A real crisis team would immediately:
kill the stunt
bury the stunt
salt the earth where the stunt once stood
No soft fade out. No gentle distancing. Just a swift, merciless execution.
Then they’d turn to him with the kind of tone reserved for celebrities who make their jobs harder and say:
“You’re done. No more hints. No more accidental confirmations. No more chaotic reveals. You sit still while we clean up the wreckage.”
And behind closed doors? Oh, the roast would be biblical.
They’d be pacing the room like:
“You launched a marriage stunt with no timeline integrity, no exit plan, no narrative cohesion, and no contingency? Are you TRYING to tank your own brand?”
They’d flip through the press coverage like they’re reviewing evidence in a fraud trial:
“Why does every article contradict the last one? Why does the messaging look like it was written by five interns who don’t speak to each other? Why does this rollout feel like a dare?”
A real crisis team wouldn’t just fix the stunt, they’d erase it from the timeline like a corrupted save file. They’d rebuild his image from scratch, brick by brick, while his current PR team sits in the corner sweating and wondering how they still have jobs.
Because the truth is simple: A competent crisis team would’ve cleaned this disaster in one afternoon. His team let it rot in public.
So what is this supposed sighting? Was she “seen” in California or Portugal? I thought she had some kind of movie premiere in another country.
Apparently, they can't say a thing because of...
Why does team real because they’re idiots always think that it’s Chris’s fake kid that they’re talking about. In this video he says are you guys loving it and he’s probably crawling around. It has nothing to do with Chris’s fake kid, but yet team real makes it about Alma.
So what is this supposed sighting? Was she “seen” in California or Portugal? I thought she had some kind of movie premiere in another country.
Apparently, they can't say a thing because of...
So she said she’ll maybe see Chris next week which means they started filming secret wars
I am laughing so hard!! I see someone wrote a message online how the baby was adopted by Alba and not Chris. Funny as f@ck now team real are saying, no the baby was adopted by Chris and not alba. BUT.. but.. buuut.. I thought they were a loving happy couple and through all that love making that team real pretends they have they made a beautiful child. So now there was no baby making… WHAT?! 🤣 I see they changed their story to be whatever they see on the Internet that best suits them. 😂// wait so not legally married? commitment, and only he adopted a kid now? so its not them being pregnant at all? You know I think i can get behind this one.
i have no idea what is going on.
Even team delulu can’t get their story straight
🤣🤣🤣