I got a link to something else and then this popped up
tumblr dot com

izzy's playlists!
Misplaced Lens Cap
No title available
trying on a metaphor

Kiana Khansmith
Xuebing Du
Show & Tell
Mike Driver
art blog(derogatory)

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
todays bird

JBB: An Artblog!
Jules of Nature
occasionally subtle

tannertan36
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

oozey mess

Origami Around
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Syria

seen from United States
seen from United States
@stephanie13diann
I got a link to something else and then this popped up
AH I see someone is bothered by my absence in an anon.
You are incorrect, No pregnancy or postpartum blinds of this entire 15 blind mess to ENT have ever been acknowledged, or answered on record. Just because you want to lie and make something up doesn't mean we will. And everyone can go on that site genius. So before claiming crap, have the receipts. ENT has not put those as 'answered' on record because he doesn't have proof on record that there is a baby at all.
This is the blind you're thinking of that was answered:
The November 1st blind item was allowed to be answered because it serves a dual purpose: it acts as a low-risk, unprovable narrative track for the gossip platform, while simultaneously functioning as the camp's original backstage escape hatch. When you look at the mechanics of why a premier celebrity gossip platform can post and answer this specific text without triggering an immediate multi-million dollar defamation lawsuit from a team like Jason Weinberg's office, it comes down to three concrete reasons:
1. The Legal Shield of "Stalker Plausible Deniability"In entertainment law, claiming that a celebrity is "moving houses due to stalkers" is a common, low-liability PR statement. It does not contain any career-ending allegations of financial crimes, corporate fraud, or severe contract violations that would immediately trigger studio morals clauses. Because the text frames the actor and his partner as the victims of external harassment, the platform runner is legally insulated. A team will not sue a site over a text that technically paints them as sympathetic victims in need of privacy.
2. The Insertion of the "Baby Disbelief" Track. The most critical part of that text is the final sentence: "They also don't believe there is actually a baby."
3. By officially clicking "ANSWERED" on this item, the platform successfully laundered the concept of a phantom narrative into the public record right out of the gate. This wasn't an accident. In long-term narrative engineering, a crisis team will deliberately allow a "disbelief" or "PR relationship" rumor track to sit un-retracted in the gossip lanes from day one. It builds an automatic layer of plausible deniability so that whenever they eventually choose to pull the plug and execute a total erasure play, the industry grapevine is already completely acclimated to the unverified nature of the timeline.
IN reality everyone knows no one was stalking them no one knows where they live, and no one moves the first week of a baby born, AND you don't go running to ENT if something genuinely serious happened. IT was also answered right before Thanksgiving, which was their main shield to prevent people "Expecting proof" of a baby through the major holidays like normal celebs.
That was allowed to be answered because it's for specific narrative reasons that I just listed above, the one below, there is no other reason besides labeling him as "with someone else."
You’re just mad they answered this one.
Enty's own stated logic is that, at least for relationship/split-type reveals, he reveals when he believes he is sure enough to take that step.
Enty himself has said publicly about reveals. In a 2016 Vanity Fair interview, he said he used to wait until a couple had split before revealing, but later started revealing “before it happens” when he was “100 percent sure,” and that when he does that, the couple often calls it quits a few weeks later. (Link to that Article is here )
A firm, backdated “actor has been with another woman since September/October” claim while he is still publicly married is not casual gossip. It directly pressures the public marriage narrative. It implies either cheating, separation, a fake timeline, or some undisclosed relationship-status change. That is exactly the kind of thing where, based on Enty’s own quoted logic, you would expect him to only “answer” it if he felt unusually confident or protected.
The one distinction is that “with another woman” is not technically the same as “they split,” but in PR effect it functions very close to it. Because if the actor is publicly married, naming him in that blind forces one of two interpretations: either the marriage is not intact, or he looks like he is cheating. Neither is neutral.
If the actor is still publicly married, then an answered blind saying he has been “with another woman” since a backdated period is not just messy relationship gossip. It effectively puts an adultery implication on the record unless there is already a split or separation that privately occurred during that time frame.
Before it is answered, defenders can say, “That could be anyone,” or “Fans are guessing,” or “It is just gossip.” But once ENT marks it answered and attaches a specific actor, especially to a backdated “with another woman” claim while he is still publicly married, the situation changes.
At that point, it becomes a named public allegation with a real implication: either adultery, or a split/separation timeline that has not yet been publicly acknowledged. That is not something a team can cleanly neutralize with “fans are stalking” or “people are invasive.” Those are distractions. They do not address the actual claim.
Last night I bit my cheek and today I woke up with it hurting
Just got home from work
November 1 : The former superhero and his wife have been forced to move because of several stalkers who want to be with the former superhero and want his wife out of the way. They also don't believe there is actually a baby.
This was to explain why no photos or proof were shown from any holiday Between October (Halloween) and Easter.
March 6th - A fan of this A-list actor who will be presenting at the Oscars, made a group chat with his friends and family and sent his wife’s nudes to the group. The actor is upset and his much younger wife has had enough of this hate from his fans and can’t take it anymore.
This was to get them through the oscar walk without any interviews and no congrats
March 25th Blind - In a very scary taking it too far moment, someone has hacked into the email account of the wife of the former superhero and are sharing the emails online .
This was the cover to get him through NYC/ASP without being asked anything about a baby.
June 19th was a mess of a blind calling fans stalkers and unhinged again to stop people expecting proof for Father's day.
See the pattern? All lies Because they have no proof of a child.
Man.. Mutherfuhking crush Monday... 🥴🫠
When the Shawarma is all gone. 😌😆🤣
Me.. 😏
@eva-knits12
@rebelbossheart
I've got a lot of DMs lately so let me put out there what a lot seem to be feeling here.
The fact is, true fans did want to see this man get his happy ending. That is why it is so stupid when people come here screaming “jealousy” or “your boyfriend,” as if any of us ever claimed him that way or even suggested we wanted him like that.
Go say that to the people who write real-person Chris fanfiction. Go say that to the people who have him plastered all over their walls and beds. You know exactly who I am talking about. Normal adults can be fans of an actor without wanting him romantically in real life. That is how you know these anons are either children or people who cannot wrap their heads around normal fandom.
I wanted to see this man happy. I wanted to see him married, settled, and sharing proper, normal things with the public. What I did not want was a million “source says” articles, never him, constantly pushing his “wife” on the audience while ignoring the very valid reasons people have concerns about her past. If I want to watch an actor promote a movie, I do not want interviews where he keeps dropping scripted “my wife, my wife, my wife” lines when it has nothing to do with the project.
He never used to insert people like this before, so do not tell me this is private in any real capacity. If he were genuinely in love and with someone, I would be happy for him. But I would expect him to share normal things, not dump five hundred articles every time they walk outside during the six times we have seen them together in four years. Normal private couples do not get that kind of coverage.
And if he got married and had a child, I would not expect contradictions, confusion, questionable documents, and blinds ranting about “fans did this” or “fans did that” while nobody will even clearly prove the child exists. That is not private. That is not genuine. You cannot put out that much press, hide from reality, scream “privacy” to ENT, and then act like the victim when people question the mess you created.
I wanted to see him happy with someone. The problem is, he has not shown that he is happy with this girl once. If he had done a real interview with GQ where he actually talked about her, their relationship, their marriage, or this claimed baby in a natural way, that would have felt genuine. But that last GQ situation, where her name was inserted on the website only and not even in the print version, was pathetic. If he was supposedly engaged by then, why was his mother the one sitting there beside him while he could barely speak about it like an adult?
Sebastian confirmed having a child in a real interview. That is what people expected from Chris. Not this absolute mess.
So do not you dare call people jealous. If this man had shown bits and pieces of a real relationship, not trolling, not weird follows and unfollows, not crumbs, not five hundred planted articles, but actual pieces of a genuine, loving relationship, we would have said, “Okay, cool, he is happy.” But that is not what he is doing.
He is not even on record about a child, yet people expect everyone to believe he allowed some random birth document to become the alleged proof of his kid while no one else will officially back it up as true? Miss me with that privacy excuse. Nobody lets that happen. And what, the clerk was just conveniently looking for his birth document when no pregnancy had even been confirmed?
No. That does not make sense, and people are allowed to say it.
At the end of the day, this was never about fans being jealous. It was about fans being asked to accept a story that keeps changing, contradicting itself, and hiding behind “privacy” only when accountability shows up. If he wanted people to believe this was real, healthy, happy, and genuine, he had every opportunity to show that in a normal adult way. Instead, all people got were planted articles, vague sources, strange timing, fake-looking proof, and a man who still will not say the most basic things out loud.
And no, lists of other celebrities or parents who have publicly acknowledged their children do not qualify as proof for him. Evidence that someone else has a child is not evidence that he does, those E news/People mag lists are printing what's already laundered in thei system and linking back to the original articles that STILL say "Reps didn't comment". Every situation stands on its own with real photo proof, and for him does nothing to answer the questions surrounding his specific story.
This is also the same man who will publicly explain missing a festival because it was his mother's birthday, yet somehow cannot address cheating rumors that have appeared in foreign tabloids (Yes the unanswered blinds from November are in tabloids over there) or even speak clearly about his own alleged child. People are expected to believe he is willing to clarify minor scheduling decisions but draws the line at the biggest stories attached to his name? That is exactly why so many people question the narrative.
So no, do not blame the fans for noticing. Blame the people who built a public narrative so messy, selective, and inconsistent that even the people who wanted to root for him cannot recognize it as happiness anymore.
No one realizes they did this because of Father’s Day? They used the same stalking fans crap in November to go silent . This is the only other blind answered of CDaN :
November 1 : The former superhero and his wife have been forced to move because of several stalkers who want to be with the former superhero and want his wife out of the way. They also don't believe there is actually a baby.
Think about it . No one knew where they lived because he sold concord so that right there was a full lie off the bat and this is the first blind by the way. They used that to hide all winter .
Then the March 6 one claiming the nude leak by a fan to his family. Another security lie to get through the Oscar’s in silence.
Now this one yesterday after Cdan just happened to answer the only other blind of this mess claiming he was recently seen with the other woman from October ?
They default to blame the fans every time for a reason . It’s a fake scapegoat . This time is probably because they know Father’s Day will get eyes on him and they have no proof , so now they make up another crazy fan issue to hide for that .
Same crap every time
Please team real is saying team pr is getting shut down . Shut down for what ???? That stupid blind that sounded like a team real post with bad English 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
New leaked doomsday photo
if fans wrote the blinds or made the divorce document, guess what-- they wouldn't have been shared and stayed online like this for months, period, end of discussion, do not go after those mods just bc that blind popped up , that is his team completely ditching their responsibility and that is not fair to anyone here, not team real, not team pr, no one. Do not harass people bc of that blind. it is not worth it, they are tricking you. That man's team had all the power to stop blinds and stop documents on social media, and stop people doing tiktoks which none of these mods even have tiktok, so don't fall for their shit anymore. ignore that man.
If those documents were "fan-made," they would have debunked that whole thing. This was all fabricated by his team.
I have a question for lovelyhideout why are you over here if you follow a page that I will not name that is trying to cause harm to some people in this group? A page that’s trying to dox folks. I don’t think you should be allowed to speak nor be able to over here.
Thanks for letting me know.
This woman is crazy . She is being paid and fans are asking fair questions and askin why she assumes secret wars because he has other work during that filming period and she’s blocking them and saying take your meds. That’s proof shes being paid to do this crap and rile all the fans up and get marvel in his algorithms. What a joke
Gross.
The fact that alba never celebrates Chris’s birthday (except for Justin’s), and yet she’s taking Chris’s spotlight AGAIN does not sit right with me.
They literally had no rights adding her into the mix when that day should have never been about her, instead of it being about Chris.
Like OKAY! let’s wrap it up! I’m done.
Jason we’re tired of this Bullshit end it already let the man be happy again.
Please get her out of his ass
They are doing everything but the one thing everybody wants. The BUA. Snap snap Jason. We are all tired.