#in all objectivity#because I always am when it comes to movies#I didnāt like Elsaās frost AT ALL#I thought it just looke ugly and unatural#too much pretty cute swirls and GLITTER AND#aaaah Iām so pissed about her frost you canāt imagine#THERE I SAID IT#I HATE THE MAIN ELEMENT OF FROZEN OK#IN ALL OBJECTIVITY#JACKāS FROST IS SO COOL AND BADASS AND IT CAN LOOK DELICATE AND WILD AT THE SAME TIME#JUST LIKE NATURE YEA#and I know Elsaās frost is more about MAGIIIIC~ then actual nature#BUT STILL#TOO MUCH CUTIE LIL SWIRLS AND GLITTER AND LIL STARS THAT DONT EVEN LOOK LIKE SNOWFLAKES AT ALL#oh man why am I so pissed#why#PROBABLY BECAUSE RISE OF THE GUARDIANS DIDNT WIN AN OSCAR#OMG I AM SO PISSED WHY AM I SO PISSED SO SUDDENLY
I feel you friend. I really really do. I know itās a perfectly valid defense to say that Elsaās ice (Iām not calling it frost because itās never referred to that way and frost is Jackās thing) doesnāt have to look natural, because itās magic, and itās Disneyās take on ice powers. But coming right on the heels of Rise of the Guardians, the entire aesthetic of Frozen is just so cheap and synthetic looking.Ā
Never mind all the other incredible details in the film, but speaking of just Jack himself, his design may be simple, but the rendering is so detailed and lovingly meticulous. The many different shades and hues that make up his complexion. The texture of his skin, clothes, and hair. No detail was spared in making Jack as lifelike and realistic as possible while still keeping his design within stylistic margins.Ā
Now, letās take a moment to compare.Ā
Of course, it comes down to the style, but considering that style and aesthetic is a great majority of what the medium has to offer, these elements are crucial to the end result. Everyone has their preferences, but Ā in general, styles that are more evolved and lend more towards realism are often taken more seriously, and make it easier for the audience to invest in the characters. When you look at the two figures above, which one looks like a person, and which one looks like it belongs on the shelves of a toy store.Ā
On the left you have Jack. His proportions are modestly exaggerated to give the character more life, and the color pallet that illuminates him and his surroundings is of muted, earthy tones. Thereās a lot of nuance there, both in his features, and in the coloration.Ā
Then on the right is Elsa. Her features are extremely exaggerated; the colors are loud and gaudy. Not that there isnāt a place for loud and gaudy when it comes to film, but if you consider that Disney wanted to make a serious tale of fantasy, politics, and human interest, the aesthetic doesnāt really help them in this respect. Itās glaringly obvious that these designs were taylor made to be reproduced as toys, as merchandising (particularly with the princess brand) is a huge contributor to Disneyās profits.Ā
Thereās actually quite a lot I have to say on this subject. Starting with how their respective powers are defined, what they mean to the character, and how they play into the story.Ā
In Jackās case, his powers are pretty well defined. We know, for the most part, what his limits and abilities are. As does he. Ā We are given a sense from the beginning of the film that his powers come from a higher place, and by the end of the film the audience, as well as Jack, has found how and why Jack came to possess such power.Ā Furthermore, the aesthetic is naturalistic, complex, and very beautiful.Ā
Regardless of how you feel about the aesthetic of her powers, you canāt deny that the film does a poor job of developing them. The source of her powers remains a mystery to us, as does their nature. We know that she was born with them, and that itās supposedly some kind of curse, but where did it come from? Who cursed her, and why? No explanation. And as far as her limits, her powers seem to range from whipping up blizzards, to dressmaking, to bringing inanimate objects to life??? And wether or not she can control these powers seems to vary at the convenience of the plot. Aesthetically, theyāreā¦wellā¦as generic as Elsa herself.Ā