CONVERSATION with JESSE HOGAN
oil on canvas, plexiglass
Conversation # 2 with Jesse Hogan / In Person / 1: 25mins
It is cold outside. We are in the gallery.
Emma Ramsay: So Jesse, we’re going to have a conversation…we are going to have chat about your work that is installed here at 55 (Sydenham Rd)…but I want to start with the work that references the Guy Benfield work. Floor Talks #2.
Jesse Hogan: Floor Talks #2
ER: I recognise the artwork straight away. It had a massive impact on me because (at the time) I had never seen work like it at in Artspace before, or really anywhere. I only expected to see work like that in an artists run space, with a younger artists that…
JH: Established expectations…a lot of established artists can dull their work down into something that is quite quantifiable…rather than having multi activities going on in the one piece…
ER: Yeah…multi activities…using things that seem like ‘finished products’ and other things that are straight out of the studio and placed in the art space…being more than just props for the durational work. It made all the art in there seem like ‘working objects’ that have been moved into the space…and they will continue their life when they are moved back into the studio.
JH: It was interesting for me to see what was actually made during the install, and what was pre made in the studio and just bumped in. It creates a tension of why he decided to include certain things.
ER: I think that’s why it had such an impact on me because there was that dynamic between objects that were so sloppy…and other formally constructed fixtures.
JH: Was he there when you saw the work working the clay wheel? How different was it from what you see in this documentation…without him or the clay wheel?
ER: No I just saw what seemed to be the remnants of a performance…with this kind of over the top backdrop becoming the artwork itself. To walk in and see this image of one my favourite art shows…in the form of a painting, I thought…Jess couldn’t have painted this from memory…it would have been a lot more minimal I guess…there is something instantly uncanny about this painting.
JH: My friend Lucy Phelan asked if the work was actually composed, ‘Did you just put things there and make the picture’. It’s meant to be an image of a real event, it’s not meant to be fantasy but I can see how documentation of art converted into painting can become fantasy…
ER: There is real conflict again between the formal shapes in the image and soft clay and paper mache heads…strange paintings that have been intuitively placed around the space…it makes for a surreal image…
JH: Bric-a-brac…a kind of collaged feel…
ER: Why did you choose this image to reproduce…of this particular Floor Talk?
JH: This particular Guy Benfield work epitomizes to me the ideal studio practice…the ideal result of the contemporary artist making works in video, painting, sculpture being serious and formal but also ridiculous. It seems like it really epitomized everything about my own practice. I want to be this free to work across all these forms and not be concerned wether they ‘go together’ in an installation setting or gallery setting. When I make a painting of an installation event…it’s sort of reducing installation back to a traditional painting…so it can be viewed on 2D terms and maybe avoid the questionable factors of ‘this doesn’t go with that’. On the surface of a painting, there is no ‘this no this doesn’t go with that’, it’s all one level…one dimension…it’s joined. It’s a way to justify what I’m doing but to also oddly put into my own art history. I see the people in these paintings as my contemporaries, but maybe one step away from being colleagues. They aren’t so far way that they are mythical figures in art history. They are closer to our kind of art making situation.
ER: There was something inspiring about this work when I saw it. I was blown away and it shifted my very raw COFA art theory kind of idea of what contemporary Australian art could be…
JH: This guy doesn’t care weather this is going to sell or not…it’s pure production…pure trial and error with materials; which I think practice should be. The second consideration should be; I’ve found material I can use and create a commercially viable product out of it. First consideration is just how you deal with matter in general.
Emma Ramsay: I can see why people would think why it is a ‘made up’ composition. The space and shadows, and colour palette are quite psychedelic …
Jesse Hogan: I suppose if I presented the photographs of these floor talks, people would take them as a fact. Painting them creates questions for the audience… is this fact? Is this an actual happening or is it made up? Where was this happening? Its one step removed from documentation.
ER: Placing them into the perspex framing, archives the images and create an authorship of history on your behalf. From the original image to the painting, you have changed the framing slightly and omitted certain elements…
JH: Yeah completely. I guess initially because of the anonymous artist thing, it got me thinking about who actually owns these images. Who do you think owns these images?
ER: Did you take the initial photographs picture yourself?
JH: The Guy Benfield image is from the Artspace archives…
ER: The other documentation of Floor Talks #1 and #3 are more of a snapshot…the Benfield one is more formal. I guess I see this work as starting with the initial image taking…and the framing has continued until this moment in time in the gallery…
JH: We experience so much art through the documentation of work. I was looking at what happens if that mode we are experiencing the art though, becomes an artwork itself in form of a painting. It’s still at that experimental stage…
ER: If adds more layers of meaning…
JH: Does it only have more meaning to me? These moments are chosen because they mean something to me. In general terms perhaps it won’t mean much at all!
ER: Well you have given that moment meaning. The formal elements of the paintings, compositionally…relationships between the figures in each painting, and across the all three paintings are creating meaning for the audience…
JH: Yeah I hadn’t actually thought about the seriality of the images, the duplication of the figures until I had literally sketched them out on the canvas. The all have a similar dynamic taking place…
ER: The shadows in them too…
JH: The shadows make it. When you are replicating photography, you are really just reproducing light. The camera exposes light onto the film, so all you are painting is light and shadow.