fiber sideblog
đ

bliss lane

pixel skylines
RMH

tannertan36

Kiana Khansmith

izzy's playlists!
todays bird
official daine visual archive
Noah Kahan
tumblr dot com

No title available
Keni
Game of Thrones Daily

Origami Around
No title available
Stranger Things

No title available
đȘŒ

Andulka

seen from Germany

seen from Singapore
seen from Russia

seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from Japan

seen from Canada

seen from France
seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Ecuador

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Brazil

seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from United States
seen from Vietnam
@resolutionblue
fiber sideblog
OP: Friends let me show you our Uyghur fashion in Xinjiang. (cr èèæŹè)
yes. freedom of the press means the freedom of the owners of the press to manufacture ideology that aligns with their worldview. the capitalist class still materially exists post revolution and, if it's available, they will try to use control of the media to create consent for a restoration of capitalist rule
before we give a "freedom" we have to ask whose freedom, to do what, and in whose interests? clearly allowing individuals to freely own newspaper businesses isn't in the interests of the overwhelming majority, who would suffer under any restoration of capitalist rule. equally, allowing the mass dissemination of pro capitalist ideology is against the interests of the masses whoever actually owns the media. so yes, the worldview of the NYT should be barred from print
freedom of the press works as an ideal in a capitalist country, most of the time, because the overwhelming majority of the media will be produced by the ruling capitalist class, which controls the economy. in that way the press manages to do much more than report information, but instead helps to protect capitalist rule by spreading and reinforcing a pro capitalist worldview while sidelining dissenting views
under the transition to socialism, however, the proletariat uses its position of power to suppress its material and ideological enemies while it builds socialism. how much suppression is necessary or wise at any time is is a question for ruling parties, and ofc can be debated, but the US 1st Amendment, which allows capitalist apologists to publish whatever they want, would be a gift to the capitalist class. this is especially true immediately post revolution, where the whole population has grown up under the indoctrination of the capitalist class and still holds many of its views as their own
in fighting for and building socialism, we can never forget that we're in a class war â a war for material power waged by different groups, based on their common interests. every policy has a class character, in that it aligns with the interests of one class over another. giving our enemies the freedom to spread propaganda in favour of the capitalist exploiters regaining power would be a betrayal of our responsibility to our own class
real. i do love the implication that the person seems to think that a hypothetical revolutionary socialist government would for some reason uphold the united states constitution with zero changes?
ive never wanted to send a death threat over a game before
tautological wordle answer
posts that make you open wordle
Oh boy better go try todayâs wordle
WHAT THE FUCK
Like a month ago I messaged a craft group about accessibility for wheelchairs and the answer I got was âthereâs a lot of stairs but we have cute boys who can carry youâ. And itâsâŠnot good. As a wheelchair bound person I largely depend on people when I want to go out and do *anything* so Iâm used to it, I laugh it off, make an annoyed post about it and off I go. But I wanna just say a thing real quick.
Even if I wasnât gay, wasnât a survivor scared of men, getting help as a disabled person is justâŠNot a pleasant thing to us! Imagine for a sec how youâd feel being carried up a flight of stairs. Youâre a grown person. Youâre being touched in an awkward way. Youâd rather do it yourself. Youâre So Uncomfortable. Itâs not where I look for the beginning of a romantic relationship. So likeâŠcould abled people stop doing this thing where they think helping us in a condescending and infantilizing way is cute? Cause Iâm real tired. Just get me a ramp or lift and Iâm cool. I donât need a dating service when Iâm just trying to go about my day
If youâre abled please reblog it cause likeâŠthe more ppl knows the better
Hello everyone! I have managed to find some clean cover art for delicious in dungeon, buried in some promotional italian pamphlet (JPOP Direct)! Some of the files were even separated in layers, i'll put it after the cut
searched a bit more and found also volume 3,4, and a piece of 6!
this is sort of sickening to me. can they swap
Submitter comment: I'd like to submit this '[s]tudy of defensive behavior of a venomous snake as a new approach to understand snakebite' not for it's topic (worth studying!) but for it's insane methodology, which... well, I'll just let the researcher speak for himself:
[Q: Why did you decide to do this experiment?
A: Snake behavior has been generally neglected as a field of research, especially in Brazil. And most studies donât examine what factors make them want to bite. If you study malaria, you can research the parasite that causes the diseaseâbut if you donât study the mosquito that carries it, you will never solve the problem. Up until now, the popular wisdom was that the jararaca would only attack if you touched it or stepped on it. But that was not what we found.
Q: Why did you need to be the victim?
A: The best way to do this research is to put snakes and a human together. In this case, the human was me. We put the snakes inside a ring on the floor of our lab until they got used to it, then I stepped in wearing special protective boots. I stepped close to the snake and also lightly on top of it. I didnât put my whole weight on my foot, so I did not hurt the snakes. I tested 116 animals and stepped 30 times on every animal, totaling 40,480 steps.]
From the recent (aptly named) interview: Researcher steps on deadly vipers 40,000 times to better predict snakebites
"X did nothing wrong" actually no, X did a lot of things wrong. X fucked up. But I also know that people like X live their lives under a microscope, and that accusations against them tend to get magnified by bias both conscious and unconscious alike, and frankly it scares the crap out of me that you have not only chosen not to question what you've heard, but that you are seeking such drastically disproportionate vengeance on a total stranger. that's not normal.
this post has generated a staggering number of comments/replies/asks all saying some version of "Nice try laundering your argument, but we all know you're talking about [specific person], and i hate you for defending them." and literally none of them have correctly identified who i was thinking about when I wrote this, but all of them have named a trans woman as said specific person.
I hate this man
using a piece of paper to carry a scary bug out of my house and then forgetting about it and accidentally using the same paper to print my resume, manager i hand it to smells it and starts making a defensive acid,
You couldnt come up with a jollier name for a bird if you tried
this thang has one of my favorite ebird descriptions of all time
One of my hottest transfeminist takes that I have is regarding drag and ballroom actually. Read the whole thing in depth instead of skimming it then getting mad at me.
I think that the US transfemme desire to disown drag/ballroom is a symptom of both white cultureâs destruction of ancestral ties and the importance of cultural continuity, and of the predominantly white ignorance of it as a gentrified Black art form similar to how whites treat other Black art. They want a destruction of it because they see the effects and results of the gentrified version and assume thatâs all there is/was.
In particular itâs frustrating because while some drag queens are cis, a lot are trans women, non-binary, or otherwise transmisogynized and drag/ballroom and the tipping culture associated with it existed in part because the transmisogynized are so fucking unemployable and it provided/s a method beyond mutual aid for the redistribution of money, through the labor of performance.
In relation to trans women, I view drag queens as a pathway to transness similar to crossdressers, femboys, (unfortunately) sissies, and similar - where although the perception of them currently may cause harm to the perception of trans women at large due to the ways they compromise with predominantly white cishetero society to allow transfemmes to explore their gender, they are, in fact, still functionally people within the spectrum of transfemininity even if they havenât fully accepted their gender expansiveness for themselves. Harm they cause to the perception of transfemmes does not lessen them from that societal assignment, any less than we can say Caitlyn Jenner, Blair White, or Kelly Cadigan are less trans women because of the harm theyâve done to the perception of trans women. They are all, in effect, varying levels of transmisogynized whether they realize it or not.
When I was in DC I knew a lot of drag kings/queens and literally 95% of them are trans and either came to drag/ballroom as a way to explore their gender through art and/or make money bc poor, or started it and it was a gateway to unlocking their gender. Not counting the cis performers elevated by stuff like RuPaul, who is explicitly transphobic, I think I can count on my hands how many cis performers Iâve met. Hell, even with RuPaul shit a number of drag artists who have been on his shows later come out as trans (such as Bosco, who I literally grew up with), in part because they suppressed their transness publicly to maintain their career until they reached a point the blowback of coming out wound impact them less. Pulling a F1NNSTER to keep cash flowing for survival, if you will.
Iunno like. The earliest Balls we have records of were literally 1880-90s, predominantly Black (the oldest drag/ballroom performer we have records of was a Black trans woman from DC), and was one of the only safe places for trans people to exist as themselves. So I find the idea of writing it off due to a much more recent gentrification and commercialization of it as ignorant as how people often treat other demonizes or commercialized Black art.
âI just donât like the spectacle it makes of transness and harm it causes-â
Baby all Blackness is spectacle to crackers and An Amount of modern drag is white people doing minstrelsy of all Black women - not in the sense of gender at all but in the sense of race.
Like. A lot of Black culture in the US specifically is Big and Loud *because* of the repression of it weâve faced and the force towards respectability politics, which has echoed to queer culture because queer culture in the US is made vast majority from Black culture. Our existence is a spectacle so why not make a show out of why they hate us and try to erase us so that they canât get rid of even more.
Hating âthe spectacleâ of an actual performance art form is solidly rooted in white supremacy and white cultural notions of propriety/respectability. Many aspects of âspectacleâ seen in drag are directly taken from Ballroom or adapted from it/vogueing.
In summary: traditions are meant to change with situational, cultural, and environmental need but still be sustained as part of a culture. Gentrification is a poison to this that makes it harder for those the culture belongs to to practice it as it should. White ancestral shame is a poison that makes them think they should nuke everything historic/cultural that makes them uncomfortable regardless of whether itâs theirs or whether itâs something they stole and gentrified. Also yeag like,,, itâs a job/gig income predominantly for societal âundesirablesâ to make money when theyâre under/unemployed due to marginalization. And itâs also been gentrified to *gestures at RuPaul, et al.*
No matter what you think about drag or ballroom, poor predominantly racialized trans folks still gon be doing it because it is part of our culture no matter what tv shows and big names and people who have only seen those do to it, and itâs always going to be seen as one of the âdisreputableâ pathways to transness that makes other trans people look down on them because of the complicated ties to transmisogyny, because until someone publicly says the words âIm also a trans womanâ, WE also view them as a personification of what we fear the world sees us asâa man in a dressârather than an egg finding their way to gender in a way we deem unacceptable because it doesnât align with how we think it âshouldâ be done.
And I think thatâs on us honestly, not on them. If we say it can take as long or as quickly and as easily or messily for someone to sort out their gender as needed, this also has to be extended to the transmisogynized we view as âdisreputableâ regardless of if/when they reach a conclusion we deem acceptable or whether they die in the shell, never able to remove their masks fully.
Aight yall gon head and eviscerate me now
unclean = adj. of or pertaining to uncles
Taiwanese Pangolin (Manis p. pentadactyla), family Manidae, order Pholidota, Taiwan
CRITICALLY ENDANGERED.
A subspecies of the Chinese Pangolin
photograph by Steijn Pulles
you put those tags on this post where they belong