by Brian Wojtalewicz
Published 10-9-12 in The Appleton Press
So Romney won the first debate, because he looked directly into the camera more, and had a much higher word count than Obama, and because he attacked more, and he looked confident? If these are the standards on whether a Presidential debate is won, when the future of this nation is at stake, I am appalled. What about what they actually said, and the truth or deceit behind it?Â
Romney claimed that Obama wasn’t tough enough on China, yet it was Romney who shipped American jobs overseas to a Chinese sweat shop to increase his corporate profits.
Romney laughed as he promised to eliminate the funding for PBS. Do you understand that this means job losses right here in our village of Appleton at the Pioneer Public TV station? It would mean job losses for thousands of other Americans at PBS stations around the country. Of course, Rupert Murdock, the Australian right-wing owner of Fox News would be elated, cutting out more competition for his propaganda arm of the Republican Party.Â
Do we really want Medicare turned into a voucher system, as Romney proposes? Did you agree with Romney when he said that if you are over 60, it doesn’t matter to you and you don’t need to listen, concerning changes to Medicare? I happen to care about the health of others under 60, and care a great deal about medical coverage of my children and grandchildren who I hope will eventually be on Medicare. Are you like Romney or me? Romney repeated his false claim that Obama cut over $716 Billion in benefits from Medicare. Obama cut it mainly from insurance corporation contractors in Medicare, and from wasteful medical practices.
Romney claimed he wants energy independence, yet he promises to reverse Obama’s new fuel efficiency standards. Romney falsely claimed “about half of [the green firms Obama invested in] have gone out of business.” The truth: Only three out of the 26 loan guarantee recipient companies have filed for bankruptcy. Romney also falsely claimed that Obama “provided $90 Billion in breaks to the green energy world.” $23 Billion of that actually was put into “clean coal,” energy-efficiency upgrades, updating the electricity grid, and environmental clean up, largely for old nuclear weapon sites.
Romney attacked the Affordable Care Act (Obama Care), even though the central ideas of it came from Republicans years ago, and it is exactly the plan Romney pushed through Massachusetts. Romney deceitfully claimed: “But I didn’t raise taxes to pay for it.” He raised “fees” to pay for it, but the biggest part of the payment came from the federal government to Massachusetts. Romney also falsely claimed that “the CBO says up to 20 million people will lose their insurance as Obama Care goes into effect next year.” False: it would expand coverage to 30 million Americans.
Romney claimed that the National Federation of Independent Businesses, “said your plan will kill 700,000 jobs.” The truth: the NFIB is a notorious right-wing advocacy org that doesn’t really represent small business, and the study they did citing 700,000 job losses didn’t even analyze what Obama actually proposed.
Romney falsely claimed that Obama put in place as much debt “as all prior presidents combined.” This isn’t even close to true.Â
Romney falsely claimed: “I don’t have a $5 Trillion tax cut.” The Tax Policy Center examined Romney’s plan for a 20% across-the-board cut on all federal income tax levels, even for the wealthiest, and complete elimination of the estate tax, even for billionaires. They found that it would indeed amount to $5 Trillion over the next decade. Romney further claimed that he would do no tax cut that would add to the deficit. How do you do a 20% across-the-board income tax cut, and elimination of the estate tax, and not add to the government debt?Â
Romney admitted that he wanted to get rid of the Dodd-Frank law that adds new regulations to big banks in the attempt to avoid another huge financial meltdown, but claims that he agrees with some bank regulation. He failed to say what regulations he dislikes, and what regulations he would agree with. This is a guy who became a multi-billionaire by gathering Wall Street investors, along with money from Central American murdering dictators, and used it in Bain capital to loot existing American businesses, and send many jobs to China. Are you going to trust him to do the right thing for us citizens?