Rhaenicent Ramble
Hey guys!!! i’m sorry if this seems inconsistent or like I’m blabbing without reaching a point— this was all just VERY stream of consciousness…
You guys might hate me for this tbh but I really don’t see the entire fandom’s problem with Rhaenicent. Like it genuinely makes no sense to me. WALK WITH ME HERE BEFORE YOU WRITE ME OFF. I HAVE A POINT I PROMISE.
I understand all the issues with fan behavior and ship wars and whatnot, but that’s not what I’m talking about. I’m talking about the show itself, and how people say that writing Rhaenicent was “disregarding the source material of an important and compelling story!”
Maybe I’m just operating off of preference here, but as someone who has actually read Fire and Blood, I truly don’t believe the book is good enough for people to be bending over backwards in order to preserve it. If you were talking about the main series, I would completely understand— A Song of Ice and Fire is an amazing saga full of magic and nuance and personality that explores everything from gender in romance to medieval feudalism, but Fire and Blood is a history book. No character within that specific text has any purpose outside of existing as a point of comparison to DAENERYS. To show that Dany exists outside her family and will rule differently than her ancestors did. It doesn’t matter how much you enjoy Rhaenys TQWNW or Daenaera Velaryon, Jaehaera, or Naerys Targaryen, they’re not written to have any discernible characterization outside of what can be recorded about them in a history book. Even the Dunk and Egg series has characters with personalities in it— Fire and Blood just doesn’t. You can’t get inside these people’s heads and you have no clue as to what they think other than headcanons and oc material you invent. Of course there are a scant few exceptions like Rhaena the Black Bride or Daemon (and I don’t even like Daemon), but they’re few and far between.
An HBO show is made for everyone, not just asoiaf superfans who want to see targaryen number 1463 do exactly what they were written to do in a book published nearly a decade ago. If you want an exact retelling of Fire and Blood, just go and reread it. Game of Thrones/House of the Dragon watchers don’t give a fuck about what Alicent or Rhaenyra were doing in the books— just like they don’t care that GoT!Robb Stark is 25 instead of 14. They just want to be entertained with a story that emotionally resonates with them. That’s why Rhaenicent was so big in the wake of season one. People wanted to see women’s stories being told in a way that didn’t inherently pit them against each other or revolve around the men in their lives.
Additionally, an argument I always seem to come across is that book Alicent is “so much better” than the one in the show, which I think is total bullshit. Alicent Hightower in the book is a one dimensional evil stepmother character. She was protecting her children, she was a badass, blah blah blah… we’ve heard it all before. She locks Viserys’ body up and orchestrates a usurpation via one council meeting… and then takes a total backseat for the rest of her tenure as Queen Mother/Dowager Queen. She does advise Aegon II occasionally, she does say that one thing to Rhaenyra that one time, she even freaks out on Jaehaera… but other than that, she disappears. HotD!Alicent has STORYLINES. Are they consistently well executed? No! But she remains important throughout the series, unlike F&B!Alicent. Being a child bride, being Rhaenyra’s friend from girlhood, actually despising the children she was forced to bear save the one that isn’t actively harming people… it all gives her layers. It makes her an actual person outside the wicked queen stereotype we see in a fictional history book. 
We already have an “Evil Queen” in the asoiaf franchise with Cersei, and you guys couldn’t even handle a heavily softened, more competent version of her when Game of Thrones was coming out. Why would they repeat that same kind of character in a different show? For what? You guys may “love” Cersei now, but no one did before. Even still, Olivia Cooke is harassed by deranged show fans because “Alicent is evil”, further proof to me that no matter what people say online, evil women are nowhere near as adored as everyone likes to pretend. So in the end, no, no one truly misses book Alicent. They just want another reason to shit on HotD or disparage Rhaenicent. They don’t like it personally, so they glaze book Alicent for little to no reason. 
People also say Rhaenicent distracts from Rhaenyra and her story, but it really doesn’t. Rhaenyra is a central character in House of the Dragon, everything revolves around her. Not Aegon, not just Alicent… but Rhaenyra. We’ve been following her journey for three whole seasons— we may be taking some detours and the road may be poorly paved, but that’s what we’ve been doing. Just because they gave Alicent a personality that didn’t translate into an envious and zealous stepmother harassing a child doesn’t mean that made Rhaenyra less of an impactful character or more difficult to root for. It just highlighted the fact that the “powerful evil queens” in stories like these are victims too, that they are often made into the people they become. Their choices are their own, but everyone is a product of their circumstances. Nothing about that makes Rhaenyra look any worse, nor does it stop people from focusing on her. Giving the main character of the series queer romances isn’t a disservice.
Not to mention Rhaenicent is written quite well in comparison to the rest of the show. It’s new and incredibly refreshing for media in this genre— a queer love story in a fantasy environment that places more emphasis on women than men. Game of Thrones was such a dudebro show no matter how you spin it, and I actually quite enjoy the direction the show runners of HotD took when they chose to make Alicent and Rhaenyra closer in age. It provides more emotional complexity and depth— two friends torn apart by the actions of the men in their lives and having to survive in a world where they’re seen as less than is so much more compelling, and it’s not something we see very often. Queer women are either fetishized or entirely ignored in media and in real life, especially in favor of queer men, and it’s exhausting. On that note, I guarantee you if Rhaenicent was a yaoi ship they’d have the same amount of shooters as Dunkaerion or Throbb or even that one random Blackwood x Bracken ship that delighted everyone for a while. That last bit also proves my point. Two minor characters with zero discernible personality traits being gay was infinitely better received than two women, who are the central figures in the show, having any kind of romantic interaction.
But I think the primary argument people make is that “THE DANCE IS SUPPOSED TO BE RHAENYRA VS AEGON NOT RHAENYRA VS ALICENT”. Well let me tell you something. Aegon II is nowhere near as interesting as Alicent Hightower in the show. I will admit that aspects of her characterization in the show are poorly handled, let me be very clear, but the premise has so much potential! Aegon II is an alcoholic bum who rapes servant girls and leaves his bastard children to fight and die in squalor. He whines about being unloved and ignored when he had every opportunity to make something of himself— an opportunity he did not take, as pointed out very clearly by Larys Strong this season. He had the whole world at his fingertips, and he chose to be lazy, incompetent, and vile. Alicent (in the show) was a young girl manipulated by her power-hungry father into a position where she has to compete with her friend for influence— her piety could even be interpreted as religious guilt and her closeness with Rhaenyra is actually fun to watch! She’s layered and interesting and infinitely more likable than her book counterpart, and while many people make the argument that evil women should have more representation, that’s not what the vast majority really want. Aegon is the king, yes, but he’s significantly less likable and far more difficult to enjoy and invest in. Of course, there will always be niche sections of Tumblr or Twitter that say otherwise, but the general public doesn’t seem to care. So why would HotD, a show made for everyone, not just asoiaf fans, choose to feature Aegon over Alicent? Alicent is much easier to like and watch, and maybe people don’t want to see more of the rapist drunkard king who doesn’t make a single decision himself save the one that gets him charred half to death. 
HotD has always spotlighted women’s stories. The theme of the Dance, even in the book, is about gender. Rhaenyra was usurped because she was a woman. No matter how people try to spin it, there was no other reason. So why is it that people have such an issue with the show prominently depicting women? Have they done it well 100% of the time? Of course not; and everyone is within their rights to just dislike something. But stop pretending Rhaenicent is some great insult heaped upon Rhaenyra or Alicent, or even Aegon, just because it’s not your cup of tea. 
















