(no actual NSFW content as far as Iâve seen, but a few things related to sex are mentioned hence the NSFW content warning)
âWhat male/female double standard do you dislike the most?â
This is a post on r/AskReddit on which the comments put menâs issues into the spotlight for once.
For example, did you know that journalists could enter menâs locker rooms without making sure that everyone in there was wearing clothes, thing that is required for them to enter womenâs locker rooms? (link)
Iâm sure you guys are aware of the fact that if a drunk woman starts sexually harassing a man itâs funny, but if you swapped the genders around the guy would get thrown out of the bar. (link)
And if you looked at the average sentence for statutory rape related to the offenderâs gender, youâll see that women have it very easy compared to men. 63% more time in jail for men. (link)
Oh, and donât get me started on woman-on-man violence. (link) Pay attention to the replies for this comment, justice seldom helps men who get beaten by their wives/girlfriends.
Men are bad for being picky when it comes to physical traits, but itâs absolutely normal for women to do the same, itâs just a preference. (link)
And the more you scroll through the comments, the more you realize that societyâs double standards that go against women are cute when the justice systems themselves reek of misandry. Iâd gladly take making it outrageous for me to be shirtless in public over a woman sexually harassing me being just a silly thing.
Words and violence are not equal. The moment they start actually planning your extermination, then you wonât even have to punch. You can simply turn them in to the authorities and theyâll get worse.
Hi! I'm a new tumblr blog and I've actually been looking at your blog and a few others before i made this account! I follow you on twitter too. Once I saw that you were accepting mods for @babyfairyreceipts, and I saw that it was you running it I just had to make an account! i realise that you've already chosen a few but if you are still looking I'd love to be considered, Thank you so much XD
MLP icon to try and fit in, maybe believing that anti-SJW people are bronies takashi0 style.
The URL says âanti SJâ and not âanti SJWâ, social justice warriors associate social justice with equality and if youâre against them youâre against equality and therefore against social justice. Iâm not even reaching.
The most basic anti-SJW URL structure ever: anti-[SJW thing] pro-[other word]. Examples: antisjw-prologic, antifeminism-pro-rubik. These are actual blogs.
Smileys and other obnoxious stuff in their reply and only post ruin what was left of their credibility. Have you ever spotted a âlol XDâ anti-SJW on Tumblr? Exactly.
Milo Yiannopoulos is nothing but a clown who thinks his ideas are valid because he gets silenced. If only he knew that it's mainly because he'd create more tension and it's already hard to deal with what liberals are doing... They should just cancel him and not his guests who have actual points to make. What a waste.
You want to sit here and tell me that the alt-right and Steve Bannon have nothing to do with white supremacy? This photo was taken at âalt-rightâ conference in D.C. but letâs just call it what it is: a gathering of white nationalists, neo-Nazis, and racists + Tila Tequila who has apparently forgotten she is not white.
These three comfortably took this photo in a room of crowded people. They have no problem showing their hatred in the open, probably because the room is filled with alt-right darlings like Jared Taylor, a white nationalist who founded the white supremacist publication American Renaissance, whose explanation of the alt-right is horrifyingly racist.Â
Other people who were there? Richard Spencer, Peter Brimelow, Kevin MacDonald, and violent misogynist Matt Forney. Thereâs a reason these people, along with other white supremacist groups, are so excited to see Donald Trump, Steve Bannon, and Jeff Sessions in the White House. So can we stop calling these people âalt-rightâ and label them as they fucking are?Â
@shitrichcollegekidssay The alt-right is white supremacist, though. Theyâre obviously racist, possibly neo-Nazi⊠Honestly, I think this movement is actually all about being the polar opposite of liberals, because theyâve had enough of their fake âpro-equalityâ bullshit thatâs not actually pro-equality at all. Liberals might be responsible for these white supremacists, no matter if itâs a joke or not. I still remember the good old days, when neo-Nazis were prosecuted and not doing Nazi salutes on Twitter, and I can almost pinpoint the period of time where it all went wrong.
No, donât pin any political party for their misguided, white supremacist bullshit. The only people who are responsible are these white supremacist groups and the people themselves who support this kind of racist, backwards shit.
(hi, I love building walls of text because Iâm argumentative like that, just a quick long text warning)
White supremacy is definitely a far right thing, though, and it starts with the alt-right that could be saying it ironically but theyâre really into this idea so I donât think thatâs ironic. One thing is sure, the alt-right gets a kick out of offending social justice warriors, itâs a movement that formed as a reaction to the excessive behavior of its leftist counterpart that can be often perceived as anti-white, anti-men, anti- any majority group.
I think neo-Nazis and white supremacists would have kept a low profile if it wasnât for the SJW left. The election of Trump itself was also a huge âfuck youâ to this movement that disguises itself as pro-equality and creates too much tension between demographic groups. Racism was starting to die out, then for some reason being white meant being racist and it all went wrong. Violent riots and terrorism made Trump win, thatâs for sure.
Not all white supremacists are part of the alt-right, of course. Thereâs even further to the right than this political alignment that starts at some point where youâll only find white supremacists if you go further to the right. Now that he got brought up because the judges have deliberated what theyâre going to do to him, letâs take Dylan Roof as an example: this scum is definitely further to the right than the alt-right, heâs an extremist for sure. Ironic or not, the alt-right is white supremacist partly to spite liberals. Maybe the irony got into them to the point where they started believing what they were saying.
People who have a problem with any identity are definitely misguided. Their morals are not right at all. But thereâs a clear line on each side that determines where misguided people are, that extends all the way further to the side theyâre in: this line starts with the SJW movement on the left, and the alt-right on the right. Racial extremists from each side are going to be the modern Black Panthers (look up what theyâve become) and white supremacists, respectively.
Thereâs a spectrum of political opinions thatâs reasonable, where youâre going to find people you can have intelligent political discussions with. But those who are out of the said spectrum can only get out through introspection and proper morlas, because they wonât actually listen to/read opposing opinions. They stay within their hiveminds, and I know this because I used to be both an SJW and (lightly) an alt-righter, one after the other. I used to be kind of anti-white, then I used to laugh at the useless shit Milo Yiannopoulos said on stage, I used to be that kind of dumbass on both sides. Then I used my brain better than when I switched to the alt-right, and I end up judging both sides.
You know what? If it was up to me, I wouldn't have given the death sentence to Roof. That was a racist mass shooting, I'd have put this scum in solitary confinement for many, many years, if not until he dies.
As a French author said in a piece that contributed to the abolition of the death sentence in the country, death is an easy escape, too short to feel the punishment. He won't live to suffer as a consequence of what he did, and this is exactly what bothers me. He's pretty much getting away with this shooting by simply losing his life when he could've suffered alone, given the rest of his life to think about what he did, alone until he died.
Instead, he's getting the shortest-lived punishment justice can deal: death. Iâd have loved to know that heâs currently rotting in solitary for his extreme hate crime.
(this post got recommended on my dash, and it inspired me to make my specialty: a wall of text)
The thing is, the general criticism isn't directed towards feminists âby definitionâ. You know, those who actually want equality between men and women? (Iâll come back to the definition later) Yeah, usually people let them do their thing.
The people others have a problem with are misandrists who claim to be feminists. (and use feminists who actually want equality as meat shields) Theyâre the ones that get called âfeminazisâ because theyâre trying to start a male genocide or reduce menâs rights below those of women. Itâs very easy to find these people on Tumblr and Twitter, by the way, many are proud misandrists, as if being a female supremacist was something to be proud of.
And those who say âHeil Trump!â arenât republicans in general but the alt-right, the polar opposite of social justice warriors. The alt-right is part of the republican side (the right) but republicans arenât necessarily part of the alt-right. That makes both affirmations wrong, but Iâm guessing thatâs the 140 character limit so letâs break it down in a better way:
Women Feminists:Â We want equal rights. *talked over by misandrists who pretend theyâre feminists*
Feminists: Ugh, fine, letâs bounce to the egalitarian movement then. *shouted down by the SJW movement that thinks itâs the movement thatâs really in favor of equality*
Feminists: I hate this.
Misandrists: Kill all men! Did you just stare rape me?! *labelled FemiNAZIs*
Republicans thatâs arenât too far on the right: Our country needs more security, terrorism is getting out of hand. *is overall afraid of terrorism and votes for whoever promises more security*
Alt-right: Heil Trump! *taunts misandrists and other parts of the SJW movement, being just as useless as its leftist counterpart*
Yeah, that wouldnât fit in a tweet. Note that Iâve struck âWomenâ because not all women want gender equality, as an example we have misandrists. With that said, despite its definition (that doesnât include equality in obligations) feminism focuses on womenâs rights when progress also has to be made when it comes to menâs rights. You wouldnât believe how many women got to court for raping young boys and didnât go to jail despite being guilty, or how much female on male rape is downplayed. Because of that, Iâd say feminists are kind of heading the right way, but it lacks the menâs rights part to make its goal of gender equality match that of egalitarianism.
With that said, the âletâs bounce to the egalitarian movementâ part might be wrong, maybe feminists in favor of equality just stand out of the spotlight as misandrists destroy their image. But I think Iâve read about some Canadian politician whoâd rather call herself an egalitarian than a feminist, and it might be because the goal of the first one is really a complete equality of identities. Feminism is really just about women and you just have to look at the name to see that, and intersectional feminism is egalitarianism rotten by misandry because they only care about issues like homophobia and racism when they happen to women apparently. Because of that, nothing says âI want equality between all identity groupsâ more than being egalitarian.
By the way, Iâm not biased towards any side of the spectrum. I took a Political Compass test less than a month ago, and I was more of a centrist. If anything, Iâm leaning a little towards the left. So donât worry about me downplaying anything these movements do, I'm not part of any of them so Iâm judging each one of them equally.
You want to sit here and tell me that the alt-right and Steve Bannon have nothing to do with white supremacy? This photo was taken at âalt-rightâ conference in D.C. but letâs just call it what it is: a gathering of white nationalists, neo-Nazis, and racists + Tila Tequila who has apparently forgotten she is not white.
These three comfortably took this photo in a room of crowded people. They have no problem showing their hatred in the open, probably because the room is filled with alt-right darlings like Jared Taylor, a white nationalist who founded the white supremacist publication American Renaissance, whose explanation of the alt-right is horrifyingly racist.Â
Other people who were there? Richard Spencer, Peter Brimelow, Kevin MacDonald, and violent misogynist Matt Forney. Thereâs a reason these people, along with other white supremacist groups, are so excited to see Donald Trump, Steve Bannon, and Jeff Sessions in the White House. So can we stop calling these people âalt-rightâ and label them as they fucking are?Â
@shitrichcollegekidssay The alt-right is white supremacist, though. Theyâre obviously racist, possibly neo-Nazi... Honestly, I think this movement is actually all about being the polar opposite of liberals, because theyâve had enough of their fake âpro-equalityâ bullshit thatâs not actually pro-equality at all. Liberals might be responsible for these white supremacists, no matter if itâs a joke or not. I still remember the good old days, when neo-Nazis were prosecuted and not doing Nazi salutes on Twitter, and I can almost pinpoint the period of time where it all went wrong.
There are totally people like that on the anti sjw side of things. Pretending there isnât makes you just as bad as the feminists or blm supporters that act like there are absolutely no negative aspects to their movments. Be better.
Itâs funny because an SJW wouldâve cropped out the left part of the picture. shittywebcomics is the exact right-leaning equivalent of a social justice warrior, in fact both movements are symmetrical on the political compass: same belief that their movement is perfect, along with a fervor that blinds them from seeing the bad parts of their ideologies. The difference is a bit deeper, but essentially the same.
The first step towards progress is to recognize the wrongs of what youâre currently defending. Then you use your morals to head towards whatâs right.
mansplain is another way to stop men for using the freedom of speech
so men canât explaining stuff they see like  women do they scream and speak whatever they want , itâs not anymore freedom of speech when men speak to feminist to explaining something today feminist will accused to mansplain but that call freedom of speech but what about womansplain When a woman attempts to tell a man how his brain should works and what the motivations behind his various thoughts, words and actions are , feminist sjw will use a words like white supremacy , Political Correctness , shaming , bigot , misogynistic , sexism âŠetc against men or anyone that donât agree with feminist , everyday feminist will find a new word to stop other from speaking or stop men
Feminists pretending that they're mind readers are the worst. Everything men say is condescending, there's an evil intent behind everything they do, this is ridiculous.
Before we start, Iâm taking no âfuck off whiteyâ because Iâm Arab. Iâm not taking any âwhy do you want to be white so bad?â either because Iâm absolutely fine with my own identity, thereâs no race Iâd rather be because at the end of the day itâs nothing but a superficial trait, a part of your DNA that changes your skin color. Other physical characteristics arenât linked to race but genetics.
Now, you may have guessed by the previous paragraph that the answer isnât yes because only liberals would say so along with the two quick answers I turned down. Iâm not going to say the opposite either, since Iâm not right-leaning. If you need to know my political orientation, Iâm pretty much in the center of the gray zone, something that isnât the case for most Tumblr users so if you hate reading opinions that donât match yours you can stop reading. This post will take every argument (that people give when they say white people are evil) apart and discuss whatâs right and whatâs wrong. Thank you for reading even if youâre not a centrist, thatâs very open-minded of you, just click the link to wonder what Iâm doing with my life. Just bear with me, Iâm an expert in walls of text and this is my novel.
Firstly, Iâm going to hit the generalization implied in the affirmation. There is an infinity of ways people have been raised, some kids have been spoiled, some parents have been harsh, some have been abusive, and I believe that the behavior of parents has a huge effect on how the kid is going to behave. Spoiled kids, usually, are poorly mannered because theyâre taking things for granted. Kids that are taught kindness often end up kind, but thatâs also the case for kids with abusive parents who see the evil in what the parents have done and decide not to hurt like theyâve been hurt. Another influence is anyone they socialize with, and what they read or watch. All these influences are what makes a person who they are socially, which places each individual on the spectrum of good and evil. Of course, introspection is the most successful way to move within this spectrum. Race doesnât make anyone lean towards one side or the other, because itâs nothing but DNA. As a conclusion, itâs easy to realize that being white has no effect on someoneâs social behavior.
Now, one very americentric argument is that Christopher Colombus (trivia: his actual name is Cristoforo Colombo. French, Spanish, and English speaking countries (among others probably) change his name a little for some reason) killed Native Americans and stole their land after they taught various things such as hunting. I personally think that itâs conquest in a nutshell: one day youâre friends, the next day youâre at war. War was all about conquest before, for example in World War 1 we lost two regions to Germany in France: the Alsace, and the Lorraine. We took them back at the end of the second one. So this conflict has been motivated by conquest, plus that doesnât say anything about the majority of white people that stayed in their lanes.
Then an argument that shows up very often is âwhite people stole black peopleâ. Thatâs super incorrect historically, the short answer is âNo, black people enslaved other black people and sold them to white peopleâ. On top of that, slavery has been abolished everywhere. If that still makes white people evil because it was allowed in the past, then what about the other countries? Do you hold them accountable too? Looks like this evil that has been stopped makes countries work like people: they evolve, they change for the better. One day you think youâre behaving perfectly, a year later you look back at who you used to be and you realize you used to be an asshole but youâre glad you changed. You used to be more evil than you are right now.
Now, letâs talk racism because Iâm itching to start pointing fingers. So one thing we can all agree with, is that racism is evil, right? Why? Because this is hate based of race. Yeah, the thing thatâs part of peopleâs identities and can never be changed. And thatâs 100% of whatâs wrong with racism, really, you decide to hate people based on something thatâs part of their identities. You know where Iâm going with this, donât you? Anyone who is prejudiced against any race, any gender, any orientation, anything thatâs part of peopleâs identities, is just as evil as a racist. And that includes misandrists, misogynists, anti-whites, anti-blacks, anti-browns, homophobic, heterophobic... Youâre all the same evil trash, none of these is less evil than the other, and you have no excuse that takes this evil away from you. Only positive evolution that takes this prejudice away from you can rid you of this evil. The right and non-evil way to hate people is individually, based on who they are socially, and I personally hate people who have a problem with a certain identity, whatever it is. And by the way, the fact that racism is prejudice based on race goes against the idea that all white people are racist, look at the third paragraph for more information.
Whatâs next, maybe the school shooters and shit? Doesnât say much about race if you ask me, look at the third paragraph for more information. Ah, cultural appropriation, how could I forget that? Liberals have taken it too far. Iâd say cultural appropriation is an evil thing only if it involves taking a part of a culture thatâs not yours and acting like itâs yours and not coming from its original maker. So is it cultural appropriation to try curry at an Indian restaurant, thing that Iâm probably doing next time I get paid? The answer is no, itâs really just appreciating a foreign dish. Is it cultural appropriation to wear a bindi for fashion and not because youâre Hindi? No, but thatâs very inappropriate because bindis are a religious thing. Yeah, thatâs two examples from Indian culture because theyâre under-represented just like Arabs so I felt like giving them a nod. Come to think of it, if it wasnât off-topic Iâd definitely tackle tokenism and its literally black and white problem. Anyway, I donât really know how youâre going to appropriate a culture nowadays, now that you can look the thing up and ta-daa, you know couscous is a Maghrebi dish. That was a self-nod. Thereâs no way to steal a culture just by enjoying it or making it yourself, now that every aspect of culture is archived you canât steal it as in making it yours and no longer theirs. But wait, you thought I was done pointing fingers, right? Letâs come back to Arab culture and look at the fact that some black people on Tumblr are trying to say Egypt was a black country when thereâs just too much evidence and logic showing that this country is Arab. Now I donât know about you, but I think pretending that an Arab culture belongs to black people is definitely cultural appropriation.
Hmm... Have I missed a common argument? I donât think cops represent white people but we could talk about homicide if we want to talk people killing each other. The numbers, by race, of cases when the killer and the dead have the same race should make a few people keep a low profile. Feel free to bring up any common arguments people give when they say white people are evil, Iâm open minded and ready to demonstrate whatâs wrong with the affirmation given. Iâm pretty certain thereâs no race thatâs inherently evil or any good or bad trait, itâs all about individuals and who they become socially.
TL;DR (too long; didnât read): Whiteys arenât evil, itâs about individuals and unofficial definitions and things that can be reproached to other races and the countries where theyâre the majority.
You know, I just gotta say this to vent. Donât take this too seriously.Â
You know who mubz is? Thatâs where I draw the line. If something terrible happened to them, Iâd be happy about it. If anything, I actually hope that something bad happens to them.
I didn't know who Mubz was, a quick research later I've never been more angry reading a Tumblr post. But you know what? I'm not going to wish bad things upon this asshole or be happy if shit happens to them. I just hope their life won't end before they realize how fucked up that post was.
Just to reflect what some of my followers are saying, thereâs currently no solid connection between the 4 black kidsâ attack on that white kid. Without a doubt, it is a hate crime based on race and politics, but there was no mention of BLM in the video. Itâs safe to assume they probably support BLM, but yeah. Itâs only an assumption at this point and it probably makes us look dumb.
Just to be EXTRA clear, I donât think itâs a stretch for people to assume BLM supporters are behind this. I was purely saying itâs an assumption at this point without proof. I personally believe it probably was BLM supporters, but we just donât know it for certain at this time.
That does look like the shit activists would do to look like good activists. I mean that's right on the "fuck white people" (said in the footage released) bandwagon and joins the extremist idea of violence towards white people. But sure, Chicago police, that was definitely based on the guy being mentally disabled even though they did make him say "fuck Donald Trump" and hurt him whilst shouting "fuck white people". Definitely not racially charged but I diverge.
This shit is definitely what a BLM activist would do if they didn't understand that the movement is actually about stopping police brutality towards black people. Violence, physical or verbal, towards white people is exactly what this Black Panther part of BLM is about. Black on white racial prejudice in North America, nowadays, is almost always linked to people using BLM to spread hatred thinking this is what the movement is about. That reminds me of feminism and its extremist misandrists that made #KillAllMen trend on Twitter.
And Iâm going to put a part of the blame on BLM leaders for not keeping the movement in check, because thereâs quite the large spectrum of extremism in the movement: youâve got the pacifists who actually want to end police brutality, then youâve got the protesters, then the rioters, followed by those who fuel racial tension by hating white people for being white, and this story shows just how far the extremism can go: taking a white man hostage, kicking him, cutting his scalp, shouting anti-Trump and anti-white things. Herd your crowd towards the right direction, and all of this couldâve been avoided.
If you want to start a movement, make sure its supporters follow the same goal. These four assholes arenât trying to end police brutality, theyâre far past just fueling racial tension MTV style, they might as well join what the Black Panther movement has become. So if these 4 degenerates donât support Black Lives Matter, theyâre definitely on the Black Panthers side, thereâs no doubting that.
EVERY SINGLE PERSON WHO SEES THIS HAD BETTER SHARE THIS. SERIOUSLY. DO NOT LET THIS GET BURIED
I donât normally get genuinely, extremely angry.
But this is one exception.
Anyone who thinks racism against white people does not exist, do me a favor and fuck yourself in the ass with a sandpaper dildo.
Every person responsible for this in this video is a waste of human life. I canât even think of an insult harsh enough to truly emphasize how worthless to society you are.
Update to the story: the police says the young man was not targeted because he was white, but because he was mentally disabled. Just like a Reddit user said in a comment that received gold twice, "They're not worried about white people rioting and burning the city down". There is blatant evidence that this was a hate crime based on race, and they decided to be politically correct by but acknowledging the fact that the man is a victim of a racially charged attack. White Lives Matter coming soon, ladies and gentlemen.
FUCKING SISSIE THE QUEEN OF AUSTRIA AND HUNGARY QUEEN ELIZABETH I. QUEEN MARY I. THREE QUEENS WHO CHANGED THE WORLD AND THERE ARE MANY MORE AND LETâS NOT FORGET QUEEN ANNE BOLEYN WHO WAS THE REASON ANGLICANS EXIST I WILL SAY YES QUEEN WHENEVER I WANT YOU BITCHES
Alright, but I gotta fact check the original post.
Yasss Queen is popular slang that came from stan culture, and originates from Lady Gagaâs fanbase. Iâve seen âYAAAAAAASâ birth with my own eyes on her social media where her fans shared stuff about her or themselves. One time she was filmed at the door of a building she just came out of, and you could distinctly hear a fan going like âYAAAAAS GAGA YAAAAS YOU LOOK SO GOODâ and this âYAAAAASâ became extremely popular within the community before it started being used by people who stan for other popstars. I saw the original video that started it all. It finally reached a wider black audience when people started âYAAAAAASâing Nicki Minaj, she caught that slang and made a track called âYasss Bish!!â The idea that this slang has been created by black people is literally cultural appropriation: youâre literally stealing it from Little Monsters, where this exclamation really came from. Back off.
Secondly, if you mix logic and geography, youâll notice that Egypt is the mystery link that would connect the Maghreb to the Middle East: you start from Morocco, then youâve got Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, and the rest of the Middle East. Do you really think Egypt, the country between two series of Arab countries, is a black country? Thereâs no combo breaker going on over there, Egypt is an Arab country too, deal with it. The misrepresentation is atrocious in the original picture, if you really want to show a black person in Africa youâve got plenty of countries and cultures to the South, and weâre letting you have that. But youâre not going to take us out of Egypt historically. North Africa is ours. I canât believe these idiots are trying to reduce the already low representation of Arabs, just to once again steal a culture because itâs known all around the world. Can we keep our pyramids and pharaohs, please? The Egyptian culture is ours, back off.
