
@theartofmadeline

No title available
No title available
occasionally subtle
i don't do bad sauce passes

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
Mike Driver
One Nice Bug Per Day
tumblr dot com

shark vs the universe
Jules of Nature

Kaledo Art

PR's Tumblrdome
Claire Keane
cherry valley forever

oozey mess
KIROKAZE

ellievsbear
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

JVL
seen from Greece

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from T1
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from United Arab Emirates

seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@seizethemeansofgnomization
Cities are inherently more sustainable than returning to some idealistic agrarian world, but we can't recognize that because we have just decided the color grey means bad
This is because cities concentrate people, allowing for land to be preserved for nature, and for less energy to be used in transport as things are closer together.
The issue with your agarian solarpunk future is that moving our entire society to agarianism would require the destruction of massive amounts of open land and be significantlh more energy intensive if you were to ever move goods between locations
Also you still need industry to produce things like solar panels which hypothetically are used to power all modes of transport, unless you want to switch to horses
This is because solarpunk is a vibe, it doesn't make sense practically as an ideology, like in concept, sure small towns spread evenly across the world with farms and nature between them sounds lovely, but that ignores how humans interact with the environment
The communist party never really issued cards, when one refers to card carrying members of that party, they refer to Magic: The Gathering cards, a popular game among Lenin and his friends.
*her friends
I have three monitors on my desk. The left one shows the order book. The middle one shows Truth Social. The right one shows the investigation queue.
On April 21st, the left screen moved first.
I am a Senior Surveillance Analyst at a commodities exchange. I have held this position for nineteen years. My job is to monitor trading activity for suspicious patterns and generate compliance reports. I am employee of the quarter. I have a mug.
At 19:54 GMT on April 21st, someone placed 4,260 sell orders on Brent crude futures. They did this during post-settlement. The window after the market closes when daily volume is typically in the dozens. Sometimes single digits. Sometimes I watch the screen and nothing happens for forty minutes and I think about whether my daughter is happy.
On April 21st, someone placed $430 million in directional bets in 120 seconds during that window. One hundred and twenty seconds. I timed it on my watch because the system clock rounds to the nearest minute and I have found, in nineteen years, that precision matters to no one but me.
At 20:10 GMT, the President posted on Truth Social that he was extending the Iran ceasefire.
Brent dropped from $100.91 to $96.83.
I flagged the trade. I flag a lot of trades. I want to tell you what happens to my flags.
My flags go into a system called TRACE. Trade Review and Compliance Evaluation. I did not name it. The system generates a report. The report goes to a committee. The committee has a name I am not allowed to share but I can tell you it meets quarterly and the conference room has a credenza with bottled water that is sparkling because someone once put still water in the room and a managing director sent an email about it that was longer than most of my surveillance reports.
The committee reviews my flags. The committee has reviewed all of my flags. Here is the complete record of actions taken on my flags in 2026:
Reviewed.
That's it. "Reviewed" is a status. In compliance, a status is the absence of an action that has been given a name so it looks like one.
Let me show you my flags.
March 9th. Someone bet millions on oil falling at 18:29 GMT. Forty-seven minutes later, a CBS reporter posted that the President said the Iran war was "very complete, pretty much." Oil dropped 25%. Forty-seven minutes. I flagged it.
March 23rd. Someone sold 5,100 lots of Brent and WTI crude futures between 10:49 and 10:50 GMT. Fourteen minutes later, the President posted on Truth Social about a "COMPLETE AND TOTAL RESOLUTION" to hostilities. Oil dropped 11%. Over 13,000 contracts traded in sixty seconds after the post. Fourteen minutes. I flagged it.
April 7th. Someone established a $950 million short position in oil futures at 19:45 GMT. Three hours later, the President declared a two-week ceasefire. Nine hundred and fifty million dollars. I flagged it.
April 17th. Someone placed $760 million in bearish bets twenty minutes before Iran's foreign minister confirmed the Strait of Hormuz would reopen. Seven hundred and sixty million. I flagged it.
April 21st. The $430 million. Fifteen minutes. I flagged it.
That is $2.1 billion in directional oil bets in April alone. Every one of them landed on the correct side of a presidential announcement. Every one of them was placed in a window so narrow you could measure it in bathroom breaks. I flagged every single one.
The CFTC chair told a Congressional committee that his organization has "zero tolerance" for fraud and insider trading. I wrote that quote on a Post-it note and stuck it to my right monitor. The one that shows the investigation queue. The investigation queue has not moved since March.
Zero tolerance. Zero staff. Zero budget. Zero prosecutions under the STOCK Act since it was signed in 2012.
Fourteen years. The law has existed for fourteen years and has been enforced zero times. In compliance, we call that a compliance rate of one hundred percent. No cases filed means no cases lost. You cannot fail an audit you never conduct. We call that excellence.
Last month the White House sent an internal email to staff. I was not on the distribution list but I have read reporting on it and I need you to sit with what I am about to say. The email instructed White House staff not to use insider information to place bets on prediction markets.
The White House had to send a memo telling its own employees not to insider-trade.
I want you to read that sentence again. Not because the instruction was unclear. Because the instruction was necessary. Because someone in the building looked at the same pattern I have been flagging for months on my three monitors and decided the appropriate response was an email.
The President's son sits on the advisory board of Kalshi. He is an investor in Polymarket. Both are prediction markets. Both saw accounts created days before U.S. military action.
One account. I cannot stop thinking about this account. It was called "Burdensome-Mix." It was created in December. On January 2nd, it placed $32,500 on Venezuela's president being removed from power. On January 3rd, Maduro was seized by U.S. special forces. Burdensome-Mix collected $436,000. Then it changed its username. Then it disappeared.
One account is a coincidence. But there were six.
Six accounts were created on Polymarket in February. All bet on U.S. strikes on Iran by the 28th. When the President confirmed the strikes, the six accounts collected $1.2 million between them. Five of the six never placed another bet. The sixth went on to correctly predict the ceasefire date and made another $163,000.
My surveillance system logged all of this. My system logs everything. My system does not have opinions and neither do I. I generate reports. The reports go to committees. The committees meet quarterly. Between meetings, the windows get shorter and the bets get larger.
March 9th: 47 minutes. March 23rd: 14 minutes. April 17th: 20 minutes. April 21st: 15 minutes.
The window is compressing. In March, you had time to make coffee between the trade and the announcement. By April, you had time to send a text. By summer, at this rate, the trade and the announcement will be the same event.
The spokesman said any implication that administration officials are engaged in insider trading is "baseless and irresponsible reporting."
Then the White House sent the email again.
I have been in compliance for nineteen years. I have seen insider trading run out of strip mall offices by men who could not spell "derivative." I have seen pump-and-dump schemes coordinated over WhatsApp by people who used their real names. I have seen a man try to manipulate soybean futures from a Panera Bread.
I have never seen $2.1 billion in perfectly timed trades across five presidential announcements in a single month go uninvestigated.
But I have also never seen a compliance system work this beautifully. Every trade flagged. Every report filed. Every committee briefed. Every quarterly meeting attended. Bottled water: sparkling. Minutes: distributed.
Zero prosecutions.
As long as the flags go up and the cases don't, my performance review says I am meeting expectations.
I am meeting expectations. The system is meeting expectations. The $2.1 billion is meeting expectations. The fourteen-year-old law with zero prosecutions is meeting expectations.
The left screen moves. The middle screen moves. The right screen stays perfectly, immaculately still.
In my field, we call this price discovery.
"[Y]our Harry Potter games are Cybertrucks" is such a good way to put it.
My unnecessary two cents is that ppl in the imperial core are prone to viewing "benefiting from imperialism" as some sort of personal attack on their character or moral standing (& the higher moral ground they believe they have the more they resist this idea, imo) -- like you realize that its just factual. In a somewhat similar way to the principle that men as a class benefit from misogyny
what did we do to deserve portal 2. that shit was so good and for what
we got to have this! we got to have a valve game set in the half life universe, and its an enemies-to-lovers-to-enemies-again sci fi comedy story about a homicidal ai created to run tests forever and the test subject she catches feelings for!! how is this game real!!!
happy birthday to the only video game ever
Andor + textposts
Academician Glushkov and the First Soviet Computer;
Nikolai Glushkov, 1983.
Соната Бетховена | Beethoven's Sonata;
Nikolai Karacharskov, 1961.
Nemesis vient d'annoncer qu'elles ne viendraient pas à la marche du 8 mars pour la première fois !
if you had to create one mandatory reading comprehension question for DE what would it be? or what questions would be fun to get to hear all the answers to
i think mine would be something about asking people to compare their reactions to Cuno & Cunoesse, and ask them to consider how the things we can infer about their lives and harry being a cop might shape the interactions we have with them. I want more people to be curious about Cunoesse and extend her the same empathy as Cuno
Another place I wish some players I watch would slow down is with the Sunday Friend. It's a huge loredump with a purposefully frustrating character so it makes sense people lose focus. But I love the part where he talks about renovating the Capeside apartments, and the comparison he directly draws between Revachol & the Coalition vs the Smoker & himself - it's so sinister! And even more so because he's the one who sets up the apartment as a metaphor after having explicitly established the context of sex and power.
okay i kept thinking about it so welcome to my completely unqualified DE english class. here are my Cuno & Cunoesse reading comprehension questions:
How do you feel while talking to these two characters? Have you ever had conversations like this in real life?
How did you choose to interact with them?
What can you infer about their lives? How might that context shape their interactions with the main character?
Why do you think the word f****t is used so much over other potential insults?
Why does successfully empathizing with Cuno require isolating him from Cunoesse? How does Cunoesse react, and what might her point of view look like during this scene?
Refusing to split the drugs with Cuno creates a rupture in your relationship - does that make it the wrong choice?
Cuno does a lot of boundary pushing and sets up explicit tests of trust/loyalty. Does Cunoesse do anything similar? What purpose might these behaviours serve?
Compare/contrast your reaction to these two characters. What makes you react to them similarly or differently?
(intended outcome: taking apart kneejerk defensiveness, encouraging curiosity & empathy, highlighting the implications of CSA, and emphasizing that these kids react pretty reasonably to a strange adult taking interest in them especially given their histories)
[X]
we live in the worst times
My exact thoughts. Couldn't leave this in the tags.
To send a message, write a complaint and boycott the company behind Burger King and the other franchises it owns.
This includes Popeyes and Tim Hortons.
when i was a teenager i used to catch myself thinking "i'm really glad i'm alive right now because of all the cool personal technologies that exist" and when i did i'd think it through and reckon that well, its not like teenagers in the 70s and 80s knew they didnt have ipods or facebook or whatever. they were also happy with the tech they had. and i'd reason that in the future there would be more fun technologies that i dont know i'm missing out on right now and the future will be an even cooler time to exist
anyway i was dead fucking wrong about that last part. i hate personal technologies now. i miss having an ipod that doesnt advertise shit to me and i miss when my htc wildfire didnt harass me 45 times a day to install an ai assistant and then install it anyway when i say no and i miss when the internet wasnt 5 websites all of which i have to log into and i miss when i didnt need an app to talk to my landlord. sorry past me you were actually right about 2009
Your country doesn't need to you fight, GI. Your country doesn't need you to kill. Your country doesn't need to you die. Look at your wife, or husband, or any stranger on the street, GI. Are their freedoms in Iran? Does the Ayatollah (or his successor, if he's truly dead) threaten them? Don't ask your government, GI; ask yourself. Who benefits from you killing Iranians? The Iranian soldier has a wife just like you, GI. The Iranian civilian has no ill will for you. Not yet. The Iranian government cannot reach you unless you march in Iran, and then it will be self-defense. Who benefits from you killing Iranians, GI? Who benefits from you dying, GI? It's not your loved ones, it's not your neighbors, it's not your country. It's a fat senile pedophile who called you a sucker, GI. Don't be a sucker. Abandon your post. Don't go to Iran. There's more honor for you in Leavenworth than there will ever be in Persia. Be smart, GI. Do the right thing, GI.
You have rights!
Call 1-877-447-4487 to speak to a counselor who can advise you on being cleared with an HONORABLE DISCHARGE for being a conscientious objector today!
Your country needs you, GI. Your country needs you alive, and happy. Your country needs you alive because you stook up for yourself against a pedophile, GI. Your country needs you to put the guns and uniforms away. Your country needs you to refuse to fight. It is your duty to your people, GI, to refuse to fight for this or any administration