102. Spanish Gold, by David Cordingly
Owned?: No, library Page count: 253 My summary: Woodes Rogers was the man who was supposed to solve the pirate problem. Sent out to Nassau to be the governor of the notorious pirate haven, Rogers already had a sailing career and a bestselling book under his belt at the time. When he arrived in the Bahamas, some of the pirates were ready and willing to accept the legitimate life - but others would be pirates to their deaths. This, then, is the story of Woodes Rogers, and what awaited him on the other side… My rating: 3/5 My commentary:
I don't like Woodes Rogers. I know, hot take, I've got beef with a man who died in the eighteenth century. But really, what I don't like isn't him, per se, it's his legacy and how he is discussed in the modern day. Woodes Rogers was meant to be the man who took down piracy, the arm of the law in the British Caribbean, the doom of pirates from the second his ship hit the shores of Nassau. The truth is…a little more pathetic than that. Rogers did bring word of the Act of Grace which pardoned pirates who had committed their crimes before a certain date, but 'King George signed a bit of paper' hardly equates to 'Rogers was a hero'. Many of the pirates just…accepted that pardon without a fight. And of those who did fight, Rogers wasn't the one who took them down; at best, he just deputised the people who did. But above all of that, what I hate about modern-day depictions of Rogers is that they tend to glamourise and lionise him for being on the side of good…despite the fact that the man was an active slave trader throughout his entire life, and gained his money by buying and selling human beings. It would be one thing if the books I read about Rogers acknowledged this. But the ones I've seen tend to just neatly brush his active role in the slave trade under the carpet, as though it isn't important or worth mentioning. For me, that's low. That's the cowardice of trying to create a 'good guys' and a 'bad guys', a hero and a villain, when the truth is that a lot of awful, immoral things were legal and widely practiced at this point in time. We shouldn't sacrifice the nuances of history when we speak about it. But we often do.
This book is another in a long line of books that conveniently ignore Rogers' part in the slave trade. I believe it's briefly mentioned, but nothing more than that. And what's left of Rogers to discuss is…well, not a lot really. The guy didn't do all that much. He found castaway Alexander Selkirk on an island - Selkirk's story is interesting. He sent people after pirates like Vane and Blackbeard - their stories are interesting. But Woodes Rogers was just sort of there the whole time, not doing much. His governance of Nassau left a lot to be desired, and wound up with him sick and in debt, falling into an early grave. This book struggles to keep its focus on Rogers because of that, straying away into other contemporary pirates and sea battles just to keep things interesting, but all that really serves to do is make Rogers look even more pathetic, because this book about him keeps refusing to be about him. And that's really all there is to say about that.
Next, pirate women!














