Art Should Be Communicative(?)
For the purposes of accessibility, I’m committing myself to making at least semi-usable text versions of videos I record. This won’t simply be a transcript, because I think that text and video are two different mediums with their own conventions.
I think that art should be communicative. While it’s the case that many from a more artistically or philosophically-inclined background might disagree that art doesn’t necessarily have to be anything, I think that’s just plain wrong. While, yes, art doesn’t necessarily have to be anything in the purely ontological sense, it’s a human-made category, and human categories have concepts attached. You can argue that food doesn’t necessarily have to be nourishing or that beds don’t necessarily have to be slept on, but at that point you’re just rejecting the entire concept of categories. Insofar as there is a category of “art” within our society, there are relevant associated concepts that make the central conceit meaningful. To me, these associated concepts are rooted in the functions of communication and community. It’s a bit of a cliché, but I put a lot of stock in the idea that “humans are social creatures”.
Fully admitting right off the bat that I’m a fairly rigid person, so my perspectives on art may not align with other people and this specific idea of art being communicative is one that I view as more of a personal categorization than a socially prescriptive one. That being said, I don’t particularly want to see anything called “art” that doesn’t have any sort of human communicative value, nor would I call those creations by the word “art”. I bring this up as relevant to the case of generative AI. I completely stop caring and disengage with media as soon as I know that it’s (fully) AI-generated. The knowledge itself spoils it for me. This is because I don’t see an AI as a conscious enough entity to be able to communicate anything, so it ends up just feeling empty. It represents something vapid and pointless to me. There are plenty of great stories, songs, films, etc. made by real humans. If I stopped engaging with all art published after the year I was born, I would still have more than enough to entertain, engage, delight, and fulfill me for the rest of my life and possibly my reincarnation thereafter.
It’s not that I necessarily don’t see the use of AI in creativity to augment creativity. I think that there’s a lot of value. Music being my background, I’m perhaps more open to the use of automation than my contemporaries in visual arts, because a core foundation of the modern musical landscape is this sort of “cyborg reality” where generative and algorithmic technologies in music have been in use for decades to enhance or modify to create something that communicates aesthetic beyond what humans alone could communicate. There is a certain stylistic appeal to artificial generation when done with carefully curated attention, but the past few years I’ve been subject to a lot of “AI music” which can hardly be called art at all—evidently just a minimal amount of effort spent prompt engineering with a once-over for quality control. This is not communicating anything to me other than that the creator wanted to create a product.
Perhaps the commodification of art in this case is in part to blame. Within the current social landscape, art and media serves primarily as an escapist or palliative function to the woes of society. People “consume” media, because media is a product. I do my best to temper this in myself, but I can only do so much given the world I grew up in.
Given that my video was recorded late at night, I think there are quite a lot of flaws with my argumentation. I am already starting to see some issues right now. I really hope anyone reading this or having watched the video is able to provide feedback, because I feel like there’s something to the thoughts I’m thinking, but I’m not quite there yet. Truth is a vector, not a destination, I suppose.
Anyway, I think I’ll wrap it up here, for now. I’m experimenting with this one-part rant/blog post and one-part essay format. Let me know what you think!