Shortleader0

I exist. She/her🏳️‍⚧️

[shortleader0]

Notes Game!!! :3

10- I post the screenshots of my victoria 3 campaigns

50- I start making posts about vic3, Hoi4, etc, more often with screenshots.

100- I record my playing Noita and upload it to youtube (I don't have a microphone so it would just be gameplay)

150- I start making videos of me playing other stuff as well (probably rimworld or something else that I'm semi good at)

250- I start non-privately reblogging the weirder stuff I follow.

I might add more stuff to this later!!

[shortleader0]

Alright new idea. If this reaches 250 I'll reblog all the stuff I've privately reblogged ever. (Or at least most of it)

[torsamors-deactivated20250510]

happy pride

[tonyzaret]

For everyone shaming me for using AI to write the rap songs about leadership I post on LinkedIn- yes the lyrics are from ChatGPT but the fursuit I’m wearing is ALL MINE.

[tonyzaret]

Soooo… I met Jackie Chan at the Dallas airport and the experience was, shall we say, extremely disappointing? He wouldn’t kiss my BARELY INFECTED pet toad and when I asked if he would buy me a beer I did NOT mean some watered down American pilsner!!!

[oneheadtoanother]

[lost-my-soup]

@my-life-is-a-sidequest

[kabber]

[fairweatheralways]

[odyver]

alright I've got to do some quick math to explain attitudes towards AI to my boss.

we're looking to create an AI policy, and when we were talking about this, my boss (older millennial) was genuinely shocked to hear that younger people do not (seem) to view AI positively (a la the recent commencement speakers being booed)

please rb for larger sample size!

Question 1/3

What is your age, and do you feel AI is a net positive or net negative in our lives today?

under 18, AI is a net positive

under 18, AI is a net negative

18-29, AI is a net positive

18-29, AI is a net negative

30-45, AI is a net positive

30-45, AI is a net negative

46-60, AI is a net positive

46-60, AI is a net negative

over 60, AI is a net postive

over 60, AI is a net negative

Remaining time: 3 days 8 hours

[odyver]

Question 2/3

How often do you visit or interact with museums/archives (whether in person or online)?

Frequently (multiple times per month)

Often (multiple times per year)

Occasionally (a couple times per year)

Rarely (once every couple of years)

Never :(

Remaining time: 3 days 8 hours

[odyver]

Question 3/3

If you saw a museum was using AI in exhibits, marketing, research, etc., would you be more or less inclined to visit that museum?

under 18, more inclined

under 18, less inclined

18-29, more inclined

18-29, less inclined

30-45, more inclined

30-45, less inclined

46-60, more inclined

46-60, less inclined

over 60, more inclined

over 60, less inclined

Remaining time: 3 days 8 hours

Thank you for helping with this data collection. Please rb for as big a sample as possible!

🫶

[digitalkiddo]

If you're writing anything involving cons, scams, heists, or morally questionable characters who are very good at lying, here are some free resources I've been using for research. Saving you the "why is this in my search history" anxiety.

1. The FBI's Famous Cases & Criminals archive (fbi.gov/history/famous-cases) has detailed breakdowns of real fraud cases, Ponzi schemes, and confidence operations. The language they use is clinical and precise, which is perfect for getting the procedural details right.

2. The FTC Consumer Sentinel Network publishes annual reports on the most common fraud tactics in the US. Great for understanding how modern scams actually work and what makes people fall for them.

3. The Smithsonian's American Art Museum has a free digital collection of forgery case studies. If your character forges documents or art, this is gold.

4. Court Listener (courtlistener.com) is a free legal database where you can read actual court transcripts from fraud trials. Want to know how a real con artist talks under oath? This is where you find out.

5. The Internet Archive's collection of old newspaper crime sections. Search for "confidence man" or "swindle" in papers from the 1920s through 1960s and you'll find incredible real stories that would feel too dramatic for fiction.

Bonus: The Psychology of Fraud section on the Association for Psychological Science website has accessible articles about why people trust, how deception works cognitively, and what makes someone a convincing liar. Essential reading if you want your con artist characters to feel psychologically real.

Reblog to save for later. Your WIP will thank you.

[bunniope]

i skink therefore i scram...!

[bunniope]

[nyancrimew]

if your sims always fucking die and your houses in the sims make no sense, consider applying for a job as a hotel room interior designer

[vee-dmsr]

[vee-dmsr]

of course 🫴🏼

[nyancrimew]

the median voter

[dogpuppy]

[goodgirl-inc]

[goodgirl-inc]

nevermind post cancelled he's dead again

[zeitghost]

[miraclemaya]

pjack is resurrected on the third day of pride. consider that.

[theonion]

Remarking that the anti-meat advertisement had significantly misjudged his moral boundaries, local man Tyler Richards reported Tuesday that a People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals billboard had falsely assumed he wouldn’t eat his cat. “I know they’re trying to make eating other animals seem wrong, but honestly, I bet my Kiki would taste incredible deep-fried with a little aioli,” said Richards, observing that the ad’s depiction of a cat trussed up like a Thanksgiving turkey looked tastier than most advertisements he had seen for actual foods. 

Full Story