Overturned Cup on Raspberries - Carducius Plantagenet Ream
American , 1837-1917
Oil on canvas, 12 x 16 1/4 in. 30.5 x 41.3 cm.
One Nice Bug Per Day
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
h
dirt enthusiast
Jules of Nature
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

No title available

Janaina Medeiros
NASA

⁂

Discoholic 🪩

oozey mess
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
🪼
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

shark vs the universe
RMH
d e v o n

@theartofmadeline

Andulka

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Romania

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Italy
seen from France

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
@sickscorpia
Overturned Cup on Raspberries - Carducius Plantagenet Ream
American , 1837-1917
Oil on canvas, 12 x 16 1/4 in. 30.5 x 41.3 cm.
I’m ready to be transformed by the ibuprofen . I’m ready to be born again in its purifying light.
Antico Palazzo, Tuscany 2025
ph. Danko Maksimovic - Paris, France (2025)
Film: Mira Color 800
king in yellow is a public domain work that i woudl really really love to do an edition of myself, but when thinking about cover design its borderline impossible to do better than the 1895 edition
my issue with polyamory is not with the basic fact of dating multiple people, that’s whatever. its with the fact that the community explicit prizes autonomy over care, and the fact that people are routinely told to gaslight themselves into being ok with things they’re not under the guise of “doing the work.”
and also the way there’s so little space for “in doing the work, i discovered poly is not for me.” not only are those discussions rare in poly spaces, but soooooo many times i’ve seen people who are seriously struggling and they keep being told to work through it and sometimes it’s clear this person is really being mentally and emotionally harmed by polyamory and the right choice is to quit.
and also the way so many of the feelings people have are chalked up to “monogamous conditioning.” sure, maybe at first but after five or ten years if it hasn’t gotten better maybe it’s not conditioning anymore, maybe it’s actually coming from within you. sometimes the negative feelings are actually your body and mind telling you “hey, this really is not working for me,” and it’s ok to say “yeah, it’s not, and actually the benefits are not outweighing the struggles at this point.”
also the way people speak about hierarchy… yes, you should be aware of couple’s privilege, but if a couple has been married for 15 years then no a new relationship one of them has should not hold the same significance as their marriage. that doesn’t make sense.
and also relational care, to me, is more important than autonomy. you should gaf if your actions affect your partner. you should understand when they feel cast aside. if your relationship can’t weather polyamory, either be honest and break up or stop being poly. instead of just expecting your partner to be quietly miserable. but there’s an expectation that a distressed partner should wait at home doing self-care alone trying to regulate while their partner is out on a date. and like… sure, i guess if it’s your first foray into polyamory and still getting used to it i get it, but if that’s where you’re holding then it sounds like that person isn’t ready. or never will be. and that’s ok. being able to self-regulate is important but if you’re constantly having to self-regulate because of the actions of a person who’s supposed to be caring for you… i don’t know, man.
there were many things that made me leave polyamory, a combo of personal experiences and what i witnssed in online polyamory spaces, but a couple of interactions were the tipping point for me.
one was that in a group i was in, someone was mentioning how they have a long-term partner who does not want to escalate their relationship to engagement or marriage, and they were fine with that until the partner proposed to a new partner. and now they’ve been struggling with jealousy. which… of fucking course!!!! they’d taken it as a given that the partner just wasn’t interested in marriage and then it had turned out they were, but not to them! that’s heartbreaking! it is!! frankly it’s a slap in the face (unless you’re also on board with the non-escalation). and they were coming for help working through that and that’s when it clicked for me… there’s no real stability. in at least the standard modern of relationship that poly communities embrace, autonomy means that at any point you can be shifted or downgraded or deprioritized and you’re expected to just “do the work” to make yourself ok with it. and what it looked like to me is that a huge percentage of poly advice is “do the work to make yourself okay with it.”
another thing was talking to someone who’d been poly for 10 years and was still struggling with things like sadness over having less time with a partner who didn’t live full-time with them bc of the time the partner was spending at another person’s house, and realizing that oh, time spent doing the work doesn’t make this better. discomfort with a setup like that is not “monogamous conditioning.” it’s someone not getting their relationship needs met. and that’s what it is for me, the idea that you cannot hold expectations of another person to meet those needs.
i do want to say that there are i’m sure many poly folks and polycules who do prize relational care and who do meet one another’s relationship needs. i’m sure there are many stable poly relationships and folks who are genuinely fulfilled and happy in them. this is not me saying “polyamory is bad and no one should do it,” it’s me naming some strains of toxicity i’ve identified in the community and its norms. i also acknowledge that i’m getting a lot of this from online polyamory groups (mostly support groups) where almost all of the posts are by people who are struggling while the people who aren’t, aren’t posting.
but with that being said, i’m not basing these opinions on the volume of individuals struggling but rather the way they’re encouraged to think and the way things are framed. for example, so many shitty and disrespectful things that people would post about would receive “you can’t tell them not to do that, it violates their autonomy.”
case in point, what inspired this rant, years after i left the community? a discussion i’ve been seeing. i didn’t see the original post but here’s what i’ve gathered: a pregnant woman found out her partner had also impregnated his other girlfriend, whose due date is a few months later, and she’s upset about it. she’s building a family with him and this throws a wrench into everything. and, someone respected in the community is saying that she doesn’t have a right to have asked him not to impregnate someone else, because that would violate his and the gf’s reproductive autonomy.
and i understand where that perspective is coming from. but essentially that is a framework that denies someone the right to stability, and right to have expectations of a partner about their future, the right to a certain family setup. if you want to impregnate multiple women then don’t date a woman who doesn’t want that! it’s fuckboy behavior. i guess at its most stripped down level you don’t have a “right” to tell someone else they can’t conceive a child but you can absolutely feel hurt and betrayed. and frankly yes you should be able to be in relationships where you can expect your partner not to intentionally do this to you.
polyamory will have you excusing all kinds of fuckboy behaviors under the guise of autonomy. it will have you thinking that expectations to the contrary are derived from control. but they’re not, they’re derived from the desire for safety and stability. the difference between a postpartum woman caring for a child who has her partner’s full support and time vs. a postpartum woman caring for a child whose partner is splitting his time with another household and baby is huge! him having a baby with someone else is a life-altering choice. it’s a choice that affects her and their child. and that’s the thing about the standard narratives of polyamory — a refusal to accept that one’s actions affect others. and that those effects can’t be washed away just by “doing the work.” no amount of inner work will make up for the fact that he will have another baby he has to split his time with.
this is just the most dramatic example but it highlights for me just how often micro versions of this dynamic are presented and folks are expected to just be fine with it. it’s a question of whether you take responsibility for how your choices affect your partners, or not. again i am sure there are plenty of polyamorous people who absolutely do take that responsibility, but i think also it’s given a free pass quite a lot.
i also think relationship anarchy is a practice which really can only be done with detachment. for example, and this is a bit different because i understand RA and solo poly are not synonyms (but philosophically they’re very similar), there were some solo poly folks responding to the above situation with “I simply set a boundary that I will not co-parent, but I don’t control my partner’s reproductive choices with others,” which sure, great, but that’s not the situation. the person who’s now left pregnant with a partner who won’t be able to fully support her can’t just boundary-set her way out of it. it only works if you choose not to entangle yourself with others physically, logistically, emotionally. which yeah, that’s solo poly, and that’s great if that’s what you want. but there have to be better frameworks for the people who don’t want to be that disengaged.
my theory is that a lot of these frameworks and narratives are downstream effects of the book more than two, which did massive harm to the community and its lessons have not been unlearned. it was co-authored by an abusive man and the woman he was abusing, and contained lots of advice that amounted to letting the people you’re in relationship with do the work on their own to be okay with whatever you’re doing polyamorously that’s causing distress. i could be wrong, maybe these toxic ideas were already part of the community, but i can’t imagine this helped.
and another thing. the way de-escalation, non-escalation, and breakups are framed. often breakups are reframed as conscious uncoupling, a process in which the couple works together to break up in a way that shifts rather than ending a relationship, generally shifting it from romantic to it platonic and/or from committed to uncommitted. and sure that sounds wonderful in theory. but it doesn’t leave room, i think, for genuine pain and anger that often surround breakups. those emotions aren’t bad, they’re real, and there are real reasons to feel them. it doesn’t leave space for the fact that sometimes the healthiest option after a breakup is to cut contact, not to remain friends or to process or to run a podcast together or teach classes together or what have you. sometimes breakups are hard breaks because that’s actually the best choice.
and even worse is the framing around de-escalation and non-escalation and the relationship escalator. if you want to marry your partner and they don’t want to marry you, that hurts! that is a rejection! if you’re living together and they decide they want to live separately, that’s also a rejection and it’s kind of a mini-breakup. i am not advocating that people consider themselves obligated to escalate or not to change the terms of a relationship when it’s not working for them. you are allowed to say no i don’t want to marry you. you are allowed to say no i don’t want to live together anymore. BUT! the person on the receiving end of this rejection is allowed to see it as a rejection, they’re allowed to be hurt, they’re allowed to reevaluate the relationship, theyre allowed to take a break to reassess. and hot take but they are even allowed to feel lead on, angry, or resentful, as long as they do not harm the other person in the process, ie don’t start screaming at your partner.
what i’ve seen several times are reels popping up in my feed of people talking about their deescalations (sometimes full deescalations that are effectively breakups) and how they may have been a little sad at first but quickly moved on into accepting the new setup and how actually this process was so good healing and etc etc and like. look if that’s your real genuine experience, great! but it does not and should not have to look like that. you are actually allowed to grieve losses, and yes losing a relationship is a loss. you are allowed to be sad for more than a moment. you’re allowed to feel empty, or miserable, or confused, or any of a range of emotions. so much of this is toxic positivity and trying to spin things that are painful into something happy and fluffy. not everything is happy and fluffy. you are allowed to take time to process a de-escalation, or even a no to an escalation request, and don’t just have to go “thank you for telling me” and seamlessly move on in joy to the new paradigm.
this for me is the core of the issue. self-gaslighting, blaming people for struggling, toxic positivity, detachment, and the assumption that everyone is cut out for all of this if only they do the inner work.
again i have no issue with the concept in itself of being in multiple relationships. or with reimagining relationships. my issues are:
- ignoring the very real friction points that polyamory causes
- reimagining relationships in ways that don’t make space for genuine reactions and emotions
- valuing autonomy for its own sake so highly that you leave behind relational care
- not understanding that one person’s actions affect other people and that the more people involved, the more true that becomes
- situations where the only successful emotional strategies are detachment or self-negation
- the expectation to make yourself feel okay with things you genuinely don’t feel okay with
so yeah. i’m sure a healthy polyamory could exist but right now this is what I’ve observed of polyamorous communities and norms and i haven’t seen much evidence these issues are being meaningfully addressed.
fin.
The Floral Decorator, 1993
1994 gianni versace latex bodycon dress
Jan Saudek.
Cows are big because they are full of love.
but ykw at least i'm not on mount everest. at least i'm not paying tens of thousands of dollars to slowly suffocate in a 300-person line at the gates of hell. never in my life will i have to be steered in a hypoxic stupor through the maze of poop and corpses atop mount everest. on this earth a lot of horrible things can happen to you without your permission but there are a few that you have to opt into. you can just say no thanks! and be guaranteed never to have to be on mount everest. much to be grateful for actually
still not on mount everest this morning 😌 alhamdulillah