Critical Analysis
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man.
“Understanding Media” by Marshall McLuhan is a highly influential text that examines the impact of media, in every shape and form, on human consciousness, perception, and society. In particular renowned for the phrase “the medium is the message”, McLuhan discusses in depth the many ways in which the tools with which we express our ideas hugely dictate how we live our lives, form thoughts, and organize society. Although the book was first published in 1964, many of its ideas are still highly relevant today, with its concepts only taking on new and exciting connotations as society progresses.
As we enter deeper into the age of artificial intelligence and particularly delve into AI-generated art and what it means for the artistic industry, I find McLuhan’s ideas very interesting and worth examining, specifically when he discusses automation and its impact on human society. I have selected two pages (390, 391) from Chapter 33 - “Automation - Learning a Living”, where McLuhan discusses the true meaning of automation using a variety of metaphors, and its profound effect on human society and human imagination.
McLuhan begins by referring to the computer as a perfect micro example of automation, where the energy or electricity being fed into the computer for it to function - and the information it emits once it operates - is fundamentally similar on a molecular level. However, the process within it is complex, with different parts that perform various functions and work independently but also in relation to a system of unity, each function occurring simultaneously. He draws a parallel to a musical instrument such as an oboe, which requires a series of mechanical functions to occur in order for it to produce certain tones. As opposed to an electrical instrument, which can produce any tone for any duration instantly. I found it interesting how he compares a musical orchestra, where multiple instruments must play simultaneously to create a homogenous sound, to a simulation of the “organic unity” that occurs within a computer. Here he demonstrates that where what would take a lot of human labour and effort to do by humans can be done simply and instantaneously by a computer.
McLuhan moves on to discuss how industrial automation created an effect of joblessness in the digital age, similar to how an electronic instrument renders the mechanical toil of an organic instrument less valuable. Markets that revolved around physical labor, toil, and mechanical effort became defunct. Essentially, labor of any kind no longer has similar, inherent value in the age of automation.
McLuhan believes that this rendering of human effort as defunct simply makes liberal education even more necessary. Since the automation of every kind releases man from the “servitude” of mechanical work, or skill-based specialization, we must now delve further into how we employ ourselves, and our “imaginative participation in society”. I find this phrase particularly interesting since the manner in which we participate in society can no longer be as simple as fulfilling a physical service or mechanical function. Imagination has replaced physical limitation and we must now be creative with the ways in which we can productively participate in society.
As McLuhan puts it, “This would seem to be a fate that calls men to the role of the artist in society”. The role of art in society is not strictly speaking essential, the way food and shelter are, however, it has always been an essential part of how human beings process the world, progress, and articulate themselves in order to develop. Today, artists must contribute in increasingly imaginative ways to the world as technology progresses. This is particularly relevant to my work and field since the advent of AI art has the power to render the “mechanical” functions of art obsolete - and so we must now imagine a world where artists fulfill a greater function that is removed from specialization and mechanical servitude - perhaps to a realm that is purely conceptual, and as generators of ideas. But what is considered mechanical and what is not is also not fully articulated until it has been replaced by a machine, since hindsight is 20 20. It would also be very challenging going into the future to differentiate what can broken down into simple Turing machines and what cannot be. The road to deciding what it means to be human and our role and meaning is going to be one with many twists and turns.
McLuhan discusses how automation has made people realize how much they depend on the routine of daily mechanics, and the confusion and purposelessness one may feel if that structure is removed. He refers to how early man performed the sedentary tasks of hunting or gathering before he began to specialize. Writing and printing marked the beginning of this specialization, separating human effort into skills of knowledge and skills of action. Similarly, I can draw parallels to a similar reality unfolding today. Artists too may have to now examine how much they depend on the routine of perfecting their specialized skills in order to succeed in what has until now been a skill-based industry. We may now have to consider what we intend to communicate with our skills, where our individuality and creative expressions lie, and what we have to say if we remove technical prowess as a factor entirely.
Finally, McLuhan discusses how our very nervous systems are now extended globally, thanks to the interconnected technological world. We now have the ability to interrelate every human experience. Of course, this has been true for many decades - and now more than ever, with social media. We can compare our experiences to infinite other ones online. McLuhan uses the metaphor of being able to simulate the flying of a plane on a computer that has never been built, by a person that does not know how to fly planes, to illustrate the imaginative power of automation on the human psyche. In my view, this is also a lens through which we can view AI as an art-making tool.










