“I would never tie you down, not even with garlands of roses. I don’t want anything from you that doesn’t come from your own impulse, like water from the springs.”
— Dulce María Loynaz, tr. James O’Connor, Absolute Solitude: Selected Poems; “XLVI”

@theartofmadeline

titsay
KIROKAZE

roma★
cherry valley forever

shark vs the universe
almost home
Today's Document

JVL
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
taylor price
The Stonewall Inn
No title available
YOU ARE THE REASON
noise dept.
EXPECTATIONS
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

#extradirty

pixel skylines
art blog(derogatory)
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Norway
seen from United Kingdom

seen from South Korea
seen from China

seen from Italy
seen from Mexico
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Russia
seen from Venezuela
seen from United States

seen from Cambodia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from Germany
seen from Malaysia
@silly-little-lizard
“I would never tie you down, not even with garlands of roses. I don’t want anything from you that doesn’t come from your own impulse, like water from the springs.”
— Dulce María Loynaz, tr. James O’Connor, Absolute Solitude: Selected Poems; “XLVI”
Art by the wonderful @janearts
Blind Side - Chapter 4
Rating: E (eventually)
Chapter: 4/?
Word count: 40,358 | 11,002 (this chapter)
Relationship: Nesta Archeron/Cassian, Gwyneth Berdara/Azriel (background-ish)
A/N: As always, @janearts has been a muse for this!
Taglist: @alexof90s @jsmelodies @misstyfikacja @freyjascatchariot @something-xoxo @heyluuu @musty-old-claptrap @pham-tastical @heirtotheshad0ws @spilledcoffeechronicles @wolfnesta @frostystarlight @whyisaravenlike-awritingdesk @acourtofladydeath @theteaqueendom @acourtofbatboydreams @spookypersondinosaur @nus4yy @irithiadourden
Let me know if you’d like to be added to or taken off the taglist!
Snippet below the cut
I blame this fic for giving me a TERRIBLE idea of what to text my crush about. when everything catches fire it's your fault 💚
Update : it worked, in that said crush was highly amused and did text back
whether they will allow themself to be engaged in any ongoing conversation . . . remains to be seen
Further update : they have been successfully lured into a conversation about books. they have also permitted me to mail them something from the "read this to understand me better" list
they are a (self-aware and upfront about it) terrible texter, so i got out the vintage stationery and sparkly fountain pen ink and will see if i can turn this into an exchange of letters instead
Oh look I finally remembered WIP Wednesday is a thing! Did somebody say viking!Cassian?
“I don’t like it,” Nesta said, scowling. Cassian only laughed, pressing a kiss to her brow, right where it furrowed. Against her will, it smoothed beneath his lips. “Nor I,” he said simply. “Anything that takes me from your bed irks me.” “Your bed,” Nesta corrected. He only shrugged. “Mine. Yours. The end result is the same, no? You’re in it, either way.” Nesta rolled her eyes as he pulled away to tie a leather belt around the chainmail, a golden buckle gleaming at his waist. Such finery— even in battle, in the bloody and brutal game of war, there was finery. The buckle itself had been set with garnets and so much gold-work it seemed like it ought to be holding up the cloak of a king, not the sword belt of a solider. And yet— This was no ordinary soldier. Even amongst the Danes, he had a reputation. Nesta saw the way they looked at him, like he was one of their gods walking amongst them in a mortal shell. Like he was… Tyr, she thought, as the name rose to the forefront of her mind. The god of war. And yet. Tyr had lost a hand to a wolf, Nesta recalled. Cassian had told her the tale by the fireside, when the flames had gilded his face and ale had made his voice as smooth as honey. What would Cassian lose, as a man facing down death? A hand, too? Or something far more vital?
on tv people are always getting called by professional titles instead of names eg captain doctor detective what have you. wish this happened more in real life in general for your average person. I would like to simply be addressed by the element of my life that is relevant to the current situation, I mostly do not want people to know or use my name. hello patient, the doctor will see you now. dear applicant we are sorry to say that we think your resume is terrible and we hope you crumble into unseeing dust forever, goodbye. you there, shopper, please stop hiding under the clothing racks and leaping out to bite people. and so forth
I honestly would not hate if this was more of a thing! (I feel like it maybe is in some other languages?) Sorry, patients, you don't need to know my name. That's for people who know me as an individual. You can call me Ms. Receptionist and we will all know who you are talking about.
I also notice myself doing a version of this when I'm looking to avoid gendered language. Someone is not him or her or that lady or this gentleman, they're "this patient" or "the dancer to your right".
Art by the wonderful @janearts
Blind Side - Chapter 4
Rating: E (eventually)
Chapter: 4/?
Word count: 40,358 | 11,002 (this chapter)
Relationship: Nesta Archeron/Cassian, Gwyneth Berdara/Azriel (background-ish)
A/N: As always, @janearts has been a muse for this!
Taglist: @alexof90s @jsmelodies @misstyfikacja @freyjascatchariot @something-xoxo @heyluuu @musty-old-claptrap @pham-tastical @heirtotheshad0ws @spilledcoffeechronicles @wolfnesta @frostystarlight @whyisaravenlike-awritingdesk @acourtofladydeath @theteaqueendom @acourtofbatboydreams @spookypersondinosaur @nus4yy @irithiadourden
Let me know if you’d like to be added to or taken off the taglist!
Snippet below the cut
I blame this fic for giving me a TERRIBLE idea of what to text my crush about. when everything catches fire it's your fault 💚
Update : it worked, in that said crush was highly amused and did text back
whether they will allow themself to be engaged in any ongoing conversation . . . remains to be seen
There's this thing I never realized I did when I was doing it that I like to think of as "Ownership of Space"
And it's that thing where you mentally place yourself as the second, auxiliary party to someone else that you consider to be "In Charge" of whatever space or occupation or responsibility you are assigned to
And when you are IN that mindset, it *feels* like you're being responsible. It *feels* like you're being respectful, and helpful, and contributing to the load.
But what you don't SEE- because it *feels* like deference- is that the other person who you're seeing as The Authority you report to- by being assigned that role, has also been assigned the invisible load of BEING YOUR MANAGER.
This is by FAR most commonly seen in husband-and-wife relationships, where the man says, "just tell me what I can do to HELP- you don't have to do it all by yourself, but it's like you won't even tell me when you NEED help. You just do everything and then get mad at me for not doing it first. I can help clean. I can help with the kids. I can help"
But I also see it- and am guilty myself of doing it- at work, at school, in public- that mental, "this is THEIR space, and i will be respectful and helpful to THEM"- without realizing that subservience in this manner isn't actually a good thing. That it actually shifts the burden of responsibility to the other person. That aspect was totally invisible to me.
I didn't understand that when I was told, "if you see something that needs to be done, just DO it", or, "take the initiative", what they ACTUALLY meant was, "I am not above you", or "you have equal say in what kind of environment you want to live or work in", or "I do not want full control over what happens here, I do not want to order you around, I do not want to be in charge, what I WANT is to co-command WITH you"
Being in The Assigned Authority position NOW, that is all so much clearer.
I am the senior member of my team at work, and now, every time I train a newbie, every time I finish catching them up to speed and giving them a list of everything that needs to be done, my next big hurdle seems to always be, "now take pride in the space when I'm not around". "Now don't assume I'll tell you when something is due or what orders to plan things in".
Now, having been on both sides of the struggle, I can appreciate the sticking points here
TO THE PERSON "IN CHARGE": The person deferring to you doesn't understand the invisible labor you're doing. They genuinely believe you know more, you WANT more, you see things they don't, and that they are being respectful and good by staying out of your way and waiting on your orders. THAT is the bit that's not clicking.
TO THE PERSON "WANTING TO HELP": "Help" implies that you are providing assistance to a problem that belongs to somebody else. Stop thinking like that. Understand that the problem belongs to BOTH of you equally, and consider what kind of shared space you BOTH want. What is your SHARED GOAL? Not THEIR goal, but a goal that belongs to you too. Own your space.
This is not a Commander-Lieutenant problem. This is a Partnership problem.
You Are Co-Commanders On This Ship
people misunderstand summer enjoyers it’s not about the heat it’s about the fact that it isn’t getting dark at 4 pm
Art by the wonderful @janearts
Blind Side - Chapter 4
Rating: E (eventually)
Chapter: 4/?
Word count: 40,358 | 11,002 (this chapter)
Relationship: Nesta Archeron/Cassian, Gwyneth Berdara/Azriel (background-ish)
A/N: As always, @janearts has been a muse for this!
Taglist: @alexof90s @jsmelodies @misstyfikacja @freyjascatchariot @something-xoxo @heyluuu @musty-old-claptrap @pham-tastical @heirtotheshad0ws @spilledcoffeechronicles @wolfnesta @frostystarlight @whyisaravenlike-awritingdesk @acourtofladydeath @theteaqueendom @acourtofbatboydreams @spookypersondinosaur @nus4yy @irithiadourden
Let me know if you’d like to be added to or taken off the taglist!
Snippet below the cut
I blame this fic for giving me a TERRIBLE idea of what to text my crush about. when everything catches fire it's your fault 💚
Once when I was in undergrad, someone described something as “problematic” in class and our professor was like, “That’s cool, but ‘problematic’ doesn’t really mean anything. It means that the thing you’re describing has a problem, and in and of itself that’s not bad. Art, especially, should always have problems, or else it’s not interesting and not art, either. It sounds like you’re trying to say that this is bad, but you don’t want to say ‘bad.’ Is that right?”
So from then on whenever one of us called something problematic, he would make us talk it out until we could name the “bad” thing we were hinting at. In this particular class, 7/10 it was some type of oppression, and the remainder was like, “I’m uncomfortable because this is very new/confusing/pushing boundaries that made me feel safe.”
Once we stopped calling things “problematic” and stopping at that, class got way more interesting and... we all had to say, like, “that’s racist” or “that’s misogynistic” or “ew capitalism gross” out loud, which a lot of us had never done in a classroom before. Or we had to be like, “Uhhh... I’m not sure what’s so bad?” and confront our own beliefs and that was maybe even more useful.
Anyway. Whenever I see the word problematic, I can’t help but think of this professor being like, “Good starting point, now let’s get specific.” I think when we have to commit to saying “that’s ___” it requires a lot more careful thought about the truth and impact and complexities of whatever we’re claiming. Sometimes there really is some bullshit afoot, and also sometimes it’s art, and it should be full of problems, because that’s what art is.
You know what's so devastating to me about "God that I were a man"? It's the way that in this situation, Beatrice is not exceptional. In the first acts, she appears to be exempt from the gender roles that everyone around her complies with: she has avoided marriage so far, and she has license to playfully criticize and reject being "over-master'd with a piece of valiant dust" (2.2.55-56). She even suggests to Hero that she claim some agency over her engagement: "it is my cousin's duty to make curtsy, and say, 'father, as it please you.' But yet for all that, cousin, let him be a handsome fellow, or else make another curtsy and say, 'father, as it please me'" (2.1.48-51). Beatrice has carved out an existence for herself that everyone else tolerates; her wit allows her to live outside of people's expectations of womanhood.
But Beatrice is not exempt from being a woman. When it actually matters, when Hero is disgraced by powerful men with no regard for her wellbeing or humanity, Beatrice can't do anything about it. And "God that I were a man" is so painful because it reminds us--and Benedick--that no matter how transcendent Beatrice appears to be, she is still constrained by her role in Messina's society. Back in act one and act two, the reason that she was allowed to poke fun at men wasn't that she couldn't be stopped; it was that it didn't matter. She has no actual power to change the order of things, and so her verbal sparring is not a threat.
(An aside: I think that Benedick is taken aback by "God that I were a man" because this has never really occurred to him. He sees Beatrice as his intellectual equal, and he has watched her carve out space for herself effectively (they know each other of old). In the 2011 production with David Tennant, the costuming and acting choices show how Benedick starts actively performing masculinity only when he accepts Beatrice's request to kill Claudio--when he has to "be a man for [Beatrice's] sake" (4.1.314). In the first acts, he wears tight clothes, a crop top, and a miniskirt. From the wedding on, he wears his military uniform and then a suit. His body language also changes; he abandons physical comedy, stands tall, and emotes less when he speaks to Claudio and Don Pedro. He wields his masculinity as a weapon because he now realizes it's a weapon that Beatrice cannot wield herself.)
The crashing realization of Beatrice's limits is so devastating to me because it's so familiar. I can only speak from experiences I've had, but as a queer woman I know that tolerance is different than empowerment. That having grown up evading dating and romance with made-up excuses to hide my queerness, having realized the extent of the misogyny in an organization I cared about and having grappled with how that misogyny prevented me from effecting change, being allowed to exist is not the same as being able to participate, to make things different. God, that I were a man. I would eat his heart in the marketplace.
i can’t get over how crazy much ado is sometimes. it feels like a deconstruction of shakespeare’s other comedies when you look at how quick and lovesick and beautiful hero and claudio are and how well they fit the script of just classic young lovers, things like how hero is one of the only characters to speak in verse, the way claudio praises her to all his friends etc. and then how in the middle of the play the script is completely flipped. now hero is in danger because of what claudio believes and no one can help her. and suddenly the love story shatters because the same willingness claudio has to fall in love with her at first sight is the same willingness he has to believe a baseless accusation and the love story starts to descend into horror because there’s no legal course of action hero can appeal to her and her own father insults and disowns her at her wedding and she’s quite literally left for dead fainting on the ground with her father saying let her die, what is it to me? it’s insane because like 30 minutes before it’s just a happy comedy love story but shakespeare shows a real darkness to the genre because claudio may think he loves her but when it comes down to it he will never trust her. her word isn’t good enough. no one is going to listen to the woman
Because I like this play a normal amount, I have an extensively annotated commentary of the script with all my favorite bits from various different productions and how I would stage it if I were running one.
Everybody thinks of Much Ado as "the feminist Shakespeare", and it is, but IMO its feminism isn't solely, or even mostly, about the female characters! It's literally a commentary on toxic masculinity.
The sort of masculinity that doesn't want to fall in love because "women aren't trustworthy" (Early-play Benedick), and gives his friends shit for getting crushes (also Benedick). The sort that takes your friend's asshole brother's word rather than talking to your girlfriend (Claudio), and tries to impress his role models (like early-play Benedick) by making a big show of shaming an "untrustworthy woman" (also Claudio). The sort that backs the big show because it reflects badly on his status (the Prince). The sort that believes that status rather than his own daughter (Leonato).
THIS is what really gets me about "Oh that I were a man, I would eat his heart in the marketplace". Beatrice is not just saying that she wishes she could defend her cousin because she loves her cousin. That entire scene is a beautiful, merciless critique of how, while there are theoretically social structures by which men can hold eachother accountable for bad behavior, those social structures are only as good as the men who form them, and they have all systematically failed Hero in order to protect those men and their egos from any discomfort or consequences. INCLUDING BENEDICK!!
So my personal staging is that when Benedick finally agrees to challenge Claudio, it's not "for love of Beatrice". It's because she's made him see how he created this monster. How Claudio's public shaming of Hero was an attempt to live up to the (shitty but less destructive) example that Early-Play Benedick had set. How it is on him to hold any and all of his fellow men accountable, and Claudio in particular, because this might NEVER HAVE HAPPENED if Benedick had been more aware of the effects of his own behavior. Ans how he is gonna have to go fight his own best friend in order to set things right-- not (just) because he loves Beatrice, but because he sees how he's responsible.
(also they are maybe having a swordfight about it because I am a sucker for romantic swordfights).
Locking blades with your hated rival on the field of battle is inherently sexual, sorry I don't make the rules
I think disability justice would be easier if abled people understood that being disabled is a mixture of all three of
I can’t do that without negative consequences
I can’t do that unless I have support for it
I can’t do that
and that trying to treat one of these as if it’s another one will get you nowhere.
Reenactor throws a spear at a drone
What a time to be alive.
“The medieval warrior, realizing the consequences of his impulsive act, immediately approached the owner of the drone and offered to pay for the damage.
The owner of the drone was so impressed by the brilliant attack that he suggested organizing a competition for bringing down “dragons” with short spears next year.
Drone owners have another year to develop a unique “dragon-like” design for their flying machines.” (x)
I am 100% cooler with this knowing that the spear-thrower realized “oops maybe I shouldn’t have done that” and tried to make it right, and that the guy who the drone belonged to was cool with it
just so everyone knows, this has already been memorialized in a runestone
Everything about this post blesses those involved with a +4 on their next Today is Good Day roll
a rough translation of inscription on the runestone:
On the seventh day of May in the year of 2016 on hither spot the mighty warrior Ulf hath slain a dragon with his spear.
so yeah, happy birthday to this dragon-slaying event and to it only
Happy Ulf Hath Slain A Dragon With His Spear!
10 years!!
Jewish Vampire Folklore 🐈⬛🩶
While most people think of Dracula when they hear the word vampire, Jewish mythology tells a much older and more mystical story about a creature called the estrie in English or striyas in Hebrew. These beings are fascinating because they occupy a strange space in Jewish mysticism as they were said to be created during the twilight hours just before the very first Shabbat. Because they were made in that liminal space between the mundane week and the holy day, their bodies were never fully finished and left them with the ability to shapeshift and change their form.
An estrie is described as a female spirit who looks like a human woman and lives among people in towns or villages to satisfy her need for blood. But unlike the vampires we see in movies, her power is deeply connected to her hair. Folklore says she can only fly when her hair is completely unbound and loose. If she wants to take flight to hunt or escape, she must let her hair down, but this also becomes her vulnerability. If you can manage to bind her hair or cover it, she is instantly grounded and can no longer use her powers of flight.
These shapeshifters are masters of disguise and often take the form of night creatures to move around unnoticed. It is common in these legends for an estrie to transform into an owl so she can watch from the trees or swoop down in the night. Other stories describe her taking the form of a cat to walk silently through a home or village without drawing any attention to herself.
There is a very specific way to heal or disarm them that speaks to the ancient Jewish value of hospitality. If an estrie is injured by a human, she can only be healed if that same person gives her bread and salt. This creates a powerful spiritual bond between the injurer and the vampire because offering bread and salt is a sign of sustaining life and welcoming a guest. By accepting this food, she is bound to the person and her injury is repaired.
It’s a beautiful and eerie reminder that Jewish folklore is full of mysterious creatures that walk the line between the physical and spiritual worlds. Shabbat Shalom 🧿✨
Copyright © 2026 Ketubah Ring. No reproduction, printing, resale, or use without permission.
nessian should have been benedick and beatrice from much ado about nothing but instead we got the yellow wallpaper
In my Civilization You’re the King and the Queen (ao3)
Honestly, when I wrote this one-shot in 2024 I had no intention of coming back to it. Then it slowly but surely dawned on me that maybe I wasn’t quite as done with historian!Cassian and archivist!Nesta as I’d thought. So here we are, with a little bonus epilogue in honour of the final day of @nestaarcheronweek ❤️
Also peep the Semper Eadem Easter egg 👀
(Read part one here!)
Nesta Archeron was not the kind of woman who walked blindly into a bad decision.
She was meticulous and careful. Methodical. The kind of person that didn’t so much as walk out of her front door in the morning without first assessing the pitfalls of doing so. She didn’t make mistakes— didn’t entertain them. And so, when she left the library that evening with a short good-bye called over her shoulder to Ron, the guard at the Manuscripts reading room door, she knew with every fibre of her being that this was a very, very bad decision.
And she’d walked into it with her eyes wide open.
There was no excuse for it, really.
Here she was, standing in the early evening light as it filtered through a skylight high above her head, in an almost empty gallery at the British Museum, surrounded by white marble and ancient friezes. It was quiet, peaceful; the man beside her almost a complete stranger. It was ludicrously stupid, to be so alone with a man she’d only just met. And yet she was here anyway, with the only sensible thing being the way she kept her hands tucked into her pockets to avoid any chance of her fingers accidentally brushing his, hanging loosely at his sides, like that’s exactly what he was hoping for.
He looked like the kind of man who’d had the layout of the Somme memorised by the age of fifteen, but still couldn’t name all of Henry VIII’s six wives. The kind of man who couldn’t tell the difference between Romanesque architecture and Gothic— who still used the term ‘dark ages’.
The kind of man she had absolutely no business entertaining for more than five minutes.