blogging conversion at a late date and an early time
Blog moved...
we're not kids anymore.
𓃗
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Keni

#extradirty
NASA
No title available
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
YOU ARE THE REASON
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
wallacepolsom
Today's Document
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
hello vonnie

titsay
Mike Driver
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
seen from Ireland

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Ireland

seen from South Korea
seen from Australia
@somanytribes-blog
blogging conversion at a late date and an early time
Blog moved...
So, finished Telushkin's book 2 days ago...
And I'm thinking. One of the things I'm thinking is that I should probably read the last two chapters again.
Next new information...
New Year is the seventh month of the calendar and now I finally understand why (although most Jewish calendars I have seen start with Tishrei, I guess they should not?)
Hmmmm, such complexities of tradition.
Surprise, calendar is still not perfect, nor is it consistent or what I was told...
Learned something new today. Yeah! New connections in my brain. Staving off Altzheimers one new connection at a time. Building those brain reserves.
I was so disappointed before. All the central beliefs mentioned in the last chapter were things I had heard before, although I expected to find something new there. Surprise, there were no surprises.
Now I'm onto what I expect to be information I already have, information about the calendar and holidays. So, surprise me again! First selection is something unexpected.
Not a big thing, but a thing to know.
I have always been told that the Jewish calendar has one more month than the common usage calendar, never counted the months in the calendars we bought. I learned today that the thirteen month Jewish calendar is a lunar calendar, which I knew - but it isn't usually thirteen months long. It's usually twelve. Now why would people not say that commonly it is a twelve month calendar, if it is the common situation?
Now I know. I'm fascinated to find out what else is new information for me in this chapter.
If not for anybody else, why now? What makes this timing the best for me?
My mother died.
Unexpectedly and quickly.
Mom was the heart and soul of my very large family and there is a huge Eva-shaped hole in our life where she used to be.
Eva was an amazing woman. She rescued herself from the horrible situation of living with an alchoholic mother who used her teenage daughters as bait to lure men to buy her drinks and keep her company. My mom experienced the poverty and dispair of a family one generation off the reservation during the Great Depression. I have a black and white picture of Mom as a baby, sitting on her angry teenage mother's lap on the running board of a WPA truck, alongside her father and two older barefoot siblings. Her father's hawkish nose and darker complexion is clearly not Anglo-Saxon, but the ethnicity is indeterminate. He could have been an immigrant, but in fact he was just the opposite. In any case, it looks like a scene from Grapes of Wrath. They look poor as the dirt beneath their feet. Which they were.
Mom was always better than her beginnings. She hated anything vulgar, dirty or demeaning to the human spirit. She loved music, dancing and a good time, but she preached and practiced moderation in all pleasures of the flesh and insisted that any problem could be solved, any obstacle surmounted if you only persevered and worked hard enough at it. She had only one semester of higher education, but she self-taught and educated herself on everything under the sun. She learned something new every day, I think.
She was a great teacher, both by example and by intent. She taught her kids how to dissect ideas and formulate their own opinions and she valued the opinions we expressed enough to challenge them and debate them. She treated us as equals in competitive games but demanded our respect as our parent and elder.
She was a voracious reader and was up-to-date on current events, science and music until the day she died. She was a modern woman in every way, independent, open-minded and technically savvy.
She abhorred laziness and irresponsible conduct. One of her favorite sayings whenever facing an unpleasant or intimidating task was "somebody needs to do that and guess what, turns out, I'm somebody," or sometimes "you're somebody," if I was the one expressing doubt or dragging my feet. She was humble and convinced that she was somehow less accomplished than most, a leftover from her impoverished childhood but she never let that stop her from being the somebody. She expressed amazement at her offspring's accomplishments and never took credit that they sprung off her shoulders.
Mom was determined to create the perfect homelife for raising babies, and I grew up in a Brady-bunch, Patridge Family, Father-knows-best, Leave It To Beaver - Donna Reed atmosphere. My home was a place where children were safe to grow up and every kid wanted my mom to be their mom. For those of us who had the priviledge to actually be related (I have six siblings and something like fifty nephews and nieces, counting spouses, and over a hundred cousins) she had a unique place in each and every heart. A season later and we are all still mourning deeply and often bursting into tears at surprising moments even as life compels our attention.
My connection with Eva, the woman, the mother, the friend, was on so many levels that losing my mom emptied my soul in a way I never anticipated. What I was experiencing went way beyond writer's block, I couldn't think or feel anything to write about. Even more frightening, I lost my connection to the divine for the first time in my life. It was if somebody had cut the cable out at the pole, blown up my receiver or torn down the transmitter. For months I had a sense that life was pointless, work was meaningless and goodness wasn't good, it was just rules that the powerful imposed on the weak to maintain control. I bobbed above the surface of my depression long enough to keep my daughter fed, clothed and loved, but I was mostly going through the motions in a puppet-like fashion. I was a two-dimensional cartoon of myself.
On Memorial Day I woke up before dawn and stared into the darkness, as I have often done over the past few months. There on the mantle was a book I had recently unpacked in our move to a new home. I had placed it it in its usual place of honor, not because of respect for the content but to create that sense of home for my husband who was returning from across the planet. I picked it up and starting reading the Kaddish from The Gates of Prayer. It resonated and comforted me in a way that nothing else had since that day in February when my son called with news of my mother's untimely death. It reopened my soul to the divine. I'm still in mourning, I am still anguished and sad but now I am back among the living, ready to grow again, with a renewed sense of interest in what kind of Jew I will be.
My mother-in-law is understandably pleased that I'm undergoing conversion but I don't know how my mother would have reacted to this news.
I would like to say she would have been joyous at the prospect of my gaining insight and growing spiritually but I suspect she might have been saddened by what she perceived as a change of heart. Although she would never have criticized and would probably have been overtly supportive and interested in hearing my whys and hows.
No, she wouldn't have been sad because she saw conversion as a failure on her part, it's just that she would have finally understood what I meant when I spoke to her of Jesus of Nazareth.
I have repeatedly tried to explain what I think about the historical Jesus and the church Paul created in his image, going back to my childhood. I told her many times that I believed that Jesus existed and while he may have been a divinely inspired Jewish Rabbi, I didn't think he was any more or less God than I am and I don't think he thought or said that he was the only son of God. That belief is strengthened by what I have studied thus far from other Jewish scholars, predecessors, contemporaries and subsequent to his time.
My mother, who had no problem with my studying native mysticism, elemental witchcraft, earth-based spirituality and celebrating celtic inspired seasonal holidays, was always convinced that "as long as I still had Jesus, I was going to heaven" even though she confided to me that she was uncertain if there was an afterlife. In fact, later in life Mom would call me for reassurance of the evidence I held that one existed.
She would never fight conversion, she long ago decreed in raising her six offspring that religion was personal and that while they might share their religion with us and instruct us in morality and spirituality, each child must chose for him or herself what they believed.
My mother put her family at the center of her belief; she even forbid us to have a religious service upon her death, instructing us to gather instead for a family celebration at a later date as the only appropriate way to honor her. Perhaps she didn't think what I believed was a religion (I get that a lot) or just never got it, no matter how many times I told her that I wasn't a Christian. Ironic, that losing her is the impetus for this change.
I also don't know what she would think if I told her that I think she would have made a great Jewish mother, and I don't mean in the Jewish Triangle sort of way, either.
I said it's not about making my family happy, and in fact there are family members who will not be happy...
Not that they haven't already called my intelligence, sanity and choices into question many, many times, but there are family members, Jews and nonJews, who will question my motivations or the depth of my committment and/or understanding about conversion. Some are devout Christians, hoping that someday I would return to the fold, some are concerned that I have somehow lost my independence and self-determination.
For all of you in the doubting camp, let me say clearly, I have no idea.
No, seriously, I am following my own star still, and just because I'm not on the same path as you, doesn't mean I am lost.
Until recently, I didn't think Judaism was prepared for Melody, even if Melody was prepared to become a Jew, was even more Jewish than nonJewish at this point in my life. But I read more, learned more and now I think the sum total of my beliefs fall directly within the tenants of Judaism as I understand them to be. (Always the caveat.)
When I came out of the closet about my beliefs in natural and mystical connections, in the divinity of the universe and my personal connection with divinity, it was a huge risk. I was a licensed attorney, a respected member of the legal and political community and my success in my chosen field and the occupation that put bread on my table required me to not be viewed as a total nutjob by the outside world.
After a long time mumbling whenever somebody asked me a religious question, I took my public stand. It felt good and I said that I refused to be pushed back into the closet to avoid censure or criticism. I won't pretend to be somebody else.
I tried for years to fit my sincerely held beliefs in the context of Christian teachings. It wasn't a good fit, no matter how I tried to describe myself floating on the waters at the liberal end of the Jesus pool. I finally left the church, and until I found the UUs, I never thought I would find a home in organized religion again.
I was delighted when I discovered the Unitarian Universalists because they seem to reflect my journey from liberal Christianity to a more comprehensive view of religion. I was fond of saying that I can't be a Christian because their view of God is too limited in my experience. But, honestly, the Unitarians can't seem to make up their collective minds as to whether they have gone too far or far enough into the light.
I enjoyed the ritual, the music and the usually the messages delivered from the pulpit. Still, there were moments when I found myself so distraught by the message that it pushed me out of my comfortably padded connect-a-pew seating and into my car for an early escape. And since I found Unitarianism the exact same time my homelife became more and more connected to the Jewish community, the things that would disturb me most often were unconsciously antisemitic behaviors or commentary. There was always a sense that some of the membership was chomping at the bit to turn the clock back to a time when Unitarianism was considered a liberal Christian religion, instead of a nonChristian congregation. I felt more relief than regret when I was forced to resign my membership because i had no independent or personal income with which to provide financial support to the congregation. I couldn't help but find that disturbing because I am so not a Christian.
In fact, now that I have spent time framing my beliefs in the context of Jewish teachings, I think I'm pretty darn Jewish, or at least Jewish-ish in my beliefs. I could be wrong. That's what the Rabbi and I will decide at the conclusion of this process.
I am waiting to see if Judaism welcomes or rejects me but I'm not trying to become something I am not. I have no objection to changing and growing, as that is the natural order of living things, but I am not changing because I think I am not good enough. Just as a small plant is good but continues to grow, I am changing because I am growing.
Who said "when you come to a fork in the road, take it?" I don't know, but I have taken the fork and my path continues in the light regardless of the paths that others may take or their opinion of mine.
If it isn't about making anybody else happy, what is this about?
Well, it's about me.
I am undertaking this conversion process not because my husband has expressed an interest in Rabinnical studies and not because of my daughter's impending committment as a Bat Mitzvah, or because I am tired of hearing her explain to everybody she knows that she is Jewish but her mother isn't (and then watch their faces as they calculate the meaning from their perspective.)
Why is this timing right for me?
I've been thinking about this from the moment I began to study Judiasm in depth and test what I learn against my own convictions. That level of study was brought about by my marriage to a Jewish man and my committment to being a member of his family, my decision and insistance that we must provide our daughter full access to her Jewish heritage, and because Judaism is practiced at home as much or more than in the synogogue, that meant I had to learn how to maintain a Jewish household. Not surprisingly, the more I practiced, the more Jewish my identity. The more my child learned, the more I had to learn to keep up with her questions. The more I learned, the more I felt at home with a Jewish identity. The more I learned, the more I wanted to know. I've been toying with the idea of formal discovery and almost took the Judaism 101 class last year. My husband wouldn't even know of my intention, had I not discussed my interest with a woman I met at a Temple dinner. She is planning to take the next class in preparation for conversion. She and I talked about the class after services but I didn't realize he had overheard until he raised it with the Rabbi fifteen minutes later.
I was surprised to discover that I didn't resent it, I took the opportunity that presented itself to move forward. Timing is everything and the timing is ripe. Again. I need to share that this isn't about them, it's about me.
I am happy she's happy, but it's not about that...
As opposed as he has been to the idea of my conversion in the past (in fact, warning me that it could lead to divorce) Jamie wasted not a minute in sharing that news with his mother. He must have told her not to tell me that he told her because she coyly asked after our typical hour long phone conversation if there was any other "news" to share. Since I consider this to be exclusively "my" process, I initially said "no." There was a pause and I heard it. This wasn't just the last question signalling the conclusion of the conversation. She had been waiting for something more that she hadn't heard but wanted to discuss. I knew what it was, too. Clearly, she had access to my secret and instructions that she had to pretend not to know because my husband knew it was mine to tell.
I was stuck in the classic Jewish Triangle - way worse than the one that swallows ships down in Burmuda. Oye. You get it, right? If you live in a Jewish family, I know you do. If you don't, well, it's the basis for all those bad jokes about Jewish women.
But I was outed and I had to fess up. She was so happy and I was so irritated with my spouse.
I am in no way ashamed of my decision or swayed by outside opinions about whether or not I should convert yesterday, today or tomorrow, I just don't wish to create a mess that I will have to clean up later. That is the reason for privacy. I needed time to share this news and I want to be the one who decides who, when and where others will be included. I had intended to keep the information to myself for quite some time, maybe for the next six months or a bit longer. Not only because it is my private decision but also because it is a process with no guarantee of a conclusion.
Yes, I know, I'm publicly blogging, and you are reading this now. But you were sent here by somebody, right? And look at that date. It's not like I wrote this yesterday. This secret has been out of the bag for a while. People make much ado of the lack of privacy in the internet. And it's true, anybody who wants to find your privately shared information on the internet can find it. Still, blogging is a pretty private process if you aren't a rock star because nobody is looking for it. Who reads a blog unless directed to it by somebody else? The person who wrote it. Anybody who thinks otherwise, is sadly delusional about the general interest in the events of their life or the thoughts rattling through their mind or the effect of their published writing on the world.
As usual (and you must have noticed this tendency by now) I digress. Anyway, back on topic:
I don't know if my husband realized how deep his misstep or how big a disappointment he could create down the road for the woman we both love. The Rabbi and I might decide I am not going to make a good Jew after all or the timing isn't right to finish the process. I suspect Jamie must have realized that or something like that right after he blurted out the news, hence the quick move to unsay it. Unfortunately, he lacks access to Dr. Who's miraculous machine, and time moves only forward for him.
Sometimes I wonder if Jamie has met his family. He should have known that the only way to ensure that news will travel in this family is to call it a secret. That's probably true of every family, though.
But it's still my process and I won't let it be hijacked by the whims of familial love. Nor will I pretend to be going in a different direction to make somebody else happy. My spiritual life is too important to me to lie about it.
On the flip side, I knew exactly what Saralee's reaction to the news was going to be. it's one of the reasons I didn't want to tell her yet. While she is culturally Jewish and has been a temple member her entire life, my beloved mother-in-law has made a point as long as I have known her of how non-religious she is. Upon learning I was Unitarian, she once said that she would be Unitarian also if she weren't already Jewish. I understood exactly what she meant and took it as the compliment she intended. Still, I always knew it would delight my mother-in-law if I became Jewish. She and I have had that Ruth-Naomi bond for a decade and her declining health probably contributed to the forward progress of the decision I was making, just as much as the death of my own mother freed me up to move forward. If it was going to happen, it will be a nice bonus to give my other mother happiness along the way, while I still can.
So I'm happy she is happy. But it's not about that...
It's sinking in...
I think I’m starting to get it.
I’m an American. I will be an American Jew, even if we live elsewhere.
American Jews of the current generation don’t tend to be Zionists if they are also liberals. I suspect more conservative American Jewish youth may fit more with the general Zionist tendencies of the preceeding generation or two.
But I get it now. It makes sense, the ferocity with which the relatives in the generation before mine speak of Israel and the presumption of my contemporaries that any Jewish person would reasonably stand for the continued existance of a Jewish Nation.
It’s not about who has the greater claim to a land that multiple religions consider holy or who lived there first or most recently, either.
I’ve heard of the pogroms, the diaspora, the expulsions, the Holocaust, but each as a separate incident, and incidents that were presented to me as barbaric behaviors on foreign soil that were long past and historic. At least that is how I recall viewing them.
I’d never seen this history presented as one event after another after another after another through centuries of time, endless, relentless and unceasing, leading up to the moment depicted by Telushkin when “the Zionist leader Chaim *Weizmann mournfully observed: ‘There are now two sorts of countries in the world, those that want to expel the Jews and those that don’t want to admit them.’”
Telushkin, Joseph (2010-09-28). Jewish Literacy (p. 303). William Morrow. Kindle Edition.
So, yeah, I get it. If not now, when?
"A Jew by Purim"
Me
Much that was new, followed by the other side of the mirror
When I last posted, I was chewing through the Torah. Well, Torah stories and the like; biblical stories and personalities that I had read, heard and even dramatized during my lifetime. These were primariliy familiar and I felt comfortable enough to argue with Talushkin's proposals on their significance.
I think there was some arrogance there on my part that caused me to think that conversion would not involve a reworking of my philosophies or a hard examination of them, at the very least.
It surprised me to see that this portion of the book concluded with yet so much left to read on Jewish Literacy. That is when I realized that I was an illiterate and needed to approach the material that followed with more care.
For three days, I have been immersed in Talushin's discussion of the Talmud, the Mishnah, and following that, reading about people and matters that I have heard mentioned briefly in other materials and referenced as historical foundation for some philosophy or event that drew my attention in passing but never had reason to study in depth.
I apologize for the lack of commentary on my thought process, but I am just taking it in to the best of my ability and adding to my foundation of knowledge. I know I will have to go back and reread much of this before I can even consider posing an argument. I also know that I won't be at the point where I actually know or understand it until I am arguing with it.
Even more intimidating to me is the text I must contemplate now. I have now reached the discussion of people who lived in my generation, names that appeared in news stories of the day or at least in the back stories of Time Magazine or the encyclopedic accounts of the history of current events. Although the events and movements they participated in took place in the generation or generations prior to my childhood, this is a Wonderland view of a world I thought I knew.
It is interesting to think, now I am a Jew and this means something different to me. What a rare privilege it is to be a convert and to have the opportunity to see the world through two lenses.
Mac, mac, macabees
Okay, now I’m sad. Such a sad ending to the story we tell ourselves and our children for the winter holidays. It has become a myth worthy of assimilating by the common community, and a symbol of religious freedom, courage and miraculous to boot.
Just take all my fun delusions, conversion process, darn ya!
After a hot bath, more thoughts on Ezra...
1) Curious as to whether matrialinial descent is the basis for only non-Jewish wives and their children being expelled, if by some miracle no Jewish women intermarried (sure, that's what happened) or if the non-Jewish spouses of Jewish women were somehow also counted as miraculously Jewish, although their mother's were most certainly not.
2) What about thouse who raise thier children as Jewish but do not convert themselves? That was me two weeks ago. Didn't that happen? does it seem that Ezra says they must go as well? Next stop, Torah verse. Okay, Rabbi, I have a timeline, so that will have to wait, but believe you me, I am going there. Be ready for my future rant.
Things I plan to ruminate upon: Matrilinieal descent and Jewish parent versus Jewish family. Convert's personal affront aside, as the non-Jewish mother of a very, very Jewish daughter, I have a difficult time believing that I am the only non-Jewish mother who has insisted that her child be given the full opportunity to embrace her Jewish heritage or that this is a modern thought process.
Conversions happened back then, clearly. In fact there is an enormous amount of ink in the Torah devoted to the acts of self-selecting Jews, those who chose to follow monotheism and recognized the ultimate divinity of the "God of the Israelites" to the exclusion of all others. And those Jewish icons who descended from an intermarriage with a woman who was not Jewish.
Like Ezra.
(Just speculating here, but wouldn't that be juicy and oh, so biblically intricate?)
End of Part One and how does one reconcile Ruth and Ezra?
Such a dilemna. There are those who would tell you that they are easily reconciled. Ruth became Jewish, hence she is not a potential progenitor of the horrid fate that would have befallen the Hebrew Nation but for Ezra's harsh intervention.
Those people were probably born Jewish and even if they are converts, I think they are not the kind of convert I aspire to be, nor the Jew I am or will be, whether or not I am recognized as such.
Was it really right and good that those wives and their children should be expelled? Wonder where the heck they went and how much of a grudge those who survived might feel, huh? Ishmael's ancestors got a shot in the arm to fuel their long-held grudge maybe? Oh well. Where comes the notion that failure to expel these innocents would have finally caused the Jews to assimilate into the larger pool of humanity and discard their monotheism, morality and culture? The prior six hundred years didn't count for any kind of precedent? Oh well. Group think.
More study needed. More thinking. More study.
Finally, Ruth...
Jamie and I argued years and years ago over the meaning of the story of Ruth and Naomi. We traveled to the Spertus to pull books from the shelves to support our differing theories and quote passages at one another. I found many; he found none. He was frustrated that his shiksa friend (this argument pre-dated our romantic involvement by many years) could prove to understand the underpinnings of Jewish philosophy better than a man who had been raised in the tradition, had studied at home and in Israel and even taught religious classes. Which I think, and pointed out to him at the time, was the point...
of the story...
of Ruth and Naomi.
'nuf said.
What he said...
Micah.
"Do justice and love goodness and walk humbly with God."
Perfect.
There is another one-liner that is perhaps more widely quoted because it is indirect and therefore less onerous an ideal with which to comply or perhaps it is just easier to justify a failure as being "out of one's control" as it is a group noncompliance.
"Nation shall not lift up sword against nation."
Great slogan to lift on a banner and push toward, after all, any progress would be good, right? And there's not much personal consequence for failure. Not like walking humbly or loving goodness or doing justice.
Seems easier to point that finger at my fellow travelers on this national path if I can't get 'er done on my own. After all, it's not like I'm responsible for the entire nation, right? As long as I tell them they need to comply, I'll be okay even if they don't. I don't know about that. More thought is required. Lot got out, as did Noah, but Moses perished in the desert along with his entire generation, despite his stalwart rant to the nation. The arguments as to why he and his generation had to die are various and interesting, and subject to further thoughts as we get there, but I'm not thinking finger pointing and excuses are going to win me any points, if I have points to collect on this journey. I think there is no real difference between one directive than the other. I have learned that no matter how sharp and public the disagreement, failure to change the course of another's actions can paint associates with the same stripes.
I shall have to devote another post to the fleeting thought I just had; does God learn? That will require much MUCH more reflection and study, and then more reflection after that. Back to the passage at hand.
Do justice and love goodness and walk humbly with God.
I couldn't help but read those words attributed to Micah and hear the voices of friends of mine who once recited them to me with passion, driven to be compassionate and responsible for the downtrodden. I can hear that ringing Kansas twang, tempered with just a hint of soft southern drawl. These were people who argued for civil rights and the redress of wrongdoing and fought against injustices both large and small. Friends who I have seen since that time highlighted in the national press speaking harshly condemning ugly words and espousing sentiments that seem to me to be in marked contrast to the spirit of those words. They gush forth with words of hatred and spite and aim them with relish at the hearts of wounded people or to disrupt the joy and celebration in the midst of a simcha. I know that they think they are speaking with the same passion and compassionate spirit of justice as before, even if I don't believe that they are. I bet they also perceive that they continue to walk humbly with God. Perhaps, but it doesn't appear to my earthly perspective to be the case.
I wonder if Reverend Fred Phelps and the Westboro Baptist Church has considered that they might be caught up in the clean sweep they are predicting, if group compliance is required? He must be counting on the escape of Noah and Lot's families as precedence. I know Fred personally, and while I have sat through a couple of WBC church services, I cannot claim to understand the workings of his mind. Shirley, Tim and Becky are all my contemporaries. I have a fondness for them that comes from several shared quests for justice on a local level, not from their more recent international fame. I found Fred Jr. to be a large and clumsy, well-intentioned if somewhat clueless older brother type, Margie was a brilliant legal strategist, passionate and articulate (all of which I heard she got from her dad) and Shirley was the ultimate mama, warm and soft and caring, her husband a delightful, thoughtful nerd who adored his wife and children above all else. Becky and Tim were a lot of fun, in fact the entire clan was a blast if you were an insider. Which I was but I would not aspire to be at this point in my life even if they would have me. (They would not; in fact the elder of the clan, Rev. Fred himself, jovialy greeted me on the courthouse steps more than once with the ringing title "Whore of Babylon," although to be fair, he did likewise warmly inquire after my health at the same time.) I don't think Fred and the clan are correct in their assessment or their interpretation of biblical lore.
I didn't yesterday and I haven't found a reason today to change my mind thus far on my path to Jew by Purim, but I am always open to learning something new.
I once found much more sense of kinship with the Phelp's family values and march toward justice than I do these days. Yes, it is true; I have stood shoulder to shoulder with the Primitive Baptist and found common ground. I am unsure if that could be the case today, no matter the cause. I suspect they've lost their collective minds and I cannot imagine what any of them, even the charming Ms. Bird would make of my spiritual journey since last we met. They weren't always crazy, although they were always different. In fact, I have been close friends, political allies and co-counseled a few employment rights cases with members of his tribe. Still, I don't know that I could carry on a reasoned debate on the golden rule or the other missives from Micah. Particularly since most of them still follow the direction their dad pointed them in about the time our respective paths separated for good or evil.
Why, then, do I hear the words of Micah ring in my head in Shirley, Marge, Tim and Brent's voices? I don't know. More reflection is required.
Rabbi Hillel's version "what is hateful to you don't do to your neighbor..all the rest is commentary...(and, my favorite part)... now go and study"
Rabbi Akiva version - love your neighbor as yourself is the major principle of the Torah - the golden rule
Justice
I would be remiss to not comment upon my husband's fondness for justice when reading the words attributed to the prophet Isaiah and recorded in verse and chapter: “Cease to do evil. Learn to do good. Devote yourselves to justice. Aid the wronged. Uphold the rights of the orphan; Defend the cause of the widow” (1: 16– 17).*
I have always preferred fairness, my spouse, justice. Fairness is often viewed as a softer, kinder mode of operation. I find that in practice it is not always as kind. Jamie likes to say that people who cry "unfair" are probably losing. I agree with that, as far as it goes. But I would go further. When my child says I am being unfair she usually means that I am not giving her what she wants. She doesn't want fairness and balance, she wants me to be on her side, regardless of what has gone before or will come after.
Fairness is a balancing test, it does not leave room for favortism and is unconcerned with issues of right and wrong.
Justice, on the other hand, is all about playing favorites and taking up a cause with no quarter given, no effort unspared, no sacrifice too great to ask. Fairness is about finding a balance. My family insists that I came to the law as a natural extension of my personality. And I don't disagree that I have no trouble expressing my disagreement on an idealistic level. While I trust my own mind to be able to discern truth, I have a scientific, liberal personality. My opinions on what is real and what is not are almost never absolute and I open to gathering new information all the time and to subsequent revision of my theories on everything and anything.
My favorite teacher of all time (Elouise Lynch, Salina, Kansas) said to our 7th grade social studies class that truth is the rarest thing. It resonated with my preteen soul to the point where it remains my banner to this day. I think perhaps truth is divine and my ability to grasp truth is limited by my ability to approach and comprehend the divine. This is why I am not suited to most religious idiologies, but suspect that I fit in pretty well with the tenants of Judaism. (At least as I understand them at this point in my life - always that caveat, Rabbi Glickman.)
Perhaps this is why I find mediation a better method of resolving conflict for my own benefit. I always believe my view is correct (what kind of person continues to foster a view they don't believe is correct, Bill O'Reilly) - but I want to be open to the view of another in case there is more to learn. And I definitely do believe my view is correct and am not afraid to argue in support of it, trust me. Still, I prefer to resolve my conflicts by giving my argument and hearing the argument of another and then weighing both for balance and such truth as can be found.
Now, if you have seen me argue in trial for a client or giving testimony before Congress or state and local legislative bodies on behalf of social justice issues, you might find my preference for mediation and fairness incongruent with my ferocious advocacy. In truth, I can be inspired to fight under the flag of justice when I champion the causes of another. You should be forewarned, I can be a just person rather than a fair one, particularly when I am working under the divinely inspired directive to aid the wronged, uphold the rights of the orphan and defend the cause of the widow.
Perhaps the real difference between fairness and justice is how far apart the scales have been tipped and how much it takes to get them back into balance. Hmmmmm. Things I think about.
*Telushkin, Joseph (2010-09-28). Jewish Literacy (p. 83). William Morrow. Kindle Edition.
Back to the text...
My assignment is to complete the Jewish literacy book by the end of June. I am on schedule and will be at the quarter complete mark by the end of the day, which is all of Part One and a bit into Part Two. We have Shabbat services on Saturday morning because we share our Rabbi with another synogogue.
So far, my favorite biblical moment is when Deborah tells Barak his friends will call him a wuss for relying on a woman in battle. I see Deborah as not just a wise and just leader, but a wise-cracking cynic.
Telushkin says the passage is her commentary on the sexism of the society in which they live. More than that, I think it is a realistic view of the way that men attempt to wield a subtle psychological influence over other men and keep the power structure patriarchical. This reflects the systemic undermining of the influence and leadership of women and is consistent with how other female leaders in the biblical literature are portrayed as either motivated solely to preserve familial ties or to protect, preserve and promote the influence of masculine kin or are acting under the specific direction of a wiser, stronger and most definitely male leader. Other heroine stories most definitely exist, but were not included in the acknowledged history of our people. Why was Deborah's line allowed to remain intact? Perhaps it is because her words, suggesting that if success and cultural accomplishments are lead by the efforts of a woman it will somehow diminish the reputation of any male followers, were read by humorlous patriarchs who, believing this to be the case, took them at face value or believed others would take it that way. Kind of like the way a Fox News viewer perceives the commentary of their alleged pundit, Bill O'Reilly, in the year 2013 C.E.