
No title available

shark vs the universe
almost home

JBB: An Artblog!
we're not kids anymore.
taylor price
trying on a metaphor
Today's Document

⁂
sheepfilms

pixel skylines
Stranger Things

#extradirty

Product Placement

Origami Around
art blog(derogatory)
Claire Keane

izzy's playlists!

JVL
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
seen from Malaysia

seen from Canada

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Indonesia

seen from United States

seen from Canada

seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Sweden
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Australia

seen from United States
@sortaedgy
is it time for frank cho and milo manara to die or what
That’s basically a naked woman I’m YELLING
What a pervert. What the FUCK does he not know how clothes work? What the hypothetical fuck is she wearing then if we can see all that?
It’s like how bath towels in comics miraculously wrap completely around breasts. Or how even when injured and dead on the ground women in comics have to be twisted into “sexy” poses. Or how women in comics walk like they’re in high heels even barefoot.
It’s the only way men know how to draw women, because to them female characters are only there to be sexy. They only think of “women” as exploitative costumes and camera angles, high heels and titillation. Sex objects to ogle, plot objects to further male heroes’ narratives and drama, not heroes to cheer for.
I’m sorry, I was labouring under the impression that this was the crowd that thought women should wear what they want..?
And that applies to fictional women who are depicted by men how? You can’t apply agency in the plot to something metatextual when it comes to fictional characters.
Come on, let’s not pretend this is a male exclusive thing.
We’re going to have this argument are we? Not to mention you’re deviating from the original point that attributing agency to fictional characters’ clothing is asinine.
What you have here are images of power, and do you really believe these characters are designed with titillating heterosexual women and bisexual and homosexual men in mind? Because I don’t think you do.
This is why the Hawkeye Initiative exists. Take common female poses in comics, put a man in the role, and see how “empowering” and “strong” it actually looks:
Also:
He got the painting for fighting against ‘censorship.’ Note that they handed him a gross design of a female being objectified, because at the end of the day, that is all they really want, to be allowed to objectify women. They don’t care about censorship in general it is about their ability to sexualise and degrade women without consequence.
You can see her butthole for chrissakes
I think the best imagery I’ve seen to explain the difference between what men think male objectification is vs what women actually want to see is the Hugh Jackman magazine covers.
Hugh Jackman on a men’s magazine. He’s shirtless and buff and angry. He’s imposing and aggressive. This is a male power fantasy, it’s what men want to be and aspire to - intense masculinity.
Hugh Jackman on a women’s magazine. He looks like a dad. He looks like he’s going to bake me a quiche and sit and watch Game of Thrones with me. He looks like he gives really good hugs.
Men think women want big hulking naked men in loin cloths which is why they always quote He-Man as male objectification - without realizing that He Man is naked and buff in a loin cloth because MEN WANT HIM TO BE. More women would be happy to see him in a pink apron cutting vegetables and singing off-key to 70s rock.
Men want objects. Women want PEOPLE.
This is the first time I have EVER seen this false equivalence articulated so well. Thank you.
This scene won’t play, I won’t say I’m in love!
remember when Raven did this show remember when Raven also had an episode regarding racism remember when Disney was good
They look like they’re in a heist movie with Rihanna as the tough-as-nails leader/master thief and Lupita as the genius computer hacker
After dramatic negotiation session at the Cannes Film Festival, Netflix has nabbed a film project pairing Grammy winner Rihanna with Oscar winner Lupita Nyong’o, in a concept that began as a Twitter sensation. Ava DuVernay (Selma) will direct, and Issa Rae (Insecure) is in talks to write the screenplay.
source
This is the original post that made it all happen! Roxy is always putting brilliant cultural bon mots out into the ether and it’s high time she gets the recognition she deserves <#3
Thank you, my friend!
WOW. Lmao
All of that bullshit for this one gif are you kidding me
Boys: thick thighs save lives 😍 Boys 20 secs later: is that cellulite? :/
Original Sky High director Mike Mitchell is working with Walt Dohrn on a sequel to the 2005 Disney superhero comedy.
Please…god let this happen…..
dear god pls
marvel and dc are OVER
im so used to giving and now i finally receive
Man I hope but if Danielle isn’t in it I’ll be upset
@tomhollandy
A little girl thought this high school senior posing for prom pictures was a real princess.
👑 👑 👑
This just warmed my heart
🔥🔥🔥🔥
Love this! Her pieces are dope af.
That child has an excellent “Watch me, Bitch” face.
yall would need a crane and the entire seahawks defensive line to pull me out
Thicc Rihanna is back, this a sign it’s gon be a good summer