is this what one could call the possibility for a flaming ace?
ojovivo
h

Kiana Khansmith
occasionally subtle
Interview Vampire Daily
đ©” avery cochrane đ©”

shark vs the universe
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

pixel skylines

Discoholic đȘ©

izzy's playlists!
Fai_Ryy
Sweet Seals For You, Always

⣠Chile in a Photography âŁ
Noah Kahan
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Aqua Utopiaïœæ”·ăźćșă§èšæ¶ă玥ă
Keni
RMH
No title available
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Italy
seen from Mauritius
seen from Vietnam
seen from Ukraine
seen from Colombia

seen from Australia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Philippines
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Russia
seen from India
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Iraq

seen from United States
seen from Vietnam

seen from United States
@spookyskirts-blog
is this what one could call the possibility for a flaming ace?
If V team were alive today, what would their favorite books/movies/tv shows be?
If you have even the slightest interest in Valhalla, be sure to follow the fun posts over on its official blog, The Walrus Squad! And its ask box is always open :)
so what youre saying is that none of the characters in your book like your book
V Team reviews of Valhalla:
Veikko: Not funny enough.
Vibeke: Not enough hard sci-fi
Violet: I canât read.
Varg: Not bad.
V Team reviews Ragnarök:
Veikko: Okay but I did NOT think that would happen.
Vibeke: So thatâs what Violet was thinkingâŠ
Violet: Wait what do you mean thatâs what I was thinking what did I do?
Varg: Oh snap.
V Team reviews GuðsrĂki:
Veikko: You had me at âPissweed.â
Vibeke: Well at least it has a happy ending.
Violet: Can someone just tell me what I did in Ragnarök???
Varg: OH SNAP!
In my opinion, Violetâs review on Ragnarök would be: It was a kidney?!
^^^ Absolutely (if she could read)
*a marxist and a young republican reach for it at the same time*
*their eyes meet ⊠the gaze burns ⊠is it loveâŠ. or hate?*
âI am very gender fluid and feel more like I wake up every day sort of gender neutral.â â Ruby Rose
So let me get this straight, in Monopoly if you give one player more money to start out itâs âunfairâ but if you do it in real life itâs âcapitalismâ?Â
You know what, Iâm going to tell you guys a story.
In my Sociology class a few semesters ago, our prof had us break off into groups and, much to our naive joy, began distributing Monopoly boards! We had no idea what was going on but yay! Games! Of course, once our group, and a number of others, got the board we began to work at setting up and distributing the moneyâŠ
until suddenly our prof told us to put the money down and pick up the dice.
âRoll the dice and sort yourselves from highest to lowest,â our teacher commanded. Â "Now, the highest number is the upper class. The next one is upper middle class. Â The next two or three are middle class. The last person is in poverty.â
Well, as the person who rolled a two this was startling and not wholly welcome news.
From that point the game changed entirely. We had to hand out the money so that the âupper classâ had this fucking mountain, and then less for upper middle, even less for middle, and I didnât get any triple digit bills. We would all collect different amounts from passing go as well.
The biggest change though? Going to jail. Upper class didnât. Period. Upper middle class could go but they only had to stay for one turn or they could immediately pay their way out. Middle class had some pretty easy guidelines for when they could pay to get out. As lower class, it was really easy for me to wind up in jail and REALLY hard to get out. But since I was working with so little money when everyone else had so much I was in jail all the time because there was no âgame overâ.  If I couldnât pay I had to go to jail for a certain period of time. I had to take out loans with interest I could never pay back just to get out only to wind up back in it again, rolling dice turn after turn hoping to be able to get out.
It was simultaneously the most enlightening and most awful game I had ever played. I was bored and frustrated and a little terrified about it all. And it wasnât only me. I would never win, I sort of accepted this, but it was amazing how the middle classes reacted as well.  They were stressed. Because they were always that close to either being able to one-up the upper class or from crashing into poverty with me. They had to fight constantly just to stay in the middle.
(I should also mention that the upper class player in one group felt so bad for the lower income players that they ended up overhauling their entire game and creating a âsocialistâ society instead. Iâm not sure how our teacher felt about that one.)
Worth stressing this is entirely in the spirit of the original designerâs aims for Monopoly.Â
Monopolyâs  original form of The Landlord Game which was explicitly designed to teach people about the unfairness of rent systems. To quote from the wikipedia entry, just as itâs the easiest source to handâŠ
Magie designed the game to be a âpractical demonstration of the present system of land grabbing with all its usual outcomes and consequencesâ.[2] She based the game on the economic principles of Georgism, a system proposed byHenry George, with the object of demonstrating how rents enrich property owners and impoverish tenants. She knew that some people could find it hard to understand why this happened and what might be done about it, and she thought that if Georgist ideas were put into the concrete form of a game, they might be easier to demonstrate.
When the usual suspects start making âdonât bring politics into gamesâ noises, I roll my eyes pretty hard. They have no idea of the history of the form.
And then the Parker Brothers pushed her out and stole the game thereby demonstrating exactly what capitalism is
your car: *bounces back and forth, defeated, its hood swinging by a mere thread*
my car: *triumphantly leaps six feet in the air, spraying hubcaps in victorious fervor*
This was wild
Welcome to the world of competitive choreography.
I wonder what the monster would have been like if Frankenstein had stuck around to teach him stuff instead of running the first chance he got because "OH MY GAWD I AM NOT READY TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITIES FOR MY ACTIONS!"
I actually still laugh at the fact that richard nixonâs nickname was tricky dicky
I keep seeing stuff about Lord of the Flies going around
Obviously, the individual experiences of the people making the posts - re: teachers, lessons, the way they were forced to study the book - arenât up for debate
but like, I feel that people might not have the whole story here and as someone who knows far too much about literature, I wanted to talk about it a little
Sir William Golding wrote Lord of the Flies in response to an earlier novel called The Coral Island. In The Coral Island, a small group of upper-class British boys from a boarding school get stranded on an island and have an absolutely wonderful time. They look back on it as a fond adventure, where they had a little vacation, invented things, and generally made their well-bred high society English parents proud.
Sir William Golding read that novel and was disgusted by the way that R. M. Ballantyne used the plot as a huge essay on the superior intellect and higher morality of English folk (read: white people). The boys in The Coral Island eventually have to seek the aid of Christian missionaries (who are there to convert the local Polynesian populace) to save them from the natives who are written as raping pillaging amoral cannibals.
Sir William Golding set out to write a more realistic novel, by the way, using the same names for his main characters as Ballantyne did (although Goldingâs characters are slightly younger). So, all the posts about Lord of the Flies showing the âhuman conditionâ insofar as it pertains to young middle-class British boys who grew up in a boarding house in the middle of the Cold War are correct. But I get the feeling that most people donât realize that was the point of the novel.
Lord of the Flies was meant as a huge âfuck youâ to the ingrained belief that English people are the most noble and wise of all people and thus incapable of descending into savagery. I doubt it was ever meant to be a sweeping generalized metaphor for the universal savage nature of humanity, and shame on the teachers who force that interpretation on their students.
itâs memorial day you know what this means
Photo of the Week
On Thursday May 14, 2015 the Fredericton Youth Feminists crashed the March for Life rally and staged a die-in to represent those who are harmed or killed by unsafe abortions.Â
whoa weâre half way there
what
whoa livin on a prayer
try replacing the word âheterosexualâ with âbeesâ and this post becomes pretty bee-phobic doesnt it