CEO of Socialism

"Counting or not counting gang violence? YEEEEOWWCH!" girl | Boston school anarchist

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

intro post

hello i am sunshine. i am an individualist anarchist.

i like:

Individualist anarchism

Polycentric law

Progressivism

Error theory (maybe non-cognitivism)

Deism

i don't like:

Capitalism

Communism

Marxism-Leninism

Liberalism

Vulgar libertarianism

Conservatism

Zionism

Moralism

Radfems

Radqueers

Animal rights

Censorship

If you disagree with me, I welcome a discussion. If you disagree with me and still wanna be friends, that's great!

other things :

Art

Philosophy

Politics

TCoAaL

Portal 2

Better Half

Writing my evil thoughts

dni if you have poor grammar or if you're not fluent in English

[dragon-in-a-fez]

personally I'm annoyed by the socioeconomic conditions that made words like "unalive" necessary but simultaneously impressed by the linguistic adaptations young people have made to continue talking about important things while subject to those conditions and I think if you can't hold both of those thoughts in your head you might just be old man yelling at cloud

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

okay but what does "i dont believe in animal rights" even mean for you im curious about that stance

i don't believe animals are owed any rights. they have the same status to me as a rock: something that human beings are allowed to own and do whatever they want with, as long as they don't infringe upon the rights of other humans.

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

I think defending child molesters makes you a bad person

i agree, but I also think advocating for arbitrary sentencing extensions makes you a bad person

[royallypalelocus]

you defend child molesters to a degree that makes you seem like a pedophile yourself

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

i think it's disgusting to say that saying people should be punished equally for equal crimes is equal to defending child rape

[royallypalelocus]

Just stop defending pedophiles. I know it's like your big thing, but find a new shtick. You're grossing everyone out.

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

ive never defended any kind of rape, you're just a retard who can't read

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

I think defending child molesters makes you a bad person

i agree, but I also think advocating for arbitrary sentencing extensions makes you a bad person

[royallypalelocus]

you defend child molesters to a degree that makes you seem like a pedophile yourself

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

i think it's disgusting to say that saying people should be punished equally for equal crimes is equal to defending child rape

[innerchildabortionclinic]

in the ideal world being a veteran gets you 10 more years or something

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

yes let's give these vets with PTSD an extra ten years cause why not

[enba-and-luka]

Do you also think this about nazi SS officers or are you just a mindless US chauvinist

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

if a veteran commits rape, he should be convicted of rape and sentenced just as if he wasn't a veteran.

if an SS officer commits rape, he should be convicted of rape and sentenced just as if he wasn't an SS officer

[racistcharacterof2day]

Racist character of today:

Angel Dust from "Hazbin Hotel"

[pueriled]

───⠀momonga pngs

all sourced from picmix no need to credit me ,, f2u feel free to repost anywhere

[chiikawagifs]

[innerchildabortionclinic]

in the ideal world being a veteran gets you 10 more years or something

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

yes let's give these vets with PTSD an extra ten years cause why not

[innerchildabortionclinic]

^me accidentally defending a child molester because I respect the troops so much

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

equating rejection of arbitrary extensions of sentencing based on irrelevant characteristics to defending the criminal that's being sentenced is insane. you basically said "i think people with [arbitrary characteristic] deserve longer sentences and if you disagree you're endorsing those criminals". i am not defending a child molester. you are disgusting for insinuating this.

[commodityproduction]

Being a veteran isn't a irrelevant characteristic. It means you are an evil person who should be persecuted relentlessly

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

so if i'm poor and i'm targeted by a military recruiter offering a way out of my poverty and so i'm shipped off to fight a war for billionaires, i'm the bad guy. amazing analysis.

[trollrider1111]

Unequivocally yes, you trash eating/spewing behemoth

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

blatant classism is crazy

[father-forsaken]

Good thing you're not poor. What was that about mommy getting you an Xbox?

I think people who voluntarily rape children should be punished, and those who abuse their power should be punished further for it. Simple as that. But go on, go defend that rapist bcs "poor baby has ptsd".

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

you're actually illiterate. I just opposed the extra ten years. Obviously we should punish rapists who abuse their power.

[father-forsaken]

So, pray tell, why do you think they're getting those 10 years, hm? And yes, let's listen to the person who thinks saying slurs is in her white right on how poor and disadvantaged and targeted she'll be by the military. You'd actually fit right in with them.

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

You cannot read. OP said, "in the ideal world being a veteran gets you 10 more years or something". ten MORE years. i took issue with just adding ten years because they're a vet. if a vet raped someone, they should get the same punishment as a non-vet who raped someone.

nazism is when you agree with the Southern Poverty Law Center on the classification of the NOI as a hate group.

[father-forsaken]

You really are a bootlicker.

You agree that someone who abuses their power to rape someone should have a more extreme punishment. A veteran who rapes a child, a VETERAN. WHO HAS POWER OVER A CHILD. AND ABUSES THAT POWER TO RAPE THAT CHILD. SHOULD HAVE A MORE EXTEME PUNISHMENT BECAUSE THEY ABUSED THAT POWER TO RAPE THAT CHILD.

Oh. Sure. Let's say this then

You are an animal abuser, rape defending privileged white fascist who slings slurs when she gets pissy.

That better? Or do you want me to say it like you're 5, given that your literacy levels are subzero?

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

Rape is definitionally an abuse of power, but being a veteran in and of itself doesn't give you special power that can reasonably be used in order to coerce someone into sex. I think that if a veteran has power over a child and they use that power to rape them, they should obviously be punished. But abuse of power is always the case in child rape. Because. It's child rape. I just don't see why having previously served in the military means you deserve way harsher sentencing than someone who hasn't. If you think that's a defense of rape, you are delusional and disgusting.

"You are an animal abuser, rape defending privileged white fascist who slings slurs when she gets pissy." Who cares! Words don't mean anything. Fascism is when thing i don't like. I don't need to give arguments in favor of things i support! Idiot is a slur!

[fujocatboy]

ask children who have been raped and beaten overseas if they think us soldiers don't have power over them? if children of us veterans abused by said veterans think they dont have power? bc either you're a troll or you do not know how the world works. power is multi faceted you fucking useless piece of shit

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

hey dipshit, VETERANS ARE NOT IN SERVICE. THEY ARE NOT OVERSEAS FIGHTING WARS.

and veterans hold power over their children because they're their CHILDREN.

[ratdog-thing]

hey. hey. slow down.

slow down and now tell me - why do you think veterans are usually getting off easier for doing any sort of crime, including sexual abuse, including sexual abuse towards children?

and now that you thought of answer, tell me - if a person knows that they're far less likely to be punished for a crime, does it affect them in any way?

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

does it matter? if we're advocating judicial reform, just advocate equal sentencing, which apparently is a tall order

[ratdog-thing]

yeah it's kinda relevant to the discussion that you're leading right now and answers your question from the above

as for me, i don't really believe something so flawed can be reformed. and for strictly personal reasons i'd rather torture and then bleed out all people who sexually abused children (although that wouldn't make for a good judicial reform, sadly)

due to those things, i don't really have a horse in this race. but it's kinda entertaining, seeing how you twist and writhe to turn your eyes away from the fact that veterans have a priviledge in this regard. you a military personnel? or maybe your daddy is?

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

alr. to answer your questions, if i were to guess, vets would get lesser punishments for crimes due to either the respect we have for vets as a society, or the fact that vets commonly have mental disorders which can be deemed a mitigating factor (for instance, PTSD). probably a combination of both.

if person knows they're far less likely to be punished for a crime, that probably means they're more likely to commit said crime. but i don't believe i claimed that. i said that being a vet doesn't give you a special power you could reasonably use to coerce someone into sex. that's differing from simply having a higher likelihood of committing rape.

as for me, i don't really believe something so flawed can be reformed.

you just basically admitted that someone being less likely to be punished for a crime means they're more likely to do a crime. so what happens when there is no justice system to punish things like rape or murder? you'll probably have more rape and murder. or maybe you're not implying the abolition of the justice system, maybe you're just a doomer with no political prescriptions.

for strictly personal reasons i'd rather torture and then bleed out all people who sexually abused children (although that wouldn't make for a good judicial reform, sadly)

probably not, as harsh punishments like the death penalty don't seem to deter crime. and for other reasons, i'd rather not punish people for crimes harshly in general. rehabilitative justice seems to be a better option.

due to those things, i don't really have a horse in this race.

you just said that you'd like to torture child rapists for "personal reasons". i think you do have a horse in this race.

you a military personnel? or maybe your daddy is?

hell nah.

[ratdog-thing]

re: prisons

not a doomer baby, just anarchist. read up if interested, i'm not really into explaining complicated topics on the interned for about a decade (it wasn't really worth it)

so yeah, i believe in rehabilitative justice - which is completely impossible to achieve with the prisons being as they are now

re: animal cruelty for sport (talking about horse races)

i don't really have a horse in this race. my personal reasons shouldn't be what's society is supposed to rely on. my personal reasons lay on the foundation of "i was molested, raped and threatened (and actually punished for speaking up about it) as a 6 yo". i have feelings and a lot of imagination.

but i'm also very strictly against basing justice-related laws and decisions on this sort of feelings. death punishment is inhuman and in current political situation it's something that should be a reason for every country to cut all ties with the country performing it. but that's not happening anywhere right now so whatever

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

not a doomer baby, just anarchist.

great! im an anarchist too. now answer me: if you know that reducing the likelihood of someone being punished for a crime increases the likelihood they'll commit that crime, what do you think will happen when there is no justice system to punish rape and murder?

so yeah, i believe in rehabilitative justice - which is completely impossible to achieve with the prisons being as they are now

I agree completely. in fact, i don't really think "prisons" as we think of them today should exist. if a person really needs to be detained, house arrest is a better option, and if they really need to be supervised, something resembling a psych ward is best.

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

You say you've never heard a good argument for animal rights. Why do you need someone to convince you that animals shouldn't be abused? And even if you don't actively support it, why does that mean you don't like it? You can be neutral on something without actively being against it

If you make a claim, you need to provide evidence. That's nonnegotiable. Like, that's a basis of logic. How do you not understand that? And to use the rock example, I've never heard a good argument for rocks' rights, so I'm anti-rocks rights. I am against placing needless restrictions on people's freedom and autonomy.

[ratdog-thing]

society will be more secure

more secure

when you have more cops

more cops is more security

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

more security doesn't necessarily mean more cops. it may mean security cameras or anti-theft tags. and which do you think is more secure: a store with no cops or a store with five cops? that's just a fact

[ratdog-thing]

cameras. yeah. sure.

enjoy your Big Brother fantasy i guess.

but none of those two make stores more secure, nor anti-theft tags do. saying it as a person who might have or might have not shoplifted quite a bit in the past.

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

guys, it's literally 1984 when convenience stores have security cameras in them. when AT&T pulls up to your neighbor's yard, Oceania is right around the corner.

A systematic review of tagging as a method to reduce theft in retail environments - Crime Science

Background Retailers routinely use security tags to reduce theft. Presently, however, there has been no attempt to systematically review the

CCTV Surveillance for Crime Prevention: A 40-Year Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis | Office of Justice Programs

This review of research on the effects of closed-circuit television (CCTV) surveillance cameras on crime rates demonstrated evidence of sign

i mean your anecdotal evidence is cute i guess but the evidence disagrees.

[ratdog-thing]

you really support more and more survaillance in the name of crime prevention. strong one.

and cameras in stores weren't what you were talking about.

i start feeling sorry for you, that's the time to stop. pity makes me a bad opponent. try reading your own previous replies before writing more and more shitty takes, i beg you. that's a gamechanger, i promise.

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

i just think that you should be free to put up security cameras if you so choose. if a guy worries about his home being broken into and his children being endangered, and he wants to put up a camera to ease his mind, i see nothing wrong with that. of course, surveillance by the government is terrible, but we're talking about private surveillance.

yes, it was. i just said "security will increase", which can mean more cameras as much as any other type of security increase. you're just trying to strawman.

just take the L man. you claimed something empirically incorrect and you know you can't argue with the facts.

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

veterans rape, torture, and kill people during war. they should all get an extra 10 years. 20 even

they deserve the same sentencing for the same crimes as non-vets. if you rape someone during war, you should be convicted of rape, just like if you weren't involved in a war.

and, yeah, they do kill people during war. that's part of war.

[woosh-floosh-art]

Kurimanju would take a sip of an American beer and then throw it on the ground

I don't think that's true... I think they would find much to love in our craft beer culture... I also think they would like our funny novelty beer hats

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

You say you've never heard a good argument for animal rights. Why do you need someone to convince you that animals shouldn't be abused? And even if you don't actively support it, why does that mean you don't like it? You can be neutral on something without actively being against it

If you make a claim, you need to provide evidence. That's nonnegotiable. Like, that's a basis of logic. How do you not understand that? And to use the rock example, I've never heard a good argument for rocks' rights, so I'm anti-rocks rights. I am against placing needless restrictions on people's freedom and autonomy.

[ratdog-thing]

society will be more secure

more secure

when you have more cops

more cops is more security

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

more security doesn't necessarily mean more cops. it may mean security cameras or anti-theft tags. and which do you think is more secure: a store with no cops or a store with five cops? that's just a fact

[ratdog-thing]

cameras. yeah. sure.

enjoy your Big Brother fantasy i guess.

but none of those two make stores more secure, nor anti-theft tags do. saying it as a person who might have or might have not shoplifted quite a bit in the past.

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

guys, it's literally 1984 when convenience stores have security cameras in them. when AT&T pulls up to your neighbor's yard, Oceania is right around the corner.

A systematic review of tagging as a method to reduce theft in retail environments - Crime Science

Background Retailers routinely use security tags to reduce theft. Presently, however, there has been no attempt to systematically review the

CCTV Surveillance for Crime Prevention: A 40-Year Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis | Office of Justice Programs

This review of research on the effects of closed-circuit television (CCTV) surveillance cameras on crime rates demonstrated evidence of sign

i mean your anecdotal evidence is cute i guess but the evidence disagrees.

[innerchildabortionclinic]

in the ideal world being a veteran gets you 10 more years or something

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

yes let's give these vets with PTSD an extra ten years cause why not

[innerchildabortionclinic]

^me accidentally defending a child molester because I respect the troops so much

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

equating rejection of arbitrary extensions of sentencing based on irrelevant characteristics to defending the criminal that's being sentenced is insane. you basically said "i think people with [arbitrary characteristic] deserve longer sentences and if you disagree you're endorsing those criminals". i am not defending a child molester. you are disgusting for insinuating this.

[commodityproduction]

Being a veteran isn't a irrelevant characteristic. It means you are an evil person who should be persecuted relentlessly

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

so if i'm poor and i'm targeted by a military recruiter offering a way out of my poverty and so i'm shipped off to fight a war for billionaires, i'm the bad guy. amazing analysis.

[trollrider1111]

Unequivocally yes, you trash eating/spewing behemoth

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

blatant classism is crazy

[father-forsaken]

Good thing you're not poor. What was that about mommy getting you an Xbox?

I think people who voluntarily rape children should be punished, and those who abuse their power should be punished further for it. Simple as that. But go on, go defend that rapist bcs "poor baby has ptsd".

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

you're actually illiterate. I just opposed the extra ten years. Obviously we should punish rapists who abuse their power.

[father-forsaken]

So, pray tell, why do you think they're getting those 10 years, hm? And yes, let's listen to the person who thinks saying slurs is in her white right on how poor and disadvantaged and targeted she'll be by the military. You'd actually fit right in with them.

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

You cannot read. OP said, "in the ideal world being a veteran gets you 10 more years or something". ten MORE years. i took issue with just adding ten years because they're a vet. if a vet raped someone, they should get the same punishment as a non-vet who raped someone.

nazism is when you agree with the Southern Poverty Law Center on the classification of the NOI as a hate group.

[father-forsaken]

You really are a bootlicker.

You agree that someone who abuses their power to rape someone should have a more extreme punishment. A veteran who rapes a child, a VETERAN. WHO HAS POWER OVER A CHILD. AND ABUSES THAT POWER TO RAPE THAT CHILD. SHOULD HAVE A MORE EXTEME PUNISHMENT BECAUSE THEY ABUSED THAT POWER TO RAPE THAT CHILD.

Oh. Sure. Let's say this then

You are an animal abuser, rape defending privileged white fascist who slings slurs when she gets pissy.

That better? Or do you want me to say it like you're 5, given that your literacy levels are subzero?

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

Rape is definitionally an abuse of power, but being a veteran in and of itself doesn't give you special power that can reasonably be used in order to coerce someone into sex. I think that if a veteran has power over a child and they use that power to rape them, they should obviously be punished. But abuse of power is always the case in child rape. Because. It's child rape. I just don't see why having previously served in the military means you deserve way harsher sentencing than someone who hasn't. If you think that's a defense of rape, you are delusional and disgusting.

"You are an animal abuser, rape defending privileged white fascist who slings slurs when she gets pissy." Who cares! Words don't mean anything. Fascism is when thing i don't like. I don't need to give arguments in favor of things i support! Idiot is a slur!

[fujocatboy]

ask children who have been raped and beaten overseas if they think us soldiers don't have power over them? if children of us veterans abused by said veterans think they dont have power? bc either you're a troll or you do not know how the world works. power is multi faceted you fucking useless piece of shit

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

hey dipshit, VETERANS ARE NOT IN SERVICE. THEY ARE NOT OVERSEAS FIGHTING WARS.

and veterans hold power over their children because they're their CHILDREN.

[ratdog-thing]

hey. hey. slow down.

slow down and now tell me - why do you think veterans are usually getting off easier for doing any sort of crime, including sexual abuse, including sexual abuse towards children?

and now that you thought of answer, tell me - if a person knows that they're far less likely to be punished for a crime, does it affect them in any way?

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

does it matter? if we're advocating judicial reform, just advocate equal sentencing, which apparently is a tall order

[ratdog-thing]

yeah it's kinda relevant to the discussion that you're leading right now and answers your question from the above

as for me, i don't really believe something so flawed can be reformed. and for strictly personal reasons i'd rather torture and then bleed out all people who sexually abused children (although that wouldn't make for a good judicial reform, sadly)

due to those things, i don't really have a horse in this race. but it's kinda entertaining, seeing how you twist and writhe to turn your eyes away from the fact that veterans have a priviledge in this regard. you a military personnel? or maybe your daddy is?

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

alr. to answer your questions, if i were to guess, vets would get lesser punishments for crimes due to either the respect we have for vets as a society, or the fact that vets commonly have mental disorders which can be deemed a mitigating factor (for instance, PTSD). probably a combination of both.

if person knows they're far less likely to be punished for a crime, that probably means they're more likely to commit said crime. but i don't believe i claimed that. i said that being a vet doesn't give you a special power you could reasonably use to coerce someone into sex. that's differing from simply having a higher likelihood of committing rape.

as for me, i don't really believe something so flawed can be reformed.

you just basically admitted that someone being less likely to be punished for a crime means they're more likely to do a crime. so what happens when there is no justice system to punish things like rape or murder? you'll probably have more rape and murder. or maybe you're not implying the abolition of the justice system, maybe you're just a doomer with no political prescriptions.

for strictly personal reasons i'd rather torture and then bleed out all people who sexually abused children (although that wouldn't make for a good judicial reform, sadly)

probably not, as harsh punishments like the death penalty don't seem to deter crime. and for other reasons, i'd rather not punish people for crimes harshly in general. rehabilitative justice seems to be a better option.

due to those things, i don't really have a horse in this race.

you just said that you'd like to torture child rapists for "personal reasons". i think you do have a horse in this race.

you a military personnel? or maybe your daddy is?

hell nah.

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

You say you've never heard a good argument for animal rights. Why do you need someone to convince you that animals shouldn't be abused? And even if you don't actively support it, why does that mean you don't like it? You can be neutral on something without actively being against it

If you make a claim, you need to provide evidence. That's nonnegotiable. Like, that's a basis of logic. How do you not understand that? And to use the rock example, I've never heard a good argument for rocks' rights, so I'm anti-rocks rights. I am against placing needless restrictions on people's freedom and autonomy.

[ratdog-thing]

society will be more secure

more secure

when you have more cops

more cops is more security

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

more security doesn't necessarily mean more cops. it may mean security cameras or anti-theft tags. and which do you think is more secure: a store with no cops or a store with five cops? that's just a fact

[innerchildabortionclinic]

in the ideal world being a veteran gets you 10 more years or something

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

yes let's give these vets with PTSD an extra ten years cause why not

[innerchildabortionclinic]

^me accidentally defending a child molester because I respect the troops so much

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

equating rejection of arbitrary extensions of sentencing based on irrelevant characteristics to defending the criminal that's being sentenced is insane. you basically said "i think people with [arbitrary characteristic] deserve longer sentences and if you disagree you're endorsing those criminals". i am not defending a child molester. you are disgusting for insinuating this.

[commodityproduction]

Being a veteran isn't a irrelevant characteristic. It means you are an evil person who should be persecuted relentlessly

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

so if i'm poor and i'm targeted by a military recruiter offering a way out of my poverty and so i'm shipped off to fight a war for billionaires, i'm the bad guy. amazing analysis.

[trollrider1111]

Unequivocally yes, you trash eating/spewing behemoth

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

blatant classism is crazy

[father-forsaken]

Good thing you're not poor. What was that about mommy getting you an Xbox?

I think people who voluntarily rape children should be punished, and those who abuse their power should be punished further for it. Simple as that. But go on, go defend that rapist bcs "poor baby has ptsd".

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

you're actually illiterate. I just opposed the extra ten years. Obviously we should punish rapists who abuse their power.

[father-forsaken]

So, pray tell, why do you think they're getting those 10 years, hm? And yes, let's listen to the person who thinks saying slurs is in her white right on how poor and disadvantaged and targeted she'll be by the military. You'd actually fit right in with them.

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

You cannot read. OP said, "in the ideal world being a veteran gets you 10 more years or something". ten MORE years. i took issue with just adding ten years because they're a vet. if a vet raped someone, they should get the same punishment as a non-vet who raped someone.

nazism is when you agree with the Southern Poverty Law Center on the classification of the NOI as a hate group.

[father-forsaken]

You really are a bootlicker.

You agree that someone who abuses their power to rape someone should have a more extreme punishment. A veteran who rapes a child, a VETERAN. WHO HAS POWER OVER A CHILD. AND ABUSES THAT POWER TO RAPE THAT CHILD. SHOULD HAVE A MORE EXTEME PUNISHMENT BECAUSE THEY ABUSED THAT POWER TO RAPE THAT CHILD.

Oh. Sure. Let's say this then

You are an animal abuser, rape defending privileged white fascist who slings slurs when she gets pissy.

That better? Or do you want me to say it like you're 5, given that your literacy levels are subzero?

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

Rape is definitionally an abuse of power, but being a veteran in and of itself doesn't give you special power that can reasonably be used in order to coerce someone into sex. I think that if a veteran has power over a child and they use that power to rape them, they should obviously be punished. But abuse of power is always the case in child rape. Because. It's child rape. I just don't see why having previously served in the military means you deserve way harsher sentencing than someone who hasn't. If you think that's a defense of rape, you are delusional and disgusting.

"You are an animal abuser, rape defending privileged white fascist who slings slurs when she gets pissy." Who cares! Words don't mean anything. Fascism is when thing i don't like. I don't need to give arguments in favor of things i support! Idiot is a slur!

[fujocatboy]

ask children who have been raped and beaten overseas if they think us soldiers don't have power over them? if children of us veterans abused by said veterans think they dont have power? bc either you're a troll or you do not know how the world works. power is multi faceted you fucking useless piece of shit

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

hey dipshit, VETERANS ARE NOT IN SERVICE. THEY ARE NOT OVERSEAS FIGHTING WARS.

and veterans hold power over their children because they're their CHILDREN.

[ratdog-thing]

hey. hey. slow down.

slow down and now tell me - why do you think veterans are usually getting off easier for doing any sort of crime, including sexual abuse, including sexual abuse towards children?

and now that you thought of answer, tell me - if a person knows that they're far less likely to be punished for a crime, does it affect them in any way?

[sunshineandsparkl3s]

does it matter? if we're advocating judicial reform, just advocate equal sentencing, which apparently is a tall order