amc tvl // prince lestat
Loved this scene so much, and did not make this connection!

izzy's playlists!
art blog(derogatory)
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
No title available
Keni

★
No title available
noise dept.
will byers stan first human second
𓃗
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

Discoholic 🪩
sheepfilms
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Jules of Nature
h

No title available
No title available
Game of Thrones Daily
Sweet Seals For You, Always

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from Italy
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Spain
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from Germany
@surrenderdorothea
amc tvl // prince lestat
Loved this scene so much, and did not make this connection!
I’m seeing a lot of “remember, this is all Lestat’s point of view, so who even knows if things went down the way we were shown.” And I don’t think that is what’s going on. “The Failures” is described as “omniscient” at the auction, and Lestat says “I am everywhere” before telling us what happened between Louis and Daniel in their first meeting.
I think the “I, Amel, digress,” gives us some sense of how Lestat might have omniscient knowledge of everything that occurred.
The only song there's ever been plays again: Love.
I can be slow on the uptake sometimes.
When I saw the scene of Lestat telling Gab to comfort Alex, because Alex needs his mother, I saw it as confirmation that Gab was Alex's maker.
It did not initially click with me that Lestat was also saying that he, Lestat, no longer needed his mother.
It must have clicked with Gab though, because the look on her face after he said it...
It is unhinged to make death threats because you are unhappy with a show. Stop watching. That’s it. No one owes you the version of the show you wanted.
A whole lot of people need to rethink how you talk about media. When you actively describe the show as an “infestation” that is “taking away” the joy people have, when you describe the show as “rotten,” written by people who “despise” the fandom, and claim, “the tale is abusing me, the tale is hate criming me,” you prime people towards violence. If you believe words and representations have the potential to cause harm, you need to take responsibility for your own fucking words.
It is unhinged to make death threats because you are unhappy with a show. Stop watching. That’s it. No one owes you the version of the show you wanted.
It’s all well and good to say you would be fine with femme Lestat so long as the show had set that up properly if you hadn’t been harassing and shaming everyone pointing out how the show was setting that up.
i don’t believe a single person on the iwtv s1 writing staff was raised catholic bc wdym lestat wanted to be a priest growing up and louis and lestat just moved on from that like they weren’t gonna fuck about it
two queer catholic boys and neither of them wanted to roleplay fucking a priest??
fake catholicism in that show
Look, they couldn’t show us everything, so we just have to accept that it happened and they both enjoyed it (while feeling a bit guilty about it, but that’s part of the enjoyment).
There is something truly toxic about how academic language is being weaponized in fan spaces. Historical, literary, and theoretical references used not to critique a text or lead to greater understanding of it, but instead to bludgeon anyone who disagrees or disappoints. It bothers me because these posts often look and feel persuasive at first, but don’t hold up to any scrutiny. They are also really long, which again, looks like deep analysis, but in the end, feels more like gish galloping disguised as critique/analysis.
I would love to see more meta in fandom, and it bothers me that academic discourse is being used for clout and influence rather than as an invitation to discuss.
Did Armand deserve an apology from Louis? Fuck no. But Louis saving both himself and Regina through empathy and compassion for the monster that Armand is - that was beautiful to me.
It Takes A Village To Burn A Village: The Great Laws, The Great Conversion and The French Revolution
Throughout the show, we’ve been looking at the Great Conversion as this impending catastrophe. That makes sense because as humans, more vampires means more instability, more violence, and more danger to humanity. But how does the Great Conversion look from the vampires’ perspective?
It has been established in the show that the Great Laws are antiquated rules through which vampires have been governed for centuries. These laws concentrate power to a privileged few (primarily coven leaders) while oppressing the many. The majority of vampires live in shame, secrecy and isolation within the shadows of society, and at the mercy of the unquestioned authority of their coven leaders. They have the power to create or to kill at their own will, and enforce these strict laws using fear (that of punishment or the reinforced belief that these laws are vital to protecting vampires from humans, as mentioned by Armand in s2e3). The punishment for violating these laws is almost always death, as we saw with Armand in s2 executing a vampire who broke the 1st law (turning another mortal to a vampire), the execution of Claudia and Madeleine, and the graveyard wall in TdV’s basement with the remains of all those who have broken the laws before (and that’s only TdV’s graveyard, and at a time when the vampire numbers were vastly little).
The Great Laws, then, are not simply rules. They are the foundation of a vampiric political order.
This brings us to revolutions.
A revolution is defined as a fundamental and often violent transformation of a political or social order. Revolutions rarely start overnight. They are the culmination of long-standing tensions: repression, lack of freedom, isolation, inequality, and the emergence of new ideas that challenge the legitimacy of existing systems.
One revolution mentioned throughout Season 3 is the French Revolution, and I don't think that's coincidental. The historical upheaval of 18th-century France, which dismantled the aristocracy, is meant to mirror the upheaval brought upon by the Great Conversion. The collapse of an old order (The Great Laws), the challenge to inherited authority (coven leaders and powerful ancient vampires), and the tension between obtaining freedom and maintaining stability.
Some parallels include:
The Great Laws establish an ancient, rigid social order similar to that of the Old Régime (French monarchy and aristocratic system).
Coven Leaders rule by tradition and fear, much like French nobility and monarchy ruled by inherited privilege.
The Great Conversion creates countless new vampires, disrupting hierarchy, similar to the Revolution mobilizing the masses and overturning aristocratic privilege. And where a small aristocracy is suddenly facing an enormous population that no longer accepts inherited authority.
Ancient vampires and coven leaders lose their monopoly on power, just like aristocrats lost political dominance.
Traditionalist vampires try to preserve the old laws, similar to how royalists and conservatives resisted revolutionary change.
Viewed this way, the Great Conversion is not simply a disaster as portrayed to us. It’s a vampire revolution.
This also reframes Armand's role in the story. As a powerful, ancient vampire and a coven leader whose authority depends on preserving the Great Laws, he naturally opposes the Great Conversion. He has been leading the opposition against it this entire season if not earlier. He warns repeatedly that it will lead to chaos, bloodshed, and anarchy. He’s not wrong, but this is a familiar argument that’s been used before, during, and after almost every revolution throughout history. Defenders of the existing order insist that stability and order are too valuable to risk. They point to the violence, uncertainty, and destruction that accompany revolutionary change as proof that even an unjust system is preferable to upheaval. The fall of the French monarchy was followed by years of political turmoil, civil war, and the Reign of Terror period (cough-Akasha-cough), events often used as proof that revolutions breed only chaos. Yet from that chaos emerged lasting changes (such as the abolishment of feudal systems) and freedoms that reshaped France and influenced much of Europe. The Great Conversion will probably follow that same pattern. From Armand's perspective, it represents the destruction of order. From the perspective of ordinary vampires, however, it is the dismantling of an oppressive system that has governed them for centuries. The chaos isn't necessarily the point though, it’s the transition.
That brings us to Lestat’s role in the story. Lestat has been portrayed throughout this season as the face of the Great Conversion (be it willingly or unwillingly) or the face of the revolution (in episode 3, the show has him repeat the revolutionaries’ chant of Liberty, Equality, Fraternity, to hint at this). His music and his clear defiance of the laws by becoming a vampire rockstar brought on the ideological catalyst needed to fast-track this revolution. We hear across season 3 the voices of vampires who find solace & representation in Lestat’s music because it speaks directly to their experience, offers a voice to their loneliness and shows them a world beyond the oppressive confines of the Great Laws: one of freedom, visibility and community. However, Lestat isn't trying to establish democracy or bring about revolution. His philosophy is more individualistic (every vampire should be free to choose their own life rather than be bound by centuries-old laws simply because they have always existed). He functions less as a revolutionary leader and more as a symbol (at least where we are at in the story).
Thanks for coming to my TED Talk!
Appleton Oomf.
Maybe it’s just me, but I don’t think an ambiguous line in a diss track is equivalent to circulating revenge porn.
Is it weird that I can foresee me forgiving Armand and Daniel for the beheadings, but hating them forever because of the sex tape?
something so deliberate about the way armand and daniel are framing the gabistat relationship. "lestat lays with his mother". "he’s boning his mom". completely reframing the power dynamics in the relationship and laying the blame exclusively at lestats feet. he’s the one doing it, he’s the one being disgusting, did you see him wanting to sleep with his mother?
Note too that Armand’s apology to Lestat stated, “your dynamic personality overwhelmed me,” making Armand the victim of Lestat.