T s u n a n F a s h i o n
A n A s a k i - K y o C o m p a n y
will byers stan first human second
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
wallacepolsom

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

Origami Around

⁂

if i look back, i am lost

izzy's playlists!
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Jules of Nature
Monterey Bay Aquarium

★
trying on a metaphor
taylor price

pixel skylines
noise dept.
h
macklin celebrini has autism

#extradirty

seen from United States
seen from Ecuador

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Taiwan

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from T1
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Bangladesh
@syni-gin-rin
T s u n a n F a s h i o n
A n A s a k i - K y o C o m p a n y
Miraculous Ladybug Redesigns - Marinette
Lillymon
Another Day
Gabriel Agreste's New Fashion Line - Now Available For Purchase.
Gabriel's still fashion designer, and his child (now Marinette), is still his model. Adrien doesn't seem to really like being a fashion model in-canon, but I think here Marinette does, she just doesn't like how much her father controls her day-to-day life. She yearns for the freedom to not have every minute of her day planned out for her - while still being able to do the things she enjoys.
I also think she's older in this version, more in the 16-17 range. There's a lot to be said about minors in the fashion industry, but neither which the canon nor I am prepared to really tackle. So the AU would focus less on those aspects and more on Marinette and Gabriel's relationship (and strain on thereof) through it.
To be honest, I don't quite know where Adrien fits in in all of this. I feel like you can't just slot him directly into Marinette's spot without changing anything. He needs another purpose for wanting to be Ladybug than just "because its the right thing to do" (that's still a purpose, but just not the only one). I'm just not sure what the most compelling thing for him to be lacking is, currently. Lots of stuff floating around, but not many concrete ideas lol
i don't understand this frame. wouldn't this also be the experience of a "neurotypical" surrounded by "Autistic/ADHD" people? would they be definitionally non-neurotypical by comparison to their local majority? wouldn't this also be the experience of someone whose aesthetic sensibilities are just out of step with those of the people around them? (or is this already enough to be definitionally non-neurotypical?)
are we sure that – in a world with many cultures and many options, where it's easier than ever before to simply be out of step with your environment – this isn't evil wizards advertising an identity group whose prescriptive content is to resign yourself to the status of a permanent minority who society needn't accommodate?
Hmm, don't like the disability identitarianism or the facile way the tweet generalizes about it, but taking a shot at interpreting it charitably:
Autistic and ADHD people seem to have a much harder time than others in coalescing around shared norms, and this would probably get worse if you removed the reference class from which they feel a shared alienation. While both factors are in play, the social deficit owes less to differing preferences than to a reduced awareness of social cues. The total uniformity of experience the tweet describes can't be real, but since it's about the internal feeling of reduced social awareness, one would expect it to be more prevalent among those for whom that trait is innate rather than situational. They're the ones for whom "being accommodated" is likely to involve an overall increased slack with respect to abnormal or unacceptable behaviour.
(It's hard for me to say how much "ADHD" features in this specifically. As an identity group, it's used less as a narrowly-defined condition than as a stand-in for a broad and vaguely-defined spectrum, because it was the pediatric diagnosis in vogue when today's young adults were children. But you know what I mean, we're all just gesturing vaguely at that whole cluster.)
Reduced social perception is centrifugal and limits norm formation, but it doesn't prevent it completely, and we can get a glimpse online of what it looks like when you have spaces with a very high rate of autistic/ADHD members without being about that. The two most prevalent styles seem to be
A subculture that encodes its expectations into explicit, often arbitrary rules, about which it is inflexibly legalistic, or
A subculture of zealous, combative individualism.
These can both be very alienating, but they don't lend themselves to the specific type of alienation that the tweet describes. Similarly, I think someone with out-of-step aesthetic sensibilities but strong social awareness would have a different experience than this, "pushing" instead of "pulling": instead of restraining their reflexive positivity for fear of doing something unacceptable, the society's suppression of unacceptable things is preventing them from feeling positively in the first place.
I guess maybe there's a similarity if, instead of positivity, we talk about vulnerability? I said "aesthetic", but this second type of situation reminds me a bit of the queer experience, and vulnerability ("is it safe to be open with this person?") really is dangerous in this specific way. In that case, perhaps we could synthesize these experiences by suggesting that autistic or ADHD people are more likely to experience positive emotions as a form of vulnerability. ...is that true? Ehh, I don't know; it's not obviously false, but I'm always skeptical. People love to self-sort into groups with 30 unrelated things in common and then pretend that all that stuff is inherent to the one or two traits by which they define their "identity". Reading charitably, though: a reasonable person could believe it, and if it were true of this or any other group, it would lead to a certain distinctiveness of experience.
I can't attest to the ADHD part (I'm already hesitant to group it in with autism as-is), but I can provide anecdotal evidence for the autism side. From a very young age, many autistic traits that are positive for the autistic - like parallel play and stimming - are actively discouraged, both by authoritative figures and social pressures.
For those who this discouragement was particularly effective on, I can definitely see it devolving into a constant, negative internal state; taking joy in what you know is bad. Perhaps self-policing would be a better term for it, but regardless of the term used, I do think the phenomena exists. (not for everyone, of course, that generalization is false).
miraculous is an amazing case study on why you should kill your darlings
when u like a character for their potential to be interesting and complex more than how they’re actually written
While I don’t think the senti-kid story necessarily works if the writers wanted to keep the show focused on kids, I think it would’ve gone over a bit better if it was just Felix who was the senti, rather than also Adrien and Kagami (especially Kagami, she was a complete retcon in that regard).
Picture this:
Gabriel, Emilie, and Natalie find the Miraculous (Butterfly and Peacock) because they have an expensive hobby (archeology/collecting rare items, as wealthy people like to do), not because they need the magic at all. They just heard a rumor of an old Tibetan monastery and wanted to check it out, got lucky in finding the two jewels. The Peacock doesn’t even have to be broken.
We can keep the basics of the backstory shown in Representation- minus the detail of Adrien being made with the Peacock. Gabriel and Emilie conceive Adrien normally, but Colt and Amelie aren’t able to like in canon, so Colt has that same jealous outburst at Gabriel. Because Emilie feels bad for her sister, and Gabriel sees an opportunity to make a deal, they lend, or maybe trade, the Peacock to them to create a child. As in canon, Colt uses it, and his jealousy makes Felix a physical copy of Adrien.
Emilie gets sick for non-magical reasons. (I wouldn’t mind having her use it for funsies and not realizing it was broken, but it’s very obviously cracked, and I can’t imagine at least one of their two kwamis not giving them a warning.) As for what happens to Colt, I’m on the fence about him being alive in present times because that kind of abuse is really heavy, so maybe he just dies for unsaid reasons (though I vote Amelie poisoned him or something).
This version would allow for a really cool contrast between Adrien and Felix’s stories and characters. You have Adrien, a normal human, capable of disobedience, but who bends easily under others and is a people-pleaser. Versus Felix, a senti being magically compelled to obey orders of whoever has his amok, but fights to be free every chance he gets. That contrast would also further Felix’s frustration and jealousy of Adrien, in addition to his own father’s hatred of him and being identical to his cousin, because Felix would kill for Adrien’s free will, but he squanders it. But then there’s also the issue that he’s essentially victim blaming Adrien, not realizing that magic isn’t the only way to force obedience- not to mention ignoring the times that Adrien did stand up for himself (like running away to school). I think that would be a really great discussion of free will, how jealousy can blind you, family conflict (and resolution), and how different kinds of abuse/trauma aren’t automatically better than each other just because they’re opposites (ex: someone with heatstroke shouldn’t be jealous of someone with frostbite. Both suck.) The intensity might be worse for each circumstance (since Felix has magical abuse and physical+verbal abuse), but he would be in the wrong for saying Adrien has it easy.
(I think at this point my ADHD is over-explaining, so I’ll leave it at that lol)
Do you think a route like that would’ve improved the show at all? I’d love to hear your thoughts!
The sentiplot has many issues and one of the big ones is that it's not a great fit for a show where Marinette is the one and only main character. They've given Kagami, Felix, and Adrien this massive weight that begs for them to take center stage for at least a few episodes, but probably a whole season or two. The show isn't going to do that, so it's near impossible to really fix the sentiplot without truly massive changes to canon.
That being said, I think that this idea would have vastly improved the sentiplot in its current form! Right now, the senti thing truly doesn't matter to Adrien's character. His mom could have gotten sick for any random reason and the only meaningful change would be that Gabriel couldn't use the rings to keep Adrienette from kissing that one time. Outside of that, Adrien's status has no meaningful effect on the story. It doesn't even keep him out of the final! He does that on his own! The senti thing is just there for cheap drama.
There's also the issue that the current storyline makes the Agreste's look awful which is clearly not the story's goal. Emilie is supposed to be an angel and Gabriel is supposed to be a grief-stricken man who loves his family. That doesn't fit with the kind of monsters who would make a magical designer slave to be their child and then wear his control rings around as daily accessories. Remember, they picked their freaking wedding rings for his slave collars! Most people wear those every day. The implications are nasty!
It makes way more sense for the Agreste's to have the peacock for more mundane reasons and for Colt to get it somehow. Maybe even have him steal it after he finds out about it to really remove the Ageste's from the perfect slave child issue. This allows for the contrast between Gabriel and Colt that canon so clearly wanted, but failed to write. It also makes Felix's actions towards Adrien make way more sense. It feels like canon Felix hates Adrien and we still don't know why that is.
As nebulous as Felix's character is, he still feels like the kind of character who needs to be tied to something like the sentiplot. It's part of the reason I don't think I can use him in my own stuff. The sentiplot is - or at least should be - such a major, defining thing for him that the only possible way to use him is to keep that plot or to give him a plot about freeing the Kwamis since they're also slaves and his abusive childhood could make him feel a bond with them.
Focusing the sentistruggle on Felix instead of spreading it out to include Adrien and Kagami would also keep the sentistuff from dominating the story. Making the male romantic lead an artificial being without true free will feels whose creation killed his mother is a massive thing that needs to be the focus of his character for the rest of the story. People are on the edge of their seats waiting for Adrien to learn the truth and want this to be a big plot. I do not think they're going to get that, but they should.
Having a side character be the artificial human allows this to be something that is dealt with and then Felix either leaves or fades into the background once his story is over because his story allowed to have an ending whenever they want it to. That's not true for Adrien. Adrien's ending is happily every after with Marinette and the sentiplot needlessly complicates that plan because it means that Adrien's character is always going to be center stage, making people want the sentiplot to mean something since it's apparently impossible for him to ever be a real boy who have true free will. That's such a massive thing that it begs for Adrien to be the main character, which is an asinine writing choice. I have no idea why they keep giving Adrien all this massive narrative weight. You don't do that if you want the female romantic lead to be the main focus! You do it if you want them to be true costars or if you want the male lead to get the majority of the focus. This is writing 101!
As you said at the top, I'm not sure how well this works for a show aimed at five-year-olds because it's still a pretty heavy stuff, but as a general idea, I'd be down to watch it! I didn't have a ton to add to this one because your pitch was already excellent!
What are your opinions on more „popular“ salt takes about Adrien and Mari, like the typical „Adrichat is an ass for for flirting with LB after she rejects him“ and „Maribug us a horrible stalker“?
Well, I'd be lying if I said that I have no idea where they're coming from. There are definitely times when I'll watch an episode and wonder what in the world the writers are trying to do, especially when it comes to Adrien's behavior as it's played a lot more straight than Marinette's. While I don't like her behavior at times, it's almost always treated as a joke, not a dramatic character beat whereas I cannot say the same for Adrien.
But these are characters in a TV show, not real people and we need to keep that in mind when judging them. It's why my go-to thought is "what is wrong with the writing staff" and not "Adrien is an incel." Because Adrien is very clearly not supposed to be an incel. Unless the writers are plotting something truly asinine, the Love Square is our end game couple. We are supposed to view Adrien as a charming and funny romantic lead. When he falls short of that role, it's not Adrien "showing his true colors." He's a fictional character. He has no true colors. If his actions and words are ever unbecoming for a romantic lead, it's because the writers are failing to write Adrien the way they want us to see him.
They consistently do this to all of the characters. Alya's supposed to be an awesome friend and a smart journalist (I think), but she can't see through Lila's BS. Marinette's parents are supposed to be loving and supportive, but they randomly believed that their daughter stole from their bakery to make a dress and didn't even try to let her explain herself. Nino is supposed to be the Chosen of Protection, but he didn't care to protect his best friend and just happily sent Gabriel on a rampage without a second thought.
Give me a character and I can point to a bunch of episodes that justify every salty take this fandom has because they're not pulling this stuff from thin air. They're picking and choosing the worst writing in the show and venting about it, which is frankly understandable. Like I get why there are so many Alya salt fics. Her writing in the Lila episodes is infuriating and I do find those fics a little cathartic at times. But it's really, really obvious that she's not supposed to be a terrible friend. She's a victim of the writers drawing the Lila plot line out for far too long and making Lila's lies far too obvious.
Similarly, a lot of the issues with Adrien and Marinette stem from the fact that you simply can't draw a romance plot out for five seasons without causing issues unless you make the romance a background plot. But they didn't do that. The love square is front and center for most episodes, but since it can't actually resolve, the writers keep adding drama that makes our leads feel horribly unhealthy.
On the Marinette side, her not being able to talk to Adrien was fine as an initial issue, but we are five seasons into this show. Over 100 episodes! You reach a point where it stops being cute and starts being concerning. It's also not helped by the fact that Marinette's crush is written like a celebrity crush and not a crush on someone she actually knows. Daily exposure to Adrien should mellow her out. Especially since he's supposed to be her friend! But if the writers let Marinette talk to Adrien, then they'd grow closer and might feel like they had to get together, so they couldn't let that. Thus Marinette being a disaster for four seasons and the terrible shoehorned plot to try and justify it in season five.
On the Adrien side, they let Chat Noir confess too soon. Prior to that, the Ladynoir relationship was a playful one where it was feasible that Ladybug just viewed her kitty as a massive flirt. This was especially true since he flirts with everyone. But once she knew that he was serious? The playfulness vanished and Chat Noir started coming across as entitled and pushy. It didn't help that they had him ignoring her preferences ("Don't call me Bugaboo") and getting them in trouble by not taking his job seriously (his flirting getting them hit in Oblivio).
In summary, the love square should have been resolved much sooner or been relegated to a b plot that got far less attention. I also would have reversed the square since it makes for a far more interesting story that you can organically draw out longer, but that's just me. I don't have any issue with people ignoring the canon problems and just writing Adrien and Marinette as the cute couple that they were obviously intended to be. I also enjoy fics that treat Adrien's pushiness as a character flaw that can be resolved because that's what canon should have done. His issues aren't the mark of a terrible person. They're the understandable flaws of a teenager who is in love for the first time and doesn't know how to express himself. If a show would actually address this kind of common tween/teen issue, then a lot of kids would get an incredibly valuable lesson that would help them when they grow up and fall in love. If you're ever watching Miraculous with a kid, I strongly encourage you to approach Adrien's character from that perspective. Talk about why his actions are understandable, but ultimately wrong and more likely to push someone away than win their heart just like we see with Ladybug.
One thing that I probably should have added to this post is that I'm not actually 100% sure what salt even is. Some people treat it as a synonym for bashing, which is basically defined as, "a fic meant to show the character(s) in question in as negative a light as possible even if that portrayal has no basis in canon or only leans into the absolute worst possible read of canon, ignoring all of the character's positive traits."
Others define salt as "anything that portrays any character that I like in an even remotely negative light even if the negative parts are fully based in something canon regularly does with this character."
I get the first definition. I'm really confused by the second one, but it seems to be the one the fandom clings to. It's actually why I made this blog in the first place. I wanted to be able to talk about the show in something other than a totally positive light, but even the remotest hint of negativity makes you a salter, so I accepted my place on the "dark side." It's way more fun to fully engage with a piece of media than it is to do this weird, toxic-positivity thing where you pretend it's flawless and treat anyone who disagrees or points out a flaw as unworthy of your fandom. You don't have to engage with those people, but telling them to get out is bullying, full stop. You don't own fandom no matter how popular you are and, for a lot of people, it's really hard to do things like write fanfic without wanting to talk about the failures of canon as those failures are often what inspire people to create fan content.
Like I said in the initial post, I truly don't mind fics that take the poor writing and use it to give someone a character arc. I think they're a vital part of any fandom.
You want to give Adrien a lesson on healthy relationships leading into him being a better partner to Ladybug? I'm here for it!
You want to show Alya discovering that she was wrong to trust Lila, leading to Alya learning to be more discerning and a better friend? I'm here for that, too! Especially if it leads to Alya brutally taking Lila down.
You want to give Marinette a lesson on delegating responsibility or learning that the rules master Fu and Tikki insist on are wrong, leading to her being a better guardian? I'm all ears!
It's the takes where Adrien is an incel or Alya is somehow worse than Lila or Marinette is breaking promises that she never once made on screen that are a hard "no" for me. They're what I think of when I think "salt." But even then I don't think those fics don't belong in the fandom. I just don't read them. It's very easy to do. Miraculous is hardly starving for content, though it will start to starve if people feel like they aren't welcome in this fandom unless they worship at the altar of canon which is a standard no healthy fandom can have.
ˏˋ°•*⁀➷
yes i absolutely hate gabriel agreste but ALSO i think he is the funniest character in the show because what do you mean he found out who scarabella and kitty noir were and just started dancing around his house, what do you mean he cooks the shittiest pancakes ever and everybody KNOWS it, what do you mean the show gives him weird up close angles of his face that look weird as hell
Lol remember the early days when there was an about-even split between people who thought that Gabriel would be Hawkmoth and people who thought Alim Kubdel would be Hawkmoth? Good times, good times. Speaking of Alix’s dad, how would you have had the show pan out with him being Hawkmoth instead?
I wasn't around to see it in real time, but I browse fanfics in rough chronological order starting from the beginning of a fandom, so I'm aware that this theory was a thing because I've read a good portion of the fics that were written pre Origins. (AO3 has a last update filter if you want to pair down your options for a less overwhelming selection or just enjoy fics from before certain plot points came to be.)
While I'm aware of the theory, I'm a little confused as to where it came from. Alim only has two brief appearances in season one. The first is from the start of The Pharaoh. In it, we see Alim telling Jalil that historical artifacts are not meant for testing crackpot theories:
Mr. Kubdel: Jalil, these types of frescoes are almost always the illustration of a legend. They called it a legend for a reason... Jalil: That's what everyone thinks. But I know it's real. I can prove it! Mr. Kubdel: Really? And exactly how are you going to prove it? Jalil: I just need to get my hands on Tutankhamun's scepter and recite the spell! Mr. Kubdel: Are you serious? Don't even think of touching that scepter. I'd lose my job on the spot. It's a priceless historical object! Not a toy! Jalil: Come on, dad! We have to try out the spell! What if Tutankhamun had found out how to bring people back to life? Mr. Kubdel: Listen, Jalil! That's enough! Get your head out of those papyrus scrolls and focus on the real world! This one! (leaves)
And his other appearance is from the start of Timebreaker. In it, Alim gives Alix the watch that is later revealed to be her miraculous:
Alix: They're Marinette's parents. You know, one of the chicks I hang out with? Mr. Kubdel: Yes, I remember. They make the best bread in the whole of Paris. (he notices one of Alix's sneakers) Couldn't you have made more of an effort to dress nicely? Alix: What do you mean? I took off my cap. (points to her cap) Mr. Kubdel: But this is a special day. Alix: Well, it's only a birthday. Mr. Kubdel: No, this is a special birthday (reaches inside his jacket pocket and brings out a watch) This family heirloom was made by one of our ancestors many, many years ago. It's been passed down from one generation to the next, on their 15th birthday. And today, it's your turn to inherit it. Alix: It's pretty sweet, dad. But I've already got a watch, synced up to my smartphone. Mr. Kubdel: But sometimes there's more to things than meets the eye. Let's just say that our ancestor was… (opens the watch) Ahead of his time. (Alix gasps) Of course, I'd understand if you'd rather me buy you a new pair of rollerblades. Alix: No, Dad! I'm stoked to have it. It's awesome, thank you! (her phone rings) Mr. Kubdel: Are your friends waiting? Alix: Yeah, but I don't wanna bail on you. It's cool. Mr. Kubdel: No, no, go ahead. (Alix stands up and grabs her cap) Now, take good care of it.
Based on these two scenes, Alim doesn't read like a villain to me. He reads like some sort of protector. If I had to pick a role for him, it would be the guardian, not the villain. After all, what better way to find missing miraculous than to go into a field that has you informed about all sorts of interesting archaeological discoveries? The fact that he's handing out a miraculous only elevates that potential, especially since Alim was smart enough to give it to the kid who was suited to be a hero while leaving Jali is be his conspiracy-theory-loving self.
Another variation of that is to have him (or Alix's other parent) be the rabbit holder and Alim is passing on the torch to Alix because it's time to start her training. He did say that the watch is handed down through their family and, if there's one miraculous that would need a lot of training, it's the rabbit. Plus a history related field is a perfect fit for a rabbit!
Of course, a villain might also go into a field like curation in order to find miraculous, but I'm really not getting villain vibes here. Part of the reason Gabriel makes such a good villain is that he has a clear, understandable goal: bringing back his wife. Alim has nothing like that, so to make him into a villain, I'd have to come up with a motivation for him and the only thing that I can think of is wanting to bring back his own seemingly missing spouse. That's not a very interesting route, though, since it's just a copy-paste of Gabriel's plot and I'd want Alim to be something unique unless you wanted to swap Adrien and Alix for some reason and just tell the same story with a focus on different characters.
I mean, you could make Alim have a motivation like protecting historical artifacts, but then why would he want the ladybug and the black cat? What wish would he be trying to make? Rewriting history won't protect it! I could maybe see a goal of rewriting history to stop a bunch of atrocities, but any historian would know that undoing a given set of atrocities means massive changes to history and it would likely just lead to different atrocities. You'd have to change how humans work or something equally messed up to make a world without atrocities, which makes it a pretty poor motivation as it would make Alim too cartoonish to really work. He'd feel like such a massive step down from Gabriel's complexity...
All of this is why I don't think that the show should have continued post Gabriel. I just don't see what motivation you can give a villain that isn't either derivative or a cartoonish downgrade. "I want to resurrect my wife" just hits different from "I want to take over the world."
To make Alim a villain in his own right, you'd have to redesign major elements of the show. I think a character with his background would work well as a master thief who collects historical artifacts for his own collection or to sell them so that he can live in luxury, but I can't picture his character sending out akumas to terrorize Paris. Ladybug and Chat Noir would go from action heroes to something more stealthy. Spies who are trying to track down Alim and stop his network, returning artifacts to their rightful owners. Not a bad concept for a show, but too different from Miraculous for me to pretend it's a good concept for a series reboot.
As someone who was a big proponent for this theory back in the day, it was because I had much more faith in the show's characterization tbf. Because I believed the characters wouldn't be acting out of character, I thought Gabriel would never put Adrien at risk.
And so that meant Hawkmoth had to be someone else and Alim was the best option out of the cast of adults. (I tried to find one of my old posts on my personal blog as an example, but I apparently did not tag it properly uwu). He - vaguely - fit the body type of Hawkmoth, his home had a place that could've been Hawkmoth's lair, and his design had a place where the butterfly brooch could've been hidden.
So, with the belief that the writers were - to put it rather bluntly - capable of writing consistent characters, and thus it couldn't be Gabriel, it meant in my head Alim was just a poorly setup twist villain. Like, Ladybug would burst into the Agreste Estate and accuse Gabriel of being Hawkmoth just to turn out to be wrong and he truly was just a grieving father. And Gabriel would be akumatized or something like that.
As for Alim's motivation? I handwaved it away as knowing too little about the man, and when the revealed happened, then we'd figure out why he was doing all of this stuff. Hindsight's 20/20 I guess lol.
Hi, I was just wondering if you knew how to get around shaky hands when doing digital art. I recently got a stylus and was excited to start making art on my phone, but it turns out my hands are too shaky and none of my lines turn out.
Sorry to bother you, also your art is really amazing!!
Hi, I can't say I've ever had to struggle with shaky hands before, but I got a few ideas.
Many art programs have a Stabilization feature for your brush that can keep your lines straight. Though it is more a bandage than a fix.
The 'proper' way I've learned to draw is by resting my hand on the display tablet, and using my elbow and/or shoulder as the pivot for making my lines. Lets your lines be more free compared to the wrist which is a more precise tool. You might want to try that as a base setup and adjust from there.
"Ghosting" is an entry-level exercise that builds up your muscle memory and is something most artists do to get their smooth, confident lines, shaky hands or not.
Thanks!
I'm not a great artist, but I do also have very shaky hands. One thing that helps is placing a rubber band around your fingers and stylus, sort of so its forcing your fingers closed. If you hold your stylus like me, it'd be your thumb, index, and middle finger.
Second is, if you can, get Clip Studio Paint. With the vector layer, bezier curve tool, and the ability to reinput line pressure (with the Correct Line and Redraw Vector Line Width tool), you can get really natural looking, clean lineart, even on really bad tremor days.
Drawing with your entire arm also helps, though you also might find it helpful to brace your elbow against something. When the tremors get real bad, I brace it against a book and put a lot of my weight on my elbow.
I find having some kind of resistance also really helps with control. If you're not using a screen tablet, I suggest covering it in a piece of paper just to get that extra resistance. I have a screen tablet and while I was working on getting that control, I also placed a piece of tracing paper over it. It was thin enough that the image shone through but thick enough to still give me that resistance (just beware this'll wear out the nibs faster) (this is even better if you have multiple monitors, so you can also have the unaltered image up on screen, too).
This thoughts still cooking, so it might not make sense, but I think Thomas (Tomas?) Astruc is a very good case study on how being too attached to your own ideas can hinder your story telling.
I don't mean this in a "Thomas's original idea for the series was bad", but rather that he seems so attached to this concept that he can't stand other people having a differing view from him.
Chloe's the titular example here. Some people thought she deserved a redemption arc, and instead of just saying "nah, I don't think so" and continuing to write her the same way he had been, he had to prove them wrong, prove that his idea was the only correct one, and so turned her into the spawn of Satan and let her rule over Paris for some reason.
Instead of making Marinette less stalker-y, he wrote an entire episode poorly justifying it. And, imao, somewhat diminishing what PTSD actually is and does to people.
I'm not saying he has to make any change (though I think making Marinette less stalker-y would be a good change), but instead of 1.) sticking to his resolve or 2.) taking the criticism, he clung dearly onto this perception of his characters and his writing suffered because of how much he had to twist things to "prove" that his original assertions were right. And also that everyone who disagreed with him was wrong and didn't understand
idk if that makes sense, but the concepts been lingering in my head recently
It makes perfect sense! I've had similar thoughts. It's hard to say for sure, but Miraculous may be a case study in "kill your darlings". I'm not deep into the behind-the-scenes lore and I was not here in the early fandom, but I do know that, at some point, a much darker version of the show was pitched. That's why these exist (image source):
[Image description: two sketches styled like comic book covers. Both have the title "The Mini Menace Ladybug". The left cover shows Marinette's silhouette in a doorway. The door's glass and the glass of a nearby window are broken. In the foreground lies a hand holding a ladybug charm. The hand is limp and surrounded by blood, implying that someone is injured or dead. The right cover is Ladybug doing a spinning kick while looking angry.]
We also have this evidence of the darker original concept:
Jeremy Zag then proposed another project... which he was unable to sell to broadcasters... the project was called "Ladybug". No one was interested, as the project was aimed more at an adult audience... Sébastien had to make sure that the project could be broadcast on Disney and TF1.... Thomas wanted to make a series for adults, but at the time, it was very complicated to make a cartoon for adults. What's more, they didn't have enough money to take on such a project. Sébastien finally agreed, but there were some changes to be made, which Thomas accepted... In the end, Thomas Astruc's entire project was discarded, leaving only the love story between the two heroes and the city of Paris, where the story was to take place.
I've been aware of this darker origin story for a while due to Tumblr and, because of this knowledge, I have often had the thought, "are the writers trying to sneak elements from this darker version into canon?" Because that's the most likely explanation for what's going on here.
If I'm right, then I think that was a terrible move on their parts. They needed to let go of the story that they couldn't sell and embrace the story that they're being allowed to tell. It's why "kill you darlings" is such good advice. Many good stories have been ruined by writers clinging to an idea that ultimately doesn't work for some reason.
It's why the sitcom How I Met Your Mother has such a universally hated ending. The show was originally supposed to go for two seasons and so they wrote an ending that would fit the second season. The show ended up running for nine seasons and, by then, the ending didn't fit, but the writers kept it and left everyone with a bad taste in their mouths, which is not what any writer wants. That's why you have to do what's best for the story even if it means abandoning something that you really love.
This early version of canon may also be why the writers are so obsessed with Marinette. My understanding is that this concept had her mainly acting as a solo hero and, oh look! What is one of canon's biggest problems? Marinette being treated like a solo hero even though she has a partner and, later on, a team!
Not saying that this theory has to be true, just saying that it would explain some things. And if they're poisoning canon by trying to include elements from their darker original? Then it makes sense to assume that they're also doing it for smaller stuff. Like I'm pretty sure I've read that the head writer wanted Chat Blanc to be a lot darker originally, but no one would green light it, so we got an incredibly lackluster episode that spat in the face of the genres Miraculous' is trying to be part of while also falling to have the sort of impact we'd expect from an episode like that. It's a good example of a darling that really should have been killed. It just doesn't fit.
(Totally unrelated sidenote, but is your blog name from Tangled? Because that's what I immediately thought of and it made me smile!)
This is my (@the-story-of-how-we-died) miraculous sideblog
Yes it is! I really like Tangled too :D
And definitely. If nothing else, it does show that you ought to do whats best for the story, not your personal desires. I think it also ties into the episodic vs serialized show bit. They wanted the serialized show part so badly that they're trying to contort an episodic show into it, but they're fundamentally different. Itd have been better to kill the concept of the serialize show than do it poorly (because, I think as we've all seen, that only breeds contempt).
I don't have much else to add, to be honest. Only that from what I've seen of his other work, Thomas isn't a bad writer, so there has to be something specifically going on with Miraculous that's turned it into... what it is lol
Marinette Agreste AU
That last post got me thinking about an AU where Marinette and Adrien swapped backstories. So I drew a picture of Marinette and her father. I'm sure someone else has done this before, but I haven't seen it, so
I'm not a great artist, but eh. In this AU, Marinette's mother died about two months beforehand (explicitly died, not "disappeared"). A stranger (Master Fu? Probably would give him a more realistic Chinese name, like Fu Xiang) gives her the Cat Eye pendant, telling her her mother wanted her to have it in case of her death.
I think in this AU, Gabriel knows of the Cat and Ladybug miraculous and what happens when you combine them, but doesn't know what they look like (their uniforms would hide their true form). Gabriel's not stupid in this AU, so he'd notice that his daughter wears the same one otherwise lol
That's all I have figured out for it rn. I'll probably draw them (Marinette and Adrien) in their superhero uniforms, next. I think it'll be less spandex superhero suits and more parkour-esque outfits, but I'll have to see how that works out
I love the outfit that Marinette wears. It's super cute! ^_^
Ahhh thank you! ^~^7