Twist

official syscourse account, no asks for this acc. harass me with your full chest coward. I AM ANTI ENDO BTW

[thee-butcherbirds]

Saying "people before labels" in reference to "syscourse" is downplaying the harm that (pro) endogenics do by spreading shit tons of misinformation about CDDs and blatant ableism and saneism.

It's gross and clearly just shows that you're not putting people with CDDs before ableists.

That saying is performative as fuck, "plualpunk" my ass

— [ 🪒 ] Tidal it/fae/fog

[thee-butcherbirds]

Saying "people before labels" in reference to "syscourse" is downplaying the harm that (pro) endogenics do by spreading shit tons of misinformation about CDDs and blatant ableism and saneism.

It's gross and clearly just shows that you're not putting people with CDDs before ableists.

That saying is performative as fuck, "plualpunk" my ass

— [ 🪒 ] Tidal it/fae/fog

[syscoursemcgee]

3rd endo boot licker

"Syscourse unaligned" and their ENTIRE blog is pro endo talking points.

"Pro science" my fucking ass. You are just ableist!

[akankun]

By the way, endos pointing to a statistic about "not all DID cases being from abuse" have utterly failed to be literate, and it's a gross statement. to claim you are the people who is not the majority, when the people in question are people who developed CDD's from non-abuse-related traumatic experiences like war, natural disasters, environmental instability is inherently ableist. These people are already struggling with being dismissed, for their trauma is less common in CDD treatment, and you are erasing them just to replace them with yourself. You have no right talking about "oppression" when your roots - and modern presence - is rooted in talking over survivors.

[syscoursemcgee]

Two endo boot lickers in my reblogs...

Ableism in disability pride month

[syscoursemcgee]

I kinda just roll my eyes now when I see pro/endos claim that endos arent claiming to have a CDD, because...sure I guess thats true for some of them but:

Is an actual fucking term someone coined. I fear endos can't use the "but we aren't claiming to have a CDD!" When this is what is on their favourite website.

[guardianssystem]

Correction, as a traumagenic DID system:

The vast majority of endogenic systems aren't claiming to have a CDD without trauma.

Many endogenic systems have trauma. Some have a CDD because of their trauma. Their system, multiplicity, or plurality just didn't come from or wasn't caused by trauma. Endogenic doesn't mean without trauma entirely.

If you scroll literally one sentence down that page, you'll see exactly what we're saying. The term exists because of mixed origins/multigenic/traumaendo systems, or systems that have experienced trauma, but aren't traumagenic.

Endogenic CDD

Endogenic CDD, also known as ECDD or Endo CDD, is a term to encompass Endogenic systems that have Complex Dissociative Disorders.

"Tired of seeing TraumaEndo and similar systems get thrown under the bus and/or forgotten. The term was coined by an Endogenic C-DID system."

Referencing,

Post by @thesillybunch · 3 images

💬 4  🔁 37  ❤️ 108 · Endogenic CDD (ECDD) Flag · Endogenic systems are claiming to have CDDs? You bet your sweet ass we are, cause some of us

"Multigenic systems exist! We exist! Stop erasing us because you're uncomfortable with people outside your preconceived notion of what a system is!"

[syscoursemcgee]

Get out of my reblogs freak. I legitimately cannot stand you. You are being ableist. Cry about it.

[syscoursemcgee]

I kinda just roll my eyes now when I see pro/endos claim that endos arent claiming to have a CDD, because...sure I guess thats true for some of them but:

Is an actual fucking term someone coined. I fear endos can't use the "but we aren't claiming to have a CDD!" When this is what is on their favourite website.

[p2w-sys]

is endos are really separate from systems PLEASE stop getting into cdd spaces, stop trying to get cdd spaces to be neutral/pro endo, stop trying to make cdd systems think that they are endogenic in some shape or form.

If you guys are an IDENTITY stop getting into systems spaces. CDDs aren't a identity, nor are they endogenic nor related. Just leave systems alone.

You guys can do whatever you want online atp idgaf just STOP getting into systems spaces.

[oceanside-aero]

reblogging again because I realized I have things to add as well.

they claim they don't have CDDs, and they're right, they don't, yet even still they demand to have a space in our communities. they fundamentally cannot understand what having a CDD is like, yet they are forcing their way into a space that isn't meant for them, with people that they cannot and will not relate to.

whether or not endogenic plurality as defined by them exists at this point is none of my concern. what is my concern, though, is that individuals who have not experienced trauma demand that trauma survivors bend over backwards for them. at this point, if you want to insist upon existing, fine, go ahead, but that does not change the fact that our community is not made for that kind of experience.

this isn't even addressing the fact that, in my personal opinion, a community that has clear, traceable roots in a hate group shouldn't even be allowed to have an online space, but that's just us, and that's another can of worms I'd rather not open right now.

[anti-willo-miku]

“why are anti-endos so angry/aggressive”

Because most of us are severely traumatized people fighting against the remnants of a hate group. I hate this sentiment, I’m not obligated to be nice to anybody.

[antiwilloclergy]

a lot of people dont understand that theres spaces that should be disorder only. system spaces are BEING overrun by endos, system spaces will and always be for disordered systems. nontraumagenic “systems” do not fucking exist.

[syscoursemcgee]

You know how this reads?

"As someone with a heavily stigmatised disorder i claim to have done full scientific research into the topic, so yes, ableist stereotypes/mocking of disabled people/intentionally misrepresenting a disability is real"