the beekeeper system

introject heavy nd traumagenic system

[syswarm]

hullo :] we’re the beekeeper system

general info

body name is swarm! we r polyfrag and autistic + have ocd

we r taken by our partner system and smooching them rn /j

they/it collectively but we all have individual prns, pls default to those

writing info

most of us are writers and all of us are nd, lots of fanfiction :] writing requests open !! pls send /nf

we r profic, exploring fucked up things in fiction, especially trauma, doesn’t make you a bad person

we also plan to take commissions, fandom + ocs, with like. flexible prices for hyperfixation shit /pos

some of the main fandoms we’ll write for: dsmp, animaniacs, looney tunes, ahkj, tss, supernatural

[simplepotatofarmer]

c!techno who tills the earth and harvests what grows, who carefully removes the frames from the beehives to collect the honey, who plants dandelions. techno who plays the violin, who mends the tears in phil's clothes, who knows how to knit, who sometimes whittles wood while the sun goes down.

techno who uses his hands for anything but violence.

[syswarm]

what pro shipping / anti anti is : i think it’s fine if people write fucked up things. media censorship is more harmful anyway because anything can be deemed “wrong” and it’s an easy in for racist and queerphobic people to start censoring things that they don’t like by labeling it as something moral. why is game of thrones allowed to explore gory topics but fanfiction isnt? people can write about their trauma. they can write about irl things that suck. that doesn’t mean they condone it. being interested in an unhealthy dynamic in media is fine. even if it is morally wrong irl, you’re allowed to explore how it would play out in fiction and wonder about the psychological effects. plenty of mainstream media is fucked. warzones are okay to write about but an unhealthy relationship isn’t? the bible has inc/st and r/pe but purity culture is fine with that. talking and writing and creating media abt smth bad will never be as harmful as the bad thing itself. most ppl write it in a negative light anyway but even if they dont its weird to be upset with someone for writing a story with an unreliable narrator, even if the contents are not morally okay. murder mysteries are fine but smth focused on the murderer isnt? drawing definitive lines is not only impossible but pointless. as long as people tag/warn for their media, let them mind their own business. just block content you don’t want to see and move on.

what pro shipping / anti anti is not : pro irl [insert anything from the fiction we support]

[autismvampyre]

this is controversial but uhm

i dont like ace ppl who find themselves to be superior to allo ppl. maybe its mostly jokes but i still get the sense that some(obviously not all, i love ace ppl in general yall are great and valid) ace communities are quite condescending and are low-key shaming allosexuals

"ew yall feel sexual attraction? that's gross. i'm just gonna eat cake."

its not just statements like that btw its a matter of tone and context, etc. it just generally carries the message of "allos r gross and sexual im better" which is way oversimplified but you get my point.

i just dont like it, it feels condescending and unnecessary. it just feels awfully similar to purity culture yk. a lot of ppl get shamed for their sexual attraction as it is bc it's considered "the wrong kind" so i dont see why ace ppl who also get shamed by society feel the need to do this.

its probably a very small minority in the ace community, all the ace ppl i know are great. i just cant help but notice the kinda loud minority and i think we should do smth about it

btw if you think asexuality isn't real or valid get tf off my blog. this post is no hate to the ace label its just a criticism of a small number of individuals in the ace community

[syswarm]

no because you’re right, and i’ll add more.

the queer community is already demonized via sexualization, the ace jokes calling ppl w/ sexual attraction gross just.. have we seen that anywhere else?? maybe?? possibly??

and ik the ace joke is abt allosexuality as a whole but to say that any attraction is inherently gross is just harmful. same vibes as the “attraction to men is gross” jokes, that is homophobia in another tin

this is coming from an ace person btw !! idk if op is ace but they are right /lh

[radiantretriever]

Guys this may be an insane hot take that'll get me cancelled but like,,, let's maybe stop making trans men feel guilty for being men.

[syswarm]

SOMEONE HAS A DNI THAT APPLIES TO US BUT THEY MAKE SUCH GOOD POINTS /D /POS

[dramatic-lesbian-blog]

some of y’all need to realise that

an m/f couple ≠ cishet people

[cottaboo-deactivated20230709]

i don’t quite know how to word this in the way that i want to. but. more discourse shit.

someone being an ace lesbian is ofc okay, they’re both asexual and lesbian. it’s okay for them to call themself that, it’s just combining both the words for the romantic/sexual orientation that they identify with. But a lot more people get pissy when a bi lesbian does the same thing? why??

[syswarm]

oh!! i just made a post on this but tldr: they treat ace/aro identity as a secondary sexuality

[syswarm]

if someone can explain to me how mspec lesbian/gay people using the split attraction model is Bad without being blatantly invalidating of aro/ace ppl i would Love To Hear It /gen /srs /will elaborate

[syswarm]

starting from the bare bones.

question : why can’t someone be lesbianromantic and pansexual?

“lesbians can’t be attracted to men.” okay, we did clarify they are romantically lesbian.

“they still can’t be attracted to men, the identities contradict eachother.” how can labels on two different spectrums contradict eachother?

“lesbians can’t be attracted to men in any way. pan ppl are attracted to all genders.”

new question then : why can someone be asexual and lesbianromantic?

“the identities don’t contradict.” by your logic, yes they do. asexuality means attracted to NO gender and lesbian means attracted to nonmen.

“but asexuals aren’t attracted to men.” they’re not attracted to anyone. part of the definition of lesbian is attraction to nonmen.

“no genders” and “some genders” contradict too, so we have the split attraction model.

just say that you see asexuality as a ‘secondary’ sexuality. asexuality’s not a ‘lack’ of sexuality.

romantic and sexual attraction can be separate, and that applies to anyone. if someone wants to label their sexuality and orientation differently, its not your business to police them.

[blank]romantic and [blank]sexual can never contradict. they aren’t on the same spectrums.

[syswarm]

if someone can explain to me how mspec lesbian/gay people using the split attraction model is Bad without being blatantly invalidating of aro/ace ppl i would Love To Hear It /gen /srs /will elaborate

[gracefully-bi]

it really baffles me sometimes that in a community literally made for including people and supporting each other and accepting each other when no one else would, there are gatekeepers and exclusionists…..

like you do realise you’re going against the very thing that the community was founded for??

[bvnnyzuku]

Trans people aren't to blame for transphobia.

Transphobes are.

transphobia existed before nonbinary people, microgenders, and neopronouns became more well known

transphobia existed before proud and confident gnc trans people became more well known

the problem has never been trans people that dont conform to cisnormative standards, the problem is how normalised transphobia is in our society.

our identities are not a joke, and we are not the punchline

[syswarm]

rly just took front for an hour to talk to the body’s abusive mom because i was clingy <3