In the barbecue of Australian political life, this federal election would have to be the vegetarian sausage: obligatory, but inevitably failing to arouse much interest and afterwards leaving you wondering why you even bothered. Even the apparently neck and neck polling of the Labor and Liberal parties seems to speak more to the virtual indistinguishability of the candidates than it does to a hard-fought political contest.
Indeed, for all the bombast and feigned indignation, there is a furious consensus at the heart of this campaign. Supporting business, increasing productivity, attracting investment, maintaining Australia’s triple A credit rating: these are the gods unto which nothing is too important to be sacrificed.
Both major parties have vowed to return the budget to surplus by 2020-21 and oppose increased spending, including for much needed social services. Both support cutting money from universities and lowering the threshold at which students are forced to repay HECS debts. Both support giving massive subsidies to private health care providers, even while they make unconvincing assurances about preserving Medicare. Neither promises any improvement in living standards for workers.
In apparent defiance of the laws of physics, most of us are left entirely unmoved by the budgetary black hole. Instead, poll after poll indicates that what most people want to see from government is better funded and higher quality hospitals, schools and universities, and proper support for the unemployed and elderly. A poll taken by the Australian National University in April found that 55 percent of people preferred higher taxation over cuts to social services, while only 36 percent favoured the opposite.
READ MORE: Despite the bluster, election reveals parliamentary consensus