#autoeroticism

[plasma-tree]

whatever you're doing, Virgil, old boy... It's working.

[isuggestforceandrogyny]

Autoandrogynephilia* anyone?

*In the sense that cis men experience "autoandrophilia" and cis women experience "autogynephilia" when they observe gender euphoria in themselves within a sexual context so trans women are perfectly normal and typical and valid for engaging in gender-affirming "autogynephilia" kink and trans men likewise valid for "autoandrophilia" and who cares if one's fetish is having one's gender identity and modality and preferred expression affirmed during sex like who cares who caaares it harms no one now anyway I personally think that seeing androgyny in oneself is kind of super duper attractive. So androgynous self-love?

[beyond-mogai-pride-flags]

Autoerotic Pride Flag

Autoeroticity: feeling arising excitement generated by physically stimulating or fantasizing about one's own body; concerning or arousing sensual desire centered on yourself; self-amatory; erotic activity involving oneself or pertaining to sexual satisfaction obtained without a partner.

Colors basing the homoerotic flag. ~ Ap

[acidicavian]

it’s so sad that i cant eat myself out….. i taste so fucking good..

[thatanthagirl]

I found this post in Carl Jung and depth psychology | Facebook. I love Carl Jung & Eminem & it fascinated me to see someone relate them to each other.

Jung's work is highly criticized for not being "scientific" & is difficult to understand because he's very "complex" & "abstract". I post his work a lot, but this time, I added some definitions from Google for terms that I wasn't familiar with. I also removed some sentences of the original post that confused me, or I thought weren't relevant to the post.

---------------------------------------------

"That's who I am as well, thanks to Marshall [Mathers]'s, aka Eminem's, high art. High art is easily recognizable because it speaks to everyone in particular in a language one needs to hear. Dark art heals Dark moods. Nothing worse than, when depressed, everyone scorns you for grieving or whatever. [...]

High art is a term used to describe art forms that are considered to be of a higher quality, while dark art is a term used to describe art that explores difficult emotions.  High art: often associated with painting, sculpture, music, and architecture; often considered to be art that is created for aesthetic expression and has a deeper meaning.  Dark art: can be a way for artists to process and heal from difficult emotions; can also refer to a mysterious or secret skill or method. -- A.I. Overview -- Google 

This quote [...] should be memorized by all who have a loved one with mental illness. Or is the one himself.

DIVINE GIFT OF CREATIVE FIRE

« Back to search results for “paying dearly”

A person must pay dearly for the divine gift of creative fire. It is as though each of us was born with a limited store of energy:

( A ) In the artist, the strongest force in his make-up, that is, his creativeness, will seize & all but monopolize this energy, leaving so little over that nothing of value can come of it. The creative impulse can drain him of his humanity to such a degree that the personal ego can exist only on a primitive or inferior level & is driven to develop all sorts of defects: ruthlessness, selfishness (“autoeroticism”), vanity, & other infantile traits. These inferiorities are the only means by which it can maintain its vitality & prevent itself from being wholly depleted. (CW15 ¶ 158)

Autoeroticism is the act of experiencing sexual pleasure through internal stimuli, such as one's own body & imagination. It can also be defined as sexual feelings that arise without any known external stimulation. Autoeroticism can involve using one's imagination to become sexually aroused, such as imagining oneself in a different form. -- A.I. Overview -- Google 

AUTOEROTICISM IN CERTAIN ARTISTS IS LIKE THAT OF NEGLECTED CHILDREN

( B ) The autoeroticism of certain artists is like that of illegitimate or neglected children who, from their earliest years, develop bad qualities to protect themselves from the destructive influence of a loveless environment. Such children easily become ruthless & selfish, & later display an invincible egoism by remaining all their lives infantile & helpless or by actively offending against morality & the law. (CW15 ¶ 158)

IT IS HIS ART THAT EXPLAINS THE ARTIST

( C ) How can we doubt that it is his art that explains the artist, & not the insufficiencies & conflicts of his personal life? These are nothing but the regrettable results of his being an artist, a man upon whom a heavier burden is laid than upon ordinary mortals. A special ability demands a greater expenditure of energy, which must necessarily leave a deficit on some other side of life. (CW15 ¶ 158)

« Back to search results for “paying dearly”

-- Written by: Michelle Anderson

-- reposted by: Sveta Alenina

-- Artist: Unknown

[bladebreecada]

I made an update a few months-ish ago where I added the following to my pinned:

I’m autosexual and autoerotic and support depictions of characters interacting with their own body, clones, reflections, and alt versions of themselves (this includes selfpair/selfcest/amasui ships). I consider these as representations of autospec attraction (attraction to oneself). As long as the characters are interacting with themselves as themselves, it’s auto. Anyone interpreting this as “inc3st-lite” will be blocked.

I have grown a bit more in understanding autosexuality. Recently, I have begun to feel that my earlier adversion to the term "selfcest" is not a good way to acknowledge other people's k1nks that explore autoeroticism through clones, duplicates, or other fictional methods of replicating one's self or alt self.

The last thing I want is any harsh judgment of other people who still use the term to describe their liking of autoerotic k1nk art or are seen as problematic because of it. That is something I do not want at all.

While I might not use the term, I would rather be neutral about it than control how others feel or describe their kinks.

I think the reason why I initially felt the way I did, including the past posts I made on the subject of autoeroticism in 18+ art, was because I was worried that I would be called out for being autosexual and liking selfcest as an extension of my autosexuality. Thus my past posts, to be honest, were made more out of fear than opening up about my autosexuality and my attraction to my own body.

Well, I did open up about my self-attraction back then, but with the "oh god please don't see me as a monster for loving myself". I don't want to do that anymore.

This was something, along with a slow development of a trigger due to a certain discourse, that I needed to resolve myself, not for someone else who was not responsible for my feelings.

I know now that it is okay to be attracted to yourself and your body, and in addition to that, it is okay and safe to explore the concept of autoeroticism in fiction in its myriad of strange and fantastical forms.

[bladebreecada]

Fuck it

I'm going to do it.

I'm going to write a love letter to myself and ask myself out!

[bladebreecada]

Late night thought

I just remembered times when guys flirted at me and the general discomfort I felt.

Not that they did anything wrong, I just had no idea how to respond to a flirt. Not interested anyway, tho.

My attraction is internal. While I still feel for others, it's an occasional fleeting crush.