maria becerra videoclip berlin
credits @ifsbecerra on twitter
seen from Georgia
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from Norway

seen from Spain
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Poland

seen from South Africa

seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Norway
seen from Türkiye
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Philippines
seen from Chile
maria becerra videoclip berlin
credits @ifsbecerra on twitter
TINI & Maria Becerra 😋
like or reblog if u save ♡
A second federal judge has issued a court ruling against the administration's plans to ask whether every person living in the country is a U.S. citizen in the 2020 census.
The U.S. Constitution, Art. I, § 2, gives Congress the duty to conduct a census every ten years and the power to determine the manner in which it will be done. Congress has delegated the authority to conduct the census to the Secretary of Commerce, and explicitly requires the Secretary to “acquire and use information available from” existing government records “To the maximum extent possible ... instead of conducting direct inquiries.”
Trump’s Commerce Secretary, Wilbur Ross, takes after his boss in that he thinks the law (and the Constitution) shouldn’t apply to him. Ross announced that the 2020 census would include a new direct inquiry--“Is this person a citizen of the United States?”--instead of using already available administrative records as federal law requires. Multiple legal challenges followed immediately.
On January 15, 2019, following a seven-day trial, a federal judge in New York issued a ruling that Ross’s action was arbitrary, capricious, and “not in accordance with law.” The court found Ross’s decision “neither logical nor rational”; his purported excuses “implausible”; his claims and assertions “simply untrue”; and his supposed justifications “unsupported by, or even counter to, the evidence.” (Read the full 277-page opinion here.)
“Secretary Ross’s decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census -- even if it did not violate the Constitution itself -- was unlawful for a multitude of independent reasons and must be set aside. To conclude otherwise and let Secretary Ross’s decision stand would undermine the proposition -- central to the rule of law -- that ours is a ‘government of laws, and not of men.’”
"El espectáculo del tiempo", de Juan José Becerra
Maria Becerra
TINI × Miénteme
like/reblog if you save/use❤️