seen from United States

seen from Philippines
seen from Spain
seen from Yemen

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from T1

seen from Germany
seen from China
seen from T1
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from China
seen from China

seen from T1

seen from Malaysia
seen from Yemen
realized another reason I’m skeeved out by the ‘insertgender loving insertgender’ format that’s been going around (seriously, it’s EVERYWHERE now) is not only that it’s weird and exclusionary feeling if you’re at all nb or bi, it specifies ‘love’ as the attraction so it’s explicitly ruling out aro people as well
i just. would not mind so much if it wasn’t so BIG, but now it seems like every positivity post and ‘protect __’ and resource blog and etc that goes over my dash is for one of them. (or one of the other terms exclusive to alloromantic gay people that have been cropping up). just. whhhyy
Part of me thinks that there's something wrong with my brain that I hold onto so many microaggressions like they happened yesterday. And part of me is all "no shit you hold on to the casual bigotry, there's been so little to counter it."
It wouldn’t be an issue if the context was “lots of people have both “queer” attraction and “straight” attraction (ie attractions that aren’t acceptable to homophobes and attractions that are), and those people are queer because bisexuality/pansexuality is a thing and isn’t being Scheodinger’s queer and also isn’t being a sort of Frankenstein monster of part straight and part gay it’s just a way of being queer alongside other ways of being queer, and because having some attractions that aren’t acceptable to homophobes is in fact sufficient to cause you problems in your life and also sufficient to have a lot in common with people who only have attractions that are unacceptable to homophobes, who knew… and also, there’s some types of m/f sex that really aren’t “straight” (acceptable to homophobes) and/or are “queer”(explicitly a part of queer culture)” yes absolutely I would agree with that, the issue is I don’t think we actually have a shared understanding about the first part.