Hey, the LGBT thing on YouTube is messed up, but videos aren't demonetized on restricted mode, only if they're "age-restricted." Those aren't the same thing and I don't want people to panic about losing income. If you read the page you linked again, you'll see that it only says age-restricted can't have ads, not restricted mode. I make YouTube videos for a living, and I have plenty of videos blocked on Restricted mode but I still make income cuz they're not age-restricted.
Hold on, I’m very confused now. Isn’t the entire point of restricting videos to say “you must be signed in on an 18+ account and have Restricted Mode disabled to view this”? Isn’t the entire point of Restricted Mode to “protect” children from content that isn’t “appropriate for their age”?
Because (and I admit I may easily be misinterpreting things here, but) everything I’ve read and watched, from Google themselves, other YouTubers, and outside sources, seems to imply that they’re one in the same (and yes, I did reread the page I linked and the one it links to about Restricted Mode itself). If a video is restricted, doesn’t it become something you can only view if you’re on an 18+ account? Why would some 18+ videos be monetizable when others aren’t? How does YouTube even make that distinction?
Plus, Google is still hiding every piece of content that even mentions LGBT people from anyone under 18, so even if they aren’t strictly demonetized, those videos are gonna get way less views, and questioning kids and teens will still be stuck in the dark as far as the world’s most popular video sharing platform is concerned.
Either way, if anyone can help me understand this, I will happily amend my post if I need to.


















