Do you think the Curious Incident of the Dog in the Nighttime is a good representation of autistic people? I'm just curious
Personally, no. I really don’t like it. I’m sure for lots of people it is a good representation but for the community overall, I think it’s done more harm than good. I think part of the problem is that Mark Haddon didn’t write Christopher as specifically autistic. It’s on one of the book jackets where it specifies his diagnosis - but that’s not present in the book. Or on the original cover. It feels more like an afterthought and, because Haddon can always say he didn’t specify autism, he didn’t really need to do any research. And he didn’t, as he’s admitted. Which shows in the book.
There are lots of people like Christopher. However, there are a lot of people not like Christopher. He’s great at maths - I suck at it. He’s taking one A Level (in maths)*- I sat 11. He struggles with things like toileting - I’ve never found this. He likes prime numbers - I could probably name about five. Including five.
Basically, yes there are some people like Christopher. I definitely have some similarities with him, but I am not Christopher. And, honestly, I haven’t met many autistic people who do identify with Christopher because he is such a narrow definition of autism. Yes autistic boys who love maths and trains. But there are lots who don’t. That’s why I love Ty. He’s a bit rubbish at maths - Livvy is way better. He’s into books (stereotypically a trait of “female autism” - aka autism...) and he’s generally just very atypically atypical (which is a weird thing to explain haha - hes basically not a stereotypical autistic character).
So yeah, Christopher doesn’t really represent me. However, Grace from The State of Grace, Nathaniel from Mindblind and Ty from The Dark Artifices do represent me a lot better!
(*a previous version of this post said he took one GCSE, but I’ve been informed it was an A level thanks to @leftforlionheart)