Response of Julia Serano’s posting about transgender actors
Julia Serano wrote an interesting post. With the Emmy’s just happening, maybe it is time to think a bit about it.
There is a tendency to conflate female impersonators (aka drag, female impressionists) with people who are transsexual. One group is not better than the other. They are just different.
Cis people have the most exposure to drag culture and the fact it is performance is usually underscored, and by performance they mean it is merely an act and something that can be shed. Not real in a fundamental sense.
Cis people have almost no exposure to trans people who move through society without making even a ripple. I will only speak to the experience of trans women, because that is my experience. People who are women 24/7 and living with partners and holding down everyday jobs are not on the radar. Many of us are married to straight cis men, but we would be loath to stand up and say that there is another side to this.
Perhaps there are people of transition in Hollywood, and elsewhere, who are either intersexed or trans who simple have crossed over and have a career. And I am not referring to some of the “aluminum foil hat” people who believe everyone in Hollywood is one of those people.
For a man to play a woman or a woman to play a man, in a way, is a stunt. A drag show. We don’t watch a show about a murderer and then marvel afterwards, “wow, that person was not really a murderer!” Hannibal was not really a cannibal.
I agree with author Serano that none of it ought to not matter. Where it seems to matter is when the plot has a person transitioning and using a cis actor reenforces the concept of impersonation.