Let's all support this! All the rest is only noise."
Yeah, I don't disagree with them. We were all larrying yesterday because it was fun. But them being in the same space was something way bigger than just "Larry." We'll see what comes of it.
Sending this to you so you can archive this qanon delusional spiral lmao the next time Louis gets photographed with Freddie or Harry gets a girlfriend we can look back and laugh
Oh, the stupidity! This is not what a cleanliness clause means. A cleanliness clause gives the label the right to drop an artist if they sully their own public image with criminal convictions or by starting a parallel career in porn. This isn't even unique to the entertainment industry - most jobs would be jeopardised by the above.
Hello India, please feel free to answer this in public. I wanted to ask you something about this post in particular the cleanliness clause: https://www.tumblr.com/indiaalphawhiskey/701448319966248960/if-you-dont-mind-can-you-please-explain-what-a?source=share
I was genuinely terrfied when I read that something like that exists. I mean I think this is legitimate proof that Larry were closeted against their will contractually, what do you think?
Also you said that if they did anything unsavory, their contract would be declared null and void, right? But why is that a bad thing, to me it seems really positive? If their contract would be declared null and void, wouldn't they be free of that awful contract (and have the potential to be a couple in public) and maybe sign to a new and better label?
Hi!
So first off, as I’ve said before, I’m not a lawyer and I have no experience in the music industry, so everything I say is inference based on: i) my general knowledge of the objectives of contracts in general, ii) contractual obligations I’ve seen exercised in my own industry, and iii) observations we’ve made about the inner workings of the entertainment industry over my years in fandom.
TL;DR - take what I say with a grain of salt, please.
So, yes, cleanliness clauses are a thing, and they’re actually pretty standard. They take many forms (from simple brand guidelines to the more extreme version Harry alluded to in BH&G), but at their most benign, they’re usually just a way for brands/organizations/corporations to pragmatically ensure their collaborators align with their image as a brand and don’t do anything to besmirch their name (see: Adidas’ very delayed dropping of Kanye West).
Is that solid, undeniable proof that Harry and Louis were forcibly closeted in One Direction?
Nothing ever really is.
But yes, in the sense that people who know enough about the inner workings of the entertainment industry clearly know what “unsavory” pertains to (considering the image of Harry that was pushed at the time didn’t discourage drinking, drugs, or sex with women by any means, so clearly it wasn’t about making him look like a church boy).
No, in that, as usual, the wording Harry (and most likely, the contract) uses is vague enough not to allude to anything that might, say, break certain anti-Discrimination laws and leave very powerful labels and management vulnerable to legal action.
Which leads me to your next point. I think what people often forget about contracts is that literally 99.9999999% are written with the objective of protecting the company, not the individual. And given what we know about the way the entertainment industry works (you know, the same industry that literally refused to release Ke$ha from her record contract with her assailant), it’s easy to deduce that “null and void” isn’t as straightforward as the wording made it sound.
Rather, what it probably means is that the record label’s obligation to support, promote, and also protect their commodity (the artist) is “null and void”, and now that the artist is no longer seen as a lucrative asset, the label will also no longer see the point in investing in them. But, like I said, contracts are designed to protect the label, and protect their previous investment and any output of that investment in perpetua, which probably means:
I) MINIMUM: a long-standing non-compete clause (so any of the boys who broke their contracts probably would not be able to sign with anyone else or make/own/perform any old/new music for at least enough time for their fanbase and appetite for them as artists to fade),
Or
II) MAXIMUM (and frankly, most common): since contracts are usually based on number of albums produced, being blackballed and shelved by their own label so the artist can’t fulfill their contractual obligations and are bound to their original contract forever.
There are obviously many other details and permutations of the kind of consequences breaking a cleanliness clause could entail, but basically, given how high profile One Direction was and how much money they were making, it’s highly, highly unlikely (read: fucking impossible) that Simon or anyone else from Syco would have willingly let them continue to make music for anyone else, let alone let them negotiate better contracts with any of their competitors.
An analysis of Harry's revealing BHG article released today:
Firstly, it's far more revealing than we're used to. The fact he went to Better Homes and Gardens when it's usually Rolling Stone and all about on the musical inspiration, the album process, industry details - is significant. Choosing BHG - not usually his target demographic - tells his story to a much larger slice of the public. Gets the narrative to focus on him as a person, not just an artist. Smart!
Information on what had been in his 1D contract - a topic that had been highly secretive under threat of lawsuit until now. Others signed with Syco or MM, like Jedward, have disclosed that they were prohibited from revealing contract details and discussing them.
So we can assume that at least some ties of the 1D contract are over for Harry, allowing him to now discuss it without legal repercussions.
Also, here is yet another piece of evidence that young Harry as a sex-crazed lothario sleeping with hundreds of women was a narrative entirely manufactured by 1D management. Bwcause being one in reality would have violated any "cleanliness clause" in his contract (what a repugnant and rage-inducing phrase).
Harry signed a contract with Columbia before he discovered they didn't have this clause. He was shocked there wasn't.
He was CONDITIONED to be always afraid in his career no matter where he went or who he signed with. Even after seeking a new label and management - he assumed he would still be mistreated and abused. The FREEDOM cry rings even more true knowing this.
Harry's fear was specifically not around drugs use, or cussing, or drinking - his fear was around not only being known to have sex at all, but who he was having sex with - and how it would mess up public perception of him.
Publicly he was said to be having sex with a lot of women. So the part of "who he was having it with" cannot be a woman. Because having sex with women was already "approved" - even pushed - by management.
The article writes:
"Harry spoke on why he doesn't like putting labels on his sexuality while discussing it in public: I’ve been really open with it with my friends, but that’s my personal experience; it’s mine," he said, while referring to the concept of labeling one's sexuality as "outdated."
So PRIVATELY Harry is open about his labels, while still considering it outdated to label. PUBLICLY he doesn't discuss his labels. That is different than having no label. It's saying he has labels, but we're not entitled to them.
As a queer person, this definitely is queer coded language. Especially when combined with the terror he describes that people would know who he ACTUALLY was having sex with, which was different than they knew him to be doing (women).
Harry says in the article he was single at 26, which would have been 2020-2021, during COVID. Yet his supposed relationship with 🐙 began in 2020, with a public event together Jan 2021.
So just wondering how he said he was afraid of revealing who he was having sex with while also publicly dating someone and being papped on a yacht uncomfortably making out. I think we can infer from this again, he wasn't actually afraid of being seen as dating that person, but...someone else. Which means there is/was someone that he dated privately, and not a woman, as that would have just been the public relationship if so.
I have never been of the opinion that H and L had a perfectly smooth relationship. Have you heard their lyrics about alienation and miscommunication and loving someone and it's not enough? I do think they had times of distance, strife, and separation. I think they did break up or have breaks in their relationship - even if it was temporary - H even told us Two Ghosts is about "the first time he broke up with me" - but that they continued to orbit each other or be the person that no one else compared to and come back to each other better.
But bluegreening and Sunflower and all the Larry stuff from 2021 - 22 leads me to hope they were connected or connecting at least.
I'm seeing a lot of Twitter people saying how they would never want a 1D reunion because of the lack of freedom H felt.
Any collaboration or reunion would not be governed by the same contracts, as the circumstances are completely different. So that's a weird conclusion.
Exclusive: Harry Styles Reveals the Meaning Behind His New Album, 'Harry's House'
On his new album, Harry Styles explores themes of belonging, peace, and discovering domestic bliss wherever you can find it.
By Lou Stoppard April 26, 2022
Looking back, it was undoubtedly risky suggesting to meet Harry Styles, the global music megastar, the apple of so many millions of eyes, at a public open-air swimming pool in London on an unusually sunny March morning—right when people were bouncing around the city with a vaguely manic, newly liberated energy, catalyzed by the total lift on COVID restrictions. But swimmers, particularly all-weather swimmers (the lido I chose is unheated and open year-round), take the meditative pleasure of swimming seriously, as Styles himself, who swims outdoors daily, knows well. "I feel like people who have discovered cold water swimming are just so happy for you that you've also found it," Styles said. In other words, no one is hassling you for water-side photos. Indeed, around us, most swimmers were doing an admirable job of feigning indifference to the fact that an instantly recognizable pinup (the hair, the face, the tattoos) was stripped off, poolside.
Styles has spent the last few years on a quest to enjoy things for what they are, to "be in the moment," as he put it. Swimming is good for this; it's hard to think about anything else when you are struggling to keep breathing. Just before the pandemic, in December 2019, Styles released his second solo album, Fine Line, to acclaim. The corresponding live shows, Love On Tour, were due to start in April 2020. But by then, the pandemic was raging; disaster declarations had been made across the U.S., and Europe was on lockdown. Styles had envisaged himself busy, playing packed shows each night, the music bellowing from his lungs, his pearls and sequins glittering in the light. Instead, nothing. "Suddenly, the screaming stopped," he said. Everything was canceled, an end to the relentless merry-go-round of attention Styles has been on since 2010—then a smiling 16-year-old in a skinny scarf that would hint at the kind of fey hip-wiggling rocker he would go on to become a decade later—when he appeared on the British talent show The X Factor and was set on a conveyer belt to stardom.
Now Styles was stuck in L.A. for months with nothing to do. "It was the first time I'd stopped since I left my mum's," he said. For a while, at the beginning of lockdown, productivity drilled into him, Styles felt like he should work, create. The ethos with One Direction (the boy band he was packaged into on The X Factor) was always more, next, bigger, better. It was "all about how do you keep it going and how do you get it to grow," he said. "There were so many years where, for me, especially in the band and the first few years coming out of it, I'd just been terrified of it ending, because I didn't necessarily know who I was if I didn't do music."
Styles came to see that COVID was out of his control, that he just had to ride it out. He bubbled with a group of friends and for about six weeks did "practically nothing." Didn't write any music. Didn't record. He was suddenly just another young guy in a house-share trying not to bug his roommates. Styles came to realize that his past schedule had facilitated avoidance. "Whether it was with friends or people I was dating, I was always gone before it got to the point of having to have any difficult conversations," he said. So he used lockdown to commit to being a better friend, son, brother. He pushed himself to confront things he hadn't brought up, had many long, honest chats. And like most people who found themselves suddenly very, very inside, he thought a lot about the idea of home—about belonging, peace, sanctuary. "I realized that that home feeling isn't something that you get from a house; it's more of an internal thing. You realize that when you stop for a minute," he said.
A few months later when he started recording in L.A., and later in Oxfordshire and London, he thought about what he was doing not as the creation of a new record but as an extension of that time kicking back with friends (he has a close-knit circle and was living with some of the same people he writes and plays with). "I've always made my worst, most generic work when I'm just desperate to get a single," he explained. So he tried to see what he was doing as open, speculative. That is, he has realized, his great skill as a musician; he's not naturally gifted at guitar or piano, not the most confident singer, can't read music, but he excels when it comes to bringing people together. He is at his best, he said, when he pulls away from what is formal or expected and does something playful, collaborative, instinctive, fun. While Fine Line is full of references to Styles' musical heroes (Joni Mitchell, David Bowie, Van Morrison), this time, when he started recording, he deliberately didn't listen to anything—except classical, music that cleansed him of sonic references—so he could start again with "a blank canvas."
He knew he had to commit to the reset, to the sense of a fresh start that was happening across his life. He is aware that this all sounds a bit pretentious, a bit airy-fairy, but then, who didn't get caught up in a rush of pandemic life-improvement epiphanies?
"I think everyone went through a big moment of self-reflection, a lot of navel-gazing, and I don't know if there's anything more navel-gazing than making an album. It's so self-absorbed," he said.
Two years on, Styles and I are meeting because that album, titled Harry's House, is about to be announced to the world. The day before we meet, I listened to the album in a room at Sony's London headquarters under the watchful eye of a company executive. Only a handful of people knew then about its existence, and, overwhelmed by the pressure of secrecy, I briefly freaked out when I found myself audibly humming one of the songs on the train home. Harry's House is, as you can probably guess, about home. Not just home in the sense of a physical space—though there are plenty of references to kitchens and "sitting in the garden" and "maple syrup, coffee, pancakes for two"—but also to home "in terms of a headspace or mental well-being," as Styles put it. "It sounds like the biggest, and the most fun, but it's by far the most intimate," he said of the album.
At this point, Styles and I were sitting with a coffee on a patch of grass outside the pool, and I had begun to realize that I had kept him in the cold water way, way too long. He was visibly shaking. "Two lengths was too much," he agreed. I think we were both trying to show off—me, nonchalance to a popular heartthrob, and him, hardiness to another committed cold water swimmer. I became worried I had incapacitated him, something that would get me into great trouble, as a member of his team reminded me by text later, as he was due to perform at Coachella in a few weeks.
"If you killed me, it would make for a good story," Styles said, eager to see the sunny side. We set off in search of heat.
Almost anyone who meets Styles will tell you how polite, breezy he is. Few interviews go by without mentioning his charm. Indeed, it is hard not to describe his boyish enthusiasm in the same campy, knowing cheesiness that enlivens his songs ("strawberries on a summer evenin'" or the exquisitely saccharine, "If I was a bluebird, I would fly to you; you be the spoon, dip you in honey so I can be sticking to you," from "Daylight" on Harry's House). Styles is teddy bears on your teenage bed, perfect handwriting on thank you cards, picked flowers on Sunday morning, puppies running on fresh-cut grass, Grandma's favorite homemade cake. At points, he is almost daffily nice, too attentive, as if held in the throes of a decade-long bout of imposter syndrome (he confirmed that he does, sometimes, expect that someone will tap him on the shoulder and say, "The jig is up. You're done now"). Surely a mask, you are thinking. No one that fancied can be that sweet.
I asked Styles this myself: Is he actually pleasant, normal, sane? "My producer keeps asking me when I'm going to have my big breakdown," he said, laughing. "The most honest version I can think of is, I didn't grow up in poverty by any means, but we didn't have much money, and I had an expectation of what I could achieve in life. I feel like everything else has been a bonus, and I am so lucky."
That said, both Styles and his therapist have questioned why he cares quite so much about being likable. This is one of the things he thought about a lot in his big pandemic reflection. In part, it's a choice, he explained. He recalled moving to London after The X Factor and hearing tales of petulant celebrities screaming because someone got their coffee order wrong and deciding to never be that guy, to never give someone a petty reason to bad-mouth him. But more recently he's come to worry that the drive for approval came from a more complex place, a place of caution, fear, control. "In lockdown, I started processing a lot of stuff that happened when I was in the band," he said. He thought about the way he was encouraged to give so much of himself away, "to get people to engage with you, to like you." He thought about the fact that no baby photos exist of him that aren't on the internet (you give a bunch to an X Factor producer doing a piece on your backstory without much thought, and suddenly your childhood is online). He thought about the journalists asking questions, when he was still a teenager, about how many people he'd slept with and how, rather than telling them to go away, he would worry about how he could be coy without them leaving the room annoyed. "Why do I feel like I'm the one who has done something wrong?" he said to me, after we got up to shift spots in the park when a teenager started filming us for a prank video.
Styles said he often spent interviews terrified about saying the wrong thing until he stopped to question what abhorrent belief or bizarre opinion he was scared he'd accidentally reveal and realized he couldn't think of anything. He thought about how, when good things happened—say, a No. 1 album—he wouldn't feel happy, just relieved. And he thought about the cleanliness clauses in the contracts he used to sign, which would dictate that they would be null and void if he did anything supposedly unsavory, and about how terrified that used to make him. And about when he signed his solo contract and learned that the ability to make music would not be affected by personal transgressions, he burst into tears, a reaction he still seemed shocked by, retelling it to me now, years later. "I felt free," he explained.
Recently Styles began to work through issues related to intimacy, dating, love. "For a long time, it felt like the only thing that was mine was my sex life. I felt so ashamed about it, ashamed at the idea of people even knowing that I was having sex, let alone who with," he said.
The life of a boy band member is something of a Ken Doll existence—a smooth nothingness where sex should be. One must be flirtatious (swoon!) without ever being seen to have sex, let alone casual sex. One must project the intrigue of a bad boy without ever doing anything bad; you are an object, an image, onto which people project fantasies, not a person who actually does things, who gets messy. "At the time, there were still the kiss-and-tell things. Working out who I could trust was stressful," Styles said. "But I think I got to a place where I was like, why do I feel ashamed? I'm a 26-year-old man who's single; it's like, yes, I have sex."
Styles has come to fame at a complex time for the idolized. When he emerged, the UK was at the height of its tabloid culture, when celebrities were being hounded, exposed. That gave way to social media, where everyone expected to see everything, where anyone could publish snapshots, footage, gossip. "I think we're in a moment of reflection," Styles said. "You look back, especially now there's all the documentaries, like the Britney documentary, and you watch how people were abused in that way, by that system, especially women. You recall articles from not even five years ago, and you're like, I can't even believe that was written." He has been thinking a lot recently about autonomy, ownership, privacy. About what he should be able to keep to himself, what he should be able to simply communicate through his music without follow-up questions or prying. Around the time of Fine Line, he faced scrutiny around his sexuality. People became incredulous that he wore dresses, waved Pride flags, and yet hadn't clarified with precision, publicly to a journalist or on social media, the specifics of who he'd slept with, how he defined. This expectation is, to him, bizarre, "outdated." "I've been really open with it with my friends, but that's my personal experience; it's mine," he said. "The whole point of where we should be heading, which is toward accepting everybody and being more open, is that it doesn't matter, and it's about not having to label everything, not having to clarify what boxes you're checking."
But Styles does not want to appear ungrateful or defensive, or even angry. All of this contemplation, this honesty, is not to say that he didn't love it, hasn't loved it all—because he has, he reminded me several times, "absolutely loved it." Despite the acceptance that some things could, should, have been different, he still feels lucky every day, he said, lucky to make music, lucky to do what he loves.
By now, we were snug in a local café; all the other attendees appeared to be in their late seventies, and no one gave us a second glance. In about an hour from now, just after we've parted, Styles' album's existence will be announced to the world on Twitter. The cover, on which he stands alone in an upside-down room, will go on within mere hours to receive over a million likes. The first single on the album, "As It Was," begins with a clip of a voice note from one of his goddaughters asking him to say good night to her. It is, he said, about "metamorphosis." About when you look back on life, and on your past selves, and barely recognize them. About when you realize everything has transformed, irrevocably. About when you grow up, change, begin to move on.
"Finally, it doesn't feel like my life is over if this album isn't a commercial success," he said. "You've never felt that way before?" I asked. He said, "Honestly, I don't think I have." With his first album, he explained, he was terrified to make fun music, "because I'd come out of the band, and it was like, if I want to be taken seriously as a musician, then I can't make fun music." He called it "bowling with the bumpers up, playing it safe." While the second album was "freer," he became concerned with making "really big songs," an objective he now questions. Now his goals are, on the surface, smaller but, to him, far greater: "I just want to make stuff that is right, that is fun, in terms of the process, that I can be proud of for a long time, that my friends can be proud of, that my family can be proud of, that my kids will be proud of one day," he said. We hugged goodbye, and he set off through North London on foot—a sex symbol, a fashion darling, a very modern rock star, weaving his way back home.
Rollling Stone article excerpts - ‘Suddenly, the Screaming Stopped’: Harry Styles on Shedding the Weight of the Past and Finding Home
When Harry Styles first began his post-One Direction solo career, he lived in fear of the other shoe dropping. In a new interview with Better Homes and Garden, he discussed the cleanliness clauses baked into his early contracts, parameters of perception he had to operate within that threatened to directly impact his budding career if he slipped up.
He says that when he signed his first contract after going solo, and those clauses disappeared, he burst into tears of relief: “I felt free,” he said.
But even during the making of his 2017 self-titled debut album, the singer felt pressure to make music that would be taken seriously after years of One Direction being seen as a manufactured boy band and nothing more. Then there was the added interrogation of his personal life as a teenager and young adult that saddled him with a shameful feeling of needing to hide his sex life — the one thing he felt was his own.
“For a long time, it felt like the only thing that was mine was my sex life,” Styles said. “I felt so ashamed about it, ashamed at the idea of people even knowing that I was having sex, let alone who with. But I think I got to a place where I was like, why do I feel ashamed? I’m a 26-year-old man who’s single; it’s like, yes, I have sex.”
When the boys were put together in One Direction, none of them could have ever predicted how out of control it would all become, how they would go from some sweet boys put together on a whim to superstardom. Were they really ready for all that came with it? The lack of privacy, the contracts?
Words: 2173, Chapters: 1/?, Language: English
Fandoms: One Direction (Band), Harry Styles - Fandom, Louis Tomlinson - Fandom
Rating: Mature
Warnings: No Archive Warnings Apply
Categories: M/M
Characters: Harry Styles, Louis Tomlinson, Niall Horan, Zayn Malik, Liam Payne, Simon Cowell
Relationships: Harry Styles/Louis Tomlinson
Additional Tags: Fetus Direction, Fetus Harry Styles/Louis Tomlinson, something something their contracts - freeform, One Direction References, Angst and Feels, I read the bh&g article and couldn't not write this, lots of smut and feelings to come, I will be warning you in the notes before it happens tho, Piss, bc I can't write an origin story and not include their piss kink, Sorry Not Sorry, do I tag omo? bc desperation? but its not sexy?
via AO3 works tagged 'Harry Styles/Louis Tomlinson' https://ift.tt/ROXWiAF
Do you think the cleanliness clause and everything he mentioned about the industry during the HSH promo was part of a narrative, or was it actually true? Because he only started bringing up those topics recently.
Hi, darling. I want to gently suggest you re-read what he said about that topic. You’re suggesting that he spoke so explicitly about the kind of trauma that comes from having something like that in place from the age of 16 to 21, but was actually lying about it. To push a narrative of… what? That he had been traumatized?
No. I think it’s more likely that he’d finally processed it enough that he was able to talk about it.
Do you think the “cleanliness clause” is also the fancy word for closeting??
Hi, anon!
I think it could be implied, considering being honest about his sexuality would be considered something "supposedly unsavory" by the eyes of their label, who were marketing him and making money out of something that was a complete lie.
However, I think it's much more than that, we often talk about his closet, of course, but closeting was just one of many other cases of abuse they suffered while in the band. They were given public images and clear instructions and they needed to play that role, if they didn't, if they said something wrong, their contracts could be cancelled and they could ruin the entire thing. Imagine being the one responsible for "ruining it", of course they were terrified.
I just hope that Harry's mention about this cleanliness clause on contracts thing is a massive slap in the face on everyone screaming shit like "it's illegal to closet someone" and all that. I'm sorry but we've literally been talking about this for so long, it's so dumb how he had to go and talk about the abusive contracts in an interview for people to start taking it seriously.
