Karel Ludwig - from the Female Nudes series (1940-1949)
seen from Russia

seen from United States
seen from Algeria
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Mexico
seen from China

seen from Australia

seen from India
seen from Malaysia
seen from Japan

seen from Italy

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Australia

seen from Australia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Australia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
Karel Ludwig - from the Female Nudes series (1940-1949)
«The second error connected to the deterministic conception of sexuality is based upon reducing nature to the biological. If we reduce the body to physiology, to the processes of the body’s functioning, then they are conceived functionally, and as a result, as something that is the passive tool of determinism. In our contemporary world we are dealing with the universal biologization of our relationship to the world: Instead of teaching the history of people we teach the prehistory of hominids, instead of developing the ability to love in young people we talk about love as being a matter of chemistry. Such an anonymous and cold objectification makes the contemporary person unaware that his desire is love beyond death and that reality is something extremely intense. When it comes to the human body biological phenomena have nothing in common with what distinguishes man—and he is distinguished by speech in particular. The reality of our body is something qualitatively different. When a man looks at a woman her body tells him something; it communicates to him the existence of beauty. Even his desire goes far beyond a simple instinct for reproduction since it can be the expression, for example, of anxiety before death. In man corporeality is simultaneously spirituality and that which is spiritual is always already corporeal.»
— Fabrice Hadjadj: “Sexuality as Transcendence”
Bee memes, or beemes. On corporeality.
(Worry not, fair reader! She loves me. She just won't admit it. :3c)
Got a new hat thanks to the coolest 60-something bi woman I know, do you think it’s gay enough?
For Lacan, psychoanalysis at its most fundamental is not a theory and technique of treating psychic disturbances, but a theory and practice which confronts individuals with the most radical dimension of human existence.
With regard to other schools, the first thing that strikes the eye is the philosophical tenor of Lacan’s theory. For Lacan, psychoanalysis at its most fundamental is not a theory and technique of treating psychic disturbances, but a theory and practice which confronts individuals with the most radical dimension of human existence. It does not show an individual the way to accommodate him- or herself to the demands of social reality; it explains how something like “reality” constitutes itself in the first place. It does not merely enable a human being to accept the repressed truth about him – or herself; it explains how the dimension of truth emerges in human reality. In Lacan’s view, pathological formations like neuroses, psychoses and perversions, have the dignity of fundamental philosophical attitudes towards reality. When I suffer obsessional neurosis, this ‘illness’ colours my entire relationship to reality and defines the global structure of my personality. Lacan’s main critique of other psychoanalytic orientations concerns their clinical orientation: for Lacan, the goal of psychoanalytic treatment is not the patient’s well-being or successful social life or personal self-fulfilment, but to bring the patient to confront the elementary coordinates and deadlocks of his or her desire.”
Slavoj Zizek - How to read Lacan. Granta. 2011.
the body is the social and cultural construction of a symbolic double of the flesh.