Why did Witch/Witchcraft become the acceptable term?
Let me explain my question….
Before the Witch trials, before Henry VII and even before the Malleus Maleficarum, there were broadly speaking, two types of magical practitioners.
A Witch – a person who practised bad magic “Witchcraft” - often in league with the devil (not me saying that its historical fact)
The Cunning Folk (often called white witches) who practised good magic “Drycraft”, most villages would have a cunning person to help fend off the evil witches and to aid in health matters.
So at first, the Witches were persecuted and the Cunning were revered.
After the Malleus Maleficarum was published all practitioners were persecuted good or bad.
At first, under Henry VII some leeway was given to the Cunning Folk but this was later rescinded. Under Henry's son Edward VI … the laws were relaxed again for the cunning folk until his sister Mary I reimposed the Catholic Church and persecuted all magical practitioners.
Well that explanation was a bit longer than expected….
Why are we left with Witches and Witchcraft, which historically was the bad side of the craft?
Why are the Cunning Folk and Drycraft all but forgotten?
The only explanation I can find (and one I'm not happy with) is – People like the Brothers Grimm popularised Witches and Witchcraft and turned them into fairytale characters …. Surely this can't be the case??
(this is just a personal bit of research I'm doing… I went down a rabbit hole and got stuck here)